Yes, one of the ideas behind wicket is that you create your own custom
wicketsession to access your session objects in a typesafe way.
Using a propertymodel like Jeremy showed is a very elegant way of
getting back that information.
Maurice
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
Nope, no other info then class is available at that time since the
component is not yet fully constructed it is to dangerous to pass that
around even though we could.
So use a custom check in the constructor of your subclass, that way
you have access to all the information you need.
Maurice
On
There are some things not entirely clear from your code, that and the
fact that i have never worked with radio or radiogroup before makes
any answer i can give an estimated guess at most, but here goes :).
What i gather from the code in radiogroup i would say that the value
is automatically set
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Benny Weingarten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
First let me congratulate this forum - I have always gotten wonderful
responses.
In my application I have a bookmarkable picture viewing page. That page
should only be viewed by users who have permission. The
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 7:51 PM, srizmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got a couple of questions:
1. BookmarkablePageLink - shouldn't events be exposed so that the
target
page [ page 2 in Joe's example ] is bookmarkable and still the user inputs
could be passed as pageParameters?
Try an AjaxSubmitLink. And make sure that page2 is using the models
that page 1 uses to store the dates in.
If you want to o back and forth between those 2 pages it is a good
idea to pass a page reference between them so when they are serialized
they don't get out of sync with each other.
Maurice
For extra credit... what is the easiest way to make the modal window
background darker? Do I need to extend the modal window and include a
different CSS file? what is the best practice for this kind of thing?
thanks!
ryan
Making the background darker is a bit tricky but it can be done in
Well, there are a couple directions you can take.
1 If the number of admin fields is relatively small you could try
grouping those fields together in a panel for each page that has these
admin fields and then simply apply your security to the panel instead
of to the individual fields. (Works best
Hmm, usually there is no need to change the guest permissions on the fly.
In that case you can just implement ISecurePage on every page that
needs to be secure and not on the guest pages.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Gabriel Bucher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all,
I did some test to
Extend one of the defaultcolumns, like propertycolumn, and override
onpopulateitem.
Something like this:
public void populateItem(Item item, String componentId, IModel model)
{
item.add(new Label(componentId, createLabelModel(model))
{
Not at the moment AFAIK.
You could file an RFE.
Maurice
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Beyonder Unknown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Users,
Is there a way to make the modalWindow unmovable? (disable the drag and
drop?).
Thanks,
Allan
--
The only constant in life is change.
If you have a quickstart someone could take a look at it.
Maurice
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 9:43 PM, taygolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still having this issue. Can anyone tell me what it might be. I think it is a
cache issue but I am really not sure
Thanks
T
taygolf wrote:
hey guys. I
Sorry, there is nothing currently in wicket that does what you want.
PropertyModel might get you there partially but you would still need
to hack a lot to get it working the way you want.
Maybe there is an external library that does what you want, i don't
know. But whatever solution you eventually
Have you seen BoundCompoundPropertyModel?
It sounds like you are looking for that behavior.
Maurice
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Thomas Kappler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Johan. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough about the motivation.
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 6:51 AM, Johan Compagner
AFAIK there is no is such thing as isEnabledInHierarchy like there is
for visibility.
You can however use an IVisitor to quickly traverse all child
components of the container and set them to enabled / disabled.
If you do this in the onBeforeRender of the container you get pretty
much the behavior
Use Select and SelectOption components http://jweekend.co.uk/dev/ArticlesPage/
Maurice
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Søren Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is my first post to this mailing-list, so I hope it's not too stupid.
:-)
I'm working on an application using DropDownChoice.
I wouldn't presume calling myself a maven guru :) but i recently build
an archetype myself too.
I wonder why you have to use resource in your archetype. i get that
your archetype is a maven multiproject but i don't see how using
resource is better then using source.
I am just guessing here but
Andrea
2008/6/20, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In the teardown do tester.destroy() this will clean up everything.
Maurice
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Andrea Jahn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thank you very much for the Java solution :) !
I have also corrected the place
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a date picker component available in the current version of Wicket
or Wicket Extenstions? If so, where can I find it? If not, then where
You have to realize that both swarm and acegi keep a copy of the
logged in user. So you have to logoff at 2 places.
You could use a logoff page but imo it would be better to do the
logging off in the link itself. Something like:
Link logoff = new Link(logoff)
{
original LoginContext and return it with getLogoffContext() call or does it
not matter what Login Context I send to logoff? If so, is the current
LogonContext saved somewhere in wicket already?
