Re: "Page Expired" page with PatternDateConverter
quickstart
11 Ekim 2010 16:00 tarihinde Hemant Shah yazdı:
> Yes, it works fine if we do not override the getConverter method. In which
> case it behaves like a normal AjaxEditableLabel, as would be expected, and
> we are using AjaxEditableLabel instances in many places in our application.
>
>
> - Hemant
>
>
> On 10/11/2010 6:24 AM, Altuğ Bilgin Altıntaş wrote:
>
>> if you don't override IConverter then everything works fine ?
>>
>> 2010/10/11 Hemant Shah
>>
>> Altuğ, thanks for responding.
>>>
>>> There are no errors reported in the log. All the classes in the project
>>> are
>>> serializable.
>>>
>>> Could this be a bug?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>> Hemant
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/10/2010 5:03 PM, Altuğ Bilgin Altıntaş wrote:
>>>
>>> Did you look at Wicket's logs ?
Be sure serialization is done correctly.
2010/10/10 Hemant Shah
I am new to the Wicket framework and I hope I can get some help with a
> problem I am facing.
>
> I am using version 1.4.12.
>
> I am overriding the AjaxEditableLabel class and its overridden
> getConverter
> method is at follows:
>
>@Override
>public IConverter. getConverter(Class type) {
>return new PatternDateConverter("MM/dd/", true);
>}
>
> However, the first time in a session the component is updated, I get
> the
> "Page Expired" message. The error results only when the getConverter
> method
> is called.
>
> Note that this happens only the first time I access it in a session. If
> I
> go to the home page and from there back to the page which contains the
> component, it works without any problems.
>
> I am not sure how to overcome this problem. I hope you guys can help.
> Thanks.
>
>
> - Hemant
>
>
>
>
Re: DropDownChoice loses Selection in Disabled Panels
Can you write your code? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/DropDownChoice-loses-Selection-in-Disabled-Panels-tp2989677p2991210.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket osgi (not Pax)
If you're already using Wicket successfully in OSGi, then I don't see what benefit using pax-wicket will add for you. pax-wicket is useful to help get you going in OSGi, since the class loading / serialization stuff can be tricky. Sounds like you're doing ok, though. =David On Oct 12, 2010, at 3:09 PM, kugaprakash wrote: > > Hi, > I have multiple Wicket Applications running on different servers, each of > them runs on OSGI/Jetty, and a Master Wicket Application also runs on > OSGI/Jetty. Master wicket application, has its own server, where it gets the > data from the sub servers. > > Do you recommend Pax Wicket for such architechture? > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-osgi-not-Pax-tp1893713p2991185.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket osgi (not Pax)
Hi, I have multiple Wicket Applications running on different servers, each of them runs on OSGI/Jetty, and a Master Wicket Application also runs on OSGI/Jetty. Master wicket application, has its own server, where it gets the data from the sub servers. Do you recommend Pax Wicket for such architechture? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-osgi-not-Pax-tp1893713p2991185.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: RadioChoice - what's wrong?
Do you use Eclipse? There is a compiler warning that you can turn on (it should be on by default) that warns against this problem whenever you may inadvertently be "hiding" other variables. I suggest to everyone I teach that they turn it on (and perhaps even turn it up from warning to error), and of course, stop ignoring the little yellow squiggly lines :) On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Zeldor wrote: > > It does! Thanks a lot! I knew it was something stupid and trivial. Huh, but > it should not cause that still - I was defining TextFields in same way and > then again to add parameters and it went fine. > > On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Andrea Del Bene [via Apache Wicket] < > ml-node+2970427-965616561-152...@n4.nabble.com > > > > > wrote: > > > Hello Zeldor, > > > > I've red your code and it seems that you define variable rc two times: > > the first time as form private field and the second time just below > > between braces. When onSubmit method calls rc.getModelObject() it uses > > private field rc which was not initialized and so triggers a > > NullPointerException. Try to remove the second type definition > > "RadioChoice" and it should work. > > > -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
tomcat host gives 404 on dynamic resources including wicket-events.js
wicket 1.4 - tomcat 6.0 or 7.0 Having issue with resolving dynamic resources when deployed as virtual host in tomcat server.xml snippet... both apps load with either url... http://192.168.100.70:8080/BEMA OR http://a.bem.com:8080 http://192.168.100.70:8080/BEMB OR http://b.bem.com:8080 however - when the vitual host access is used (a.bem.com) requests for dynamic resources produce 404 (static requests and pages load fine) for example...http://a.bem.com:8080 ...cannot find wicket-event.js --- Request URL:http://a.bem.com:8080/resources/org.apache.wicket.markup.html.WicketEventReference/wicket-event.js Request Method:GET Status Code:404 Not Found --- but ...http://192.168.100.70:8080/BEMA ...finds it just fine --- Request URL:http://192.168.100.70:8080/BEMA/resources/org.apache.wicket.markup.html.WicketEventReference/wicket-event.js Request Method:GET Status Code:200 OK --- Same exact apps...deployed by simply renaming war file...our customer want to deploy the exact same app on Tomcat several - but with different configurations/resources/database Any ideas, Thanks, Terry -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/tomcat-host-gives-404-on-dynamic-resources-including-wicket-events-js-tp2990681p2990681.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: repaint a fragment
