the user's browser address field.
>-Original Message-
>From: Chris Colman [mailto:chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com]
>Sent: Saturday, 8 October 2011 10:52 PM
>To: users@wicket.apache.org
>Subject: RE: Forwarding in 1.5 not working like in 1.4
>
>Could it be that Wicket s
>It looks like either javax.servlet.forward.url is not set as attribute
>in the HttpServletRequest or Wicket doesn't use it.
>I think it is the latter.
>
>On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Chris Colman
> wrote:
>> Looks like the redirect is due to the PRG strategy implementation so it's
>
always sets the PageManagerProvider to the
DebugPageManagerProvider, overriding any setting made in the derived
class' init() method. I need a custom PageManagerProvider in both debug
and production modes.
Is there any way around this?
Yours sincerely,
Chris Colman
Pagebloom Team L
vider());
}
From: Chris Colman [mailto:chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 11 October 2011 8:24 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Settting of PageManagerProvider is overridden in debug mode
In debug mode, setting the page manager provider like
I just turned off serializing using:
private class NullPageManagerProvider implements IPageManagerProvider
{
public IPageManager get(IPageManagerContext context)
{
return new NullPageManager(context);
}
}
But now the back button goes back one page only.
Is
Wicket is clearly the best framework as we all know :) but newcomers
might not think that with the "retro style" Wicket website. It could
really benefit from an artistic/design update. I'd offer to help but as
a software engineer all my design skills exist below the presentation
layer :)
>-Ori
Did I read somewhere recently that Wicket itself was starting to use
some of jQuery directly for some of its js? If the use of jQuery
directly by Wicket were to become more pervasive would that mean we
would not need a separate
jqWicket or wiQuery or is the Wicket library only using a small subset
After creating a QuickStart and not being able to reproduce the problem I
discovered that my original app was linking with an earlier 1.5 snapshot. Once
I linked with the latest snapshot jars it magically worked - yeehah!
>-Original Message-
>From: Chris Colman [mail
ve usually leads to significant performance
improvements.
Yours sincerely,
Chris Colman
Pagebloom Team Leader,
Step Ahead Software
pagebloom - your business & your website growing together
Sydney: (+61 2) 9656 1278 Canberra: (+61 2) 6100 2120
Email: chr...@stepahead.com.au
hing algorithm
>
>On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Chris Colman
>wrote:
>
>> Obviously this isn't a problem during debug with a single user but
when
>> 1000s of pages need to be rendered each minute the time spent
performing
>the
>> above operations may becom
having, in the above example, 2800
objects allocated and then dereferenced with every page render.
>
>On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Chris Colman
> wrote:
>> I'll try to get some time to build a test to get some timings.
>>
>>>-Original Message-
>>>Fro
an easily handle millions per second.
>
>
>In other words: don't add caching unless you are willing to measure the
>throughput gains (on the intended target systems).
>
>Regards,
> Erik.
>
>--
>Erik van Oosten
>http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com
>
>
Occasionally over the last few days/weeks testing our 1.5 migration I've
seen the following exception.
I'm wondering if anyone has any idea of what's causing it or have seen
something similar. We've never seen it before with Wicket 1.4
It only happens when I click a link while it is still process
I have discovered that this only occurs when running our app inside
IntelliJ. When we run it in tomcat directly, outside any IDE, I can't
get the problem to occur. Hopefully the problem will not appear at all
when running on the production server.
>-Original Message-
>From: C
I haven't tested other browsers but the problem is occurring for me on
FireFox 7.0.1.
>my application has same problem, but it only throw socket error when IE
6 -
>8
>brower, chrome and IE9 has no the problem.
>
>here is my question:
>http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Is-there-ModalWindo
We do something similar but use
/content/value
Then you can mount the single page at "/content" and then treat what
follows as a parameter which determines how that page is rendered.
>-Original Message-
>From: Arjun Dhar [mailto:dhar...@yahoo.com]
>Sent: Friday, 21 October 2011 5:20 PM
1.4.8 is a very old version. Maybe try using the latest 1.4.x version
and see if the problem hasn't already been fixed.
