Hi,
The component constructor doesn't call #add() at the moment (and I think
this wont change soon without a better reason).
So even if adding the varargs this wont help.
But you can create your own components which do this:
public class MyForm extends FormEntity {
public MyForm(String id,
thanks, it works perfectly :)
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/6-4-0-RadioColumn-event-in-dataTable-tp4655161p4655178.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Why aren't you using fluent interfaces?
The API ist built around that and allows for a much cleaner structure
inside your constructors.
Just watch out for those Auto-Formaters ;)
new FormRsvpPage(frmRsvp, cpm)
.add(new StatusPanel(pnlRsvp))
.add(new ConfirmPanel(pnlConfirm))
Emond,
Finally I can make it run in Firefox by disable using websocket in web.xml
init-param
param-nameorg.atmosphere.useWebSocket/param-name
param-valuefalse/param-value
/init-param
Don't know if there's drawback doing that since it comes as default setting in
The PropertyValidator is added in the BeanValidationBorder. Unfortunately,
I don't know what property the FormComponent is for, when
BeanValidationBorder is created.
So I guess, I have to get rid of CompoundPropertyModel and pass PropertyModels
to my FormComponents' constructors.
Interestingly,
Hi,
I think
https://code.google.com/p/londonwicket/downloads/detail?name=LondonWicket-FormsWithFlair.pdfcan=2q=shows
an example for this.
It is also based on Wicket 1.3 but this area is not different in Wicket 6.
jQuery is just a detail about internals. The Java APIs are still the same.
All you
Thanks, I will try it out
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi,
I think
https://code.google.com/p/londonwicket/downloads/detail?name=LondonWicket-FormsWithFlair.pdfcan=2q=shows
an example for this.
It is also based on Wicket 1.3 but this area is
Ah, I see, thats exact what I'm searching for.
I've wrapped the BookmarkableLink in a Panel and override onConfigure()
so the default wont match.
Thanks, a lot
Cheers Dirk
Mit freundlichem Gruß
*Dirk Wichmann*
d...@team-wichmann.de mailto:d...@team-wichmann.de
Mobil: +49 163 569 2 563
Am
Hi,
Your investigation is fully correct!
I think you can overcome this by adding an invisible panel. I.e. at the
server side add style='display:none' to the Panel. Wicket JS will replace
the old with the new one and then your fadeIn effect will show it.
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Carlson
Martin Grigorov-4 wrote
I.e. at the server side add style='display:none' to the Panel. Wicket JS
will replace
the old with the new one and then your fadeIn effect will show it.
And with:
panel.setVisible(false);
panel.setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag(true);
the style-attribute is added for you by
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Hans Lesmeister 2
hans.lesmeis...@lessy-software.de wrote:
Martin Grigorov-4 wrote
I.e. at the server side add style='display:none' to the Panel. Wicket
JS
will replace
the old with the new one and then your fadeIn effect will show it.
And with:
Hi - I would like to link to a static image, and the link should be
stateless.
I have tried this (using Scala):
val img = new Image(img, new ContextRelativeResource(images/img + imgId
+ .png))
But the link becomes stateful.
I just found
val img = new Image(img, new UrlResourceReference(new
12 matches
Mail list logo