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:59 PM, fachhoch wrote: > > my fragment is inside a listitem ,on click I added this listitem to taget > nothing happened but if I call listitem.replace with new fragment it was > adding an additional div is ths the right way to repaint fragment ? You can call item.setOutputMarkupId(true) and add that item to the AjaxRequestTarget to repaint it (and the frag inside it). Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
Re: repaint a fragment
my fragment is inside a listitem ,on click I added this listitem to taget nothing happened but if I call listitem.replace with new fragment it was adding an additional div is ths the right way to repaint fragment ? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/repaint-a-fragment-tp2990937p2991093.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: repaint a fragment
Exactly. On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:24 PM, fachhoch wrote: > > you mean If I put this fragment inside a webmarkupcontainer and add this > webmarkupcontainer to target this will repaint my fragmnet ? > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/repaint-a-fragment-tp2990937p2991045.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Integrating Separate Different Wicket Applications Into One
Hi When you say integrate different applications, do u mean each one is a sub-application? Do those applications extend the WicketApplication class? If they don't then I have had some experience to integrate sub-modules into one main application. Let me know if that is what you mean. Otherwise I guess some of the experts here would help out. Cheers On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:06 AM, kugaprakash wrote: > > Hi, > Can you please let me know? > thanks > Kuga > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Integrating-Separate-Different-Wicket-Applications-Into-One-tp1889319p2990281.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
Re: repaint a fragment
you mean If I put this fragment inside a webmarkupcontainer and add this webmarkupcontainer to target this will repaint my fragmnet ? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/repaint-a-fragment-tp2990937p2991045.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: repaint a fragment
No html is rendered to represent a fragment. You will have to wrap it
with a div and then refresh the div.
Scott
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:06 PM, fachhoch wrote:
>
> I have a fragment I want to repaint when user click on ajax link
>
> here is my fragment
>
> private class ProgramFragment extends Fragment {
> Long sysAuditProgId;
> public ProgramFragment( final ProgramStatusDTO
> programStatusDTO) {
> super("program",
> "programFragment",ProgramStatusPanel.this);
>
> this.sysAuditProgId=programStatusDTO.eaAuditProgram.getSysAuditProgId();
> setOutputMarkupId(true);
>
> add(new Label("programAcronym",
> programStatusDTO.eaAuditProgram.getInfGrantProgram().getProgAcronym()));
> EaAuditProgramAmednment amendment=
> programStatusDTO.eaAuditProgram.getAmednment();
> add(new Label("modifier",amendment==null ? ""
> :"(Amend)"));
> add(new Label("status",programStatusDTO.getName()));
> add(new
> Label("daysPassed",programStatusDTO.getDaysPassed()==0?"-":String.valueOf(programStatusDTO.getDaysPassed(;
> }
> }
>
>
> in onClick I am calling
>
>
> target.addComponent(getPage().get("program")));
>
>
>
> when I click on the link nothing happens, a refreshing view or ListView
> onPopulate method is called for repaint, for a Fragment or
> WebMarkupContainer what method is called ?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/repaint-a-fragment-tp2990937p2990937.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
repaint a fragment
I have a fragment I want to repaint when user click on ajax link
here is my fragment
private class ProgramFragment extends Fragment {
Long sysAuditProgId;
public ProgramFragment( final ProgramStatusDTO
programStatusDTO) {
super("program",
"programFragment",ProgramStatusPanel.this);
this.sysAuditProgId=programStatusDTO.eaAuditProgram.getSysAuditProgId();
setOutputMarkupId(true);
add(new Label("programAcronym",
programStatusDTO.eaAuditProgram.getInfGrantProgram().getProgAcronym()));
EaAuditProgramAmednment amendment=
programStatusDTO.eaAuditProgram.getAmednment();
add(new Label("modifier",amendment==null ? ""
:"(Amend)"));
add(new Label("status",programStatusDTO.getName()));
add(new
Label("daysPassed",programStatusDTO.getDaysPassed()==0?"-":String.valueOf(programStatusDTO.getDaysPassed(;
}
}
in onClick I am calling
target.addComponent(getPage().get("program")));
when I click on the link nothing happens, a refreshing view or ListView