Thanks, David
Maurice Marrink wrote:
You have to realize that both swarm and acegi keep a copy
In version 1.3.0 inheritance is somewhat limited. It can only follow
absolute paths.
So unless your ${SecuredTextFieldOne} alias resolves to something like
this: PageClass:panel1ID:panel2ID:textfieldID it will not work.
This has been fixed in 1.3-SNAPSHOT where you can now use container
classes
This sounds like your page is living in the default pagemap where
there should be a pagemap for each tab/window each with thee own
instance of the page.
can you confirm IPageSettings.getAutomaticMultiWindowSupport is on?
If so you could take a look at WebPage$PageMapChecker and
Just checking. Are you providing WicketTester with the correct path to
your webapp root?
If that is the case can you check if you can load other resources from
that path.
Maurice
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Tomasz Prus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
when i included javascript:
add(new
By default a logincontext only allows a single login, this can be
changed by a constructor flag.
To switch principals simply login a second time with the new context
and logoff with the old context.
the session will be preserved.
Maurice
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Sergey Podatelev
[EMAIL
Take a look at how CookieValuePersister does it, basically the same as
you. you can use it by calling setPersistent(true) on a formcomponent.
Maurice
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK. Regarding the NULL thing, I added this:
Cookie userIdCookie
Sounds Like a bug.
Could you open up a jira request please and attach a quickstart
showing this behavior.
Thanks.
Maurice
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:52 PM, smallufo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi , after a few try and errors , I can conclude how the problem occurs
In the ChildPanel , if my code
init() {
super.init();
}
}
2008/6/18, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You need to call super.init(). that will fix your swarm problems. as
for spring i think you need:
addComponentInstantiationListener(new SpringComponentInjector(this));
InjectorHolder.getInjector().inject
Isn't the browser sending out a locale different from the os locale?
Check your browser it should have some options for a preferred
language or locale.
Maurice
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I want to show my team mates the greatness of using wicket
Take a look at swarm, it has a jaas history. It should be dead simple
to port it back to jaas again.
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Wicket-Security
Maurice
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Jesper Åkesson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
I have a webapplication built on
What wicket version are you on? There was a bug about this but is has
long been fixed. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1095
Maurice
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 9:40 PM, smallufo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello ,
I had exactly the same problem , and solved by searching to this post.
You need to call super.init(). that will fix your swarm problems. as
for spring i think you need:
addComponentInstantiationListener(new SpringComponentInjector(this));
InjectorHolder.getInjector().inject(this);
Maurice
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Andrea Jahn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Well it depends on what you want to test.
with the 1.3-snapshots you can test independtly, see HiveTest which
tests your policy file. you can expand on that to test if certain
subjects have the permissions you expect them too, if all your pages
are accounted for in the policy file, etc.
But
Using swarm, i usually let the default isAuthenticated methods intact
and let the request be redirected to the loginpage where i check if a
known third party has done the authentication for me, if so i
automatically log the user in for wicket and redirect back to where i
came from.
You can
The following works for me using wicket 1.3.x.
in web.xml:
filter
filter-nametabs/filter-name
filter-class
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter
/filter-class
init-param
param-nameapplicationClassName/param-name
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Cristi Manole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[1] I get these kind of errors quite often:
there was an error cleaning up target [EMAIL PROTECTED]
markupIdToComponent
any idea what causes them? [i'm guessing it's a panel that gets updated to
often for my server -
In the Button.onSubmit do getForm.visitChildren(FormComponent.class,
new IVisitor()
{
public Object component(Component component)
{
//do something with the models from the components here.
}
}
Maurice
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 2:10 PM, wfroud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Frank Silbermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I did some experiments starting with a clean quicksort project. The
images did appear. However, when I modified the web.xml to change from:
filter-mapping
filter-namewicket.myproject/filter-name
It seems that you homepage is stateless, wicket does not create a
session for stateless pages to preserve server resources. You can
force wicket to create a session for you by calling
Session.get().bind() in your constructor (or any other place that is
executed during a requestcycle).
Maurice
On
Actually the example does set a model for the password field. As shown
in this snippet.
//Set compound model on the form, inputfields will use that model too.
super(id, new CompoundPropertyModel(new ValueMap()));
// only remember username, not passwords
add(new
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/newuserguide.html#Newuserguide-LocalizationandSkinningofApplications
Maurice
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Martin Makundi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you paste the code for better insight into your problem?
