You can have a variable that contains an indication that something was
done. In the CloseButtonCallback you clear that variable and in the
WindowClosedCallback you check to see whether that variable reports
that something was done. If it was, you report to the calling page.
For me, the variable w
- Alex
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: jcar...@carmanconsulting.com [mailto:jcar...@carmanconsulting.com] On
> Behalf Of James Carman
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 4:58 PM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Best Practice passing data between Bookmarkable pages
>
You mean metadata on the session?
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> It's a good usecase for metadata. No problem there.
>
> Martijn
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Steve Mactaggart
> wrote:
>> We do pass params for the actual page's content, but this is transient
>>
In your onSubmit() method, you're referring to the local variable
"studyReference." Why not try getting the model value while inside
the method?
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:04 AM, nivs wrote:
>
> Hi James
>
> Point(s) noted. I have got something going here and it is working but is
> this what you
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 5:42 AM, nivs wrote:
> 2. firstName = new TextField("studyName",new
> PropertyModel(pModel.getObject().getStudyName(),"studyName"));
>
It should be:
new PropertyModel(pModel, "studyName").
The first argument to PropertyModel's constructor is the "root" for
the property e
se where this
> really applies), the whole page is going to be re-rendered if javascript is
> not supported. So adding components to the target is superfluous.
>
> On Aug 15, 2010, at 7:44 AM, James Carman wrote:
>
>> How does the ajax logic get executed if the client
>From the looks of the code for findSubmittingButton(), it shouldn't
matter whether you're in onError() or onSubmit(). What does
findSubmittingButton() return in onSubmit()?
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 6:59 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In a form with two submit buttons, a result must be calculated in
> onE
How does the ajax logic get executed if the client doesn't have
Javascript enabled?
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Don Ferguson wrote:
> When using AjaxRequestTarget, one always has to check for null, as in:
>
> if (target != null) {
> target.addComponent(...);
> }
>
> or suffer the con
But then all listviews that need up/down links have to be in a form.
On Aug 14, 2010 12:37 PM, "Sebastian" wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> thanks for pointing me to the reuse component concept. It solved my
> problem partially but not completely. The problem is, that the links
> provided by the listview
; time.
>
> **
> Martin
>
> 2010/8/14 Martin Makundi :
>> Still.. if value not changed, what does it matter?
>>
>> 2010/8/14 James Carman :
>>> What if the validation criteria is based on other fields too?
>>>
>>
>
> -
What if the validation criteria is based on other fields too?
study
> object/instance in the initial model should be in synch right? Correct me if
> I am wrong. Let me also think about this point u made. But yeah do let me
> know if i have made a mistake.
>
> cpm = (CompoundPropertyModel)this.getModel();reset the
> original one
>
That's not a wicket class. You're missing commons-collections.jar
On Aug 13, 2010 4:34 PM, "gnugrf" wrote:
>
> I had added wicket-extensions to my pom.xml, because I was planning on
making
> use of DataTable and DefaultDataTable, however, I hadn't yet added any
code
> that would require the depe
Your DDC is bound to the original StudyModel's study with the lines:
PropertyModel propertyModel = new
PropertyModel(studyModel.getStudy(),Constants.STUDY_STATUS);
studyStatusDpChoices = new
DropDownChoice(Constants.STUDY_DROP_DOWN_CHOICE,propertyModel,studyStatusList,defaultChoiceRenderer);
Then
apparently it was. DUH!
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> ajax file upload?