onPopulate method is called for repaint, for a Fragment or
WebMarkupContainer what method is called ?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/repaint-a-fragment-tp2990937p2990937.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior Question
Doh! Never mind. I just discovered that buried in my Page was this piece of code: AjaxFormValidatingBehavior.addToAllFormComponents(form,"onblur"); That's what was adding the onblur call to the dropdown. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior-Question-tp2968982p2990385.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Integrating Separate Different Wicket Applications Into One
Hi, Can you please let me know? thanks Kuga -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Integrating-Separate-Different-Wicket-Applications-Into-One-tp1889319p2990281.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior Question
Again, I can offer a hack :D
public class DoSomeHackBehavior extends AbstractBehavior {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 3554634545756435367L;
@Override
public void onComponentTag(Component component, ComponentTag tag) {
FormComponent comp = (FormComponent) component;
tag.getAttributes().remove("onblur");
}
}
}
after that, you can add this behaviour to any component
component.add(new DoSomeHackBehaviour());
:D
I have found that Wicket adds an onblur Ajax call to every HTML event you
can define for the AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior on a DropDownChoice
control. I haven't tested this on other controls. This means your server
will be getting an extra Ajax call each time a user moves focus away from
the dropdown, even if they didn't change the dropdown selection. This
seems like a bug.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior-Question-tp2968982p2990266.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Confused about Resource basics
Further to this - if I look at the code in the wicket filter:
resource = webApplication.getSharedResources().get(resourceReferenceKey);
// If resource found and it is cacheable
if ((resource != null) && resource.isCacheable())
{
..
Session.findOrCreate(request, response);
It seems that shared resources will also load the session etc time.
How can I avoid the session being loaded?
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Wayne Pope
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just realised that our session is getting loaded multiple times per
> web request. I see that aside from the page request the session is
> getting loaded for items such as css, js, etc that are referenced in
> the code.
> Now I'm trying to make sure I understand resources correctly in terms
> of session synchronization. I can;t find much documentation on that
> aside from the mention in SharedResources javadoc.
>
> Can someone correct me on this. But aside from SharedResrouces are all
> other types of resources sync'd with the session (ie its loaded)?
> Including StyleSheetReference, all ResourceReference's, etc?
>
> It seems that all our css and javascript references that are part of
> components are going through loading the session.
>
> thanks for any pointers on this as I'm really confused.
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior Question
meduolis wrote:
>
> Again, I can offer a hack :D
>
> public class DoSomeHackBehavior extends AbstractBehavior {
>
> private static final long serialVersionUID = 3554634545756435367L;
>
> @Override
> public void onComponentTag(Component component, ComponentTag tag) {
> FormComponent comp = (FormComponent) component;
> tag.getAttributes().remove("onblur");
> }
> }
>
> }
>
> after that, you can add this behaviour to any component
>
> component.add(new DoSomeHackBehaviour());
>
> :D
>
Thanks again. But unfortunately the onblur Ajax called survived.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior-Question-tp2968982p2990115.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Confused about Resource basics
Hi, I just realised that our session is getting loaded multiple times per web request. I see that aside from the page request the session is getting loaded for items such as css, js, etc that are referenced in the code. Now I'm trying to make sure I understand resources correctly in terms of session synchronization. I can;t find much documentation on that aside from the mention in SharedResources javadoc. Can someone correct me on this. But aside from SharedResrouces are all other types of resources sync'd with the session (ie its loaded)? Including StyleSheetReference, all ResourceReference's, etc? It seems that all our css and javascript references that are part of components are going through loading the session. thanks for any pointers on this as I'm really confused. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Testing concurrant updates on database
SOLVED!
I followed your advice and added an hidden field to the Page (this is much
simpler than my previous solution) but instead of using a Validator I made the
service layer catch OptimisticLockingFailureException (thrown by the ORM layer)
and rethrow a custom Exception.
Your advice on testing the Page using a single session works fine with the
realistic assumption that the lifecycle has not any "pitfall" and I'll adopt
this method.
Thanks a lot.