>-Original Message-
>From: MattyDE [mailto:ufer.mar...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Friday, 21 October 2011 5:37 PM
>To: users@wicket.apache.org
>Subject: Big Problem: BookmarkableP
I suspect that will be our problem too. With simple quickstart the pages
do not take very long to render and so impossible to click links fast
enough such that you can click on one before the last link has completed
rendering - maybe we could add a delay in the rendering somewhere or do
a big datab
I've just noticed that some of the .js resources seem to be loading from
different addresses. I'm using 1.5.2 with the UrlRenderer patch to fix
the forwarding issue.
Depending on the page it appears like the same .js is requested at two
different URLs. Presumably the browser will perform a downloa
ing in 1.5 not working like in 1.4
>
>this is a general problem with forwarding. instead of forwarding why
>dont you just 302?
>
>-igor
>
>On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Chris Colman
> wrote:
>> I've just noticed that some of the .js resources seem to be loading
Is it possible in inmethod grid to create a column where each row
contains a link (nice to have an icon even instead of text) that a user
can click on to initiate an AJAX event such as opening a modal dialog?
If so is there a dedicated column property class for this already or do
we need to create
ethod grid - Is is possible to have column with AJAX
link
>to perform some action?
>
>Hi,
>
>You can create a column that renders a Panel and this panel can
>contain anything you need.
>
>On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Chris Colman
> wrote:
>> Is it possible in
>Chris,
>
> Did you send this to the wrong email address or did I miss something?
>
Whoops! Please disregard this email - went to the wrong email
address.
>--
>Jeremy Thomerson
>http://wickettraining.com
>*Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*
---
Are BookmarkablePageLinks only for use with tags use or is it
possible to catch an AJAX event and use the BookmarkablePageLink as the
'destination specifier' for the navigation or does navigation under AJAX
always have to be via setReponsePage()?
Chris
have a bpl
available so I was trying to leverage the data I had already built up in
that rather than construct a PageParameters with all the required
parameters.
>
>-igor
>
>
>On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Chris Colman
> wrote:
>> Are BookmarkablePageLinks only f
> ...
>As I said I guess this could be an example of this issue, though I'm
not
>100% sure:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4138
>
>If that is the case, do you know when this issue will be fixed?
I submitted that JIRA issue and a patch has been provided as an
attachment. The patch
Does anyone know how to make a column sortable in an inmethod datagrid.
I saw a method called 'setReorderable' but calling that will true
doesn't seem to produce the up/down arrow in the column header that I
would expect.
Any suggestions?
Yours sincerely,
Chris Colman
tuff/core/tree/master/jdk-1.5-parent/inmethod
-
>grid-parent/inmethod-grid-
>examples/src/main/java/com/inmethod/grid/examples/pages/datagrid
>
>Attila
>
>2011/11/1 Chris Colman
>
>> ** **
>>
>> Does anyone know how to make a column sortable in an
>Breaks POJOS: A real POJO does not need to implement an interface or
>extend a class.
A object oriented framework is a foundation on which you extend your
application. Back in the C++ world there was MFC, OWL, .Net, etc., In
the Java world there was AWT and then Swing etc.,. All event driven,
ob
>Another area I am not keen with at all with wicket which is mentioned
is
>having to build the object tree code the same way the html page is.
With
>element Ids, I am a little confused as to why we cant simply insert the
>component using the element id and let wicket figure out where to stick
it
>o
alue
which is incorrect.
Is there a best practice or standard way to deal with this in Wicket so
that when the user presses 'Back' they only see fresh data and not stale
data? Do we need to intercept the browser's back button mechanics via
JavaScript to force a refresh of the d
issing for
javax.inject:javax.inject:jar
Have I done something wrong or do I need to upgrade to a later JDK
(currently 1.6.0_29-b11)?
Yours sincerely,
Chris Colman
Pagebloom Team Leader,
Step Ahead Software
pagebloom - your business & your website growing together
Sydney: (+61 2) 9656 1278 Canberra: (+6
;http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket
>
>-igor
>
>On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Chris Colman
>wrote:
>
>> ** **
>>
>> I have done a recent update on my working copy of the trunk and mvn
clean
>> install yields:
>>
>> ** **
>&g
wicket.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Can't build wicket from updated trunk
>
>already moved.
>
>-igor
>
>On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Chris Colman
> wrote:
>> Is Wicket moving to git?
