Sam Stainsby schrieb:
Finland, Finland, Finland
The country where I quite want to be!
^^^ Not the best job application I've seen :-)
but a nice reference to monty python´s flying circus ;)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
feedback messages are tied to components they are reported for (the link
in your case).
Since this component isn't located on your response page, the message
will not be rendered.
Use Session#info() instead.
Regards
Sven
uud ashr wrote:
Hi all,
Why does wicket panel don't work if I
Hi,
When a client has a page in his browser that he does not touch for a while
and the session expired. after that if he hits an ajax link for example - an
exception occurs in the wicket level due to the session expired state.
How can I gracefully handle such a situation assuming that there is
I was thinking this as well, but the message should in that case also NOT
appear when you do setResponsePage(new MyAnotherPage()), no ?
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Sven Meier s...@meiers.net wrote:
Hi,
feedback messages are tied to components they are reported for (the link in
your
Hi!
Yes, I hate this situation too. Our application has various different
silos and whenever the user session expires, he loses his silo and is
redirected to a generic homepage and an inexperienced user will never
know how to get back to where he was. Some information should be in
the url. I
Can you just simply track user activity and store it into a persistence
layer that do not expires with session and then once session expires
redirect them to that last page (after they have logged in?)?. You could add
a check that sees if the user had some pending actions (that are cleaned
out if
Can you just simply track user activity and store it into a persistence
layer that do not expires with session and then once session expires
redirect them to that last page (after they have logged in?)?.
Maybe wicket could do this automatically using Servlet Context?
**
Martin
Best,
How exactly do you see this implemented? There will be plenty of details to
be taken care for. e.g. For how long should this information stay on
that Servlet Context? If your application has many users what information
should go there?...
Wouldn't it be simpler to have a component instantiation
How exactly do you see this implemented? There will be plenty of details to
be taken care for. e.g. For how long should this information stay on
that Servlet Context? If your application has many users what information
should go there?...
Somehow configure that
- my application has following
Hi Martin,
Can you just achieve what you wan't making siloA, siloB, siloC been
different Wicket applications?
I still see the problem of how this state will be stored on Servlet Context
and how do you manage/recover/delete it for a certain user... How is this
generic user defined? Isn't this a
Hi,
i have the same problems for our heavy ajax wicket site. I use
wicket-ajax so the stateless flag can not be used. If the session
expires i make some assumptions:
* all user generated content is thrown away. (e.g. shopingbasket)
* the pagecomponents the user is on is in initial hierarchie,
Hi!
Can you just achieve what you wan't making siloA, siloB, siloC been
different Wicket applications?
No, that is not the proper solution. They are the same application.
I still see the problem of how this state will be stored on Servlet Context
and how do you manage/recover/delete it for
So essentially what you want to use is the (failing) request URL to redirect
users to different pages? Some kind of strategy for redirecting to Expired
Pages and to Home Pages based on the URL instead of fixed pages? Isn't
this possible by rolling out your own WebRequestCycleProcessor?
Ernesto
So essentially what you want to use is the (failing) request URL to redirect
users to different pages? Some kind of strategy for redirecting to Expired
Pages and to Home Pages based on the URL instead of fixed pages? Isn't
this possible by rolling out your own WebRequestCycleProcessor?
I do
Should be the same.
Sven
Pieter Degraeuwe wrote:
I was thinking this as well, but the message should in that case also NOT
appear when you do setResponsePage(new MyAnotherPage()), no ?
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Sven Meier s...@meiers.net wrote:
Hi,
feedback messages are tied to
Neither do I... but
maybe AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.respond(RuntimeException e, RequestCycle
requestCycle) is the method to override?
Best,
Ernesto
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
So essentially what you want to use is the
That's where we have our workaround, currenlty. And it is ugly.
But where could we bind the silo information into urls globally?
**
Martin
2009/12/28 Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com:
Neither do I... but
maybe AbstractRequestCycleProcessor.respond(RuntimeException e, RequestCycle
But where could we bind the silo information into urls globally?
Mounting pages? Or better having some kind of configuration class that you
use to mount the pages and do the ugly URL plumbing on that method?
Best,
Ernesto
It should be automatic and global, like a url encoding scheme, and it
should come with an interpreter that will process the
homepage/errorpage when necessary.
**
Martin
2009/12/28 Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com:
But where could we bind the silo information into urls globally?
Create a RFE? Maybe on 1.5 it is already possible?
Ernesto
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
It should be automatic and global, like a url encoding scheme, and it
should come with an interpreter that will process the
homepage/errorpage
How would you formulate such RFE?