Good bye
Daniele Cremonini
-Original Message-
From: jcar...@carmanconsulting.com [mailto:jcar...@carmanconsulting.com] On
Behalf Of James Carman
Sent: 11 October 2010 10:09
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Testing concurrant updates on database
You're really not supposed to be monkeying with the version property
yourself. You're supposed to let the ORM provider do that. What I
would do is create a hidden field and put a validator on that. The
validator would check to make sure that the current version in the
database is the same as what you got when you read the record out
initially. You then just basically need to test that this works
properly (using mock objects for your DAOs). You can assume that the
database ORM provider's locking works property, or at least I would.
To make sure nobody turns off the optimistic locking in the future,
just add in a unit test case that validates that the optimistic
locking is turned on by checking the metadata.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:00 AM, CREMONINI Daniele
wrote:
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> I'm using Wicket 1.3.4.
>
> The optimistic locking is enabled for sure (the program has been written by
> me) and metadata and data confirm that things are actually functioning the
> way I thought.
>
> Because the Page contains a LoadableDetachableModel, every time I submit the
> page, Wicket reloads the object overwriting the version attribute.
> To workaround this behaviour I overridden the onBeforeRender method to save
> the version as soon as I open the page or refresh part of it:
>
> public class ExtraDataForm extends Form {
>
>
>
> �...@override
> protected void onBeforeRender() {
> setDataBaseVersion(getModelVersion());
> super.onBeforeRender();
> }
>
> }
>
> In order to update the version when saving I had to "force" the version into
> the extraDataNew object:
>
> add(new Button("btnSave") {
> �...@override
> public void onSubmit() {
> try {
> final ExtraDataNew extraDataNew =
> (ExtraDataNew)extraDataModel.getObject();
>
> extraDataNew.setVersion(getDataBaseVersion());
>
> edManager.saveExtraDataNew((ExtraDataNew)extraDataModel.getObject());
> info("Extra data saved.");
> } catch (Exception e) {
> log.error("Could not save: ",e);
> error(e.getMessage());
> }
> }
> });
>
> That's why I need to test the Page using two different sessions.
>
> Thanks
> Daniele Cremonini
>
> -Original Message-
> From: jcar...@carmanconsulting.com [mailto:jcar...@carmanconsulting.com] On
> Behalf Of James Carman
> Sent: 08 October 2010 12:13
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Testing concurrant updates on database
>
> What exactly are you trying to test? Are you trying to test the
> optimistic locking? You didn't write that. If you want to test that
> you actually have optimistic locking turned on, then you can do that
> by checking the metadata.
>
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:27 AM, CREMONINI Daniele
> wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> My problem is I have to test a Page that should prevent lost updates via
>> optimistic lock checking.
>>
>> I resolved the problem using JPA optimistic lock and if I use two different
>> browsers then the Page works in the desired way.
>>
>> The problem comes in the test phase: to emulate two concurrent sessions I
>> would instantiate two pages accessing to the same object (record) on the
>> database this way having two sessions that I will call A and B.
>> Then on the session A I update and save (everything is expected to be
>> correct), then on session B I update and save (an exception is expected to
>> be thrown).
>>
>> My approach might be
>>
>> final WicketTester.DummyWebApplication testWebApplication1 = new
>> WicketTester.DummyWebApplication() ...
>> final WicketTester.DummyWebApplication testWebApplication2 = new
>> WicketTester.DummyWebApplication() ...
>>
>> ...
>>
>> tester1 = new MyAppWicketTester(testWebApplication);
>> tester2 = new MyAppWicketTester(testWebApplication);
>>
>> tester1.startPage(new ITestPageSource() ...
>> tester2.startPage(
Re: chrome + wicket ajax + back button = problem?
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-923 for a solution. On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:31 -0500, "Ryan Crumley" wrote: > I have (I am using MixedParamHybridUrlCodingStrategy) however in this > case > the browser is not contacting the server on back button click so the > UrlCodingStrategy does not come into play. > > Ryan > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:13 PM, wrote: > > > I've had similar issues, have you tried HybridUrlCodingStrategy? > > > > > > > > Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely > > for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This > > communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure > > under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if > > you have received this communication in error and delete this email from > > your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not > > to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the > > contents of this information. > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: chrome + wicket ajax + back button = problem?
I have (I am using MixedParamHybridUrlCodingStrategy) however in this case the browser is not contacting the server on back button click so the UrlCodingStrategy does not come into play. Ryan On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:13 PM, wrote: > I've had similar issues, have you tried HybridUrlCodingStrategy? > > > > Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely > for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This > communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure > under State and/or Federal law. Please notify the sender immediately if > you have received this communication in error and delete this email from > your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested not > to disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on the > contents of this information.