2008/6/11 Peter Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
Didn't we use custom actions for those locations?
A user could have global or location permissions, right?
In that case the permissions would be the same for each location. The
only difference would be in the fact that the user has or does not
have a location. which is checked by your
DummyLoginContext());
---
2008/6/11, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Didn't we use custom actions for those locations?
A user could have global or location permissions, right?
In that case the permissions would be the same for each location. The
only difference would be in the fact
It should be fairly simple to show a message on the login page stating
the user will be redirected to whichever page they were trying to
visit.
It would be a lot more difficult i think to show a warning prior to
redirecting to the login paging. But as i understand it that is
fortunately not what
In all my years i have never used the ComponentPropertyModel. I always
use the CompoundPropertyModel.
public class MyPanel extends Panel {
public MyPanel(String id, IModel model) {
super(id, new CompoundPropertyModel(model));
add(new Label(name));
}
}
Maurice
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:49
Sure you can, its just that most people use DataTable in some kind of
search page, where you only show labels.
But all you have to do is implement IColumn (or extend AbstractColumn)
then you use anything you want. In our project we have a column
showing an image.
Maurice
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 5:27 PM, nanotech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I am using panel inside a ModalWindow. I have few questions regarding Modal
Window.
1. It seems that setInitialWidth(800) is not being honoured. No matter what
size I set it comes out to be same size.
Did you set a
If that does not work you can also force the list to recreate all
items by calling removeAll() after you have deleted the object.
Maurice
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Sam Barnum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ricky, what are you using as the model for your refreshing view?
You should be using
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Flavius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using a DefaultDataTable and I want to get the index of the selected
item. However the index always returns 0. Is this by design?
new AbstractColumn(new Model(Test Label))
{
You can just wrap your dataprovider in a model, use the iterator to
fill a temporary list and simply return that in your model. Optimally
you would use a LDM or have a hook on your dataprovider (if you do not
care about building a reusable model) to return the inner list of the
provider.
Maurice
Well assuming you are only using a securewebmarkupcontainer to hide
the entire menu if a user as no permissions for any of the pages
accessible from that menu.
Otherwise there really is no need since the links will be hidden.
Then you have a couple of options.
-Use a datapermission for each swmc
Can't you use setReuseItems(true), that way the populate method will
be called less frequently and thus will generate less validators.
Don't use the removeall in combination with the reuse that will negate
the effect :)
Maurice
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Martin Makundi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thought it better to reply here, so everyone can find it back later :)
As said before by default any self especting authorization strategy
will redirect to a login page if it detects that the user is not
authorized for the page / component currently being created. So the
trick is to make sure
See my reply in the other thread.
Oh and next time could you keep it to one thread ;) thanks.
Maurice
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:12 AM, mfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys,
I am using wicket-auth-roles which so far is working greaet serving all my
purposes.
Though I am stuck in this scenario
What do you mean?
If your page accepts a certain model in its constructor you can do
with it whatever you want.
Any page (with or without empty constructor) can be created from
within another page. Although typically you will do this on a link
click or form submit.
Just do setResponsePage(new
Mark the session as dirty. Wicket cannot detect if some property of a
pojo has been updated in your session.
By marking the session as dirty wicket will (re)save everything.
Maurice
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:52 PM, smallufo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you .
It solves my confusion.
But I
().getUser();
Here , user is still null. Why ?
2008/6/5 Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mark the session as dirty. Wicket cannot detect if some property of a
pojo has been updated in your session.
By marking the session as dirty wicket will (re)save everything.
Maurice
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008
The plan is to first get at least a beta out for 1.3.1 and then start
working on 1.4.
Given the amount of time i have been able to put into wasp and swarm
lately it would not be feasible to actively develop 2 branches at the
same time. Even with someone helping out on the 1.4 branch we would
still
Looks like your security strategy is not allowing your pageexpired
page to be instantiated. in that case it will try to render the login
page.
Note that this is default behavior both in wicket-auth-roles and swarm.
Check the documentation for how to set your security strategy to allow
wicket to
Make a model that does the getString in the getObject and give that
model to your label.
Maurice
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Fabien D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
If I use this code :
BookmarkablePageLink lien_accueil = new
BookmarkablePageLink(accueil,
Just add your custom tabbar and a panel to your page. and let the
tabbar know which panel it should update.
