Re: Wicket-Hibernate Related LazyInitializationException
Hi James
Thanks for the time. I use the CPM for the whole use case. Mmm..is LDM
mandatory for such a use case? Am open for thoughts just want the best way
to implement it.
Can you explain a bit further what your thought was please?
Thank you
Regards
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:13 PM, James Carman wrote:
> Just make sure your form's model is a LDM too.
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Nivedan Nadaraj
> wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > I am guessing this is more of a Hibernate thing/issue but if some one has
> > encountered this and has a explanation that I can probably use from the
> > Wicket front would be great.
> >
> > https://forum.hibernate.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1008473
> >
> >
> > I have a LazyIntializationException when i page through some items. I use
> > the PageableListView, the List item(s) are entities that are retrieved
> via
> > an association Person.phones which is a Set type.
> > The funny thing is, the LIException is intermittent. I am also using
> > OpenSessionInViewFilter. Any thoughts?
> >
> > By the way the this is the load() implemenation, I have set the Model
> > Object's phoneList with a list of values fetched via the Service->DAO. I
> > have used this with other entities without association and it works but
> I
> > guess is a different scenario(not associations)
> >
> > Model = new LoadableDetachableModel() {
> >@Override
> >protected Object load() {
> >return containerForm.getModelObject().getPhoneList();
> >}
> >};
> > }
> >
> > If someone has any thoughts would appreiciate hearing from you.
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
Re: Wicket-Hibernate Related LazyInitializationException
Hi Dan,
Thanks for your time most appreciated.
1. Option 1 as you may agree, not always is a good thing to do so I would
drop that.
2. Option 2 - I have tried this in the following manner.
As part of the look up for the Subjects via the DAO, I iterate through the
list of Person.Phones collection and assign them into a Collection
and set it into a value Object with has a List. This is because i cannot use
the Set in the PageableListView. In doing so, I have forced the entities in
the collection/proxy to be intialised isn't it? Looks like even with this it
beats me.
3. Option 3 - I have to read up more on how I can use this code/or something
similar, we use Spring for DI.
Further, each time I want to view a Person detail, I do a second look up
when the user clicks from a list of Persons. I send issue a lookup into the
DAO to get the Person's details afresh(the exact same method I used to list
all Subjects in the first place), so this again would have refreshed the
Phones collection on the Person in context.
I will try to track it down I guess it has to do with session anyway. I also
use the CPM to hold the Model for the whole page. Not a LDM.
Thanks again for the time
Cheers
Niv
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Dan Retzlaff wrote:
> Hi Nivedan,
>
> Even though the subsequent requests have a Session open, the entities with
> the uninitialized collections don't know about it. I'm sure if you track it
> down, you can explain the "intermittent" behavior by prior access to the
> collection when the original session is open.
>
> I'd say you can either (1) configure Hibernate to load the collections to
> load unlazily, (2) manually access the collections to force them to
> initialize in the specific cases you're encountering LIEs, or (3) employ
> some kind of AOP hack to reinject the new session right before the
> collection is accessed. They're all kind of ugly, and I've never heard of
> anyone else doing the last, but it's been working well for my team.
>
> For your reference, here is the AspectJ aspect I wrote. (We use Guice for
> dependency injection.)
>
> /**
> * Reattaches entities whose lazy collections are about to be initialized
> *
> * Can we keep track of all lazy relationships that get initialized, and
> * uninitialize them at the end of the request? This would prevent
> referenced
> * entities from being serialized and replicated (unless separate
> references
> * were created to them).
> *
> * @author dan
> */
> @Aspect
> public class ReattachAspect {
> private static final Logger LOG = Logger.getLogger(ReattachAspect.class);
>
> private Provider sessionProvider;
>
> @Before("call(public final void
> org.hibernate.proxy.AbstractLazyInitializer.initialize()) &&
> target(initializer)")
> public void reattachLazyInitializer(LazyInitializer initializer) {
> if (initializer.getSession() == null && sessionProvider != null) {
> if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
> LOG.debug("reattaching session to lazy initializer for " +
> initializer.getEntityName());
> }
> Session session = sessionProvider.get();
> initializer.setSession((SessionImplementor) session);
> }
> }
>
> @Before("call(private void
> org.hibernate.collection.AbstractPersistentCollection"
> + ".throwLazyInitializationExceptionIfNotConnected()) &&
> target(collection)")
> public void reattachPersistentCollection(PersistentCollection collection) {
> SessionImplementor session = ((AbstractPersistentCollection)
> collection).getSession();
> if ((session == null || !session.isOpen()) && sessionProvider != null) {
> if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
> LOG.debug("reattaching session to collection");
> }
>
> session = (SessionImplementor) sessionProvider.get();
> CollectionPersister persister =
> session.getFactory().getCollectionPersister(collection.getRole());
>
> collection.setCurrentSession(session);
> session.getPersistenceContext().addInitializedDetachedCollection(persister,
> collection);
> }
> }
>
> @Inject
> public void setSessionProvider(Provider sessionProvider) {
> this.sessionProvider = sessionProvider;
> }
> }
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Nivedan Nadaraj >wrote:
>
> > Hi All
> >
> > I am guessing this is more of a Hibernate thing/issue but if some one has
> > encountered this and has a explanation that I can probably use from the
> > Wicket front would be great.
> >
> > https://forum.hibernate.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1008473
> >
> >
> > I have a LazyIntializationException when i page through some items. I use
> > the PageableListView, the List item(s) are entities that are retrieved
> via
> > an association Person.phones which is a Set type.
> > The funny thing is, the LIException is intermittent. I am also using
> > OpenSessionInViewFilter. Any thoughts?
> >
> > By the way the this is the load() implemenation, I have set the Model
> > Object's phoneList with a list of values fetched via the Service->DAO. I
> > have used this with other entities without association and it works but
> I
> > guess is a different scenario(not
Re: Wicket-Hibernate Related LazyInitializationException
Just make sure your form's model is a LDM too.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Nivedan Nadaraj wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I am guessing this is more of a Hibernate thing/issue but if some one has
> encountered this and has a explanation that I can probably use from the
> Wicket front would be great.
>
> https://forum.hibernate.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1008473
>
>
> I have a LazyIntializationException when i page through some items. I use
> the PageableListView, the List item(s) are entities that are retrieved via
> an association Person.phones which is a Set type.
> The funny thing is, the LIException is intermittent. I am also using
> OpenSessionInViewFilter. Any thoughts?
>
> By the way the this is the load() implemenation, I have set the Model
> Object's phoneList with a list of values fetched via the Service->DAO. I
> have used this with other entities without association and it works but I
> guess is a different scenario(not associations)
>
> Model = new LoadableDetachableModel() {
> �...@override
> protected Object load() {
> return containerForm.getModelObject().getPhoneList();
> }
> };
> }
>
> If someone has any thoughts would appreiciate hearing from you.
>
>
> Cheers
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket-Hibernate Related LazyInitializationException
Hi Nivedan,
Even though the subsequent requests have a Session open, the entities with
the uninitialized collections don't know about it. I'm sure if you track it
down, you can explain the "intermittent" behavior by prior access to the
collection when the original session is open.