Re: "Page Expired" page with PatternDateConverter
Yes, it works fine if we do not override the getConverter method. In
which case it behaves like a normal AjaxEditableLabel, as would be
expected, and we are using AjaxEditableLabel instances in many places in
our application.
- Hemant
On 10/11/2010 6:24 AM, Altuğ Bilgin Altıntaş wrote:
if you don't override IConverter then everything works fine ?
2010/10/11 Hemant Shah
Altuğ, thanks for responding.
There are no errors reported in the log. All the classes in the project are
serializable.
Could this be a bug?
Regards,
Hemant
On 10/10/2010 5:03 PM, Altuğ Bilgin Altıntaş wrote:
Did you look at Wicket's logs ?
Be sure serialization is done correctly.
2010/10/10 Hemant Shah
I am new to the Wicket framework and I hope I can get some help with a
problem I am facing.
I am using version 1.4.12.
I am overriding the AjaxEditableLabel class and its overridden
getConverter
method is at follows:
@Override
public IConverter. getConverter(Class type) {
return new PatternDateConverter("MM/dd/", true);
}
However, the first time in a session the component is updated, I get the
"Page Expired" message. The error results only when the getConverter
method
is called.
Note that this happens only the first time I access it in a session. If I
go to the home page and from there back to the page which contains the
component, it works without any problems.
I am not sure how to overcome this problem. I hope you guys can help.
Thanks.
- Hemant
Re: DropDownChoice loses Selection in Disabled Panels
Hi, yes exactly. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/DropDownChoice-loses-Selection-in-Disabled-Panels-tp2989677p2989706.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: DropDownChoice loses Selection in Disabled Panels
did you bind DropDownChoices with models (ex : PropertyModel) ? 2010/10/11 splitshade > > Hi, > > i have spent some time researching this strange behaviour. > I have a Page with some Panels, that contain DropDownChoices. > These Panels are initially disabled on the Page. > > If a validationError occurs on this page, ALL dropdownchoices that are in > disabled panels > lose their values. > > Is this a known Bug? an Implementation Issue? > > Some hints are greatly appreciated, thanks in advance. > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/DropDownChoice-loses-Selection-in-Disabled-Panels-tp2989677p2989677.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
DropDownChoice loses Selection in Disabled Panels
Hi, i have spent some time researching this strange behaviour. I have a Page with some Panels, that contain DropDownChoices. These Panels are initially disabled on the Page. If a validationError occurs on this page, ALL dropdownchoices that are in disabled panels lose their values. Is this a known Bug? an Implementation Issue? Some hints are greatly appreciated, thanks in advance. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/DropDownChoice-loses-Selection-in-Disabled-Panels-tp2989677p2989677.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: "Page Expired" page with PatternDateConverter
if you don't override IConverter then everything works fine ?
2010/10/11 Hemant Shah
> Altuğ, thanks for responding.
>
> There are no errors reported in the log. All the classes in the project are
> serializable.
>
> Could this be a bug?
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Hemant
>
>
>
> On 10/10/2010 5:03 PM, Altuğ Bilgin Altıntaş wrote:
>
>> Did you look at Wicket's logs ?
>>
>> Be sure serialization is done correctly.
>>
>> 2010/10/10 Hemant Shah
>>
>> I am new to the Wicket framework and I hope I can get some help with a
>>> problem I am facing.
>>>
>>> I am using version 1.4.12.
>>>
>>> I am overriding the AjaxEditableLabel class and its overridden
>>> getConverter
>>> method is at follows:
>>>
>>>@Override
>>>public IConverter. getConverter(Class type) {
>>>return new PatternDateConverter("MM/dd/", true);
>>>}
>>>
>>> However, the first time in a session the component is updated, I get the
>>> "Page Expired" message. The error results only when the getConverter
>>> method
>>> is called.
>>>
>>> Note that this happens only the first time I access it in a session. If I
>>> go to the home page and from there back to the page which contains the
>>> component, it works without any problems.
>>>
>>> I am not sure how to overcome this problem. I hope you guys can help.