Wicket needs an autonomus but parametrizable global behavior, that is
transparent to all url encoding schemes, that can be used to identify
users's silo in the application. When session is invalidated or other
errors occur, each silo can have its own
Hi all,
I created a custom DataTable based on AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable, as well
as a ChecBoxColumn based on the CheckBoxColumn in wicket-phonebook. My
questions:
1. Would it be also possible to create a RadioColumn for the DataTable? From
what I've read, I need to add the entire DataTable to
Maybe if you replace users's silo with user location and then say
Example, if location=silo... things will be a little less bound to your
use case... Otherwise your description of what you want to achieve looks
fine fine to me... but I'm no core developer... So, why not wait to see what
do they
2009/12/28 Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com:
but I'm no core developer... So, why not wait to see what
do they comment on this issue?
Maybe they just want us to weather this out on ourselves ... ;)
**
Martin
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Martin Makundi
I'm getting this exception when calling getConvertedInput() on
birthDateField.
java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.String cannot be cast to
java.util.Date
I'm using wicket 1.4.1
birthDateField = new TextFieldDate(birthDate, new
ModelDate());
You forgot to set Type of the textfield... you know, generics are only
compile-deep.
public TextField(final String id, final ClassT type)
type - Date.class
**
Martin
2009/12/28 Sam Barrow s...@sambarrow.com:
I'm getting this exception when calling getConvertedInput() on
birthDateField.
I tried that too, still same error.
On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 16:02 +0200, Martin Makundi wrote:
You forgot to set Type of the textfield... you know, generics are only
compile-deep.
public TextField(final String id, final ClassT type)
type - Date.class
**
Martin
2009/12/28 Sam Barrow
did you try debugger and breakpoint?
2009/12/28 Sam Barrow s...@sambarrow.com:
I tried that too, still same error.
On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 16:02 +0200, Martin Makundi wrote:
You forgot to set Type of the textfield... you know, generics are only
compile-deep.
public TextField(final String id,
I think this suggestion is worth condsidering more carefully:
Can you just achieve what you wan't making siloA, siloB, siloC been
different Wicket applications?
No, that is not the proper solution. They are the same application.
OK, but could you deploy multiple copies of the same app to
Might work, but I do not know if it has any consequences such as will
the user have a single wicketsession?
**
Martin
2009/12/28 Jim Pinkham pinkh...@gmail.com:
I think this suggestion is worth condsidering more carefully:
Can you just achieve what you wan't making siloA, siloB, siloC been
Hi Sam,
did you try
birthDateField = new TextFieldDate(birthDate, new ModelDate(),
Date.class);
Maybe it helps.
Cheers
Per
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Actually, I think Martin has a solution but he doesn't like it: because it
is not a clean solution. What he is asking for, if I didn't get it wrong at
the end, is been able to have more than one HomePage, ErrorPage, and so on
based on incoming URLs. But this included as a framework feature... not
I guess wicketsessions will be different. I know I proposed to do that but
not sure is the best solution. I your case I would surelly opt for the
solution you have in place right now.
Ernesto
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Might work,
Hi,
2009-12-28 15:57 keltezéssel, Jim Pinkham írta:
OK, but could you deploy multiple copies of the same app to different root
contexts - that would give you the info you want in each URL and thus be
able to do different home/error pages with some config along with each copy
of the app.
I am more worried about the session duplication. I want to get
multi-homed single application look and feel. Single wicketsession
per user.
**
Martin
2009/12/28 Pieter Degraeuwe pieter.degrae...@systemworks.be:
Hmm, that's not correct. Different frontend apps should use the same EJB's.
In that
Hmm, that's not correct. Different frontend apps should use the same EJB's.
In that case, It's not so ugly anymore in my opinion. (I don't want to
advocate the use of EJB's though..)
2009/12/28 Major Péter majorpe...@sch.bme.hu
Hi,
2009-12-28 15:57 keltezéssel, Jim Pinkham írta:
OK, but
Right, right, my bad. But then you should create three different
webmodules for a single application, that's why wicket would be loaded 3
times only for this separation.. It's just unneccesary resource usage IMHO.
2009-12-28 16:30 keltezéssel, Pieter Degraeuwe írta:
Hmm, that's not correct.
Any feedback on why placing a file upload component on a form in Wicket
would cause the ajax behavior to stop working
Known issue within the wicket community?
J.D.
-Original Message-
From: Corbin, James [mailto:jcor...@iqnavigator.com]
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 12:47 PM
To:
Great tip, thanks! After implementing, I see that the behavior is added to
the text field correctly, but the renderHead() method is not being called,
can you help me understand why that is?
jwcarman wrote:
On 3/9/08, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
On 3/9/08, Warren
Hi!
Did you implement the IHeaderContributor and mark @Override?
2009/12/28 duncan787 duncan...@gmail.com:
Great tip, thanks! After implementing, I see that the behavior is added to
the text field correctly, but the renderHead() method is not being called,
can you help me understand why
Well done, Uwe!