I'd say you can either (1) configure Hibernate to load the collections to
load unlazily, (2) manually access the collections to force them to
initialize in the specific cases you're encountering LIEs, or (3) employ
some kind of AOP hack to reinject the new session right before the
collection is accessed. They're all kind of ugly, and I've never heard of
anyone else doing the last, but it's been working well for my team.
For your reference, here is the AspectJ aspect I wrote. (We use Guice for
dependency injection.)
/**
* Reattaches entities whose lazy collections are about to be initialized
*
* Can we keep track of all lazy relationships that get initialized, and
* uninitialize them at the end of the request? This would prevent
referenced
* entities from being serialized and replicated (unless separate references
* were created to them).
*
* @author dan
*/
@Aspect
public class ReattachAspect {
private static final Logger LOG = Logger.getLogger(ReattachAspect.class);
private Provider sessionProvider;
@Before("call(public final void
org.hibernate.proxy.AbstractLazyInitializer.initialize()) &&
target(initializer)")
public void reattachLazyInitializer(LazyInitializer initializer) {
if (initializer.getSession() == null && sessionProvider != null) {
if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
LOG.debug("reattaching session to lazy initializer for " +
initializer.getEntityName());
}
Session session = sessionProvider.get();
initializer.setSession((SessionImplementor) session);
}
}
@Before("call(private void
org.hibernate.collection.AbstractPersistentCollection"
+ ".throwLazyInitializationExceptionIfNotConnected()) &&
target(collection)")
public void reattachPersistentCollection(PersistentCollection collection) {
SessionImplementor session = ((AbstractPersistentCollection)
collection).getSession();
if ((session == null || !session.isOpen()) && sessionProvider != null) {
if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
LOG.debug("reattaching session to collection");
}
session = (SessionImplementor) sessionProvider.get();
CollectionPersister persister =
session.getFactory().getCollectionPersister(collection.getRole());
collection.setCurrentSession(session);
session.getPersistenceContext().addInitializedDetachedCollection(persister,
collection);
}
}
@Inject
public void setSessionProvider(Provider sessionProvider) {
this.sessionProvider = sessionProvider;
}
}
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Nivedan Nadaraj wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I am guessing this is more of a Hibernate thing/issue but if some one has
> encountered this and has a explanation that I can probably use from the
> Wicket front would be great.
>
> https://forum.hibernate.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1008473
>
>
> I have a LazyIntializationException when i page through some items. I use
> the PageableListView, the List item(s) are entities that are retrieved via
> an association Person.phones which is a Set type.
> The funny thing is, the LIException is intermittent. I am also using
> OpenSessionInViewFilter. Any thoughts?
>
> By the way the this is the load() implemenation, I have set the Model
> Object's phoneList with a list of values fetched via the Service->DAO. I
> have used this with other entities without association and it works but I
> guess is a different scenario(not associations)
>
> Model = new LoadableDetachableModel() {
>@Override
>protected Object load() {
>return containerForm.getModelObject().getPhoneList();
>}
>};
> }
>
> If someone has any thoughts would appreiciate hearing from you.
>
>
> Cheers
>
Wicket-Hibernate Related LazyInitializationException
Hi All
I am guessing this is more of a Hibernate thing/issue but if some one has
encountered this and has a explanation that I can probably use from the
Wicket front would be great.
https://forum.hibernate.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1008473
I have a LazyIntializationException when i page through some items. I use
the PageableListView, the List item(s) are entities that are retrieved via
an association Person.phones which is a Set type.
The funny thing is, the LIException is intermittent. I am also using
OpenSessionInViewFilter. Any thoughts?
By the way the this is the load() implemenation, I have set the Model
Object's phoneList with a list of values fetched via the Service->DAO. I
have used this with other entities without association and it works but I
guess is a different scenario(not associations)
Model = new LoadableDetachableModel() {
@Override
protected Object load() {
return containerForm.getModelObject().getPhoneList();
}
};
}
If someone has any thoughts would appreiciate hearing from you.
Cheers
Data Sharing with InlineFrame Pages
Hello, I have a page with an embedded InlineFrame which is used to submit a multipart form. I would like the InlineFrame's page to share a model object with the parent page. This way the parent page can control the workflow after the form is submitted. However, something is preventing model changes made during the form submission from being visible in subsequent requests to the parent page. My guess is that issue stems from the way in which the child page (with its reference to the parent page) is being serialized into the page store because the subsequent parent requests see the *unmodified*model object. Further confusing me is the fact that I use the same upload panel with the InlineFrame in two different pages, and in one of the two the model change * is* seen by the parent. I'm no PageMap expert, but I debugged into Session enough to see that the page versions are the same between the form submission request and the subsequent parent page request in both cases. There is obviously some gotcha that I've stumbled into on one page and not the other. Can anyone decipher what may be going on? Or recommend a best practice for sharing data with an embedded iframe page? I am using Wicket 1.4.13. Thanks, Dan
Problem on wicket-auth-role ve Spring-security integration
Hi, I'm trying to integrate Wicket-auth-roles 1.4.9 and Spring Security 3.0.4 by following https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/spring-security-and-wicket-auth-roles.html. @AuthorizeAction and @AuthorizeInstantiation annotations are not working. The blog says " The only filter we need defined from Acegi is the HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter. This filter will ensure that the SecurityContext is transported to and from the HttpSession onto the Thread context. All authorization is delegated to the wicket-auth-roles module which uses Annotations (@AuthorizeInstantiation)." So how can I make configuration to provide this?
Re: [OT] Plugin WicketForge 0.8.1 available for IDEA 9+
Thanks guys! I'm glad you like it... It's nice to get some positive feedback... :-) PS: ok, next time i will post it as [ANN] ;-) -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/OT-Plugin-WicketForge-0-8-1-available-for-IDEA-9-tp3066018p3068223.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
webapp shutdown listeners
Hi, is there a generic way to add one or multiple wicket app shutdown listener to a wicket application instance without having to override the onDestroy method and roll my own listener registration code? Regards, Seb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Dynamically loading image
Thanks for the help guys.
I've got it all working correctly now. For other people's future reference.
I think this is the page that Igor was referring to which I pretty much
copied : https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/uploaddownload.html
I am retrieving the images from a db as a byte array
//heres a simplified version of my code. Hope this helps someone!
