/mount/point!MK!3!MK!
johan
On 7/29/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The example is also online:
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/ajax/
So far I'm not sure what should the default look like
/mount/point|3|
or
/mount/point(3)
or maybe something else?
Does anyone have an opinion
where is the print server installed?? on the client? then talking to
it from the server is pretty hard (the client has to initiate
everything) but als installing such a thing is not really user web
friendly. Why cant you generate it on the server (html, pdf or just an
image) then send that back?
they should run fine on 2.4 (tomcat 5) or 2.5. (tomcat 6) as long as
the 2.4/2.5
methods are not called.
I guess they are just new methods that aren't implemented yet?
johan
On 8/20/07, David Leangen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just out of curiosity...
Is there a reason why Wicket is using
then you browser tells wicket that it should use English .
But you can set it yourself: Session.setLocale()
johan
On 8/22/07, smithfox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used RequiredTextField, when the field is empty, the feedback show some
meesage in English, How to change it to Chinese.
--
i think igor has some more info...
On 8/22/07, Alex Shneyderman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just started to look for a component based framework. I came across
both tapestry and wicket (and it would be hard not to as you guys
share the same host) but I kind of fail to see what the differences
Or make the fields itself not transient, but a proxy that has a transient
field
and the proxy can deserialize and inject itself again (see wicket-ioc
project)
johan
On 8/23/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why can't you just implement read/writeObject on your page/component?
-Matej
i think that is grown this way, previously the model constructor did some
more i believe
Also i don't like this(id,null) because thats just horrible, If you call the
constructor with the model then the model shouldn't be null.
a nicer way could be
public Component(final String id, IModel
/24/07, Sam Hough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Johan,
Glad it wasn't a totally silly idea. Any top tips or problems you can
share?
Nice that Igor's approach by its very nature avoids sending the same
component more than once. Trees are great ;)
Johan Compagner wrote:
this is how we
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/forminput/
and for example the string field reports the message just fine. So what are
you doing different?
johan
On 8/28/07, dzenanr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have done the following in my form and still no error messages displayed
(key is a String
i changed it on 2 places.
On 8/29/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes that should also be lazy through a model
can you create an jira issue ? (with a patch if possible)
On 8/29/07, Edvin Syse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found that when I create a new Palette
yes then you give the component for which it can get a localizer.
But i fixed it already in trunk anyway. toString() won't try to construct
the message
johan
On 8/30/07, Martin Bednář [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johan Compagner napsal(a):
thats odd
on your production machine you have enabled
look at the source :)
On 8/31/07, Thomas Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matej and Johan, thanks for your feed-back. I've tried to avoid the
WicketSessionFilter and make everything work from our code. Just curious:
is
the WicketSessionFilter handled something special by Wicket? Or how does
:
- Where the httpSession attribute with the sessionKey is set?
- Is there a working example available where WicketSessionFilter is used?
Tom
Johan Compagner wrote:
again look at the source :)
Session.get() will create a WicketSession object. (Session.findOrCreate
())
And if you then make
we already have that but it is not in the filter because the filter doesn't
have anything to do with that kind of stuff
its in
WebApplication.getSessionAttributePrefix(final WebRequest request) (dont
know why it needs the request param)
and then appended with:
Session.SESSION_ATTRIBUTE_NAME
It is needed i guess if we say that the method
protected abstract void onSubmit(AjaxRequestTarget ajaxrequesttarget, Form
form1);
needs a form parameter that can't be null
Also i see something strange in the AjaxButton because if you dont give the
form then the form parameter
can be null:
The intent was that not all kind of components could be a button because of
the single inheritance that java gives us
But like Matej said, everywhere we do an instance check of button we should
change that to do it on IFormSubmittingComponent
johan
On 9/3/07, David Leangen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a bit more info: in wicket 1.3 (default with SLC) the change objects aren't
really used anymore
(they are not stored). They only cause an increment of the page version
number..
johan
On 9/3/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
igor.vaynberg wrote:
On 8/23/07, Sam Hough [EMAIL
and in the mean time your code is obfuscated and hard to read/copy :)
On 9/3/07, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of the good minification libraries do more than just stripping
comments. usual features include:
* strip comments
* rename local variables to save space (ex:
And if yui uses that one for there own then yes it works pretty good, code
is hardly readable anymore ;(
On 9/3/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/1/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I certainly didn't want to reinvent the wheel. But all existing
solutions I was
thats a pretty nice one, it also compresses CSS. It does depend on rhino and
another jar
so its a total of 3 jars so it should be outside the wicket core or
extentions (a project by itself?)
also all the examples that i see are with the command line and input
filenames
i hope it has a interface
don't know if that is really feasible to do.
because then we have to scan through the complete classpath for resources
like js and css
and then compress them all and keep a reference to that compression all the
time thats could be quite a waste.
it all depends on how long it really takes
johan
thats very odd if that is the case, looks like a tomcat bug to me.
