t 7, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Jonathan Locke
> wrote:
>
> > so the quick start is somewhat helpful because it definitely works, but
> the
> > way it works is pretty confusing to me. the code below from the quick
> start
> > was not on any of the documentation pages i was abl
me is the filter class name.
> Copy/paste in web.xml. But this probably is not the reason.
>
> On Oct 7, 2016 5:21 AM, "Jonathan Locke" wrote:
>
> > i don't think this is probably a bug in wicket web sockets, but i was
> > wondering if you had any hints how t
s/wicket/guide/7.x/
> guide/nativewebsockets.html#nativewebsockets_2
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 6:21 AM, Jonathan Locke
> wrote:
>
> > good question! i fought with this all day today and fin
re what this means though...
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Jonathan Locke
wrote:
> it appears i never get a WebSocketPayload in onEvent. i checked in
> WebSocketBehavior.renderHead and it's getting in there and rendering JS to
> set up the web socket, but it never gets t
tring toString() {
return this.applicationKey + "-" + this.sessionIdentifier + "-" +
this.key;
}
}
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Jonathan Locke
wrote:
> it appears i never get a WebSocketPayload in onEvent. i checked in
> WebSocketBehavior.renderHead and it's get
new Information("Connected " + View.this.
webSocketConnection));
}
});
ideas?
7.4.0
9.2.2.v20140723
3.1.0
2.23.2
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Jonathan Locke
wrote:
> well this part is solved now. i believe the issue was that jersey wanted
> an olde
docs you sent. thanks!
jon
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> What exactly is the problem?
> Which impl of Wicket WebSockets do you use?
>
> On Oct 5, 2016 9:56 PM, "Jonathan Locke" wrote:
>
> > trying to find a set of maven de
, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> What exactly is the problem?
> Which impl of Wicket WebSockets do you use?
>
> On Oct 5, 2016 9:56 PM, "Jonathan Locke" wrote:
>
> > trying to find a set of maven dependencies that work for servlet api +
> > wicket
trying to find a set of maven dependencies that work for servlet api +
wicket 6.24.0 + jetty 9 + wicket web sockets + jersey
does anyone know the magic combination of version numbers?
jon
schenko:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> maybe https://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/apidocs/6.x/org/
>> apache/wicket/util/time/Duration.html
>>
>> Duration.MAXIMUM
>>
>> kind regards
>>
>> Tobias
>>
>> Am 03.10.2016 um 20:07 schrieb Jonat
hello all,
been a while! i don't quite understand the parameters of this issue i'm
running into yet, but i have an AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior that i'm adding
to my page in order to handle updates from asynchronous queries. it works
great except that *every once in a while* the timer dies and there
ah, i figured it. the behavior has to be added in onInitialize(). silly me.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-6-ajax-integration-tp4671704p4671705.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
hello all!
having some trouble with the new wicket 6 ajax. it looks much better but i
think i'm confused.
i'm trying to use AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior to call back from JS to the
server side and for some reason the behavior's renderHead() method isn't
even being called. is there something i nee
Just moved to Albuquerque and wondering if there are any Wicket folks around
here.
Jon
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Albuquerque-tp4661609.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hey there! Any Wicket people in Denver? I'm going on a trip from the 13th to
the 21st of April and wanted to find out a bit about the local tech scene...
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Denver-tp4657726.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list arch
Super cool!! Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Free-Wicket-guide-now-available-tp4657407p4657460.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubsc
Hello Wicketeers!
It's been a long while since I checked in, but I'm glad to see Wicket is
still going strong!
I'm posting because Steve Jobs recently trashed my iWeb site from beyond the
grave and so I have migrated some of that content to WordPress, where I'm
hoping to do a bit of blogging on c
Why this business about component nesting keeps coming up is really beyond
me. If you're running into non-trivial problems with keeping component
nesting in sync, you really need to stop what you're doing and back up a
step or two because you're definitely looking through the wrong end of the
Wicke
Needless to say, I don't particularly agree with most of the criticisms
listed.