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>> - Hemant
>>>
>>>
>>>
Re: ajax lazy suggestion box
No problem. Glad to help. Happy Wicketeering! On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Josh Kamau wrote: > Just did it. > > It worked just as i wanted. > > Thanks. > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Josh Kamau wrote: > >> Thanks James. >> >> Let me look at it. >> >> Seems like there is always an answer with wicket. >> >> Regards. >> Josh >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:35 AM, James Carman > > wrote: >> >>> The lookup functionality is provided by you. You can do whatever you >>> want with the input. Look at the example and implementation of the >>> getChoices() method. It would be trivial to change it to do a >>> "contains" rather than "startsWith" search. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Josh Kamau >>> wrote: >>> > I have looked at the autocomplete box that you have suggested. The issue >>> i >>> > have with it is that if i type some text that appears in the middle , it >>> > wont be looked up. If for example am looking for United Arabs Emirates, >>> i >>> > cant look up by typing Arabs. I have to start by typing United. get my >>> > point? >>> > >>> > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:24 AM, James Carman >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> >> It's called a auto-complete: >>> >> >>> >> http://wicketstuff.org/wicket14/ajax/autocomplete >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Josh Kamau >>> wrote: >>> >> > Hi Team, >>> >> > >>> >> > I am looking for a dropdown list that narrows down based on what is >>> typed >>> >> > and Loads the values from the database as the user types. Something >>> like >>> >> the >>> >> > dropdown in visural wicket >>> >> > http://wicket.visural.net/examples/app/dropdownbut doesnt preload >>> all >>> >> > the values. My other option is the create a Lookup >>> >> > value dialog box but i would like to avoid this . >>> >> > >>> >> > Any suggestion is welcome. >>> >> > >>> >> > Regards. >>> >> > Josh >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> - >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>> >>> >> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: ajax lazy suggestion box
Just did it. It worked just as i wanted. Thanks. On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Josh Kamau wrote: > Thanks James. > > Let me look at it. > > Seems like there is always an answer with wicket. > > Regards. > Josh > > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:35 AM, James Carman > wrote: > >> The lookup functionality is provided by you. You can do whatever you >> want with the input. Look at the example and implementation of the >> getChoices() method. It would be trivial to change it to do a >> "contains" rather than "startsWith" search. >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Josh Kamau >> wrote: >> > I have looked at the autocomplete box that you have suggested. The issue >> i >> > have with it is that if i type some text that appears in the middle , it >> > wont be looked up. If for example am looking for United Arabs Emirates, >> i >> > cant look up by typing Arabs. I have to start by typing United. get my >> > point? >> > >> > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:24 AM, James Carman >> > wrote: >> > >> >> It's called a auto-complete: >> >> >> >> http://wicketstuff.org/wicket14/ajax/autocomplete >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Josh Kamau >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Team, >> >> > >> >> > I am looking for a dropdown list that narrows down based on what is >> typed >> >> > and Loads the values from the database as the user types. Something >> like >> >> the >> >> > dropdown in visural wicket >> >> > http://wicket.visural.net/examples/app/dropdownbut doesnt preload >> all >> >> > the values. My other option is the create a Lookup >> >> > value dialog box but i would like to avoid this . >> >> > >> >> > Any suggestion is welcome. >> >> > >> >> > Regards. >> >> > Josh >> >> > >> >> >> >> - >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> >
Re: ajax lazy suggestion box
Thanks James. Let me look at it. Seems like there is always an answer with wicket. Regards. Josh On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:35 AM, James Carman wrote: > The lookup functionality is provided by you. You can do whatever you > want with the input. Look at the example and implementation of the > getChoices() method. It would be trivial to change it to do a > "contains" rather than "startsWith" search. > > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Josh Kamau wrote: > > I have looked at the autocomplete box that you have suggested. The issue > i > > have with it is that if i type some text that appears in the middle , it > > wont be looked up. If for example am looking for United Arabs Emirates, i > > cant look up by typing Arabs. I have to start by typing United. get my > > point? > > > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:24 AM, James Carman > > wrote: > > > >> It's called a auto-complete: > >> > >> http://wicketstuff.org/wicket14/ajax/autocomplete > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Josh Kamau > wrote: > >> > Hi Team, > >> > > >> > I am looking for a dropdown list that narrows down based on what is > typed > >> > and Loads the values from the database as the user types. Something > like > >> the > >> > dropdown in visural wicket > >> > http://wicket.visural.net/examples/app/dropdownbut doesnt preload all > >> > the values. My other option is the create a Lookup > >> > value dialog box but i would like to avoid this . > >> > > >> > Any suggestion is welcome. > >> > > >> > Regards. > >> > Josh > >> > > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
Re: ajax lazy suggestion box