On 9/4/07, Ghodmode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/4/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
go to quickstart dir and run mvn package, that will create a war you
can
deploy on any servlet container.
-igor
I
into the jar and select the better (original, minified, gzipped,...)
A possible advantage, is for user of frontal like Apache, lighttpd,... to
serve those static resources
Johan Compagner wrote:
yeah but a one time hit shouldn't be to much of a problem..cache the
result
The problem with wicket
, minified+gzipped
* ...
The rules that manage the selection of the stream are configured at the
Application/ResoursesSettings level.
/david
Johan Compagner wrote:
i don't think that will work very easily because the component will make
ResourceReferences to its internal css and js files
Mr igor has this to say:
tbh it looks like a problem in cglib bytecode generation. i think i have
seen this once when i was writing salve, but i dont remember exactly what
caused it :|
if nothing he tries works you can always tell him to extract an interface
out of commentservice and use that -
+1!
On 9/4/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why thank you! (made me blush)
On 9/4/07, Cristi Manole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess it's not that appropriate to write a thank you note on this
address, but i just couldn't help myself.
What you guys did with this framework
, so I'll go with
whatever you decide.
Should I send in the patch?
Cheers,
Dave
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 09:09 +0200, Johan Compagner wrote:
we can look to add those to the interface but maybe it is better to cast
to
a Component (that has those methods)
they should be components anyway
stupid thing is that all those slides and fades and fancy ui things are not
really ajax..
thats just JavaScript/DHTML
johan
On 9/5/07, bmarvell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry if this has been asked several times but it I didn't easily find it
from a search.
Fair enough about the actual
ahh so you want to do real programming in the javascript?
So attaching purely in client side javascript events and those events call
the server?
Thats not how wicket works, in wicket you normally don't program javascript
you get it pushed
and the events get attached by the serverside.
johan
On
String js += var myMsg = ' + JavascriptUtils.escapeQuotes(new
ResourceModel(MY_MSG, null) + ) + ';;
that looks a bit wrong, try something like this
String js += var myMsg = ' + JavascriptUtils.escapeQuotes(new
ResourceModel(MY_MSG, null).getObject() + ) + ';;
On 9/5/07, Marieke Vandamme [EMAIL
thats odd ValueMap is just a hashmap so why it wants to get a username is
strange
testing..
johan
On 9/5/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like a bug in property resolver that it doesn't handle maps
properly. Johaaan?
-Matej
On 9/5/07, David Leangen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is also something really going wrong??
because 501 is this:
try
{
method = clz.getMethod(is + name, null);
}
catch (Exception e)
{
log.debug(Cannot find getter + clz + . + expression,
e);
}
can you make an jira issue for this?
On 9/4/07, Gabor Szokoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uh, oh, one more quick thing:
I'm still on wicket 1.2, and my wicket:message labels retain their
text in the locale they were first rendered in.
Is there anything I can do on locale changes to make them
Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you wrote it! :)
-igor
On 9/5/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is also something really going wrong??
because 501 is this:
try
{
method = clz.getMethod(is + name, null
I take the discussion is about removing onPopulate now?
why not keep onPopulate and remove the final?
On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the reason for it being final is that the super.onbeforerender() call HAS
to
be done last, otherwise new items do not get onbeforerender
TSEE IS THAT AS LOUD AS YOU CAN GET?
On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WHAT IS WRONG WITH IT?
-IGOR
On 9/6/07, bhupat parmar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
THE HEADER IS NOT WORKING
DIV id=header
UL
LIA href=# wicket:id=homeLinkHome/A/LI
http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=java%2C+jsfl=
java is all you need to know for wicket
so jsf seems pretty low to me in that picture..
On 9/6/07, cowwoc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This might be of interest to the Wicket community:
http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t101110.html
--
View
In Germany, the best sold car is the VW Golf. But does this mean I should
buy one? No, there are a lot of better alternatives (in the meaning of
quality and design, for example).
really? i thought it was German Build Quality! The best there is!
Are there even better? (don't mention now
please tell me, tell me!
johan
On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
because the final is there for a very important reason?
-igor
On 9/6/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I take the discussion is about removing onPopulate now?
why not keep onPopulate
, session.foo.sushi.bar);
?