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>>-Original Message-
>>>F
heap space for maven.
>>
>> Just run the following line prior building:
>>
>> snip
>> set MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx1024m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m
>> snap ####
>>
>> That should bring you through.
>>
>> -matthias
>>
>> Am 02.01.2
>> set MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx1024m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m
>> snap
>>
>> That should bring you through.
>>
>> -matthias
>>
>> Am 02.01.2012 um 05:43 schrieb Chris Colman:
>>
>>> I cloned the wicket git repos and then checked out branch wic
deployed the 1.5 version of the
app.
Yours sincerely,
Chris Colman
Not sure if I have an answer to your question but recently I asked how to turn
off page versioning and was told to do:
getRequestCycleSettings().
setRenderStrategy(IRequestCycleSettings.RenderStrategy.ONE_PASS_RENDER);
which worked.
The interesting thing was it was not necessary to call:
get
>> Not sure if I have an answer to your question but recently I asked how to
>turn off page versioning and was told to do:
>>
>> getRequestCycleSettings().
>> setRenderStrategy(IRequestCycleSettings.RenderStrategy.ONE_PASS_RENDER);
>
>Actually this just turns off the redirecting. The pages are sti
>On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Chris Colman
> wrote:
>>>> Not sure if I have an answer to your question but recently I asked how
>to
>>>turn off page versioning and was told to do:
>>>>
>>>> getRequestCycleSettings().
>>>>
> s
v [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
>Sent: Monday, 9 January 2012 8:37 PM
>To: users@wicket.apache.org
>Subject: Re: stateless, not versioned pages - session problem
>
>On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Chris Colman
> wrote:
>>>On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Chris Colman
>&g
I'm having a problem with relative URLs.
If the current page is:
content/mypage/n1/p1/n2/fred
And it contains a link to
content/mypage/n1/p1/n2/jane
The relative URL rendered to HTML is:
../../../../../../jane
Which of course is wrong as the browser tries to jump to:
jane
instea
>> I looked at the URL renderer and it was returning just 'jane' instead
of
>> ../jane
>
>actually jane is correct and ../jane is incorrect.
>
>if the browser is on content/mypage/n1/p1/n2/fred
>
>then going to a relative url jane will produce
>
>content/mypage/n1/p1/n2/jane
>
>which is what you
>why is RelativePathPrefixHandler invoked on that tag? sounds a little
>funky...
>
>-igor
I'm using UrlPathPageParametersEncoder for backwards compatibility with
1.5 links. I'm not sure if that could be causing the funkiness of
RelativePathPrefixHandler being invoked.
Are BookmarkablePageLinks tr
Maybe the UrlRenderer should be returning ./jane instead of just jane.
Hm.
>
>
>On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Chris Colman
> wrote:
>>>why is RelativePathPrefixHandler invoked on that tag? sounds a little
>>>funky...
>>>
>>>-igor
>>
ve URLs
>
>wicket by default always generates relative urls. this is the
>safest/easiest approach for fronting the app with a proxy, which most
>people do...
>
>-igor
>
>
>On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Chris Colman
> wrote:
>>>why is RelativePathPrefixHandler inv
>> Am I right in saying that RelativepathPrefixHandler should never even
be
>> applied to BookmarkablePageLink tags (and any classes derived from
>> BookmarkablePageLink)?
>
>At least its source doesn't indicate that BPL should be treated
specially.
I've made some inroads: I got a quickstart to fa
The problem is related to non standard (i.e. "wicket") namespaces.
In my quickstart if I change the namespace in all markup from "wicket"
to "foobar" then the BPL which has only the last segment differing from
the current page ends up producing an incorrect link to another page in
the same path.
I've just submitted a JIRA issue with quickstart for this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4330
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.a
on
suffixed .js and the clean .js as two separate resources and do a second
download of the .js.
Hmmm, interesting.
Again, this is not strictly a Wicket issue but I'd be interested to know
what others think about this.
Yours sincerely,
Chris Colman
Pagebloom Team Leader,
Did you wan to get or set the session? Your subject said 'set' but the
body asked about 'get'.
>Hi,
>It would be enough for me if I could get session by id. Is there a
>possibility?