The lookup functionality is provided by you. You can do whatever you want with the input. Look at the example and implementation of the getChoices() method. It would be trivial to change it to do a "contains" rather than "startsWith" search. On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Josh Kamau wrote: > I have looked at the autocomplete box that you have suggested. The issue i > have with it is that if i type some text that appears in the middle , it > wont be looked up. If for example am looking for United Arabs Emirates, i > cant look up by typing Arabs. I have to start by typing United. get my > point? > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:24 AM, James Carman > wrote: > >> It's called a auto-complete: >> >> http://wicketstuff.org/wicket14/ajax/autocomplete >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Josh Kamau wrote: >> > Hi Team, >> > >> > I am looking for a dropdown list that narrows down based on what is typed >> > and Loads the values from the database as the user types. Something like >> the >> > dropdown in visural wicket >> > http://wicket.visural.net/examples/app/dropdownbut doesnt preload all >> > the values. My other option is the create a Lookup >> > value dialog box but i would like to avoid this . >> > >> > Any suggestion is welcome. >> > >> > Regards. >> > Josh >> > >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: ajax lazy suggestion box
I have looked at the autocomplete box that you have suggested. The issue i have with it is that if i type some text that appears in the middle , it wont be looked up. If for example am looking for United Arabs Emirates, i cant look up by typing Arabs. I have to start by typing United. get my point? On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:24 AM, James Carman wrote: > It's called a auto-complete: > > http://wicketstuff.org/wicket14/ajax/autocomplete > > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Josh Kamau wrote: > > Hi Team, > > > > I am looking for a dropdown list that narrows down based on what is typed > > and Loads the values from the database as the user types. Something like > the > > dropdown in visural wicket > > http://wicket.visural.net/examples/app/dropdownbut doesnt preload all > > the values. My other option is the create a Lookup > > value dialog box but i would like to avoid this . > > > > Any suggestion is welcome. > > > > Regards. > > Josh > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
Re: ajax lazy suggestion box
It's called a auto-complete: http://wicketstuff.org/wicket14/ajax/autocomplete On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Josh Kamau wrote: > Hi Team, > > I am looking for a dropdown list that narrows down based on what is typed > and Loads the values from the database as the user types. Something like the > dropdown in visural wicket > http://wicket.visural.net/examples/app/dropdownbut doesnt preload all > the values. My other option is the create a Lookup > value dialog box but i would like to avoid this . > > Any suggestion is welcome. > > Regards. > Josh > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
ajax lazy suggestion box
Hi Team, I am looking for a dropdown list that narrows down based on what is typed and Loads the values from the database as the user types. Something like the dropdown in visural wicket http://wicket.visural.net/examples/app/dropdownbut doesnt preload all the values. My other option is the create a Lookup value dialog box but i would like to avoid this . Any suggestion is welcome. Regards. Josh
Re: Testing concurrant updates on database
You're really not supposed to be monkeying with the version property
yourself. You're supposed to let the ORM provider do that. What I
would do is create a hidden field and put a validator on that. The
validator would check to make sure that the current version in the
database is the same as what you got when you read the record out
initially. You then just basically need to test that this works
properly (using mock objects for your DAOs). You can assume that the
database ORM provider's locking works property, or at least I would.
To make sure nobody turns off the optimistic locking in the future,
just add in a unit test case that validates that the optimistic
locking is turned on by checking the metadata.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:00 AM, CREMONINI Daniele
wrote:
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> I'm using Wicket 1.3.4.
>
> The optimistic locking is enabled for sure (the program has been written by
> me) and metadata and data confirm that things are actually functioning the
> way I thought.
>
> Because the Page contains a LoadableDetachableModel, every time I submit the
> page, Wicket reloads the object overwriting the version attribute.
> To workaround this behaviour I overridden the onBeforeRender method to save
> the version as soon as I open the page or refresh part of it:
>
> public class ExtraDataForm extends Form {
>
>
>
> �...@override
> protected void onBeforeRender() {
> setDataBaseVersion(getModelVersion());
> super.onBeforeRender();
> }
>
> }
>
> In order to update the version when saving I had to "force" the version into
> the extraDataNew object:
>
> add(new Button("btnSave") {
> �...@override
> public void onSubmit() {
> try {
> final ExtraDataNew extraDataNew =
> (ExtraDataNew)extraDataModel.getObject();
>
> extraDataNew.setVersion(getDataBaseVersion());
>
> edManager.saveExtraDataNew((ExtraDataNew)extraDataModel.getObject());
> info("Extra data saved.");
> } catch (Exception e) {
> log.error("Could not save: ",e);
> error(e.getMessage());
> }
> }
> });
>
> That's why I need to test the Page using two different sessions.
>
> Thanks
> Daniele Cremonini
>
> -Original Message-
> From: jcar...@carmanconsulting.com [mailto:jcar...@carmanconsulting.com] On
> Behalf Of James Carman
> Sent: 08 October 2010 12:13
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Testing concurrant updates on database
>
> What exactly are you trying to test? Are you trying to test the
> optimistic locking? You didn't write that. If you want to test that
> you actually have optimistic locking turned on, then you can do that
> by checking the metadata.