And for the right job, Java isn't half as bad as you seem to think. I'd say
the trouble is Java vs. the JDK (and other libraries). While Java itself is
still reasonably cool, there is a lot of real crap out there. And
Yes, that's exactly it. Some weirdness with Tomcat sessions colliding
(although not resetting). I have a workaround for now... I simply mount each
application on a separate path and it all works. Strange.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/page-expire-ajax
I have two wicket applications running on the same box (my laptop, for
example) with one on port 8880 and one on port 8881. Each application does
ajax-self-updating. Now, if I start the first application, all is well and
will stay well forever as far as I can tell. But the exact moment i start up
t
Hooray!!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Wicket-releases-Wicket-1-5-tp3797412p3797722.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Well, even with HEAD of trunk, I'm still not getting link disabling so I may
try to create a quickstart. However, those funny errors trying to resolve
"style.css" have a workaround: simply stop using mountPackage and they go
away.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.n
Okay, will do. Thanks Martin!!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-1-5-and-Automatic-Link-Disabling-tp3748072p3751604.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
Thanks, that's useful information if I have to go back to 1.4 or if 1.5 goes
final soon. For now though, I'm looking to use 1.5 snapshot builds (trunk
head) as the last RC (1.5-RC5.1) seems to have some problems for me...
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.co
Ah, is it possible that this is a problem in the last RC that was fixed in
HEAD?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-1-5-and-Automatic-Link-Disabling-tp3748072p3749160.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Thanks for the thoughts!
This is a bit strange. Not only is it not working, but when I add that
setAutomaticLinking to my init, it causes further errors... it's apparently
trying to resolve ".style.css" (no class name)...
It's possible it's my fault somehow. I'll debug in the morning, but any
ide
In Wicket 1.5, the new mountPackage() in combination with wicket:link doesn't
seem to create links that automatically disable when you're already on the
given page. Is auto-link enable/disable still supported?
Thanks!
Jon
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nab
You don't want to copy a page map. If I understand your problem correctly,
you may want to check out continueToOriginalDestination():
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5041879/on-wickets-continuetooriginaldestination-method
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabbl
Sweet!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Big-Brazilian-e-Stores-using-Wicket-tp3539473p3539633.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Cool!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Wicket-Cookbook-Published-tp3406012p3415429.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: us
one other possibility you didn't mention is to nest or layer models. you
could use an attribute modifier with a view-adapting model that wraps the
data model to provide translation from a pure data model into a value
appropriate for the view layer. this would preserve abstraction better. make
sense
I don't think we even have an option to order servers with fewer than 8 cores
and 16GB of RAM at my day job. I think our minimum spec could easily handle
twice that load (20K sessions) on a single box. And the web tier scales out
very easily. Want more sessions, buy more boxes. I would not be worr
10K concurrent *requests* or sessions?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Is-wicket-suited-for-my-needs-tp3305543p3306071.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
You certainly do need to learn something about Java. But while you're doing
that, you also need to start learning how to think about coding. If you do
it by trial and error like this, it will take you years to learn something
you could learn in months.
--
View this message in context:
http://apa
In the end, the code above is some pretty horrific and very optional
suffering.
When I look at that code, I basically see a dislocated shoulder. A novice
went to the gym and started trying to move the weights instead of exercise
the muscle.
Thinking in Java is a good book. No doubt about it. Bu
*bows*
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/ERROR-exceded-the-65-535-byte-limit-Please-Help-me-tp3041743p3041843.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To uns
Yes. Learning Java better would certainly help, but to me there's an even
deeper problem because what we're looking at is result-oriented coding...
and result-oriented coding is what gets you into this sort of mess. The way
out of that trap in general is to start working on and thinking about
*pro
I think if you find component hierarchies to be "hell", you probably aren't
using Wicket right. Break things down into small reusable chunks using
Panels and you will find everything gets much, much easier.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Free-wicket-f
I very much appreciate the sentiment, but the book stands on its own and
nobody owes me more than "thanks" for starting Wicket. Besides, it would be
a slight to certain core developers (they know who they are) who have at
this point put in more time than me. If you want to thank the Wicket team,
s
BTW, there are also technical problems with giving you the e-book for free.
There is simply no way to do this on Amazon. Even gifting a Kindle book is
not possible at the moment.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/My-New-Book-Now-in-Dead-Tree-Format-tp299
Sorry, no. I think the price is pretty reasonable. Especially given the
cost/benefit relative to your typical software industry book. You can barely
buy two lattes for the price of my e-book here in Seattle and the profit off
a copy is about enough to buy me a beer, which I know you want to do!!