>
>--
>View this message in context: http://apache-
>wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-set-the-session-
ed
to it. It would be good if we could stop that somehow. They have version
numbers built into their names so the browser will never end up trying
to use a 'stale' .js file.
Regards
Chris
____
From: Chris Colman [mailto:chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com]
Sent
It would be good if we could stop that somehow. They have
version
>numbers built into their names so the browser will never end up trying
>to use a 'stale' .js file.
>
>Regards
>Chris
>
>
>
>From: Chris Colman [mailto
I had the exact same 'can I SET the session' requirement today. I
thought of dealing with search engine crawlers and their stateless view
of the site by assigning the same session instance to each request from
a given crawler to avoid creating a new session for every request they
made.
Well I achi
>A use case:
>Imagine that the management of the session in a cookie is disabled in
>the web server config, so jsessionid is always encoded in the url.
>If resources don't have the jsessionid in their url then a new
>temporary Wicket and http sessions will be created and discarded for
>each request
>This may be light or heavy operation, depends on the actual Session
impl.
>
>And in WicketFilter we do not know whether this is a request to a
>package resource or to any other IResource impl which may need the
>session. We have this info later.
>
>On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:
icketFilter.
>This may be light or heavy operation, depends on the actual Session
impl.
>
>And in WicketFilter we do not know whether this is a request to a
>package resource or to any other IResource impl which may need the
>session. We have this info later.
>
>On Wed, Jan 1
ion, depends on the actual Session
>impl.
>>
>>And in WicketFilter we do not know whether this is a request to a
>>package resource or to any other IResource impl which may need the
>>session. We have this info later.
>>
>>On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:15 PM
I just checked with 1.5.x and for stateless pages all bookmarkable page
links do not incur the jsessionid suffix for a non cookie client. Once
an Ajax link is added to the page however the jsessionid suffix appears
on all links which makes sense as the page is no longer stateless once
Ajax gets inv
; Create a ticket please
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Chris Colman
>> wrote:
>>> I just checked with 1.5.x and for stateless pages all bookmarkable page
>>> links do not incur the jsessionid suffix for a non cookie client. Once
>>> an Ajax
.@gmail.com]
>Sent: Friday, 13 January 2012 8:13 AM
>To: users@wicket.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Javascript resources and jsessionid
>
>i remember this being fixed in 1.5 after the resource refactor...
>
>-igor
>
>On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Chris Colman
> wrote:
&g
JIRI issue 4334 has fixed this now which is great.
The next issue is that while Wicket is able to avoid establishing a
session for requests for package resources it would be good if their URL
made it easy for other filters (eg., Open Persistence Provider in View)
to also ignore them to allow them
caching.IResourceCachingStrategy#dec
orat
>eUrl.
>> There you can tag them as you wish.
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Chris Colman
>> wrote:
>>> JIRI issue 4334 has fixed this now which is great.
>>>
>>> The next issue is that while W
9:18 PM, Martin Grigorov
>>>wrote:
>>>> See
>>>org.apache.wicket.request.mapper.BasicResourceReferenceMapper#mapHand
le
>> r
>>>>
>>>> All IStaticCacheableResource are passed to
>>>>
>>>org.apache.wicket.request.resource.c
ate ignore entry in the filter.
Yours sincerely,
Chris Colman
Pagebloom Team Leader,
Step Ahead Software
pagebloom - your business & your website growing together
Sydney: (+61 2) 9656 1278 Canberra: (+61 2) 6100 2120
Email: chr...@stepahead.com.au <mailto://ch
Forget that last bit about wicketstuff not using the 'wicket' namespace
for its resources. I was confused by some old files in the browser cache
from Dec 2011.
____
From: Chris Colman [mailto:chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 17 January 2012
exactly in wicketstuff do you mean ?
We were still using 1.4 back in December so that makes sense. Sorry for the
confusion.
>
>>
>> ____
>>
>> From: Chris Colman [mailto:chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, 17 January 2012 8:4
e resources
>
>Hi Chris,
>
>With IResourceCachingStrategy you can pre/suf-fix the resource name
with
>"my.namespace.static", for example.
