Take a look here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4140
I suppose that BookmarkableCryptoMapper attached to that Jira case is what
you're looking for.
Regards,
Dmitry
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/CryptoMapper-and-mounted-
some "Hot-plug" mechanism that does not require to reload the
> whole servlet container with every change?
>
> Thanks!
> Sebastian
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
&
Hello all,
I'm new to Wicket. Just wonder about subj (theoretical interest). On one
hand, stateful component model has no architectural limitations on its
own preventing me from reattaching component to different parent, just
like I can do with desktop applications or with any self-contained tree
On Monday 09 June 2008 10:47:45 Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> > IMHO they cannot be easily used together at the moment.
>
> Hmmm, interesting. My only experience with Groovy is years ago, and
> back then we abandoned and switched to PNuts (which I guess should
> work with Wicket as well) due to Groovy's
On Saturday 07 June 2008 22:09:02 Ashley Aitken wrote:
> So my question is: what is the status (now and going forward) with
> regards to using Groovy to develop with Wicket? I know there has been
> much discussion of generifying Wicket but perhaps moving to a dynamic
> language could be an a
On Thursday 06 March 2008 18:59:59 graemer wrote:
> So as some of you may know I've been updating the Grails Wicket plug-in.
I didn't know but I tried the plug-in a couple of weeks ago (with help of your
blog) and it worked fine expect that I couldn't make wicket classes reload. I
should look at
How I can create a stateless org.apache.wicket.markup.html.image.Image?
I thought that just calling new Image("id") will do the job, however
getStatelessHint() returns false.
It looks like a bug in LocalizedImageResource#isStateless().
I guess it should be
return resourceReference == null;
wi
Cristi Manole wrote:
>
> thank you both for your answers, but there are still problems...
>
> I already tried what Don suggested, but that only allows for the
> autocomplete text to be displayed correctly in IE, but not in FF (at
> least not in 2.0.0.9).
>
> I really cannot figure out why.
>
On Tuesday 05 February 2008 23:16:03 Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> wicket has a throttle which works on time not on number of
> characthers, for that you need to roll your own javascript
How can I "roll" my javascript which doesn't use ajax before n characters for
AutoCompleteTextField? I could only do
On Wednesday 23 January 2008 12:55:17 Martijn Lindhout wrote:
> I like that one with the ResourceReference. What about providing a setter
> on the component, so that no subclassing is needed?
IMO setter or constructor parameter should be ok, though Wicket classes use
getters (probably to reduce s
On Wednesday 23 January 2008 11:47:26 Martijn Lindhout wrote:
> users need to open the jar, pick the right markup file, copy it, changes
> css attributes, etc. That's not what I expect from component reuse, right?
> Or do I miss something?
The other option is to create overridable methods which pr
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 22:40:52 Hoover, William wrote:
> In your WebApplication...
>
> getApplicationSettings().setPageExpiredErrorPage(PageExpiredErrorPage.class
>); getApplicationSettings().setAccessDeniedPage(AccessDeniedPage.class);
> getApplicationSettings().setInternalErrorPage(Internal
On Sunday 13 January 2008 12:47:44 Dmitry Kandalov wrote:
> On Sunday 13 January 2008 04:19:30 Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> > Ok, so rarely you need to roll your own
> > IRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy, we do provide implementations to
> > cover most common cases. And even if you
On Sunday 13 January 2008 04:19:30 Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> Ok, so rarely you need to roll your own
> IRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy, we do provide implementations to
> cover most common cases. And even if you do, you only need to know
> about IRequestTarget - which has good javadoc, and so does the
On Saturday 12 January 2008 23:25:43 Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> sure, and all you need to know is that you subclass
> requestcycle.onbeginrequest() and add your own code there and it is
> called at the beginning of the request. why do you need to know the
> sequence of calls that leads to onbeginreques
On Saturday 12 January 2008 19:56:41 Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> should we document how our xml parser works? how about how wicket
> assembles parts of markup into different markup fragments? all these
> things have no effect on you as a wicket user.
>
> a question for you, in what way will knowing the
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 14:00:30 Roy van Rijn wrote:
> And second, if you want to experiment with mounting you can also make
> your own coding strategy by implementing
> IRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy. This is pretty straight-forward and,
> I imagine, fun to do :-)
I attempted to do somethi
On Saturday 17 November 2007 19:15:23 Georg Sendt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with page logic works different in Firefox and IE.
>
> The code shows 4 buttons but only 2 are visible at the same time. There is
> a Candidate/NotCandidate-Button pair and a Observer/Not-Observer pair.