It's not on amazon.uk just yet, but if you buy it here I believe they will
ship it anywhere in the world:
https://www.createspace.com/3487090
Createspace is the demand publisher for the book and is also owned by
Amazon.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nab
Yes, but not for Linux!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/My-New-Book-Now-in-Dead-Tree-Format-tp2998832p2999635.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To u
For those of you who were grumbling about not having a Kindle, now you have
no excuse :)
http://www.amazon.com/Coding-Software-Process-Jonathan-Locke/dp/0615404820/
Would like to hear feedback from readers, of course. Also if you enjoy it
and can make time, please blog it, rate it on Amazon or
You can always read it on your Mac or PC (there's a free Kindle reader).
Also, there will be a print book. It's just been delayed a bit by some
printer issues.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Coding-On-Software-Design-Process-tp2720854p2952828.html
Sen
Yes. The other 90% is just filler.
On Oct 2, 2010, at 7:42 AM, "James Carman [via Apache
Wicket]" wrote:
> Did you make sure to put all the best stuff in the first 10% of the book? :)
>
> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Jonathan Locke
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
You can read the first 10% of any Kindle book for free. It's on the product
page on the right hand side where it says "Try it free."
http://www.amazon.com/Coding-Software-Design-Process-ebook/dp/B0042X99SA
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Coding-On-So
Excellent!
A few people have pointed out that I didn't include a Table of Contents on
the product page. I updated Amazon, but the change won't show up for 2-4
days, so here it is:
Table of Contents
Introduction
About this Book
About the Author
Acknowledgements
Chapter 1 - Practicing the
Hello Wicketeers!
I recently finished writing a short book (less than 70 pages) on software
design process. I wrote this book because I wanted a place to put down some of
the most interesting ideas and things I've learned about software design over
the years that have been too long for everyda
you're thinking of windows.
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Igor Vaynberg
> wrote:
>> i thought they were all stored as electrons
>
> My vote goes to Umpalumpa's shifting miniature pumpkins on scales
>
> Martijn
>
> --
> Become a Wicket expert, learn from
TimeUnit is icky and storing time values in primitive types is a bad idea.
Alexandru Objelean wrote:
>
> I was wondering why would wicket need Duration class as long as java
> provides a similar TimeUnit. Maybe it would be a good idea to deprecate
> this
> class & encourage usage of TimeUnit?
we did almost exactly the same thing at thoof. although occasionally you'll
get a designer stuck on a build problem or something, it works really well.
definitely the best approach in my mind.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> so you are giving designers markup from a wicket app? why not just let
> th
you've got to admit it's a short distance between bloody fist fights in a
basement for no purpose whatsoever and using struts.
Peter Ertl-3 wrote:
>
> Struts Club?!
>
> That's disgusting :-(
>
> Am 11.01.2010 um 22:57 schrieb Jonathan Locke:
>
>>
that's because it's the number one rule! nobody talks about Struts Club.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> here is an interesting tidbit
>
> wicket is on the front page of nabble
>
> http://old.nabble.com/
>
> sorted by activity. we are there along maven, jquery, cxf, tomcat,
> etc. how is the adop
honestly, your response is too thoughtful. these pointy haired bosses are
self-serving. they don't care about training costs or developer pain and
they don't really care if their org runs efficiently. what they care about
is that if there is a failure, their choice didn't cause it. which is why
yup. ibm is into it.
i also think it's telling that wicket is a global phenomenon at this
point... there are books on wicket in english (3), german (2), japanese (1)
and chinese (1). and these are independent books, not localizations of one
book.
jon
p.s. if your group needs advice, i oc
out which component
> should actually own the root lock.
>
> -igor
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Jonathan Locke
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> i know i'm jumping into this in the middle and maybe someone already
>> proposed this or it's not a good
i know i'm jumping into this in the middle and maybe someone already
proposed this or it's not a good idea for some reason that's not immediately
obvious, but i wonder if we could do some lock splitting here (in wicket
1.5?) so that the coarse grained page lock is replaced with a locking system
f
an interesting question... i had some thoughts about this as related to my
"sprockets" experiment a few years back...
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/wicket-users/200804.mbox/%3c16411092.p...@talk.nabble.com%3e
unfortunately, i know as little about GWT now as i did then.
jon
On D
not definitely looking yet, but my company was just bought and while that's a
good thing, it's unclear to me exactly how everything is going to shake out.
so i'm curious what's going on out there. i can provide references from some
of the best in the industry. you already have a code sample.
Go Wicket! :)
Maarten Bosteels wrote:
>
> Let's all vote !