//this is the class that serves up the images
public class ImageResource extends DynamicWebResource {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
public ImageResource() {
super();
}
@Override
protected ResourceState getResourceState() {
ValueMap params = getParameters();
String id = params.getString("id");
if (id.equals("image1")) {
//show image 1
return new ResourceState() {
@Override
public byte[] getData() {
//get the image1 from server
return image;
}
@Override
public String getContentType() {
return "image/jpeg";
}
}
} else (id.equals("image2")) {
//show image 2
return new ResourceState() {
@Override
public byte[] getData() {
//get the image2 from server
return image;
}
@Override
public String getContentType() {
return "image/jpeg";
}
}
}
}
}
//this is how I access the image from wicket
add(new Label("profileImage", "") {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
protected void onComponentTag(ComponentTag tag) {
ResourceReference imageResource = new
ResourceReference("imageResource");
tag.put("src",
RequestUtils.toAbsolutePath(getRequestCycle().urlFor(imageResource).toString())+"?id=image1");
super.onComponentTag(tag);
}
});
//and this needs to be added to the wicket application init method
getSharedResources().add("imageResource", new ImageResource());
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Dynamically-loading-image-tp3064795p3068044.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: WebMarkupContainer issue
issue solved - I found another place in the code I was referencing the panel from the page itself directly, not via the WebMarkupContainer. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/WebMarkupContainer-issue-tp3063886p3067980.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
DropDownChoice with tooltip
I needed tooltip functionality on a dropdownchoice component and I have a work around but it involved copying a bunch of existing code because I couldn't figure out an easy way to add "title" to an html select->option. The IChoiceRenderer passed into the DropDownChoice only has getter/setters for Value and id. It would have been nice for the AbstractChoice to call getToolTip or loop through behaviors at the "option" level in the AbstractChoice.appendOptionHtml() function, this would allow us to override the html output a little easier. Is there a better way to do this? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/DropDownChoice-with-tooltip-tp3067946p3067946.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Logout (Session destroy) on the last (stateful) page?
Does the redirect to the home page happen because of Wicket's default render strategy (REDIRECT_TO_BUFFER) that causes two requests? You invalidate session on the first which redirects to the buffered response. When the second request comes in expecting to get the already-rendered response, you get a new session. On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Martin Makundi < martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote: > Hi! > > I am curious too. For this reason we had to build our logoutpage so > that it invalidtes session logically but not in httpsession sense. > > Only clicking something from login page will do that. > > But it's a hack, I would like to know what's the proper way ;) > > ** > Martin > > > > 2010/12/1 Matthias Keller : > > Hi > > > > I've got the following problem: > > After a user completes a wizard, he sees a last confirmation page > containing > > some data, thus it must be a stateful page called by the following code > from > > the wizard: > >> > >> setResponsePage(new ConfirmationPage(myBean)); > > > > This ConfirmationPage must only be displayed once, thus if the user does > a > > refresh it must not be available anymore. > > I expected that I would be able to call session.invalidate() from > somewhere > > within the ConfirmationPage's onAfterRender or onDetach methods. > > Unfortunately, whenever I do this, the user is automatically redirected > to > > the home page without a trace in the logs > > Any idea how to do that? > > > > Thanks > > > > Matt > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
Re: wicket question
after doing some thinking I tried removing the form here is my solution http://www.mypage.com";> I can now pass my values from the wicket session to the form and the action is not over written by wicket. problem solved. thanks for the input guys. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-question-tp3067609p3067802.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
common links
all my pages extend from BasePage, this page has some links which are common to all pages , right now I am creating these Ajax and non Ajax Links everytime the sub class page is instantiated by calling super. instead of creating them every time can I create them only once and add these Links ? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/common-links-tp3067767p3067767.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket question
Simply put them there with a Label. Regards, Erik. Op 01-12-10 18:26, 96silvia write: the problem is the hidden input values are coming from a wicket session. so if I use a non wicket form how do I get the values from a wicket session to the non wicket form? -- Erik van Oosten http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: component not visible exception
We don't override isVisible() and we don't call setVisible() on the save button. But we do on the container. The container starts off hidden and an AjaxTimer is used to set it visible. On Nov 30, 2010, at 1:57 AM, Matthias Keller wrote: > One other thing to check is, do you have a custom isVisible() override in the > container or do you explicitly set it to visible/invisible using setVisible()? > If the former, this logic will usually be re-evaluated upon form submission > and if that logic depends on some state which might change upon submission, > you might get exactly that error. > > Matt > > On 2010-11-29 20:21, Igor Vaynberg wrote: >> another possibility, if this page is using hybrid url coding strategy, >> is that the session expires and the form is submitted against a new >> instance of the page - where the button is not visible. >> >> -igor >> >> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Douglas Ferguson >> wrote: >>> The problem is that I can't recreate this error, but I see it in production >>> alot. >>> >>> So I have no way of looking at the action url. >>> >>> D/ >>> >>> >>> On Nov 29, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote: >>> easy. the form's action url points to a version of the page where the button is not visible. so when the button is clicked and the form is submitted wicket rolls back the version of the page to one where button is not visible and you get the error. not sure that is what is happening in your app, but its one possible explanation. look at form's url and make sure none of your ajax actions are changing the page version. -igor On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Douglas Ferguson wrote: > We do toggle the visibility of the web markup container that contains the > button. > > Here's how it works. > > 1) Page loads and the container is hidden > 2) An ajax timer is used to watch for state to change > 3) When state changes we make the container visible (which then makes the > submit button visible) > > How could they user manage to click on the save button when is it not > visible? > > The only thing I can think of is that this could be some back button > issue. > But then again, I'm not sure how that would manifest... > > D/ > > On Nov 29, 2010, at 11:25 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote: > >> in order for component to be visible all of its parents have to be >> visible from the page down to the component. same for the enabled >> state. >> >> -igor >> >> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Douglas Ferguson >> wrote: >>> Hmm... even if we aren't changing the visibility of the button? >>> >>> On Nov 29, 2010, at 10:42 AM, Marco Mancini wrote: >>> try to set mybutton.setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag(true); bye marco 2010/11/29 Martin Grigorov > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Douglas Ferguson< > doug...@douglasferguson.us> wrote: > >> We have not overridden isVisible, nor have we do we have a popup >> modal. >> That's why I was asking if this could be a back button issue. >> >> The only thing we do is set the button enabled. Could this be the >> problem >> even thought he message it talking about visibility? >> > No. There is a separate check for enabled state. It is definitely for > visibility. > >> D/ >> >> On Nov 29, 2010, at 3:15 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote: >> >>> Here is another scenario: >>> >>> Ajax request sets the visibility of the submit button (or its >>> parent) > to >>> false but forgets to repaint the button so it is still visible for >>> the >> user. >>> Then the user clicks on this button, it fires and then the backend > shows >>> this message - the button is invisible so it cannot be clicked. >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Chris Colman >>> wrote: >>> A back button where? The form is on a page and has a submit button only. If there is an > error a ModalWindow pops up - it only has an OK button which is meant to > make the ModalWindow simply disappear and thus re-enable the page beneath - the one with the form on it. Chris > -Original Message- > From: Douglas Ferguson [mailto:doug...@douglasferguson.us] > Sent: Monday, 29 November 2010 6:53 PM > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Subject: Re: component not visible exception > > Could this be happening because of the b
Re: Logout (Session destroy) on the last (stateful) page?
Hi! I am curious too. For this reason we had to build our logoutpage so that it invalidtes session logically but not in httpsession sense. Only clicking something from login page will do that. But it's a hack, I would like to know what's the proper way ;) ** Martin 2010/12/1 Matthias Keller : > Hi > > I've got the following problem: > After a user completes a wizard, he sees a last confirmation page containing > some data, thus it must be a stateful page called by the following code from > the wizard: >> >> setResponsePage(new ConfirmationPage(myBean)); > > This ConfirmationPage must only be displayed once, thus if the user does a > refresh it must not be available anymore. > I expected that I would be able to call session.invalidate() from somewhere > within the ConfirmationPage's onAfterRender or onDetach methods. > Unfortunately, whenever I do this, the user is automatically redirected to > the home page without a trace in the logs > Any idea how to do that? > > Thanks > > Matt > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Logout (Session destroy) on the last (stateful) page?