>
> -igor
>
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:06 PM, James Carman
> wrote:
>> Has anyone had any luck getting this to work? We've got a page that
>> does a fil
Has anyone had any luck getting this to work? We've got a page that
does a file upload. Everything works fine in Firefox, IE8, etc. But,
IE6 (of course) fails.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For a
I'd say at least move it to wicketstuff, so that if there's some other
person out there with the will and means to take the project on, they
can do so.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just created a ticket (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2976)
> t
If you're using Maven, you can do something similar to what I've done
in my advanced wicket application.
http://svn.carmanconsulting.com/public/wicket-advanced/trunk/
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Alec Swan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using Wicket 1.4.5 and I need to read a property from my appl
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:06 PM, wrote:
> Right, I guess that's my question, what are you losing by not calling
> super.encodeURL(url), but it may not matter because its only omitted for
> bots in the SEO example
>
You're losing session support for folks who have said they don't want
to allow coo
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:54 AM, H. Turgut Uyar wrote:
> It seems to me that I have to explain a lot of complicated things to
> explain this to the students. They are 3rd year students who have taken
> only one OO course, and that's in C++.
>
> Thank you both for your concern and help
Definitely!
I would not promote this in any introductory material. Sometimes you have
to walk before you can run.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Martin Makundi <
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Also use of compoundpropertymodel is confusing and misleading in a
> professional sense. In
Cast it?
On Aug 3, 2010 10:19 PM, "rolandpeng" wrote:
>
> Hi,I want to redirect to a dynamic webpage,but I can only get the
destination
> as a fullpath classname string .The sample code like below,
>
> String pageClass=task.getFormResourceName();
>
> WebPage page=null;
> if(pageClass.equals("com.
azy...
>
> Yes the original value must be hashed by the client. The reasoning being
> that SSL could be broken and expose the data. I don't necessarily agree
> but thats how the original system was written.
>
>
>
>
> James Carman
> Sent by: jcar...@carmancon
And, you don't want to convert it before you store it in the db? It must be
converted at the browser level? Is there any more information you can give
us that would make this requirement not sound so crazy? :)
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:15 PM, wrote:
> Correct
>
>
>
>
>
the spec I am working with.
>
>
>
>
> James Carman
> Sent by: jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
> 08/03/2010 01:45 PM
> Please respond to
> users@wicket.apache.org
>
>
> To
> users@wicket.apache.org
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: Encrypt Form Fields Using JS
>
And, what does that buy you? Why do you want to submit one-way hashed
values?
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 1:37 PM, wrote:
> Ok, the value will be hashed, one-way...anyone have any ideas?
>
>
>
>
> James Carman
> Sent by: jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
> 08/02/2010 04:4
Have you looked at the "style" property on Session?
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 3:21 AM, armandoxxx wrote:
>
> Hey wicket ppl
>
> I got a question about styling my pages.
>
> In a web app project I'm working on, we have many different users coming
> from various companies. Each company has different
Then it's not "encryption". Encrypted data should be readable to those who
have the "key."
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 3:29 PM, wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, that would work however per our business rules the
> encryption must be one-way and will not be decrypted...
>
>
>
>
> Igor Vaynberg
> 08/02
mple use a flash uploader to a servlet that has
> nice progress indicator (like gmail)
>
>
> johan
>
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 16:29, James Carman
> wrote:
> > So, is there anything I can do to "fix" the problem (aside from hitting
> the
> > user on the
is most likely the case.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 16:17, James Carman
> wrote:
> > I have a theory about what is causing this issue. Just wanted to run it
> by
> > you guys. In my log files, I first see this:
> >
>
I have a theory about what is causing this issue. Just wanted to run it by
you guys. In my log files, I first see this:
org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.InvalidUrlException:
org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: After 1 minute the Pagemap null is
still locked by: Thread[http-10080-Pro
Will mockito let you mock more than one class at once? If so, you can add
Serializable to the list.
On Jul 31, 2010 5:40 PM, "Erik Brakkee" wrote:
> That my tests will not be equivalent is no big problem. In this case I am
> really unit testing the pages while mocking the backend. That allows m
The problem with using the AspectJ-injected references occurs when you
pass your reference to another class (such as a model, for instance).
That class may not be instrumented via AspectJ to handle the
serialization/deserialization properly for that reference. So, it
will fail.
On Thu, Jul 29, 2
http://commons.apache.org/fileupload/faq.html#whole-path-from-IE
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:10 AM, vov wrote:
>
> Yes, but how to fix this problem?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/FileUpload-getClientFileName-1-4-9-vs-1-4-8-tp2306372p2306431.html
Why not set up a property on your page/component for the selected text
and use a PropertyModel?
