Hi Dean,
On Jan 11, 2008, at 4:27 AM, Dean Sellers wrote:
> Hopefully I haven't caused any work for anyone as I have found the
> solution to the problem. The instructions on the xwiki admin page may
> need an update/clarification.
>
> The answer is to name the directory you expand the .war into w
You can use this:
Quoting "Esbach, Brandon" :
/**/
IE doesn't support transparency very well in PNG's (all IE versions
prior to IE7) - you can get around it though using some script. Gif
transparency works to some decent extent in most versions of IE.
Check here for more info, and a possibl
Hopefully I haven't caused any work for anyone as I have found the
solution to the problem. The instructions on the xwiki admin page may
need an update/clarification.
The answer is to name the directory you expand the .war into with a .war
extension as per;
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page
Greetings fellow earthlings,
I am hoping some generous soul can help me here, I am a thin-client app
noob, but (IMHO) not a complete muppet. What I have is a brand new Linux
(Ubuntu 6.06 server distro) server, Jboss 4.4.2.GA, mysql 5.0.22, xwiki
1.1.2, java-1.5.0-sun-1.5.0.13.
My goal is an xwiki
This is driving me nuts. Any suggestions or guidance is appreciated.
I have the following config:
Linux
Java 1.5.0_13 and 1.6.0.03
Jetty 6.1.6 and 6.1.7
MySql 5.0.44
xwiki-enterprise-web-1.2-rc-3.war
xwiki-enterprise-wiki-1.2-rc-3.xar
Firefox 2.0.0.11
I can verify that Jetty runs properly by d
The XWiki development team is pleased to announce the release of XWiki
Enterprise Manager 1.0 Milestone 3.
Go grab it at http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download
This is the last XEM 1.0 milestone. RC1 and RC2 will follow.
The main modifications since XEM 1.0M2 are all XE 1.2 branch new
Gaëtan GUYODO wrote:
> Thanks.
> You say, about databases : "mysql is the best choice for the moment".
> I planned to use Oracle 10g. Is XWiki really working with apache, fully
> fonctionnal, or is there a lot of known issues ?
> Gaëtan
>
Every performance-critical XWiki instance should run behi
Gaëtan GUYODO wrote:
> I have now a xwiki running with java 6u3, tomcat 6.0.14, Oracle
> 10.2.0.3.0, connected to an Active Directory, and it seems to work (only
> 10 minutes of tests).
> I have a question about AD users : they appear into xwiki only if they
> try to connect once. Is it normal ?
On Jan 10, 2008, at 5:08 PM, Gaëtan GUYODO wrote:
> I have now a xwiki running with java 6u3, tomcat 6.0.14, Oracle
> 10.2.0.3.0, connected to an Active Directory, and it seems to work
> (only
> 10 minutes of tests).
> I have a question about AD users : they appear into xwiki only if they
> try
I have now a xwiki running with java 6u3, tomcat 6.0.14, Oracle
10.2.0.3.0, connected to an Active Directory, and it seems to work (only
10 minutes of tests).
I have a question about AD users : they appear into xwiki only if they
try to connect once. Is it normal ?
I thought I will find all my A
Vincent,
Yes! From a users point of view improving the following areas would make a
huge difference in useability:
* A super slick WYSIWYG editor providing similar functionality as offline
web page editors/word processors to enable users to easily and quickly enter
(and cut and paste text/images
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:04:20 -, Esbach, Brandon wrote
> Did you change the Hibernate configuration to point to another database
> though?
Yew, of course (hibernate.cfg.xml is attached)
error is:
6:18:06,857 [http://127.0.0.1:8800/xwiki-enterprise-web-1.2-rc-3/bin/view/Main/
WebHome] [http-88
On Jan 10, 2008, at 2:31 PM, rssh wrote:
>
> Good day.
>
> I just download xwiki, and see, that it is not possible to set name
> of default
> database scheme other than 'xwiki'. (Becouse xwiki.tableName is
> hardcoded in
> SQL statements)
>
> Unfortunately. this means that it is hard to use x
Did you change the Hibernate configuration to point to another database
though?