On 9/6/07, Gabor Szokoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/5/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can you make an jira issue for this?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-936
Any ideas on encapsulating the session as a propertymodel
that
super.onbeforerender() be called last, that way it will cascade to any new
items added in repeater's onbeforerender().
-igor
On 9/6/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please tell me, tell me!
johan
On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
because the final
the custom serialization is already off by default for quite some time
the
org.apache.wicket.util.io.SerializableChecker$WicketNotSerializableException:
only kicks in (so also for the default) when an IOException happens with
writeObject
So that you get a nice trace which field it exactly is of
for keeping
onpopulate,
it would just be confusing
-igor
On 9/6/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and?
why can't AbstractRepeater.onBeforeRender() be not final?
If i overwrite to do what ever i want (but i do need to call
onBeforeRender
at some point else we generate an error
thats why i said the concreet repeaters that implement onPopulate should
make them final
also what do you mean with funny errors,
you only get funny errors when you override both or 1 and start calling the
other.
calling super on different times in your onBeforeRender doesn't create
anything funny
that i could make
onbeforerender final.
-igor
On 9/6/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thats why i said the concreet repeaters that implement onPopulate should
make them final
also what do you mean with funny errors,
you only get funny errors when you override both or 1
this drain my attention span.
the only reason i introduced onpopulate is so that i could make
onbeforerender final.
-igor
On 9/6/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thats why i said the concreet repeaters that implement onPopulate
should
make them
sure no problem, just point them out :)
On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, whenever those emails comein...why doesnt onbeforerender is getting
called...you can answer them :)
-igor
On 9/6/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
who? that overrides
2 tags generating the same milisecond for the same client/session?
that looks very very very odd to me.
johan
On 9/7/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Actually we discussed that.
I suggested it but as Matej wrote:
don't think so. you can have two tags
hi,
I can organize one if there is enough interest
Martijn and i will be there then.
And for example if people are also interested in the wicket security i will
also drag Maurice to the table.
johan
could do this a bit more near belgium? :-)
On 9/7/07, C. Bergström [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johan Compagner wrote:
hi,
I can organize one if there is enough interest
Martijn and i will be there then.
And for example if people are also interested in the wicket security i
invocation count 1??
So you only do 1 request and you profile that?
thats not a good test. You have to do plenty and multiply on the same time
(10 for 100 request or something like that)
to really see the difference. (and have a warm up phase)
johan
On 9/10/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe the profiling was not a perfect one. But still, I have to give up
using
SecondSessionLevelStore just because the responsiveness of the application
is very slow.
Johan Compagner wrote:
invocation count 1??
So you only do 1 request and you profile
you should call invalidate() anyway instead of invalidateNow()
there could maybe be usecases where you should call the invalidateNow() for
example if you want to invalidate
the current http session and make in the same request a new one (if that is
possible??)
But you should do invalidate()
yes please change this because else i can keep on deleting constantly stuff
:(
On 9/10/07, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@vincent
Hmm, looks like you are generating unique id's for your snapshots. I
don't think that is wise as the server will run out of disk space like
that in no
as
IPageStore (specified in session store constructor). Then go to your
tmp dir and you should be able to find the serialized pages there.
-Matej
On 9/10/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I figure it out?
Johan Compagner wrote:
if you save the page to disk how
of
the
fields, the size of the page dropped dramatically.
Alex.
Johan Compagner wrote:
you got to be kidding me...32MB
really? Or is this a nice joke so in the middle of the day :)
johan
On 9/10/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is about 32MB. Kind
The extra memory for the ClickListener is negligible and does give you
more flexibility because now you can have more than one interested party
for the link click. My use case (fetch nested component, add listener)
was already answered sufficiently by Martijn (bad OO, components should
and also keep the ui state down to a minimum - which will make your app
clusterable and thus scalable for the future.
the app is clusterable it could serialize it just fine ;)
32MB and everything is serializeable thats an accomplishment!
johan
convertvalue() isn't called for a datefield i think...
because i think the type is set (to Date) and then the converter is called:
convertedInput = converter.convertToObject(getInput(), getLocale());
so i don't think it will be trimmed...
johan
On 9/7/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and that shouldn't be done because then backbutton or what ever you do will
always
request the page again, that would fix our back button problem even more :)
but thats
a horrible user experience
johan
On 9/10/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't set the no-store flag.
what are we to provide? a prebuilt project for eclipse? a prebuilt project
for netbeans? a prebuilt project for idea? a prebuilt project for jedit? a
prebuilt project for ant? a prebuilt project for make? a prebuilt project
for buildr? a prebuilt project for foo?
i want Igors Special Build
is helpful to
me :) Amersfoort is fine for me.