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Eric Reagan wrote:
> Martin,
> I have the following. All I am getting is a null value. Am I setting the
> model object wrong?
>
> IModel stringObjectModel = new Load
Doh!
On Jul 23, 2010 3:13 PM, "Jim Pinkham" wrote:
> I was just looking around for my dunce cap after noticing this little
gotcha
> - and I thought of this forum instead to share my moment of
> not-so-brilliance:
>
> public LoginForm(final String id) {
> ... other stuff ...
> add(new FormComponen
= 1360371698
*** Profiler engine warning: target VM cannot load class to instrument
sun.reflect.GeneratedSerializationConstructorAccessor394
*** probably it has been unloaded recently
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:40 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Johan Compagner wrote:
>
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Johan Compagner wrote:
> the only thing i dont get is that for you the forSerialization flag
> should be true (at least the stack trace you shown us)
> So for your serialization thing you should have:
> GeneratedSerializationConstructorAccessor1 or something..
>
I
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> In these kind of cases I've learnt to trust Johan.
>
It appears I'm learning that myself!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional co
Class serializationTargetClass)
>
> and that is constructing byte code on the fly and calling defineClass
> on it which results in a new class all the time that is a
> implementation of MagicAccessorImpl
> that then is a "fake" constructor for your
I am not using intern() anywhere. Who knows if any of the gazillion
third-party libraries are using it, though. Time to fire up jmap
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Thomas Kappler
wrote:
> On 07/22/10 20:30, James Carman wrote:
>>
>> Guys, our production server is running int
private constructor:
>
> private A() {}
>
> Then i think nothing is tried to be generated.
>
>
> 2010/7/23 Andreas Prieß :
>> On 22/07/10 21:53, James Carman wrote:
>>> I'm running Tomcat, so it's:
>>>
>>> $ env | grep CATALINA
>>
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Johan Compagner wrote:
> what kind of classes are serialized constantly?
> are those proxies or other generated onces?
>
All sorts of stuff I guess. This doesn't necessarily happen on one
particular page. It just starts happening after a while and the
applicatio
t;>> Granted a webapp is not native, but some clients do desire a close to
>>> native experience and this is a nice touch.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPod
>>>
>>> On Jul 21, 2010, at 12:48 PM, James Carman
>>> wrote:
>>>
>
ttp://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/hotspot/gc/gc_tuning_6.html>these
> are my settings
> set JAVA_OPTS=%JAVA_OPTS% -Xms512m -Xmx1024m -XX:PermSize=256m
> -XX:MaxPermSize=256m
>
> 2010/7/22 James Carman [via Apache Wicket] <
> ml-node+2299232-642663496-232...@n4.nabble.com
>>
t; **
> Martin
>
> 2010/7/22 James Carman :
>> Oops! I must not have copied that line. All it said was "PermGen space"
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Martin Makundi
>> wrote:
>>> Where is the outofmemoryerror ?
>>>
>>
Oops! I must not have copied that line. All it said was "PermGen space"
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Martin Makundi
wrote:
> Where is the outofmemoryerror ?
>
> **
> Martin
>
> 2010/7/22 James Carman :
>> I'm running Wicket 1.4.9 and Sun&#
I'm running Wicket 1.4.9 and Sun's JDK 1.6.0_20 on a RHEL4 64-bit machine.
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:30 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> Guys, our production server is running into an error from time to
> time. I get the below stack trace after the site has been running for
>
Guys, our production server is running into an error from time to
time. I get the below stack trace after the site has been running for
a while. It's not running in development mode. It's running in
deployment mode. Any thoughts? What's with this
generateSerializationConstructor() stuff?
sun
If not, hit them with this...
These are not the page switching animations you're looking for. Move along.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Per Newgro wrote:
> Ok thats a point.