>This way your filter will be able to recognize it. It is the same as
adding
>the /static/ segment. Just at different place
Wicket rendered this page:
http://www.myurl.com.au/content/newArticle/o/76429/ar/486
It is mounted at /content/newArticle using a
UrlPathPageParametersEncoder
And /o/76429/ar/486 are named paramters as per 1.4 style
Wicket generates the following tag when it rendered the page:
http://web
links - correct URL generated?
>
>Are you still on 1.5-SNAPSHOT ?
>This have been fixed with WICKET-4290 few days ago
>
>On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Chris Colman
> wrote:
>> Wicket rendered this page:
>>
>> http://www.myurl.com.au/content/newArticle/o/76429/a
This was also no doubt caused by a naughty build script here which
pulled in old versions of the wicket jars!
>-Original Message-
>From: Chris Colman [mailto:chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, 18 January 2012 6:32 AM
>To: users@wicket.apache.org
>Subject: RE: J
/org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior/indi
cator-ver-1326193494000.gif
It is completely repeatable.
Yours sincerely,
Chris Colman
Pagebloom Team Leader,
Step Ahead Software
pagebloom - your business & your website growing together
Sydney: (+61 2) 9656 1278 Canberra: (+61 2) 6100 2120
Email:
ser went to the form or will it use the page URL
to perform a re-render and show any model updates that submitting the
form may have caused?
>
>
>
>On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Chris Colman
>wrote:
>
>> ** **
>>
>> I often use modal forms/dialogs so this i
That's the way we've done it too as in our app we have found the need to
do a 'reverse lookup' of mounted path -> page class.
>-Original Message-
>From: lucaabbati [mailto:luca.abb...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Sunday, 29 January 2012 5:40 AM
>To: users@wicket.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Listing all t
Chain.doFilter(ApplicationFilt
erChain.java:206)
at
com.sas.av.model.context.UrlRedirectorFilter.doFilter(UrlRedirectorFilte
r.java:77)
Using latest snapshot as of about 1 hour ago when I pull all changes on
wicket-1.5.x branch.
Yours sincerely,
Chris Colman
Pagebloom Team Leader,
St
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter
>> (ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
>> at com.sas.av.model.context.UrlRedirectorFilter.doFilter
>> (UrlRedirectorFilter.java:77)
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Using latest snapshot as of about 1 hour ago when
Wow, that SimpleCDN tool looks pretty cool.
>From a cursory glance at the doco it seems like they assume that
anything that starts with:
/wicket/resource/
is a static resource and that's what I've been doing also with good
success. I suppose I just need to remember to avoid mounting any non
sta
uary 2012 3:29 PM
>To: users@wicket.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Strange form in a panel behaviour
>
>quickstart?
>
>-igor
>
>On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Chris Colman
>wrote:
>
>> ** **
>>
>> I have a form in a panel inside the home page and all of
In trying to solve your problem of determining how the user closed the
form you might find the ModalX library in Wicketstuff useful.
ModalX (Modal eXtensions) for Wicket (part of Wickestuff) provides a
generic modal panel, modal form which you can simply extend to build
your own modal panels, moda
04 AM
>To: users@wicket.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Cannot detect ModalWindow cancel
>
>Thanks for your help! I will look into this.
>
>On 02/01/2012 11:34 AM, Chris Colman wrote:
>> In trying to solve your problem of determining how the user closed
the
>> form you might
I had a similar problem. After trying many things the only solution was
to do as the devs suggested: make sure the ModalWindow that opens the
modal with the form in it is ITSELF in a form. Not sure why this is the
only way to get modal forms with DatePickers working on IE 8 - it just
is.
We fixed
upport different CSS templates that have
different requirements for the 'wrapping comment'. Is this possible?
Yours sincerely,
Chris Colman
Pagebloom Team Leader,
Step Ahead Software
pagebloom - your business & your website growing together
Sydney: (+61 2) 9656 127
place ${urlForCss} with the result of a call to urlFor(...). You can
>also store this html as a text template, in your cms, etc.
>
>Bas
>
>Op 10-2-2012 21:41, schreef Chris Colman:
>>
>> We've been doing 'header contribution' for some time now and this
&g
rdcoded bit of html in which you
>replace ${urlForCss} with the result of a call to urlFor(...). You can
>also store this html as a text template, in your cms, etc.