Danny
On 9/7/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
I can organize one if there is enough interest
Martijn and i will be there then.
And for example if people are also interested in the wicket security i
will
also drag
just like last week?
On 9/11/07, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think Martijn will be here tomorrow Johan. He has taken some
time off to work on the book.
Maurice
On 9/11/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/11/07, Wouter Huijnink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
see my comments in that issue.
Its not that we have to do something on the serverside this is a clientside
issue.
johan
On 9/11/07, Carlos Pita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
behavior if the event is onblur. Can you submit RFE?
Done. I filed it as minor improvement
i think we are closing the response now later then we did even after
Session.detach()
will look at it.
On 8/30/07, Jan Kriesten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
with the latest snapshot I get the following exception when invalidating a
session:
---8---
[09:46:04.142]
hmm
we always closed the buffer at that place
it seems that resin suddenly wants to do a save of session objects when it
wants to redirect
that seems very odd, it should at least test if it can do that. I would
report a bug by caucho.
johan
On 8/30/07, Jan Kriesten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i think that will be a bit to much for a first time user group meeting that
is more or less for dutch people (but ofcourse everybody is welcome)
johan
On 9/12/07, Arje Cahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
Great to see that there's so much interest in a Wicket meeting in The
Netherlands!
On Sep 12, 2007, at 12:59 AM, Johan Compagner wrote:
page.getPageMap().remove(page)
johan
On 9/12/07, Justin Morgan (Logic Sector) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Okay, another newbie question. :)
I have some secured pages that require a user login. The main page
looks like a good idea
On 9/13/07, Wouter Huijnink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe it's an idea to setup a Wiki page where people can add their name
so we really get some insight in how many people would actually be
interested in joining such a meetup? Maybe it's just 10 and then I'll shut
because it seems there can be quite a lot of people
i have to look around where to do it. and also what kind of day
because this many people then 2,3 hours in the evening is maybe a bit to
little time.
we could do it in a weekend on saturday (afternoon) and then maybe later on
getting something to
shared resources and refenences to it are for basic use pretty simple,
SharedResourece.add() adds a resource under a specific name, and then
you make a ResourceReference with that same name in your component
that has a src or href that wants to show the resource
On 9/17/07, Andrew Klochkov [EMAIL
look at WebApplication.mountSharedResources()
and RequestCycle.urlFor(final ResourceReference resourceReference, ValueMap
parameters)
johan
On 9/17/07, Leszek Gawron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I already know how to serve an image from database - dead easy. Thing is
the image is a
thats completely automatic.
in your Resource that you have mounted under /images/ when you get a request
to it
you just do: Resource.getParameters()
johan
On 9/17/07, Leszek Gawron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johan Compagner wrote:
look at WebApplication.mountSharedResources
we really should make that invalidateNow() method very hard to find or
something like that.
don't use invalidateNow() so easily that is only valid is very very specific
circumstances.
just call invalidate()
But what you encounter is a bug that should be fixed if it isn't already by
matej
johan
the nullpointer comes from outside of wicket (criterion class) but you
say if you click quickly you only get it? all pages are blocked by a
barrier that is build around the pagemap. its in Session.get page
method. only 1 request can pass that at the same time.
but what is
suddenly null that you
What do you mean with Scaling?
Wicket scales pretty well. because we fully support clustering out of the
box.
So you can add just add new servers.
Wicket it self is fast, the database would be much more of a bottleneck.
johan
On 9/19/07, Lowell Kirsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For work I'm
thats final
you could try to do something with:
protected Object convertChoiceIdToChoice(String id)
But that is an id and how is that id converted to what?
Is that the ClassDescriptionBean?
And that Again must be converted to something else?
johan
On 9/19/07, Federico Fanton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
suspicion is that the browser is still busy
parsing
the last update and click B sends a form in an intermediate state.
Does that sound likely? I've seen it in the past that after innerHTML you
have to wait a while to access the DOM.
Johan Compagner wrote:
do you click fast on a dom
toString is for debug (except for the default String/Number classes and so
on)
The problem is that StirngResourceModel uses internal stuff that doesnt have
to be set at that time of the toString() call
so debug statements don't work and generate nullpointers.
johan
On 9/21/07, Jan Kriesten
wow, uploading 200+mb files! and you still go over that?
i don't think
we get the size somehow in advance
On 9/21/07, spencer.c [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a form with a FileUploadField, where the maximum file size is fairly
large (100-200MB).
