Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

> On 26 Jun 2017, at 15:17, Adam Litke wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:04 AM, Ben De Luca > wrote: > Is there some way to make vnc/web the default for each vk. Oh I have searched > and not found. :/ > > I feel like there used to be a way to do this at the

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Ben De Luca wrote: > Are we running the same code? > > I applaud the amount of effort, but I cant image there is a depth of > testing. Oh thats right we are the testers for rhel > Hi Ben, It's always great to get constructive feedback. I've tried to look for bu

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

I really would like to hear it too. Because oVirt got my attention on how actively the community is and the tremendous progress that Frank mentioned. V. > On 29 Jun 2017, at 17:27, Frank Wall wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:51:52AM +0200, InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter > wrote: >>> 2

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

Are we running the same code? I applaud the amount of effort, but I cant image there is a depth of testing. Oh thats right we are the testers for rhel On 29 June 2017 at 21:27, Frank Wall wrote: > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:51:52AM +0200, InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter > wrote: > > > 2. Shoul

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:51:52AM +0200, InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter wrote: > > 2. Should I migrate from XenServer to oVirt? This is biased, I know, but > > I would like to hear opinions. The folks with @redhat.com email > > addresses will know how to advocate in favor of oVirt. > > in term

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

On 28.06.2017 12:33, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: >> 2. Should I migrate from XenServer to oVirt? This is biased, I know, but >> I would like to hear opinions. The folks with @redhat.com email >> addresses will know how to advocate in favor of oVirt. >> > I don't know, and I don't think (having a @redha

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Vinícius Ferrão > wrote: > >> Hello again, >> >> Setting the folder permissions to vdsm:kvm (36:36) done the trick to make >> NFS work. I wasn't expecting this to work since it does not make sense to >> me,

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 4:04 AM, Ben De Luca wrote: > Is there some way to make vnc/web the default for each vk. Oh I have > searched and not found. :/ > I feel like there used to be a way to do this at the cluster level but I also could not find it. Your best bet would be to configure VM templ

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

> 2. Should I migrate from XenServer to oVirt? This is biased, I know, but > I would like to hear opinions. The folks with @redhat.com email > addresses will know how to advocate in favor of oVirt. > in term of reliability, better stay with xenserver __

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

Is there some way to make vnc/web the default for each vk. Oh I have searched and not found. :/ On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 at 8:35 am, Fabrice Bacchella < fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > > > 4. There is any good SPICE client for macOS? Or should I just use the >> HTML5 version instead? >> > > I'm

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

> 4. There is any good SPICE client for macOS? Or should I just use the HTML5 > version instead? > > I'm afraid not. > Y. There is one spice client, RemoveViewer, but I will not call it good, it's very slow. So I tend to use the embedded vnc viewer. __

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Vinícius Ferrão wrote: > Hello again, > > Setting the folder permissions to vdsm:kvm (36:36) done the trick to make > NFS work. I wasn't expecting this to work since it does not make sense to > me, making a parallel with the iSCSI problem. > > I'm starting to beli

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

Hello again, Setting the folder permissions to vdsm:kvm (36:36) done the trick to make NFS work. I wasn't expecting this to work since it does not make sense to me, making a parallel with the iSCSI problem. I'm starting to believe that's something just bad. Perhaps the Storage system is runnin

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 12:23 AM, Vinícius Ferrão wrote: > Hello Adam and Karli, > > I will remap uid and gid of NFS to 36 and try again with NFS sharing. > > But this does not make much sense, because on iSCSI this should not > happen. There are no permissions involved and when oVirt runs the >

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

Hello Adam and Karli, I will remap uid and gid of NFS to 36 and try again with NFS sharing. But this does not make much sense, because on iSCSI this should not happen. There are no permissions involved and when oVirt runs the hosted-engine setup it creates the ext3 filesystem on the iSCSI share

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

Den 23 juni 2017 22:47 skrev Adam Litke :On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:Den 23 juni 2017 21:08 skrev Vinícius Ferrão :Hello oVirt folks.I’m a traitor of the Xen movement and was looking for some good alternatives for XenServer hyperviso

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

Hello Adam, Since the NFSv3 server is running on a FreeBSD based system I don’t want to mess with permissions (that installation was only a test). So I’ve mapped all users to root and all groups to wheel: everyone has permission to do anything on any file. # cat /etc/exports /mnt/pool/ovirt -

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Karli Sjöberg wrote: > > > Den 23 juni 2017 21:08 skrev Vinícius Ferrão : > > Hello oVirt folks. > > I’m a traitor of the Xen movement and was looking for some good > alternatives for XenServer hypervisors. I was aware of KVM for a long time > but I was missing a

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Vinícius Ferrão wrote: > Hello Adam, > > Since the NFSv3 server is running on a FreeBSD based system I don’t want > to mess with permissions (that installation was only a test). So I’ve > mapped all users to root and all groups to wheel: everyone has permission >

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

Den 23 juni 2017 21:08 skrev Vinícius Ferrão :Hello oVirt folks.I’m a traitor of the Xen movement and was looking for some good alternatives for XenServer hypervisors. I was aware of KVM for a long time but I was missing a more professional and appliance feeling of the product, and oVirt appears to

Re: [ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

Please provide links to the files /var/log/vdsm/vdsm.log and /var/log/sanlock.log on the host you are attempting to use. Does the problem happen in the same step when using NFS vs. ISCSI? How are you configuring the NFS export that you give to hosted-engine to use? On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 2:53 P

[ovirt-users] Frustration defines the deployment of Hosted Engine

Hello oVirt folks. I’m a traitor of the Xen movement and was looking for some good alternatives for XenServer hypervisors. I was aware of KVM for a long time but I was missing a more professional and appliance feeling of the product, and oVirt appears to deliver exactly what I’m looking for. D