>
> Even though they misspelled both "Apache" and "Wicket" :-)
>
> http://shunmugakrishna.wordpress.com/2009/12/14/what-java-web-application-frameworks-do-you-use/
>
> Maarten
>
> --
if i understand you correctly, you can set an error directly on the session
(as opposed to on a particular component) and it will display on the target
page.
Early Morning wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to make a feedback panel appear immadiately after page load
> (such
> as when you search an
don't know what you're doing exactly or if i ever tested this one, but this
might be of interest:
http://code.google.com/p/twenty-six-wicket-tricks/source/browse/trunk/twenty-six-wicket-tricks/src/main/java/com/locke/library/web/panels/caching/CachingPanel.java
jon
MartinM wrote:
>
> Hi!
except they are type-safe.
also, there is component scope.
jthomerson wrote:
>
> Basically the same.
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 7:34 AM, sakthi vel wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> What are the scopes in wicket application much like f
it's pure common sense.
"don't prematurely optimize" is just a version of "don't fix what ain't
broke".
luther.baker wrote:
>
> Thanks Igor.
>
> We're not having performance issues. I'm just mapping what we
> traditionally
> do to Wicket. I did come across
>
> CSSPackageResource.getHead
shouldn't it be one of igor's famous tables with the sort headers?
then we wouldn't need to argue over how to order it.
jWeekend wrote:
>
> I've been having some very brief communication with Ralf Eichinger who
> has been making a valuable contribution over the last few weeks by
> starting to
protected final void validate()
{
if (isEnabledInHierarchy() && isVisibleInHierarchy())
{
// since this method can be called directly by users,
this additional
check is needed
validateComponents();
why not use kitten captcha?
fatefree wrote:
>
> I saw there was an archived post about a panel that was created for this
> purpose, but the code was shared through PasteBin and it seems the urls
> are
> old and possibly, filled with some kind of virus. Does anyone still have
> or
> know of a c
y we can't put the articles online for free since they
> were written for a commercial print magazine.
>
> Regards,
> Michael
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Jonathan Locke
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> if anyone from javamagazin is reading this list, would love
on of this article ..
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 18:19, Jonathan Locke
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> btw, is this a print magazine?
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@
btw, is this a print magazine?
Rüdiger_Schulz wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> the next issue of german Javamagazin (http://www.javamagazin.de/) has
> their
> title story about Wicket. It consists of two articles. One technical one,
> showing basic setup and principles of Wicket, and another a
nice!
Rüdiger_Schulz wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> the next issue of german Javamagazin (http://www.javamagazin.de/) has
> their
> title story about Wicket. It consists of two articles. One technical one,
> showing basic setup and principles of Wicket, and another about practical
> use of t
Thanks,
Jonathan Locke
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
r.
> in my case the error appeared for a wrong wicket:id
> (using 1.3.6)
>
> it would be helpful if the error message made more sense, shall i file a
> jira issue for this? (don't know if the same message occurs in 1.4)
>
>
> Antoine
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 200
uh that was:
class EmailField extends TextField[Email]
where the square brackets are angle brackets :)
Christian Helmbold-2 wrote:
>
>
> I think the difference between sub classing and static factory methods is
> a matter of taste in this case.
>
> If I have many fields, I'd need many clas
the advantage to subclassing is that you're working better with the type
system whereas static pulls you out of the object world and should be used
with great caution. for example, subclassing enables more subclassing and
therefore more reusability. static factory methods cannot be specialized.
the advantage to subclassing is that you're working better with the type
system whereas static pulls you out of the object world and should be used
with great caution. for example, subclassing enables more subclassing and
therefore more reusability. static factory methods cannot be specialized.
yeah, i think yourkit is the way to go.
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>
> At my job we were able to connect yourkit to our production server and
> diagnose the problem in that way. If you have such spikes, it usually
> is the garbage collector trying to clean up.
>
> Martijn
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 20
Oh, it's MUCH worse than even that. Every single component constructed by
your application will get a complete Java stack trace attached to it at the
point of construction. Not only does that seriously damage your performance,
but this stack trace also takes up space! This is why we warn you abou
Oh, it's MUCH worse than even that. Every single component constructed by
your application will get a complete Java stack trace attached to it at the
point of construction. Not only does that seriously damage your performance,
but this stack trace also takes up space! This is why we warn you abou
not sure, but try getResourceSettings().setResourcePollFrequency(null) in
your app init
Matt Welch wrote:
>
> I'm experimenting with Wicket inside Google's new Java support for its App
> Engine. My simple apps run fine if the configuration is set to DEPLOYMENT,
> however in development mode, I
will this include SHARKS with FRICKIN' LASER BEAMS attached to their heads?