>
> Thanks
> Per
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: u
said, no. if you try to add something and it doesnt have
> output markup id set to true it should throw an exception just like if
> you wouldve used addcomponent()
>
> -igor
>
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:59 AM, James Carman
> wrote:
>> I'm talking about that
ou are adding children you should already know that their ids are set
>
> -igor
>
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:03 AM, James Carman
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:59 AM, James Carman
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:57 AM,
This really does save me quite a bit of code! Everywhere that I was
saving off a FeedbackPanel field to my page/component so that I could
later use it to add to an AjaxRequestTarget, GONE!
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:49 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> Here's the actual code (it works in our app
>
> -igor
>
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:34 AM, James Carman
> wrote:
>> Perhaps we could just register a AjaxRequestTarget.IListener and
>> implement the onBeforeRespond() method? You would check to see if
>> there are any messages to be shown (still looking for
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:59 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Martin Grigorov
> wrote:
>> What
>> about org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget.addChildren(MarkupContainer,
>> Class)
>>
>> I.e.: target.addChildren(getPage()
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Martin Makundi
wrote:
> Yes!
>
> Igor's solution sounds very generic... could it be a
> swith/setting/option in the framework that can simply be "turned on"?
>
I'm sure it could, very easily. But it'd have to be added to one of
the settings objects (PageSettings
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:29 PM, jcgarciam wrote:
>
> I guess what Martin and James talk about is having a FeedbackPanel at the
> top and a lot component (panels) ajaxified which only update the
> FeedbackPanel on their callbacks. Therefore they pass the FeedbackPanel on
> every Panel constructo
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> What
> about org.apache.wicket.ajax.AjaxRequestTarget.addChildren(MarkupContainer,
> Class)
>
> I.e.: target.addChildren(getPage(), IFeedback.class) ?
Even cooler!
-
To
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> yes, you are on the right track. i just described this to someone in
> irc not a few days ago...
>
> override application.newajaxrequesttarget
> register your listener
> in listener onbeforerespond check if there are any messages -
> getsess
et.getPage()) feedback panel component gets added
to the AjaxRequestTarget that's passed in.
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> there is already IFeedback interface that tags all components like
> feedbackpanel.
>
> -igor
>
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010
I've struggled with this myself in the context of AJAX events that are
handled completely by subpanels. I want only one feedback panel on
the page, but the subpanels need to be able to add them to their
AjaxRequestTarget. Perhaps you could override the default ajax
request cycle handling in some
gt; super(id, new CompoundPropertyModel(study)); So this wraps the model
> as study. How will be able to add the second model in the same manner?
> If it sounds too basic do bear with me I will experiment as well.
>
> Thanks again
> Niv
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 7:04 PM,
Your form can edit two different objects. It will edit whatever you bind
your fields to
On Jul 16, 2010 4:23 AM, "Nivedan Nadaraj" wrote:
> Hi
> Thanks for the pointer. I did read through models and
> LoadableDetachableModel. Not sure if this model addresses the problem at
> hand. Isn't LDM rel
You can use a org.apache.wicket.util.template.JavaScriptTemplate.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Ted Vinke wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
> I'm trying to accomplish something new with Wicket: output just some text,
> instead of a component. I simply can't figure out how to dynamically render
> from
Very cool. Thanks, Wicket Team!
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> there have been a lot of threads over the years about having some
> place to initialize components other than constructors. there are a
> few problems with constructors, such as not being able to call
> getP
does not address any serialization issues with
the injected references.
Regards,
Harald
Von: jcar...@carmanconsulting.com [jcar...@carmanconsulting.com] im Auftrag
von James Carman [ja...@carmanconsulting.com]
Gesendet: Samstag, 10. Juli 2010 12:35
An: us
Here's some work I did. See if it works for you:
http://svn.carmanconsulting.com/public/wicket-cdi/trunk/
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Korbinian Bachl - privat
wrote:
> Hi Igor,
>
> as I might hit the problem in next weeks (GF 3.0.1 + EJB + Wicket) i just
> wanted to ask if your code is pu
ount A' to account B' so you need to consider this
when implementing.