Hi I've got the following problem: After a user completes a wizard, he sees a last confirmation page containing some data, thus it must be a stateful page called by the following code from the wizard: setResponsePage(new ConfirmationPage(myBean)); This ConfirmationPage must only be displayed once, thus if the user does a refresh it must not be available anymore. I expected that I would be able to call session.invalidate() from somewhere within the ConfirmationPage's onAfterRender or onDetach methods. Unfortunately, whenever I do this, the user is automatically redirected to the home page without a trace in the logs Any idea how to do that? Thanks Matt smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: wicket question
I see your problem... In my case I am posting from a simple form (no validation
or pre-populated values) that just needs to pass the parameters to my wicket
form on a secure page.
So.. it is back to your main question, how to stop the wicket form from posting
to itself, but to get it to post to different url.
You could try something suggested by Igor
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/RelativePathPrefixHandler-and-form-quot-action-quot-attributes-td1867803.html
override oncomponenttag() of the form and call super followed by
tag.put("action", "whateverurl");
-igor
-
On 01 Dec 2010, at 12:26 PM, 96silvia wrote:
>
> the problem is the hidden input values are coming from a wicket session. so
> if I use a non wicket form how do I get the values from a wicket session to
> the non wicket form?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-question-tp3067609p3067719.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket question
the problem is the hidden input values are coming from a wicket session. so if I use a non wicket form how do I get the values from a wicket session to the non wicket form? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-question-tp3067609p3067719.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket question
there is nothing wrong with the wicket form. what is wrong is when wicket renders the page it replaces the form action that I have (which is a url ) with wicket "?wicket:interface=:17:opcForward::IFormSubmitListener::" this isn't what I want to have happen. the action needs to be the url -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-question-tp3067609p3067716.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket question
Hi. What's wrong with wicket's form? Best regards, Alexander. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket question
I took a look at the site and I have started implementing something similar. I use a normal non-wicket form on the home page that posts to my mounted wicket page with the login form on it. I mounted my login registration page to "memberRegistration" User Password http://croptrak.emalan.com/Home -- Eugene On 01 Dec 2010, at 11:23 AM, 96silvia wrote: > > I have this wicket form I want to use wicket to pass the phone number and > contact email. > > > http://www.mypage.com";> > > > > > > my question is my java code passes the correct parameters for the phone > number and the contact email. > but overwrites the form action and places > "wicket:interface=:10:opcForward::IFormSubmitListener::" I don't want this > to happen I need to post these values to www.mypage.com > > is there a way to do this? > I am using wicket 1.4.5, jdk6 > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-question-tp3067609p3067609.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Cache HTML output of a page
cache your business logic. wicket rendering is pretty fast, i doubt that is your bottleneck. -igor On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:03 AM, andrea.castello wrote: > > Hi, > > is there a way to get the HTML output of a page component and cache it > somewhere (ie: a custom cache or and Ehcache object or somethink similar? > > I need to pre-cache HTML in order to speed up the page rendering on Ajax > requests. > > Thanks you, > > Andrea > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Cache-HTML-output-of-a-page-tp3067050p3067050.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
wicket question
I have this wicket form I want to use wicket to pass the phone number and contact email. http://www.mypage.com";> my question is my java code passes the correct parameters for the phone number and the contact email. but overwrites the form action and places "wicket:interface=:10:opcForward::IFormSubmitListener::" I don't want this to happen I need to post these values to www.mypage.com is there a way to do this? I am using wicket 1.4.5, jdk6 -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-question-tp3067609p3067609.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: [OT] Plugin WicketForge 0.8.1 available for IDEA 9+
On Dec 1, 2010, at 4:43 AM, Paul Szulc wrote: > this is definitely not off topic :) Have to agree 110%. The IntelliJ experience is made whole with this plugin. Congrats guys, and thanks for all the work! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Feedback panel on modal window
Hi, I have one model window with a panel atached. I added a validator to one form in model window. But when I try to submit I can't show errors. Whatching the console I found it: "WARN - WebSession - Component-targetted feedback message was left unrendered. This could be because you are missing a FeedbackPanel on the page." I have a feedback panel on page, however I would like to have another one on modal window. But now I'm not getting any kind of message. Thanks Tito
Updating DataTable help
I have a DataTable that lists the file names of a user as stored on the
database. Once these are listed, the user has an option to upload/delete files
and displaying the names of the files on the table (before I even update the
database, similar to the way Multi Upload field works).
At the moment I am using ajax call backs on the upload file to try to update
the list that controls the datatable (this is not working)
So on:
void respond (final AjaxRequestTarget target)
{
// I add more items to the list
}
Is this the correct approach to do this or is there a better alternative?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket 1.4.14 and WiQuery Tabs
This is from another thread but it sounds like the devs have found the problem (and a fix). I'm hopeful anyway! http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r1031432-wicket-branches-wicket-1-4-x-wicket-src-main-java-org-apache-wicket-ajax-Ajaxa-tt3067178.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: AjaxButton + Form
That sounds strange. AjaxButton implements IFormSubmittingComponent interface, hence it should first invoke its onsubmit method and then parent form's onSubmit (as described in Form class JavaDoc). Is your AjaxButton inside form's hierarchy? It is public final void onFormSubmitted() No, Form#onSubmit is not called at all. After successful execution of internal submission trace proceed to AjaxButton#onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget target, Form form) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket 1.4.14 > Bug with panels updated by Ajax rendering a CSS
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r1031432-wicket-branches-wicket-1-4-x-wicket-src-main-java-org-apache-wicket-ajax-Ajaxa-tt3067178.html Ernesto On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Brad Grier wrote: > Let me know how it goes. I can't help but think this bug is related to the > problem I'm seeing. > > -Original Message- From: Antoine Angénieux > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 7:05 AM > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Subject: Re: Wicket 1.4.14 > Bug with panels updated by Ajax rendering a CSS > > Nobody has any idea on the subject ? > > OK, I'll come up with a quickstart this WE ! > > Cheers, > > Antoine. > > Le 29/11/2010 15:42, Antoine Angenieux a écrit : >> >> Hi all, >> >> I have just upgraded my dev environment from Wicket 1.4.13 to 1.4.14 >> this morning and discovered a bug related to CSS. >> >> On a page, I have a panel containing a listview, itself populated with >> panels that have in their constructor: >> add(CSSPackageResource.getHeaderContribution(CSS)); >> >> When browsing to this page, the listview is initially empty. When the >> panel is updated by an Ajax Link making the listview model list not >> empty, the list view contents are rendered, but the CSS is not (and the >> reference to the css script does not appear in the Wicket Ajax Debug >> Window), and thus the presentation is all messed up. >> >> I just downgraded back to Wicket 1.4.13, and all is fine. >> >> I don't have time to prepare a Quickstart yet, but if anyone who has >> been fixing bugs on Wicket 1.4.14 has a brilliant intuition on what can >> cause this regression, it would be great ;) >> >> Otherwise, I'll try to find sometime later this week to file a JIRA >> issue with a Quickstart. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Antoine. >> >> > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket 1.4.14 > Bug with panels updated by Ajax rendering a CSS