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Java-Wicket-Job-Opportunity%2C-Finland-tp26853946p26944833.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
I had some issue with multipart forms and ajax recently, but in 1.4.4 it
works for me, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2432 for
more details. Is this the same issue for you?
Maybe try the quickstart, see if there the ajax is working for you.
Regards,
Peter
2009-12-28 16:46
I'll try the quickstart and see if I can reproduce it outside of our code.
We are using Wicket 1.4.4 and the issue occurs. I'm not sure if it's the
looping issue or not, I've just observed, that with the upload control in a
form, none of the ajax behaviors on other controls that are on the
Thank you MartinM. Your question caused me to question the other methods I
was overriding from the super...after removing those unnecessary overridden
methods, its working like a charm.
Thank you!
MartinM wrote:
Hi!
Did you implement the IHeaderContributor and mark @Override?
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 4:49 AM, Early Morning goodmorning...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I created a custom DataTable based on AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable, as well
as a ChecBoxColumn based on the CheckBoxColumn in wicket-phonebook. My
questions:
1. Would it be also possible to create a
use a cookie. every time a user enters a silo set it in a silo
cookie. when the session expires, the cookie will still be there.
-igor
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 5:04 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
2009/12/28 Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com:
but I'm no
Ok, something could be built on that. Not as robust as an url but
works. Requires a nice design in the request processing. Still RFE?
**
Martin
2009/12/28 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com:
use a cookie. every time a user enters a silo set it in a silo
cookie. when the session expires, the
rfe? for what? cookies have nothing to do with wicket.
-igor
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Ok, something could be built on that. Not as robust as an url but
works. Requires a nice design in the request processing. Still RFE?
**
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Not as robust as an url but works.
you can build your own url conding strategy that postprocesses urls in
any way you want.
-igor
**
Martin
2009/12/28 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com:
use a
rfe? for what? cookies have nothing to do with wicket.
Not as robust as an url but works.
you can build your own url conding strategy that postprocesses urls in
any way you want.
RFE for built-in support of multi-homing in wicket, out-of-the-box.
**
Martin
-igor
I just upgraded from Wicket 1.4.2 to Wicket 1.4.5 and started receiving the
following exceptions from my Unit test.
Is this a known issue or do I need to change my test?
Thanks.
org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: *There is no application attached
to current thread main*
at
is this rule approx true?
as far as it's described in the javadoc:
[1] org.apache.wicket.Session.getSizeInBytes()
Size of this session, including all the pagemaps it contains
[2] org.apache.wicket.PageMap.getSizeInBytes()
Size of this page map in bytes, including a sum of the sizes of all the
that does what?
so we provide sethome(string) and gethome(string) which are analogues
to setcookie(cookie) and getcookies() which does not lock you into a
single way of doing multihoming.
there is some code you have to write to build an application
-igor
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 9:56 AM,
- sethome(string) needs to be called at a particular point in the
request cycle, could be built-in or not?
- gethome() with homepage handling needs to be done in a particular
manner in the request cycle, could be built-in or not?
- alternative url encoding scheme, could be built-in or not?
does
yah.. styles won't work either.. they're in the session so when
invalidation occurs...the data is lost. So Wicket needs some built-in
method to pass tokens between sessions.
**
Martin
2009/12/28 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
- sethome(string) needs to be called at a
we have one, its called cookies
-igor
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
yah.. styles won't work either.. they're in the session so when
invalidation occurs...the data is lost. So Wicket needs some built-in
method to pass tokens between
I agree. But what about cookie-less users. Just forget about them?
2009/12/28 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com:
we have one, its called cookies
-igor
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For
Can we get access to the jsessionid? Maybe we could use that to track
cookieless users.
**
Martin
2009/12/28 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
I agree. But what about cookie-less users. Just forget about them?
2009/12/28 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com:
we have one,
Haha, but jsessionid is probably destroyed when session dies..
**
Martin
2009/12/28 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
Can we get access to the jsessionid? Maybe we could use that to track
cookieless users.
**
Martin
2009/12/28 Martin Makundi
so you think there are people out there that will use ajax but not
allow cookies...
-igor
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
I agree. But what about cookie-less users. Just forget about them?
2009/12/28 Igor Vaynberg
Yes, many companies' security policies allow javascript but not cookies.
**
Martin
2009/12/28 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com:
so you think there are people out there that will use ajax but not
allow cookies...
-igor
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Martin Makundi
lol, i guess you cant use most major sites out there eh?
-igor
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Yes, many companies' security policies allow javascript but not cookies.
**
Martin
2009/12/28 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com:
so
jsessionid works
**
Martin
2009/12/28 Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com:
lol, i guess you cant use most major sites out there eh?
-igor
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Yes, many companies' security policies allow javascript
The problem was that the test case was creating AnnotApplicationContextMock
before creating the WebApplication itself. The following code worked for me:
MyApplication webApp = new MyApplication()
{
@Override
public void init() {
I unsuccessfully tried several different ways to invoke the AjaxSubmitLink
from my test method.