>
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:27 AM, CREMONINI Daniele
> wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> My problem is I have to test a Page that should prevent lost updates via
>> optimistic lock checking.
>>
>> I resolved the problem using JPA optimistic lock and if I use two different
>> browsers then the Page works in the desired way.
>>
>> The problem comes in the test phase: to emulate two concurrent sessions I
>> would instantiate two pages accessing to the same object (record) on the
>> database this way having two sessions that I will call A and B.
>> Then on the session A I update and save (everything is expected to be
>> correct), then on session B I update and save (an exception is expected to
>> be thrown).
>>
>> My approach might be
>>
>> final WicketTester.DummyWebApplication testWebApplication1 = new
>> WicketTester.DummyWebApplication() ...
>> final WicketTester.DummyWebApplication testWebApplication2 = new
>> WicketTester.DummyWebApplication() ...
>>
>> ...
>>
>> tester1 = new MyAppWicketTester(testWebApplication);
>> tester2 = new MyAppWicketTester(testWebApplication);
>>
>> tester1.startPage(new ITestPageSource() ...
>> tester2.startPage(new ITestPageSource() ...
>>
>> but as soon as run the complete set of test anything "blow up".
>>
>> Do you have any suggestion?
>> Thanks
>> Daniele Cremonini
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
> __
> This message has been scanned for viruses.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
Re: Customizing the Datepicker for a background mask
Hello all, Have anyone tried to resolve this issue with wicket datepicker earlier?... Any suggestions regarding how to proceed are also welcome. Thanks in advance, Amigo -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Customizing-the-Datepicker-for-a-background-mask-tp2967939p2989358.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
RE: Testing concurrant updates on database
Thank you for your reply.
I'm using Wicket 1.3.4.
The optimistic locking is enabled for sure (the program has been written by me)
and metadata and data confirm that things are actually functioning the way I
thought.
Because the Page contains a LoadableDetachableModel, every time I submit the
page, Wicket reloads the object overwriting the version attribute.
To workaround this behaviour I overridden the onBeforeRender method to save the
version as soon as I open the page or refresh part of it:
public class ExtraDataForm extends Form {
@Override
protected void onBeforeRender() {
setDataBaseVersion(getModelVersion());
super.onBeforeRender();
}
}
In order to update the version when saving I had to "force" the version into
the extraDataNew object:
add(new Button("btnSave") {
@Override
public void onSubmit() {
try {
final ExtraDataNew extraDataNew =
(ExtraDataNew)extraDataModel.getObject();
extraDataNew.setVersion(getDataBaseVersion());
edManager.saveExtraDataNew((ExtraDataNew)extraDataModel.getObject());
info("Extra data saved.");
} catch (Exception e) {
log.error("Could not save: ",e);
error(e.getMessage());
}
}
});
That's why I need to test the Page using two different sessions.
Thanks
Daniele Cremonini
-Original Message-
From: jcar...@carmanconsulting.com [mailto:jcar...@carmanconsulting.com] On
Behalf Of James Carman
Sent: 08 October 2010 12:13
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Testing concurrant updates on database
What exactly are you trying to test? Are you trying to test the
optimistic locking? You didn't write that. If you want to test that
you actually have optimistic locking turned on, then you can do that
by checking the metadata.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:27 AM, CREMONINI Daniele
wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> My problem is I have to test a Page that should prevent lost updates via
> optimistic lock checking.
>
> I resolved the problem using JPA optimistic lock and if I use two different
> browsers then the Page works in the desired way.
>
> The problem comes in the test phase: to emulate two concurrent sessions I
> would instantiate two pages accessing to the same object (record) on the
> database this way having two sessions that I will call A and B.
> Then on the session A I update and save (everything is expected to be
> correct), then on session B I update and save (an exception is expected to be
> thrown).
>
> My approach might be
>
> final WicketTester.DummyWebApplication testWebApplication1 = new
> WicketTester.DummyWebApplication() ...
> final WicketTester.DummyWebApplication testWebApplication2 = new
> WicketTester.DummyWebApplication() ...
>
> ...
>
> tester1 = new MyAppWicketTester(testWebApplication);
> tester2 = new MyAppWicketTester(testWebApplication);
>
> tester1.startPage(new ITestPageSource() ...
> tester2.startPage(new ITestPageSource() ...
>
> but as soon as run the complete set of test anything "blow up".
>
> Do you have any suggestion?
> Thanks
> Daniele Cremonini
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
__
This message has been scanned for viruses.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