Hi Brad, I think Johan Compagner has found the issue, see the thread in dev list started a few hours ago: svn commit: r1031432 - /wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/ajax/AjaxRequestTarget.java It looks like this is all related to that commit. I'll be waiting for Wicket 1.4.15 before upgrading my current applications from Wicket 1.4.13. Cheers, Antoine. Le 01/12/2010 15:01, Brad Grier a écrit : Let me know how it goes. I can't help but think this bug is related to the problem I'm seeing. -Original Message- From: Antoine Angénieux Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 7:05 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Wicket 1.4.14 > Bug with panels updated by Ajax rendering a CSS Nobody has any idea on the subject ? OK, I'll come up with a quickstart this WE ! Cheers, Antoine. Le 29/11/2010 15:42, Antoine Angenieux a écrit : Hi all, I have just upgraded my dev environment from Wicket 1.4.13 to 1.4.14 this morning and discovered a bug related to CSS. On a page, I have a panel containing a listview, itself populated with panels that have in their constructor: add(CSSPackageResource.getHeaderContribution(CSS)); When browsing to this page, the listview is initially empty. When the panel is updated by an Ajax Link making the listview model list not empty, the list view contents are rendered, but the CSS is not (and the reference to the css script does not appear in the Wicket Ajax Debug Window), and thus the presentation is all messed up. I just downgraded back to Wicket 1.4.13, and all is fine. I don't have time to prepare a Quickstart yet, but if anyone who has been fixing bugs on Wicket 1.4.14 has a brilliant intuition on what can cause this regression, it would be great ;) Otherwise, I'll try to find sometime later this week to file a JIRA issue with a Quickstart. Cheers, Antoine. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - Aucun virus trouvé dans ce message. Analyse effectuée par AVG - www.avg.fr Version: 10.0.1170 / Base de données virale: 426/3290 - Date: 30/11/2010 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket 1.4.14 > Bug with panels updated by Ajax rendering a CSS
Let me know how it goes. I can't help but think this bug is related to the problem I'm seeing. -Original Message- From: Antoine Angénieux Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 7:05 AM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Wicket 1.4.14 > Bug with panels updated by Ajax rendering a CSS Nobody has any idea on the subject ? OK, I'll come up with a quickstart this WE ! Cheers, Antoine. Le 29/11/2010 15:42, Antoine Angenieux a écrit : Hi all, I have just upgraded my dev environment from Wicket 1.4.13 to 1.4.14 this morning and discovered a bug related to CSS. On a page, I have a panel containing a listview, itself populated with panels that have in their constructor: add(CSSPackageResource.getHeaderContribution(CSS)); When browsing to this page, the listview is initially empty. When the panel is updated by an Ajax Link making the listview model list not empty, the list view contents are rendered, but the CSS is not (and the reference to the css script does not appear in the Wicket Ajax Debug Window), and thus the presentation is all messed up. I just downgraded back to Wicket 1.4.13, and all is fine. I don't have time to prepare a Quickstart yet, but if anyone who has been fixing bugs on Wicket 1.4.14 has a brilliant intuition on what can cause this regression, it would be great ;) Otherwise, I'll try to find sometime later this week to file a JIRA issue with a Quickstart. Cheers, Antoine. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: UrlRewrite rule and Wicket
You can try the approach from
http://blog.jteam.nl/2010/02/24/wicket-root-mounts/
This allows you to install a URL mounter that implements the following
interface:
interface RootMountedUrlCodingStrategy {
boolean accepts(String rawPath);
}
Regards,
Erik.
Op 30-11-10 11:21, Krzysztof Kowalczyk wrote:
Hi,
We have existing urls in a form:
/long,and,complex,title,id/new_opinion
/long,and,complex,title,id/something
or sometimes
/long,title/id/new_opinion
The links like "/long,and,complex,title" are managed by fast and
scalable view, and are stateless. Now we are using Wicket in the same
war. It is mounted to "/cms".
We are trying to replace forms, that are pure evil in the first
technology with wicket based forms. But we need to keep the links
untouched.
So I created UrlRewrite (http://www.tuckey.org/urlrewrite/) rules:
^/(.*),(\d+)/new_opinion$
/cms/new_opinion/id/$2/url/$1
^/(\?wicket.*)
/cms/$1
...
I have a wicket page - that is mounted on "/new_opinion" with enhanced
HybridUrlCodingStrategy with:
- redirectOnBookmarkableRequest = false
First rule forwards the request to proper place. Wicket gets the
correct requestUri and all the stuff. But the rule does not work if we
have redirectOnBookmarkableRequest = true because Wicket constructs
wrong urls in ServletWebRequest.getRelativePathPrefixToWicketHandler :
if (!Strings.isEmpty(forwardUrl))
{
// If this is an error page, this will be /mount or
/?wicket:foo
relativeUrl = forwardUrl.substring(1);
relativeUrl =
relativeUrl.substring(filterPath.length());
}
before this fragment Wicket has correct link, after this we get:
"g,and,complex,title,id/new_opinion", or errors (sometimes the link is
shorter and I get array index out of bounds). If method does not throw
exception it returns wrong number of ../ . Unfortunately
redirectOnBookmarkableRequest = false does not solve the problem as
the second rule catches Wicket that are redirected if they hit
bookmarkable page. So this fragment need to be fixed in order to have
working bookmarkable links with UrlRewrite.
My temporary workaround is custom delegating WebRequest with small hack:
public String getRelativePathPrefixToWicketHandler() {
HttpServletRequest httpRequest = getHttpServletRequest();
String forwardUrl =
(String)httpRequest.getAttribute("javax.servlet.forward.servlet_path");
final String filterPath =
(String)httpRequest.getAttribute(WicketFilter.FILTER_PATH_ATTR);
if (!Strings.isEmpty(forwardUrl))
{
int count = forwardUrl.split("/").length;
String string = "";
for (int i = 1; i< count; i++) {
string += "../";
}
return string + filterPath;
}else {
return wrappedReqest.getRelativePathPrefixToWicketHandler();
}
}
I guess it will not work in all cases though...
If there is a different way of doing url rewriting? If not, I consider
it a bug in Wicket.
Regards,
Krzysztof Kowalczyk
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
Erik van Oosten
http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: implicit key in PageParameter ?
Hi I found the solution , it is MixedParamUrlCodingStrategy Thanks. 2010/12/1 smallufo > Hi , thanks . > But it seems that IndexedParamUrlCodingStrategy only accepts integer > parameters. > I need String value ... > > > 2010/12/1 Martin Grigorov > > See Indexed** UrlCodingStrategies >> >> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:52 AM, smallufo wrote: >> >> > Hi , I wonder how to build an implicit key when a Page is >> > mountBookmarkablePage() ? >> > >> > Suppose I have a TagPage , that accepts a parameter : "name" , and if >> the >> > TagPage is mounted to "/tag" prefix >> > The url will look like : >> > http://foobar.com/app/tag/name/abc >> > >> > I feel the "name" is redundant >> > >> > I hope I can achieve shorter url like this : >> > http://foobar.com/app/tag/abc >> > http://foobar.com/app/tag/other >> > >> > Is is possible ? >> > >> > >
Re: implicit key in PageParameter ?