1. formTester.submit(submitButton) does not call
AjaxSubmitLink#onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form form)
2. formTester.submitLink(submitButton, false) fails with
I am making a modal window link component that will fallback to a
standard redirect if javascript is disabled. Traditionally I have been
overriding a method called onFallback() and forcing users to manually
setRedirect(true), setResponsePage(blah), but I would prefer it if I
could just pass the
Hi Igor,
Em 23/12/2009 20:28, Igor Vaynberg escreveu:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Ricardo Mayerhofer
ricardo.ekm.lis...@gmail.com wrote:
Good discussion.
Em 23/12/2009 15:32, Igor Vaynberg escreveu:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Ricardo Mayerhofer
why not use Class.getName() instead?
Martijn
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Anthony DePalma fatef...@gmail.com wrote:
I am making a modal window link component that will fallback to a
standard redirect if javascript is disabled. Traditionally I have been
overriding a method called
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
why not use Class.getName() instead?
This is a generic component that can be used for any kind of modalwindow
link. So naturally I won't know what the fallback page is for every
instantiation.
--
View this message in context:
jsessionid works
... but leads to lots of boilerplate where you need to rewrite all URLs
targeted at your app's code. I guess Wicket can do that for you, but still...
- Tor Iver
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hej,
2009/12/28 uud ashr uuda...@gmail.com:
Won't work using:
setResponsePage(MyAnotherPage.class);
But fine when use constructor:
setResponsePage(new MyAnotherPage());
At work we had a similar case where an object in the session, that was
explicitely set before calling, wasn't set in the
As recent as the 1.4.4 release (dated December 10th, 2009), I started
getting the following stack trace.
This happens when submitting the form.
Note: This doesn't seem to occur with the same code base running against
Wicket 1.4.1.
Did something break in 1.4.4 relating to this?
hi, I'm using datagrid of inmethod,I want open a new window popup no modal,
then override this method
public class MyDataGrid extends DataGrid {
.
@Override
protected void onRowClicked(AjaxRequestTarget target,
tried that, didn't work.
any other ideas?
On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 16:11 +0100, Per Newgro wrote:
Hi Sam,
did you try
birthDateField = new TextFieldDate(birthDate, new ModelDate(),
Date.class);
Maybe it helps.
Cheers
Per
in certain cases wicket will set multipart property on your forms for
you. eg if it detects a file upload field in the form.
-igor
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Corbin, James jcor...@iqnavigator.com wrote:
A little more information on this issue,
I observed this error after a dialog is
Yep, I read about that in the jira issue wicket-2621.
The parent form has a fileupload field and I verified the generated HTML
defines the encoding on that form as multipart.
The dialog that is popped up from that panel, also defines a form, in which
wicket converts to a div (can't have nested
I developed a new class PopupSettings because I can't extend it,
MyPopupSettings is same as PopupSetting but the method public String
getPopupJavaScript() { . } return a window.open(' url ').
This works.
De: Juan E Kipes jeki...@yahoo.com.ar
Para:
Upgrading to 1.4.5 does not fix the problem. Something else is amiss here.
I've even tried explicitly setting the form to multi-part (e.g.,
myForm.setMultiPart(true))
More investigation is needed.
j.D.
-Original Message-
From: Corbin, James [mailto:jcor...@iqnavigator.com]
Sent:
create a quickstart and attach it to a jira issue.
-igor
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Corbin, James jcor...@iqnavigator.com wrote:
Upgrading to 1.4.5 does not fix the problem. Something else is amiss here.
I've even tried explicitly setting the form to multi-part (e.g.,
I doubt it's a problem, but if you're worried about the class reference you can
introduce a middle man that will handle the serialization as a string:
class ClassHolder implements Serializable {
private Class? clazz;
// constructor, setter, and getter omitted...
private void
Just debug it to find the reason.
**
Martin
2009/12/29 Sam Barrow s...@sambarrow.com:
tried that, didn't work.
any other ideas?
On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 16:11 +0100, Per Newgro wrote:
Hi Sam,
did you try
birthDateField = new TextFieldDate(birthDate, new ModelDate(),
Date.class);
Maybe
I guess the servlet container handles jsessionid transparently.
**
Martin
2009/12/28 Wilhelmsen Tor Iver toriv...@arrive.no:
jsessionid works
... but leads to lots of boilerplate where you need to rewrite all URLs
targeted at your app's code. I guess Wicket can do that for you, but still...
alecswan1 wrote:
So, how do I test AjaxSubmitLink#onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form
form) method?
You may try using http://wicketpagetest.sourceforge.net/ to test it instead.
It
supports real AJAX.
-
--
Kent Tong
Better way to unit test Wicket pages
83 matches
Mail list logo