Note that in the case of panels you should use Link in your tabbar component.
Maurice
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 12:01 PM, cresc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Erik.. I understand ur
Well if you are talking about having other html elements between the
tab bar and the content itself, then no you would have to write your
own components. but using some css or overriding the default markup
for the tabbedpanel you might be able to achieve the same visual
effect.
Maurice
On Sun,
Are you by any chance replacing components? This could happen if you
let the ajax render a component that has been removed from the page.
Maurice
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 7:32 PM, atul singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
As a result of code integration from various teams we have introduced
some
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:57 AM, Monica D'Arcy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am currently trying to implement some authorization/authentication using
SWARM and am running into some problems. After Logging on with a class that
extends the UsernamePasswordContext class, I attempt to
According to the code (i took a quick peek) the path is only used for
resource loading. it does not parse web.xml.
You have 3 options:
1 override getHiveKey in the application you pass to WicketTester to
return a fixed string.
2 override WicketTester.newServletContext to return a custom context
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Uwe Schäfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maurice Marrink schrieb:
Yes that is exactly what wasp is for.
cool, at least one thing i got right ;)
You can either extend WaspAuthorizationStrategy or
ClassAuthorizationStrategy. The latter provides a basic
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Andrea Jahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
No I think(hope) I got it. I've implemented an example based on my earlier
created SecureLink example.
There's a DataView. The items area Locations. For each item a delete link is
created. Users with global
Typically when using DataTables you let the IDataProvider use your
dao. to return an iterator over the objects (users in this case)
When you use SortableDataProvider You need to provide an ISortState.
SingleSortState is a very basic implementation of this, you could
build your own by wrapping a
An easy way would be to check them against the expected html output.
See for example WicketTestCase#assertResultPage
Maurice
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Ryan O'Hara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to test a component that is added to another component that is
added to the
This sounds very strange.
If you disable a component the model value will still be rendered to
the html. disabled is used differently by different component
components, for example a disabled textfield will add a disabled
attribute to the html output but a disabled link will replace the tag
with a
In the case of custom components there usually is a tight binding :)
Using JSR allows you to neatly package everything in a jar and
distribute your component.
Not saying that is the only thing you should use it for, its just one usecase.
Maurice
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 2:09 AM, David Nedrow
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Tim Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to get a feel of how suitable swarm is for an application -
particularly how much support for what we need is handled by swarm/wasp and
how much we need to write ourselves.
swarm looks good, eg
According to the code it returns a DummyHomePage which is most
definitely a Page.
Are you supplying WicketTester with an Application of your own?
What wicket version are you running?
Maurice
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Izak Wessels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could somebody please explain
Hi Uwe,
Yes that is exactly what wasp is for.
You can either extend WaspAuthorizationStrategy or
ClassAuthorizationStrategy. The latter provides a basic implementation
to do component instantiation checks based on static fields available
on the class. if you use java 1.5+ you could build your
That would be the easiest yes.
Maurice
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
If I want a centralized properties file for localization, where should I put
it and how should I call it?
Is it supposed to be in the same folder as my WebApplication class?
Is is
I am not sure i follow you.
According to the log the user does not have the datapermission for the dropdown.
I tried to set the permissions like in the explanation below, but that didn't
work:
// Welcome page
permission ${ComponentPermission} ${front}.Welcome, inherit, render,
global;
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Uwe Schäfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maurice Marrink schrieb:
feel free, to convert me ;)
I am not good at converting people, either you see the light or you don't
:P
*g*
One of the strong points of swarm (imo ;)) is the ease with which it
lets you
In the properties file for your page do:
component1Id.nullValid=Choose type
component2Id.nullValid=Choose date
Instead of just the id you can also include the (partial) path,
working your way to the top from the component you are trying to use.
Maurice
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Martin
Does your cancel button have default formprocessing set to false?
Maurice
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:36 AM, Michael Mehrle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a strange problem cancelling out of a modal. Unless I make
selections on all my form components inside that modal, it just won't
close.
No, that is not how it is supposed to work. Each user should always
get his/her own session regardless.
development mode is for quick reloading of markupfiles etc without redeploying.
Not sure how you managed that but we use dev mode all the time and we
have never seen this behavior.
Maurice
On
at 8:34 PM, Michael Mehrle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not that I am aware of - don't know that setting. What would that do
exactly?