To do this, change the file "hibernate.cfg.xml" under "xwiki\WEB-INF".
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of rssh
Sent: 10 January 2008 13:32
To: users@xwiki.org
Subj
Good day.
I just download xwiki, and see, that it is not possible to set name of default
database scheme other than 'xwiki'. (Becouse xwiki.tableName is hardcoded in
SQL statements)
Unfortunately. this means that it is hard to use xwiki as platform for web
application, because usually we have s
Thanks.
You say, about databases : "mysql is the best choice for the moment".
I planned to use Oracle 10g. Is XWiki really working with apache, fully
fonctionnal, or is there a lot of known issues ?
Gaëtan
Sergiu Dumitriu a écrit :
> Gaëtan GUYODO wrote:
>> I need to useApache HTTP server in fron
On Jan 10, 2008, at 12:29 PM, goldring, richard wrote:
> Just a thought:
>
> Perhaps XWiki should either allow users to edit a page with the wiki
> editor
> or the WYSIWYG editor BUT NOT BOTH and not provide translation
> between them.
> My reasoning is:
> * that swapping between the editors
Hi Sergiu,
could you please suggest me an open source program that allows me to do it? (i
don't find the option in mine :(
Thank you very much
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Sergiu Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A: XWiki Users
Inviato: Giovedì 10 gennaio 2008, 12:12:14
Oggetto: Re: [xwiki-u
Hi Brandon,
Thank you for your answer, i've tryed to embed the jscript in the skin, but
with no success...
could you please help me?
Thank you
- Messaggio originale -
Da: "Esbach, Brandon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A: XWiki Users
Inviato: Giovedì 10 gennaio 2008, 12:06:15
Oggetto: Re: [xwik
Just a thought:
Perhaps XWiki should either allow users to edit a page with the wiki editor
or the WYSIWYG editor BUT NOT BOTH and not provide translation between them.
My reasoning is:
* that swapping between the editors can mess up the formatting - which
annoys users no end.
* the WYSIWYG wiki o
On Jan 10, 2008, at 12:07 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
> j05ef wrote:
>>
>> Sergiu Dumitriu-2 wrote:
>>> But you cannot prevent smart users from using images from other
>>> sources
>>> than attachments, as they can enter HTML tags.
>> Yes I can and I want to. To achieve this, my skin only rende
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Sorry for the silly question, but i have an annoying problem on custom
> icon visualization.
>
> The background of them appear correctly transparent in firefox, instead
> in explorer it appear as "lightgrey" (as shown in the image attached)
>
> The
j05ef wrote:
>
> Sergiu Dumitriu-2 wrote:
>> But you cannot prevent smart users from using images from other sources
>> than attachments, as they can enter HTML tags.
> Yes I can and I want to. To achieve this, my skin only renders
> $doc.EscapedContent.
Ah, nice trick.
About the ImageMacro, I
IE doesn't support transparency very well in PNG's (all IE versions
prior to IE7) - you can get around it though using some script.
Gif transparency works to some decent extent in most versions of IE.
Check here for more info, and a possible workaround for the PNG problem:
http://homepage.ntlwor
Hi everybody,
Sorry for the silly question, but i have an annoying problem on custom icon
visualization.
The background of them appear correctly transparent in firefox, instead in
explorer it appear as "lightgrey" (as shown in the image attached)
The png have been created with Paint.NET 3.0...
Hi Tim,
The XWiki farm admin is looking into it this week or early next week
AFAIK.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Jan 10, 2008, at 9:05 AM, Tim Chippington Derrick wrote:
> We are still having the same problem. Is anybody actively looking at
> this issue? We are a very small group of people running a ch
We are still having the same problem. Is anybody actively looking at
this issue? We are a very small group of people running a charity
organisation and the wiki is a *very* useful resource for our members
for coordinating stuff. We really miss being able to add some new users
already, but can't
27 matches
Mail list logo