I set the maximum size using the form's:
thats just a debug log:
*
catch* (Exception e)
{
*log*.debug(Cannot find getter + clz + . + expression, e);
}
maybe i should just delete that log statement to kill the confusion.
johan
On 9/25/07, Phillip Rhodes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys, I'm seeing a weird problem with Wicket.
we already have a change recorder on a page for its components, all
the methods you mention should also call that.
Then it can also be
made much more fail prove because a component should just 'fire' call
the change method. because state is not just those what you mention
but could be anything
On
but this discussion is not just about getter/setters (i don't care about
those)
but also for add and remove.. then we are getting into some other stuff
johan
On 9/26/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/26/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I disagree. We need to
componentChanged(component) on a page (or somekind of listener)
and that component did trigger it self what ever did happen on it (getting a
child, settting the visibility, or setting an internal none wicket core
property)
johan
On 9/26/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/26/07, Johan
recorder:
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=12473029framed=y
Did I get the wrong end of the stick?
Johan Compagner wrote:
we already have a change recorder on a page for its components, all
the methods you mention should also call that.
Then it can also be
made much more fail
Why don't you want session sticky load balancing?
How does none sticky sessions work then? If there are 2 request comming in
then wicket makes sure
that the page is access in one thread. So that the page is not changed by 2
threads at the same time
Does your application server lock over the nodes
Serialize to the session is a completely wrong statement
Nothing is serialized into the session, it is put in the session. and then
the application server
can serialize the session to other nodes or to disk or what ever.
If you have an standard app server and you don't have multiply nodes and you
by the final thing since I'd like them gone for
my
auto-dirty, first/last class attribute and so I can keep using onClick and
onSubmit...
If I'm hitting an imaginery brick wall then I'd be delighted to be shown
the
light.
Cheers
Sam
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
On 9/26/07, Johan Compagner
yes we do
we use it still extensively
we dont cache the changes anymore those are gone, but we still uses it to
bump up the versions
else how can we do that?
johan
On 9/29/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/27/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the problem
but then still we have the event..
johan
On 9/29/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
newVersion();
looks much better to me than addStateChange(new
ChangeThatIsNotUsedAnyway() { public void undo() });
-Matej
On 9/29/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes we do
we
) or anywhere I like.
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
On 9/27/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the problem is that that still not really does auto dirty..
Because where does it end? just add/remove/visitble/enable?
The nice thing is we have already something like that: thats page
versioning
, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but then still we have the event..
johan
On 9/29/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
newVersion();
looks much better to me than addStateChange(new
ChangeThatIsNotUsedAnyway() { public void undo() });
-Matej
be happy with a 90% solution that was very simple and that was
what I
was after. Something like the change tracker would be lovely but it seems
in
doubt if that will even exist for long. I won't raise this issue again.
Thanks for your time.
Johan Compagner wrote:
i have told you now i
look at BoundedCompoundPropertyModel (i could type the name a bit
wrong, cant check at this time) With that you can do something like:
label1.setmodel(bcpm.bind('key') and do the samething for label2
On 9/27/07, Peter Dotchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to use the same value in
nicely said! could be adde to our webpage/wiki!
On 9/29/07, Ryan Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arguments that should get some traction with managers:
- Wicket is more productive than JSF. The simple creation of custom
components, lack of XML configuration and tight Ajax integration mean
i also have been asking around for a big room.
And Servoy is willing to sponser a big room if needed (if there are really
comming 30+ people)
The problem is that the coming 2 weeks i can't do much about it because
first we (servoy) has its own conference next week (servoy world)
johan
On
are you talking about 1.2 or 1.3?
in 1.2 a session could grow a little bit because we have there max 7 pages
that all also can contain some version info.
But as you said when you do setResponsePage(Page.class) everything drops to
normal
that means that you have to use 1.3 because then the newly
ok found it, We are leaking auto add html header containers.
Looking to fix it.
On 10/3/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
are you talking about 1.2 or 1.3?
in 1.2 a session could grow a little bit because we have there max 7 pages
that all also can contain some version info
for this or is
it
to minor to justify the overhead?
bw,
Martin
Johan Compagner wrote:
ok found it, We are leaking auto add html header containers.
Looking to fix it.
On 10/3/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
are you talking about 1.2
pages are stored in the session (if they are statefull, that means they have
callbacks)
A stateless page could maybe been seen as a request scope object.
there is no such thing as a combination of those 2.
johan
On 10/3/07, dukehoops [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm evaluating Wicket as
1 - 100 of 1338 matches
Mail list logo