-Original Message-
From: Maurice Marrink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 12:02 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Strange
Or you can wrap the LDM in a CompoundPropertyModel and set that as the
model of parent panel, that way your subpanels do not need to have
there own model and they will trigger a load on the LDM.
Maurice
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so you have
Panel
it - could you please point me
in the right direction?
Also, I assume setting this in the cancel button's event handler would
be sufficient?
Thanks for your input.
-Original Message-
From: Maurice Marrink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 11:47 AM
To: users
Which security framework do you plan on using? ;)
Maurice
2008/5/20 Uwe Schäfer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
hi
i remember someone asking for a wicket based forum few weeks ago. i plan to
build one within the next few months. is there anyone interested in
contributing code, ideas, reviews, tests or
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:38 PM, Uwe Schäfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maurice Marrink schrieb:
Which security framework do you plan on using? ;)
*g* actually, it could use a homegrowkn one, which essentially is a bunch of
interfaces (together with a trivial impl).
sorry, that i did
You could take a look at http://wicketstuff.org/wicketsecurity/basichttp/
It does the same with standard http headers.
Source
http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicket-security/examples/all_in_one/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/security/examples/httplogin/basic
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/i18n.html
Maurice
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Mathias P.W Nilsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I have a lot of pages that have text description. ( Many lines of text) It
can have css markup in with bold, color etc. My problem is that the site is
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
something like this should probably be filter inside the database not
by some external filter which forces you to load the entire dataset.
No that would be foolish, but that wasn't suggested.
-igor
On Sun, May 18, 2008
Let me see if i understand you correct.
If a user logs in to your site and then navigates away to a site/page
not handled by your domain without logging off and thus keeping the
session on the server.
And then after a little while comes back to your domain (maybe he
types the url again in the
I think everybody is missing the point that listview was intended to
refresh itself entirely (all the items) on each render not just after
a hide/show cycle.
The reason for this is that you always want an up-to-date list. If you
don't want this this behavior you can use setReuseItems(true);
Or am
wicket synchronizes on the session.
So only one request is processed at a time, (except for resources like
images etc)
So even ajax requests are synchronized.
There might be some more details i am not aware of but this is in a
nutshell our synchronization.
Maurice
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 4:33
can be hit by
multiply rerquest at once.
Pages are threadsafe and that is not done by a big sync block, but by
placing a barrier. See Session.getPage() there there is code that
makes sure that 1 thread at a time gets a page from the session the
rest just has to wait
On 5/16/08, Maurice
You do not need a hidden form parameter, wicket automatically resolves
the form input with the component on the server side.
On submit the model of the component is loaded and set with the new
input. If you use a model such as LoadableDetachableModel, that knows
how to get the latest object from
Yes there are other solutions :)
In this case you would use a DataPermission.
Something like
permission ${DataPermission} delete_product, enable;
coupled with a DatasecurityCheck on your links like so:
setSecurityCheck(new DataSecurityCheck(delete_product));
will do the trick.
Maurice
On Thu,
On a side note:
Don't forget to overwrite isErrorPage() to return true.
Maurice
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why should wicket handle exceptions like that, what kind? what should wicket
do then?
you should just be sure that you always can create
You can use
setEscapeModelStrings(false) to not escape special characters.
attributemodifiers to add attributes to tags or use onComponentTag for this
Maurice
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Milan Křápek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks,
the XML code is fine, but I need to know how to do it
1.3.1-SNAPSHOT is an older version it has been renamed to follow
wicket naming conventions to 1.3-SNAPSHOT.
That is the major and minor versions will always be used to indicate
the latest snapshot, this prevents users needing to change there pom
whenever a new patch version has been released.
I
nice :)
one thing though: i went searching for uitjes and after clicking the
volgende button a couple of times i selected one to show more details.
Now when i use the browser backbutton or the terug link i always end
up at the first page of my search results. I would have expected to
return to
, inherit,
render;
permission ${ComponentPermission} ${myPackage}.ContainerPage2, enable;
};
Argh, i am only just reading you are using 1.3.1-SNAPSHOT. You should
be using 1.3-SNAPSHOT. That does it i am deleting those jars.
Maurice
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL
.
Maurice
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Andrea Jahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've changed to the 1.3.1-SNAPSHOT version. Therefore I have only
replaced the constructor PolicyFileHiveFactory
1 - 100 of 422 matches
Mail list logo