Hi , thanks . But it seems that IndexedParamUrlCodingStrategy only accepts integer parameters. I need String value ... 2010/12/1 Martin Grigorov > See Indexed** UrlCodingStrategies > > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:52 AM, smallufo wrote: > > > Hi , I wonder how to build an implicit key when a Page is > > mountBookmarkablePage() ? > > > > Suppose I have a TagPage , that accepts a parameter : "name" , and if > the > > TagPage is mounted to "/tag" prefix > > The url will look like : > > http://foobar.com/app/tag/name/abc > > > > I feel the "name" is redundant > > > > I hope I can achieve shorter url like this : > > http://foobar.com/app/tag/abc > > http://foobar.com/app/tag/other > > > > Is is possible ? > > >
Re: [OT] Plugin WicketForge 0.8.1 available for IDEA 9+
cool, looking forward to test the new versions once i 'm home ; thank you On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:43, Paul Szulc wrote: > cool! > > this is definitely not off topic :) > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Minas Manthos wrote: > >> >> WicketForge 0.8.1 is available for download. >> >> -Facet detection implemented >> -Highlight Wicket components >> -... >> >> full change notes http://plugins.intellij.net/plugin/?id=1545 >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/OT-Plugin-WicketForge-0-8-1-available-for-IDEA-9-tp3066018p3066018.html >> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> > > > -- > Best regards, > Paul Szulc > > http://www.paulszulc.com > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Wicket link with no server side consequences
Thanks Ernesto, Martjn
The WebMarkupContainer worked . I didnt know i would use it on a link.
regards.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why do you need a Link component for it if you are going to do nothing
> on server side? Cant you just use WebMarkupContainer if you happen to
> need generating JavaScipt on server side? E.g.
>
> Bla
>
> WebMarkupContainer bla = new WebMarkupContainer("bla")
> bla.add(new AttributeModifier("onclick","Whatever JavaScript");
>
> ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Ernesto
>
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Josh Kamau wrote:
> > Hello there;
> >
> > I would like to create a wicket link (it has a client side and a
> serverside
> > component) that only executes a javascript code but never sends any
> requests
> > to the server, is it possible. Am thinking of
> > adding a javascript function that returns false , and on serverside
> > implementation, i just put nothing to be executed. It smells like a hack
> > though. Is there a way of doing this? hope the question is clear .
> >
> > Regards.
> > Josh.
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>
Re: Wicket link with no server side consequences
Why do you need a Link component for it if you are going to do nothing
on server side? Cant you just use WebMarkupContainer if you happen to
need generating JavaScipt on server side? E.g.
Bla
WebMarkupContainer bla = new WebMarkupContainer("bla")
bla.add(new AttributeModifier("onclick","Whatever JavaScript");
?
Regards,
Ernesto
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Josh Kamau wrote:
> Hello there;
>
> I would like to create a wicket link (it has a client side and a serverside
> component) that only executes a javascript code but never sends any requests
> to the server, is it possible. Am thinking of
> adding a javascript function that returns false , and on serverside
> implementation, i just put nothing to be executed. It smells like a hack
> though. Is there a way of doing this? hope the question is clear .
>
> Regards.
> Josh.
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to enable/disable an hierarchy?
Thanks, finally got it to work. By overriding parentPanel.onBeforeRender(), and visit the children I was able to enable/disable child components. It is important to call super.onBeforeRender() before visiting children to populate the ListView first. I could not use onConfigure() because some of the components that should be enabled/disabled is part of a ListView, and the ListView isn't populated yet when onConfigure is called. -- Einar On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Wilhelmsen Tor Iver wrote: > > I could override onConfigure in every component, and read the field that > > controls the enabling/disabling, but that would create a lot of > boilerplate > > code for the 80-90% of FormComponents/links that should be disabled. It > > would be a lot cleaner to disable the parent, and only handle the ones I > > want enabled. > > Sounds like you want to use a Component.IVisitor on the parent, which deals > with enanbling/disabling subcomponents based on some state. > > - Tor Iver > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
Re: Wicket link with no server side consequences
use a webmarkupcontainer and a attribute modifier, or if you want to reuse it, extend webmarkupcontainer and modify the attributes directly. Martijn On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Josh Kamau wrote: > Hello there; > > I would like to create a wicket link (it has a client side and a serverside > component) that only executes a javascript code but never sends any requests > to the server, is it possible. Am thinking of > adding a javascript function that returns false , and on serverside > implementation, i just put nothing to be executed. It smells like a hack > though. Is there a way of doing this? hope the question is clear . > > Regards. > Josh. > -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: implicit key in PageParameter ?
See Indexed** UrlCodingStrategies On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:52 AM, smallufo wrote: > Hi , I wonder how to build an implicit key when a Page is > mountBookmarkablePage() ? > > Suppose I have a TagPage , that accepts a parameter : "name" , and if the > TagPage is mounted to "/tag" prefix > The url will look like : > http://foobar.com/app/tag/name/abc > > I feel the "name" is redundant > > I hope I can achieve shorter url like this : > http://foobar.com/app/tag/abc > http://foobar.com/app/tag/other > > Is is possible ? >
Wicket link with no server side consequences
Hello there; I would like to create a wicket link (it has a client side and a serverside component) that only executes a javascript code but never sends any requests to the server, is it possible. Am thinking of adding a javascript function that returns false , and on serverside implementation, i just put nothing to be executed. It smells like a hack though. Is there a way of doing this? hope the question is clear . Regards. Josh.
WebMarkupContainer update affecting scrollbar which is outside container
I have an issue whereby an ajax update on a WebMarkupContainer is having
unexpected effect on content outside the container.
The page in question consists of two parts:
1. on the left hand side, a menu, composed of a list of AjaxFallbackLink
objects. This is contained in a .
2. on the right hand side, a panel, which itself is contained in a
WebMarkupContainer.
Here is standard behavior:
When a link is clicked, it's color changes to indicate it is selected
(achieved by using AttributeModifier to change the css class). Also, the
content of the panel changes. Works fine.
Here is the issue:
when the list is long, a scrollbar appears in the DIV surrounding
it (which is correct). I want to avoid the scrollbar moving back to the top
of the list when an item is clicked, so rather than doing an update on the
whole page, I use ajax to update just:
1. The selected link
2. The previously selected link
3. The WebMarkupContainer containing the panel (which will now have new
content).
If I just do an update on the two AjaxFallbackLink objects, there is no
problem, and the DIV does not scroll back to the top. However, when I do an
update on the WebMarkupContainer, the DIV does scroll back to the top - even
though the is outside the WebMarkupContainer.
Here is the snippet from the html:
#
#
#
(I have removed most of the list items for the sake of brevity).
Here is a snippet from the java:
Panel mainPage = new SimplePage("mainPage");
mainPageContainer = new WebMarkupContainer("pageContainer");
mainPageContainer.setOutputMarkupId(true);
add(mainPageContainer);
mainPageContainer.add(mainPage);
The list items are then added as AjaxFallbackLink objects.
As always, help greatly appreciated !
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/WebMarkupContainer-update-affecting-scrollbar-which-is-outside-container-tp3067035p3067035.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
implicit key in PageParameter ?