Ofcourse it's a dumb example nobody implements such transactions in
session memory (I hope ;)) but somebody might try similar things for
more lightweight transactions.
**
Martin
2010/7/9 James Carman :
> Th
1423-751388596-293...@n4.nabble.com
>
> wrote:
> Also yes ;)
>
> 2010/7/7 James Carman <[hidden email]<
http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2281423&i=0>>:
>
>
> > 2010/7/7 Martin Makundi <[hidden email]<
http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&n
igor
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 2:35 PM, James Carman
> wrote:
>> Right, it's doable, but there's a bit of homework you have to do to
>> make sure it all works correctly. You have to solve the whole
>> "onFirstRender" problem in a reliable way. O
> abstract Component getPart2(String id);
>
> onInitialize() {
> add(getPart1("part1"));
> add(getPart2("part1"));
> }}
>
> -igor
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 2:23 PM, James Carman
> wrote:
>> And, this method doesn't really work very
And, this method doesn't really work very well either. You can't
reliably call those abstract methods from the superclass' constructor.
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Chris Colman
wrote:
>>class Page extends Page {
>>
>>abstract Component getPart1();
>>abstract Component getPart2();
>>}
>>
2010/7/7 Martin Makundi :
> But remember... not being reconstructed does not mean that you won't
> have MULTIPLE INSTANCES of the same page.
>
> ... thanks to serialization ;)) so be warned if you code something
> that depends on instances.
It's not just serialization. A new page instance wil
Wicket stores the "state" (its fields) of a component (and thus pages)
between requests. So, your idea should work. Did you see any
serialization errors/warnings on your output log? Perhaps the
component's state can't be serialized?
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Anh <7za...@gmail.com> wrote:
Or...
new Form
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:10 AM, James Carman wrote:
> To answer your question, you can use new Form()
>
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:10 AM, James Carman
> wrote:
>> So, do you even need a form? These could be links.
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 1, 201
To answer your question, you can use new Form()
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:10 AM, James Carman wrote:
> So, do you even need a form? These could be links.
>
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Dawid Strzelczyk wrote:
>> On this form i have only 2 buttons: "Add Product to B
So, do you even need a form? These could be links.
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Dawid Strzelczyk wrote:
> On this form i have only 2 buttons: "Add Product to Basket" and "Continue
> Shopping".
>
> 2010/7/1 James Carman
>
>> What type of object are yo
What type of object are you "editing"?
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Dawid Strzelczyk wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a question about form creation.
>
> new Form< "what type should be here" >
>
> Best regards
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
You don't have to load all the data. You can "page" the data in your
data provider.
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:35 PM, adp wrote:
>
> I need to implement a data table in wicket with load on demand.
> The problem in use the existent implementations is that they load in advance
> all data and if tha
ListChoice doesn't allow you to choose multiple. You want ListMultipleChoice.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Douglas Ferguson
wrote:
> I was just attempt to use the ListChoice and it seems to me that the
> constructor signatures are wrong.
>
> The model for this should be List not List, other
Try using
InjectorHolder.getInjector().inject(this);
inside your model implementation's constructor.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:30 AM, David Meulemans
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've got an implementation of the IModel interface and I want to inject a
> Spring bean in it.
>
> In the method public String ge
Looks like if you use Spring 3.x, you can do it. You have to use the
"value" of the @Transactional annotation to figure out which tx
manager to use.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:58 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> These discussions might be of interest to you:
>
> https://jira.springso
These discussions might be of interest to you:
https://jira.springsource.org/browse/SPR-3955
http://forum.springsource.org/showthread.php?t=27754
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:34 AM, pieter claassen
wrote:
> Yes, I reload the objects using my DAOs but, I have 2 MySQL databases on the
> backend a
How are you managing transactions?
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 7:27 AM, pieter claassen
wrote:
> I find that when I delete objects from my ListView, my model object for the
> ListView still contains a reference to the object. When the view tries to
> render, the object is already removed from the dat
Why not just get it published to the main Maven repository? It's not
that difficult.
