Hi,
> I believe that the browser it self became a real platform for
> applications.
> > Would be nice to have a material design implemented also in Wicket, like
> > the React version,
> > www.material-ui.com
> > there is also Angular 1
> > material.angularjs.org
> > and Angular 2
> > material.angu
t; >> so how to quantify ?
> >> (What about load balancing ? What about stateless pages ? Why it does
> not
> >> scale ?)
> >>
> >> 3. JS based apps resource availability is plenty.. So for new projects
> >> better to go with thes
better to go with these ?
>> - What if the maintaining these apps becomes tedious due the cons of
>> these
>> JS discussed earlier.
>>
>> May be some more insights will help us all understand, how to choose what
>> depending on the scenari
?
- What if the maintaining these apps becomes tedious due the cons of these
JS discussed earlier.
May be some more insights will help us all understand, how to choose what
depending on the scenarios in hand.
- fzb
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabb
able to make decision.
>
> - fzb
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.
> n4.nabble.com/Wicket-vs-JS-frameworks-tp4675771p4675798.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> --
decisions,
you need to stand by those and prove it.. This topic was intended to
clarify & get more insights to be able to make decision.
- fzb
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-vs-JS-frameworks-tp4675771p4675798.html
Sent from the Users
rketing team of some company said that their product is the best.
Good luck!
>
> - fzb
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-vs-JS-frameworks-tp4675771p4675796.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Na
ill help us all understand, how to choose what
depending on the scenarios in hand.
- fzb
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-vs-JS-frameworks-tp4675771p4675796.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.
l with Wicket or otherwise.
- fzb
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-vs-JS-frameworks-tp4675771.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To u
che-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-vs-JS-frameworks-tp4675771p4675785.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional command
ll.
Lets wait n hear from some more experts on this topic. People who had done
lot of apps on JS side & Wicket side will be a good candidate, not being
Biased :)
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-vs-JS-frameworks-tp4675771p4675783.htm
zb
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.
> n4.nabble.com/Wicket-vs-JS-frameworks-tp4675771.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> -
> To unsu
e any combinations which
> works well with Wicket or otherwise.
>
> - fzb
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-vs-JS-frameworks-tp4675771.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> --
sing other frameworks as well. Are there any combinations which
works well with Wicket or otherwise.
- fzb
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-vs-JS-frameworks-tp4675771.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble
14 matches
Mail list logo