Hi , I wonder how to build an implicit key when a Page is mountBookmarkablePage() ? Suppose I have a TagPage , that accepts a parameter : "name" , and if the TagPage is mounted to "/tag" prefix The url will look like : http://foobar.com/app/tag/name/abc I feel the "name" is redundant I hope I can achieve shorter url like this : http://foobar.com/app/tag/abc http://foobar.com/app/tag/other Is is possible ?
Two AutoCompleteTextFields and ajax.
Hello everyone.
I have problem with two AutoCompleteTextFields and ajax.
There is form which contains only two AutoCompleteTextFields. The list of
values on the second field is limited depending on the value of the first
field. So if you change value of first field, the second field should be
refresh. Below is source code of this form:
final Model m1 = new Model();
AutoCompleteTextField t1 = new
AutoCompleteTextField("t1", m1, settings) {
List values;
@Override
protected Iterator getChoices(String input) {
values = new LinkedList();
for (int i = 0; i < 20; i++) {// I create the list
of example values
values.add(input + " " + i);
}
return values.iterator();
}
};
final Model m2 = new Model();
final AutoCompleteTextField t2 = new
AutoCompleteTextField("t2", m2, settings) {
List values;
@Override
protected Iterator getChoices(String input) {
values = new LinkedList();
// I create the second list of example values which are
depedent on the value of the first field
for (int i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
values.add(input + " " + i + " - " + m1.getObject());
}
return values.iterator();
}
};
t1.add(new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior("onchange") {
@Override
protected void onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget art) {
m2.setObject(null);
art.addComponent(t2);
}
});
The problem occurs when I am executing the following scenario:
1. I write some text into the first field.
2. I write some text into the second field.
3. I clear first field's input and I click 'Tab' to set foucs on the second
textfield.
4. I write some text into the second field.
Now, there is impossible to select value from list of values using mouse.
Could you have any Idea how to resolve this problem with mouse?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Two-AutoCompleteTextFields-and-ajax-tp3067005p3067005.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to enable/disable an hierarchy?
> I could override onConfigure in every component, and read the field that > controls the enabling/disabling, but that would create a lot of boilerplate > code for the 80-90% of FormComponents/links that should be disabled. It > would be a lot cleaner to disable the parent, and only handle the ones I > want enabled. Sounds like you want to use a Component.IVisitor on the parent, which deals with enanbling/disabling subcomponents based on some state. - Tor Iver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: How to enable/disable an hierarchy?
Using onConfigure doesn't help much. If I disable the common parent, and call setEnabled in onConfigure in the few components I want visible, the components will still be disabled during the rendering phase because onComponentTag calls isEnabledInHierarchy. I could override onConfigure in every component, and read the field that controls the enabling/disabling, but that would create a lot of boilerplate code for the 80-90% of FormComponents/links that should be disabled. It would be a lot cleaner to disable the parent, and only handle the ones I want enabled. --einar On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote: > have a field in the page that controls whether or not these components > should be enabled/disabled, then override their onconfigure() methods > and setenable/disabled based on the field. > > -igor > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Einar Bjerve > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > How can we enable/disable almost an entire hierarchy under certain > > circumstances, while still keeping some of them open for > editing/clicking? > > > > The obvious solution would be to enable/disable the ancestor and override > > isEnabledInHierarchy for the few components that should still be enabled, > > but it's final so can't do that. > > > > We also tried writing a behavior that traversed all children and set the > > affected FormComponents/Links to disabled. But that didn't work either. > We > > can't do it in beforeRender() because the render phase has started when > it > > is called and then setDisabled will fail. And we can't do it in bind() > since > > some of the children to be disabled is FormComponents in a DataView, and > > children of a DataView isn't added until onBeforeRender - so they aren't > > available yet. > > > > Overriding isEnabled in every component that should be disabled isn't > really > > an option either, due to the amount of components affected. > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
Re: [OT] Plugin WicketForge 0.8.1 available for IDEA 9+
cool! this is definitely not off topic :) On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Minas Manthos wrote: > > WicketForge 0.8.1 is available for download. > > -Facet detection implemented > -Highlight Wicket components > -... > > full change notes http://plugins.intellij.net/plugin/?id=1545 > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/OT-Plugin-WicketForge-0-8-1-available-for-IDEA-9-tp3066018p3066018.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > -- Best regards, Paul Szulc http://www.paulszulc.com
Re: UrlRewrite rule and Wicket
The code in Wicket 1.4.14 is the same. There is still lines that causes problem:
if (!Strings.isEmpty(forwardUrl))
{
// If this is an error page, this will be
/mount or /?wicket:foo
relativeUrl = forwardUrl.substring(1);
relativeUrl = relativeUrl.substring(filterPath.length());
}
And I still need my workaround. It seems that nothing outside wicket
can redirect links - without breaking Wicket lifecycle. Even with
workaround I cannot create outbound rule, because then pages lose
state. I would prefer not to create my own url coding strategy, as the
exact form of the link is constructed outside Wicket...
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Krzysztof Kowalczyk
wrote:
> Ok, thanks, I will try it tomorrow
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Igor Vaynberg
> wrote:
>> upgrade to 1.4.14 because that code looks different for me.
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Krzysztof Kowalczyk
>> wrote:
>>> We use Wicket 1.4.12.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Igor Vaynberg
>>> wrote:
you must be using an old wicket version...upgrade to latest 1.4.x
-igor
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Krzysztof Kowalczyk
wrote:
> As I have already written in previous mail (pointing to exact line
> that cause the errors) - Wicket is falling because it handles
> forwardUrl in incorrect way. It tries to remove "/" and filterPath
> from forwardUrl even though forwardUrl does not contain filterPath. I
> guess that it is because of an assumption that only wicket exists in
> application and no other framework has influence on forwardUrl. I
> don't know what are other cases that are handled by those lines, but
> forwardUrl can have any value and Wicket assume some concrete value.
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Igor Vaynberg
> wrote:
>> first figure out why its failing - why is wicket generating a wrong
>> url, and then you can determine if its a bug in wicket or somewhere in
>> your configuration.
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:21 AM, Krzysztof Kowalczyk
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We have existing urls in a form:
>>>
>>> /long,and,complex,title,id/new_opinion
>>> /long,and,complex,title,id/something
>>>
>>> or sometimes
>>>
>>> /long,title/id/new_opinion
>>>
>>> The links like "/long,and,complex,title" are managed by fast and
>>> scalable view, and are stateless. Now we are using Wicket in the same
>>> war. It is mounted to "/cms".
>>>
>>> We are trying to replace forms, that are pure evil in the first
>>> technology with wicket based forms. But we need to keep the links
>>> untouched.