>
>Bas
>
>Op 10-2-2012 21:41, schreef Chris Colman:
>>
>> We've been doing 'header contribution' fo
r (or
something like that) then I can write a simple timer that tracks how
long each page takes to render.
Yours sincerely,
Chris Colman
Pagebloom Team Leader,
Step Ahead Software
pagebloom - your business & your website growing together
Sydney: (+61 2) 9656 1278 Canberra: (+61 2)
timing
>
>I did this with a simple servlet filter, then profiled individual
service
>calls within the slower pages.
>
>On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Chris Colman
>wrote:
>
>> ** **
>>
>> I'm interested in measuring the time taken to render each individual
p
It sounds like you have a lot of layers/scaffolding (=high maintenance)
in your design.
The "exposed domain model" pattern was created to avoid all those extra
layers (especially DAOs and DTOs) in recognition of the fact that for
most applications they *feel* redundant and *seem* like code
duplica
If a user has disabled session cookies your Wicket app will still work
fine using URL rewriting.
If you stop the URL rewriting and give a message to people who have
disabled cookies you will prevent a certain % of visitors from using
your web app.
I'm not sure what that % of people is but in the
I configure StringResources for forms using the FormClass.properties
file and this works well.
Different strings can be provided for lang, locale etc.,
Is it possible to provide a different string based on the markup
'variation'
Yours sincerely,
Chris Colman
Pagebloom Team Le
"Not found" errors are bad.
What version of Wicket are you using?
>-Original Message-
>From: Ian Marshall [mailto:ianmarshall...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 8:41 AM
>To: users@wicket.apache.org
>Subject: RE: Link URLs with JSessionID truncated
>
>Hi Chris,
>
>I suppressed J
erties file.
From: Chris Colman [mailto:chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com]
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 8:09 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: StringResources in forms based on 'variation'
I configure StringResources for forms using the FormClas
I've added the RenderPerformanceListener but where is the output? Where
can we retrieve the performance stats?
>-Original Message-
>From: robert.mcguinness [mailto:robert.mcguinness@gmail.com]
>Sent: Sunday, 12 February 2012 2:22 AM
>To: users@wicket.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Wicket 'ho
>-Original Message-
>From: robmcguinness [mailto:robert.mcguinness@gmail.com]
>Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 11:17 AM
>log level must be set to debug for
>org.apache.wicket.devutils.inspector.RenderPerformanceListener.
>
>
>ex. output:
>19:14:10.563 DEBUG o.a.w.d.i.RenderPerformanceLis
I was going to suggest that the relative URL problem might be caused by:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4138
but that was fixed in 1.5.3.
Maybe it's related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4138
, fixed in 1.5.4.
In any case I would build the latest 1.5.x snapshot a
atest 1.5.x snapshot.
Yours sincerely,
Chris Colman
Pagebloom Team Leader,
Step Ahead Software
pagebloom - your business & your website growing together
Sydney: (+61 2) 9656 1278 Canberra: (+61 2) 6100 2120
Email: chr...@stepahead.com.au <mailto://chr...@stepa
Added a JIRA for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4408
If I explicitly add the component to the parent it works but I can't do
this in our app.
From: Chris Colman [mailto:chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012
What Wicket class did you use for the "I forgot my password" button. I
think it has to be one of the 'submitting' types for the model to be
updated.
>-Original Message-
>From: lang [mailto:delan...@telfort.nl]
>Sent: Sunday, 19 February 2012 8:48 AM
>To: users@wicket.apache.org
>Subject: n
Native Java serialization is wy over the top in what is spits out to
the stream. Each object that gets streamed has it's entire class name
and package name dumped to the stream. So an object that might only have
a 4 byte integer attribute in it takes up to 100 or more bytes in the
stream.
You
The advice to try a different serializer is spot on.
Serialize any object tree to file using Java's standard serializer and
then open that file in a binary editor and then you'll see why the
standard Java serialization stream takes a surprisingly large amount of
bytes to store each object.
I had
Has anyone used the new editable column classes in inmethod grid
provided by Tom Burton?
I really like the extra functionality Tom has added to inmethod grid but
I can't get the check box to appear as a check box.
It appears only as text showing either true or false.
Has anyone else tried the
301 - 400 of 613 matches
Mail list logo