Otan wrote:
>
> Are you a fan of Wicket but you can't use it because your company or
> client
> is tied with PHP? Have you ever wished that Wicket was available in the
> PHP
> land?
>
> Picket to the rescue!
>
> Pick
t;
> Jonathan, can you elaborate? Why do you think jersey is better? Have you
> any experience of integrating it with wicket?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Jonathan Locke wrote:
>>
>>
>> interesting. yeah, igor's right. wicket is not for web services.
interesting. yeah, igor's right. wicket is not for web services.
i prefer jersey to restlet and jersey plays fine with wicket.
Casper Bang-3 wrote:
>
>> restlet is for building services not uis, that quote makes absolutely no
>> sense.
>>
>
> While I agree the quote smells of FUD, one does
uh, well maybe not dangerous, just less clear than it could be.
Jonathan Locke wrote:
>
>
> i think you mean to add the projects listview to the categories list view
> /item/
>
> your structure is a little dangerous here because you have one ListItem
> item
> obs
i think you mean to add the projects listview to the categories list view
/item/
your structure is a little dangerous here because you have one ListItem item
obscuring the other. if the outer one were called outerItem and the inner
one
were called innerItem, i think you meant to say outerItem.a
hey wow, this is something i might actually use on a regular basis. thanks!
Vinayak Borkar wrote:
>
> Hello fellow Wicketeers,
>
> We have released a beta version of a code search engine for open source
> Java code, that uses Wicket v1.4.
>
> You could search for wicket by following the li
So true! So true!
Can someone tell me what the surprise was afterwards? ;-)
I'll still be surprised on account of not knowing what it was since Seattle
is a bit too far from Amsterdam.
Darn, I kinda miss Holland right now...
jon
Linda van der Pal wrote:
>
> You'll just have to wait for
ectory break encapsulation?
>
> -Luther
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Jonathan Locke
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> yes, but wicket takes a different view than maven on resources in
>> general.
>> they are always closest to the component the
yes, but wicket takes a different view than maven on resources in general.
they are always closest to the component they belong to. it's a form of
encapsulation. so maybe it's wrong from maven's point of view, but putting
them in src/main/resources would be wrong from wicket's point of view. the
it's totally possible. did it at a company last year (but that's
proprietary, of course).
Martin Makundi wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> There has been some discussion in the past about using Wicket for
> rendering WML pages:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/mobile-devices.html
>
> Is there any such wml+
and there's brix, a wicket cms framework written on top of jackrabbit
John Armstrong-3 wrote:
>
> Jackrabbit is also great and does all of this and more with a nice
> friendly API wrapped around it.
>
> http://jackrabbit.apache.org/
>
> And its an apache project..
>
> I don't recommend roll
Ideally the markup should stay in the markup file and the text in that
markup that needs to be localized would be localized via wicket:message and
a properties file. In cases like below, you would break the text into
properties-localized hunks and into panels with multiple markup localization
fil
behaviors aren't really designed to work like components and render markup
like that, so it's a bit weird... what if you want to go extend or change
the markup for the feedback error? it's now embedded in a bunch of code.
walnutmon wrote:
>
> In order to add feedback next to the component I us
resources. for instance in wicketstuff examples are not packaged with
> the main component.
>
> francisco
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Jonathan Locke
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> using the maven deps is fine. the purpose i had in mind for the
>> r
etter. i know that our components are not
> necessarily mavenized, but even then we should pay particular
> attention to this one.
>
> as i said, i'm ready to get this done on my side - it would be nice if
> somebody else could work on a maven plugin or other post-
couldn't sleep tonight, so i did a bit of work on it...
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Wicket+Component+JAR+Metadata
just a quick first sketch. thoughts?
Jonathan Locke wrote:
>
>
> i don't have time to develop the metadata standard, but i could make
would be
> also nice to have at least one example of wicket component with
> metadata to play with.
>
> for a list of things i plan to do, check the issues tab of the project
> home - and feel free to add.
>
> regards
>
> francisco
>
>
> On Wed, Jan
be useful for components in maven repos. and the day we manage to
> have an automatic 'discovery' process - people won't be required to
> submit wicket-enabled-repo urls anymore.
>
> how does that sound?
>
> francisco
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:02
1 - 100 of 347 matches
Mail list logo