>>>
>>> So I created UrlRewrite (http://www.tuckey.org/urlrewrite/) rules:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ^/(.*),(\d+)/new_opinion$
>>> /cms/new_opinion/id/$2/url/$1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ^/(\?wicket.*)
>>> /cms/$1
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>> I have a wicket page - that is mounted on "/new_opinion" with enhanced
>>> HybridUrlCodingStrategy with:
>>> - redirectOnBookmarkableRequest = false
>>>
>>> First rule forwards the request to proper place. Wicket gets the
>>> correct requestUri and all the stuff. But the rule does not work if we
>>> have redirectOnBookmarkableRequest = true because Wicket constructs
>>> wrong urls in ServletWebRequest.getRelativePathPrefixToWicketHandler :
>>>
>>> if (!Strings.isEmpty(forwardUrl))
>>> {
>>> // If this is an error page, this will be /mount
>>> or /?wicket:foo
>>> relativeUrl = forwardUrl.substring(1);
>>> relativeUrl =
>>> relativeUrl.substring(filterPath.length());
>>> }
>>>
>>> before this fragment Wicket has correct link, after this we get:
>>> "g,and,complex,title,id/new_opinion", or errors (sometimes the link is
>>> shorter and I get array index out of bounds). If method does not throw
>>> exception it returns wrong number of ../ . Unfortunately
>>> redirectOnBookmarkableRequest = false does not solve the problem as
>>> the second rule catches Wicket that are redirected if they hit
>>> bookmarkable page. So this fragment need to be fixed in order to have
>>> working bookmarkable links with UrlRewrite.
>>>
>>> My temporary workaround is custom delegating WebRequest with small hack:
>>>
>>> public String getRelativePathPrefixToWicketHandler() {
>>> HttpServletRequest httpRequest = getHttpServletRequest();
>>>
>>> String forwardUrl =
>>> (String)httpRequest.getAttribute("javax.servlet.forward.servlet_path");
>>> final String filterPath =
Re: URLs using wicket wizard
Thanks for a really quick aswer. For mounting the wizards I use QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy. I'll take a closer look at HybridURLCodingStrategy and will come back. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/URLs-using-wicket-wizard-tp3066862p3066877.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: URLs using wicket wizard
Even better IndexedHybridUrlCodingStrategy to see "stepN" as parameter On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Korbinian Bachl - privat < korbinian.ba...@whiskyworld.de> wrote: > What type of URLCodingStrategy do you use? IMHO the HybridURLCodingStrategy > should do what you want > > Best > > Am 01.12.10 10:13, schrieb bamse: > > >> I am rather new to Wicket, still I am building an application using the >> Wizard-functionality, since this is very suitable for the app. >> The app consists of several modules, implemented as wizards. Each wizard >> obviously has a number of steps, using the WizardStep, which is a panel. >> This works fine, but as an example I would like to have the url for a >> single >> step look like this: "/module1/step1", instead of >> "/?wicket:interface=:26". >> >> I mount each wizard as a page, so the url then looks nice. But when step >> two >> is accessed, the url is the strange one. I do not want to destroy the >> functionality that Wicket gives such as regarding the pagemap, therefore I >> am reluctant to making too much on my own. >> >> I have searched the forum, but haven't found anything that really helps >> me. >> I would be grateful for any help. >> >> > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
Re: URLs using wicket wizard
What type of URLCodingStrategy do you use? IMHO the HybridURLCodingStrategy should do what you want Best Am 01.12.10 10:13, schrieb bamse: I am rather new to Wicket, still I am building an application using the Wizard-functionality, since this is very suitable for the app. The app consists of several modules, implemented as wizards. Each wizard obviously has a number of steps, using the WizardStep, which is a panel. This works fine, but as an example I would like to have the url for a single step look like this: "/module1/step1", instead of "/?wicket:interface=:26". I mount each wizard as a page, so the url then looks nice. But when step two is accessed, the url is the strange one. I do not want to destroy the functionality that Wicket gives such as regarding the pagemap, therefore I am reluctant to making too much on my own. I have searched the forum, but haven't found anything that really helps me. I would be grateful for any help. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Concerning changing image onsubmit
ajaxButton.add(new AttributeAppender("onclick", true,
"this.disabled='disabled'"));
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Muro Copenhagen wrote:
> Hi Igor,
>
> Thanks for the reply...i found IndicatingAjaxButton that i could use.
>
> It almost does what i want, it adds the busy button next to the submit
> button.
>
> I now need to disable the original button.
>
> I tried this without any luck:
> http://wicketbyexample.com/disabling-an-ajax-submit-button/
>
> Do you know how to add an attribute like: style="display: none;"
> to the original submit button on the fly, when click.
>
> I mean what behavior to use/implement?
>
> Best Regards
> Muro
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Igor Vaynberg >wrote:
>
> > write a behavior that adds javascript to the button that does that.
> >
> > -igor
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Muro Copenhagen
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I want to change the button image to a ajaxloader image, after the user
> > > clicks on submit,
> > > and there are no feedback errors.
> > >
> > > It has to work both on a regular button and on a ajax button.
> > >
> > > Any suggestions on how to make this work?
> > >
> > > Best Regards
> > > Muro
> > >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>
URLs using wicket wizard
I am rather new to Wicket, still I am building an application using the Wizard-functionality, since this is very suitable for the app. The app consists of several modules, implemented as wizards. Each wizard obviously has a number of steps, using the WizardStep, which is a panel. This works fine, but as an example I would like to have the url for a single step look like this: "/module1/step1", instead of "/?wicket:interface=:26". I mount each wizard as a page, so the url then looks nice. But when step two is accessed, the url is the strange one. I do not want to destroy the functionality that Wicket gives such as regarding the pagemap, therefore I am reluctant to making too much on my own. I have searched the forum, but haven't found anything that really helps me. I would be grateful for any help. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/URLs-using-wicket-wizard-tp3066862p3066862.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: Concerning changing image onsubmit
Hi Igor, Thanks for the reply...i found IndicatingAjaxButton that i could use. It almost does what i want, it adds the busy button next to the submit button. I now need to disable the original button. I tried this without any luck: http://wicketbyexample.com/disabling-an-ajax-submit-button/ Do you know how to add an attribute like: style="display: none;" to the original submit button on the fly, when click. I mean what behavior to use/implement? Best Regards Muro On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote: > write a behavior that adds javascript to the button that does that. > > -igor > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Muro Copenhagen > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I want to change the button image to a ajaxloader image, after the user > > clicks on submit, > > and there are no feedback errors. > > > > It has to work both on a regular button and on a ajax button. > > > > Any suggestions on how to make this work? > > > > Best Regards > > Muro > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
Multiple wicket applications in a single WAR
Hi I have a web app where clients can log in as well as third party users. To do this I implemented 2 wicket applications (both extending AuthenticatedWebApplication) to keep the authentication and sessions separate from each other. The two are separated in web.xml with separate servlet mappings like so: wicket.servlet org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketServlet applicationClassName za.co.MyNormalWebApplication wicket.servlet.thirdParty org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketServlet applicationClassName za.co.MyThirdPartyWebApplication wicket.servlet /app/* wicket.servlet.thirdParty /thirdParty/* It all works fine and I am happy with how It works But for some wierd reason wicket gets confused. It starts mapping incorrectly, and if I come in on /app it serves up the third party application/session/login screen and vice versa This happens with no apparent reason and once its stars doing it, it doesn't stop. So the app will work fine for days, with no issues, then out of the blue it starts doing it and only recovers after a server restart We are running WebSphere Application Server 6.1 -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Multiple-wicket-applications-in-a-single-WAR-tp3066793p3066793.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