>
> With Fir
On Monday 12 November 2007 22:13:33 ChuckDeal wrote:
> > You're right. But if you were not using List you could return SortedSet
> > from
> > SortingModel and it would work :)
>
> But then I'd be using a Set instead of a List. DropDownChoice (via
> AbstractChoice) expects the choices model to repr
On Monday 12 November 2007 23:40:51 Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail wrote:
> Hi, I have a Label who's model maight come with markup for bold italic,
> bullets, etc. (e.g. "This is a Message")
>
> Obviously I get "This is a Message" rendered.
>
> Is there a way to get the label to render:
>
> "*This*
On Sunday 11 November 2007 14:36:10 Johan Compagner wrote:
> why do you want to move it to another pagemap? the probelm is that you
> cant do that because then the other browser instance cant find it
> anymore or that on is also changing and accessing the same page, in
> 1.3 you are then better of
On Sunday 11 November 2007 14:29:02 Dmitry Kandalov wrote:
> return new BookmarkablePageRequestTarget(pagemapName, pageClass) {
> protected Page newPage(Class pageClass, RequestCycle requestCycle) {
> final Page page = super.newPage(pageClass, requestCycle);
> pag
On Saturday 10 November 2007 03:49:51 Johan Compagner wrote:
> wicket doesn't have support for these kind of pages (yet)
Does "yet" mean it's planned/ in progress?
> You have to implement that yourself. You could have a map of pages per
> class in your session and resolve to them. You can do that
Hi,
I was recently wondering is there request coding strategy which would allow me
to have one page instance of certain class per session, so after requesting
mounted url user would always use the same page instance or a new one would
be created if there was no instance of that class.
One of t
On Friday 09 November 2007 12:24:12 Dmitry Kandalov wrote:
> Probably that is because this component is already rendered.
I mean the component has been already checked for being enabled :)
Dima
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM
On Thursday 08 November 2007 23:28:40 ChuckDeal wrote:
> > Perhaps I didn't get the explanation but why can't you wrap models in
> > this order?
> >
> > AppendingListModel(
> > SortingModel(
> > HibernateListModel()
> > )
> > )
>
> In that order the list would be sorting PRIOR to ap
On Friday 09 November 2007 11:22:20 Toscano wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I found some questions related to this topic, but I couldn't make it to
> work.
> I have two dropdowns, countries and regions. The easy thing is that I load
> the regions when the country has been selected, and I use
> AjaxFormComponen
On Wednesday 07 November 2007 01:18:32 ChuckDeal wrote:
> SortingModel (IChainingModel) -> AppendingListModel
> (IComponentAssignmentModel) -> HibernateListModel (database oriented model
> that returns a list of items from the db, unsorted).
Perhaps I didn't get the explanation but why can't you
On Thursday 08 November 2007 14:13:22 raybristol wrote:
>
>
> then in code behind I use protected void populateItem(Item item) to
> specified each table cell's data, because I can put any String in td tag so
> I can easily put any javascript function call, however, I want to do that
> for
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 00:55:23 James Perry wrote:
> I empirically found out what the solution was to the problem of not
> selecting the correct default choice of the Manufacturer within Product!
>
> I added a ChoiceRendered to the constructor of DDC and it did the trick!
It seems like equals
On Monday 05 November 2007 18:55:07 James Perry wrote:
> Also what about wrapping the List in a PropertyModel; would that help?
>
> On 11/5/07, James Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello Dima,
> >
> > That was my initial assumption but I already have overrided my
> > equals()/hashCode() metho
On Monday 05 November 2007 16:39:02 James Perry wrote:
> I have a problem with the DropDownChoice. More specifically, I have a
> Product class which is like:
>
> public class Product implements Serializable {
>
> private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
>
> private Manufacturer manu
On Sunday 04 November 2007 02:37:39 Johan Compagner wrote:
> You just should call super of the same constructor you are in.
> just give the super call everything you got. If you got a model, give it
> but you don;t have to you can set it in the constructor with setModel
> afterwards.
That's what
On Sunday 04 November 2007 01:23:39 Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> > IMHO it does make sense. When I see several different super(...) calls in
> > constructors the first thing that crosses my mind is that these
> > superclass constructors have different logic. But it's not true for
> > wicket and in most
On Saturday 03 November 2007 21:18:17 Brill Pappin wrote:
> This is a common Java pattern. There should be only one place in the code
> where properties are set from a constructor, all other constructors should
> pass on their parameters, defaults if required, to the one constructor that
> actuall
On Saturday 03 November 2007 01:27:53 Devin Venable wrote:
> I've been trying to figure out why when I hit my wicket page, it loads
> three times. I discovered this while debugging...my constructor was
> called three times for my derived WebPage.
>
> I've captured the call stack produced by the th
On Monday 29 October 2007 22:30:57 skatz wrote:
> Is there a way to get an enclosure to work with a repeater. Perhaps I am
> missing something, but I can't get:
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
>
> to work. What I get is an exception telling me there is no component
> matching "item".
Enclosure can s
37 matches
Mail list logo