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Paul Szulc wrote:
> If you would like to, I can elp you create maven repository on google code
> for this project. Let me know.
>
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Richard Nicho
What kind of objects are they? For entities, I use a uuid for the primary
key and it's assigned when the object is created. That way you make
equals/hashcode based on the uuid so that everything stays consistent
On Jun 19, 2010 1:42 PM, "jOki" wrote:
Hi,
I tried with/without setReuseItems an
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Tim L Casey wrote:
>
>
> That’s ok. I never understood folks who don’t use layers.
>
I do use layers, when it makes sense. It's just a matter of taste, I
guess. Some folks like to stick with their paradigm no matter what.
I guess I've just become a bit more fl
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Brian Topping wrote:
> The best reason for me to keep a service/business layer talking to the DAO is
> to provide a clean transactional boundary. Then, all I have to do is add a
> Spring @Transactional annotation to the method and I'm fully atomic.
>
> If my vi
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Kent Tong wrote:
> I agree that if the service is simply delegating to the DAO without
> adding anything, then it is probably be a good idea to merge them.
> However, this sample application is meant to demonstrate how to do
> it in a general case where the servic
Just as a test, turn off the reuseItems property. See what happens.
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 5:04 AM, jOki wrote:
>
> Even Im trying to implement the remove link as:
>
> - item.add(removeLink("removeKeyword", item));
>
> and it doesnt work... always remove the last row...
>
>
> --
> View this me
erstood
folks' aversion to talking to the DAOs from the view layer, especially
when it means you have to have duplicate methods in your service layer
to do so. It just doesn't make sense to me.
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 8:01 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> Why is spring-orm version 3.0.1.RE
Why is spring-orm version 3.0.1.RELEASE and not 3.0.3.RELEASE? Why
not just uset a {spring.version} property in your POM so that it all
stays in synch?
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Kent Tong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've written a tutorial on this topic. You may check it out at
> http://www.dzone.co
Try Mawb Notes
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:42 PM, jammyjohn wrote:
>
> Could anybody suggest how to create a popup button. I read in the forum that
> a link can be attached to a button. But it did not help me.
>
> Not sure, where is the mistake in the below code.
>
> html code
> --
> //
Are you Hungarian?
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Erdinc wrote:
> I add "PG" prefix to page classes, e.g PGCustomerEditor, and "RC" to custom
> components, e.g RCDateTimeEditor.
>
>
>
>
> From: Gustavo Henrique
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Sent: Sat, June 5,
Have you tried clearing your cache on your browsers?
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Bryan Montgomery wrote:
> Hello,
> I've been banging my head against the proverbial brick wall for the last
> day. I have a fairly large web application which I've been modifying part
> of.
>
> Essentially, part
I would say you need to use your own image resource, not subclass Image itself.
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Erwin Bolwidt wrote:
> Hi Ernesto,
>
> Just got the 1.4.9 source code and I see what you mean.
> But why is it like this?
> I copied the whole Image source code to a new class, removed
I thought the filters were executed in the order of their
filter-mappings, not their filter definitions.
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:23 PM, nino martinez wael
wrote:
> Argh, how stupid.. Thanks a lot igor, how can I buy you a beer or Coke?
>
> I spend a tremendous time trying to figure out what was
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
wrote:
> I've not used jRebel, but I commonly run my applications in debug mode in
> Eclipse and do not have to restart the server - even with code changes. The
> exception is changing a method signature of classes that are already loaded
> - but
You'll have to re-create the table, perhaps?
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 5:50 PM, wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I need to turn off sorting in AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable initially and
> then click of a Ajax Link button in need to turn it On. I
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
---
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Sam Zilverberg wrote:
> I looked at "Controller" but it seems that if i use it i have to respond
> with some ModelAndView object to requests...
>
If you take care of the request yourself, by spitting back what you're
supposed to on the response, then you just retu
401 - 500 of 1919 matches
Mail list logo
