And, I also tried changing the AjaxButton to AjaxSubmitLink in the java code
and with the same input type.../ (as in for a submit button) in the HTML
page.
I am still having the same issue.
All I am confused is, what happens such that the onSubmit method in the
AjaxButton is never called once I
Thanks for the help Igor! I was sure I had already tried to add the
friends = new HashSetUser(); line to my constructor and that it didn't
work. Apparently I screwed up somehow, because it is working after all.
Regards,
Linda
Linda van der Pal wrote:
I've created a quickstart and attached it
Spring will give you all feature you need and will need in a year...
My Frameworks for my archetype: ;)
- Wicket
- Wicketstuff-jquery
- Spring
- singleton-beans for all short-running transactions
- session-beans with extended EntityManager for long running tx (
dont
Hi guys,
I'm trying to insert a download url in a piece of template code. The
template part looks like this:
wicket:panel
span wicket:id=familyName/span
applet code=jalview.bin.JalviewLite width=100% height=750
archive=jalviewApplet.jar
param name=file value={{URL
b/c you can't put a tag into a tag ... as it says: it is a value and it needs a
value, not a tag ... xml doesn't work that way
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bas Vroling [mailto:bvrol...@cmbi.ru.nl]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Juni 2009 09:41
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff:
If I set setRenderBodyOnly(true) it doesn't work either, and then it
shouldn't complain anymore. (wicket is the one complaining, not the
applet btw)
On 10 Jun, at 09:53, Dorothée Giernoth wrote:
b/c you can't put a tag into a tag ... as it says: it is a value and
it needs a value, not a
By the way. When using @Configured one has to get AspectJ working if
I'm not mistaken?
I've been messing with it for a while now and it's not going great.
:-/ What I did was install the AJDT plugin for Eclipse and converted
my project to a AspectJ project, then I got stuck. How are you who
have
param wicket:id=filename /
add(new WebMarkupContainer(filename).add(new
SimpleAttributeModifier(value, ...)));
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Bas Vrolingbvrol...@cmbi.ru.nl wrote:
If I set setRenderBodyOnly(true) it doesn't work either, and then it
shouldn't complain anymore. (wicket is the
Projects can't require anything. It's people :)
Wicket runs on anything that supports Servlet specification.
2009/6/10 Dorothée Giernoth dorothee.giern...@kds-kg.de
Hey guys,
I got a (weird) question: a project requires us to write our own server.
But I am eager to use wicket. Now what I
Ok, that is starting to work, thanks! Now I only need to get the url
in the simpleAttributeModifier. This doesn't accept models but needs a
CharSequence, which does seem logical but how do I get the actual URL
of the dlink model in there?
On 10 Jun, at 10:48, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Now that helped. Thnx.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Marat Radchenko [mailto:slonopotamusor...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Juni 2009 11:24
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: wicket on java server
Projects can't require anything. It's people :)
Wicket runs on anything
i don't think it is possible to do... because HomePage isn't a secure page
and then it's not under swarm control when it's rendered.
i'm afraid that you have to do by your hand...
but i'm not an expert! ;-)
Luca
2009/6/9 Christopher L Merrill ch...@webperformance.com
I have a question about
You could always look at the source for how Link does it: getURL() calls:
/**
* Gets the url to use for this link.
*
* @return The URL that this link links to
*/
protected CharSequence getURL()
{
return
Thanks for the extensive feedback, but urlFor() does not accept that
as input...
I tried being smart and did this (please correct me if this is
nonsense):
add(new WebMarkupContainer(filename).add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(
value,
Hmm if you refactor your daos or domain classes you still need to
manually change your xml files..
2009/6/10 Martin Sachs sachs.mar...@gmail.com:
Spring will give you all feature you need and will need in a year...
My Frameworks for my archetype: ;)
- Wicket
- Wicketstuff-jquery
-
Frank,
Regarding your question (without joining the IOC holy-war), your experience
seems odd. The wicket rad project has examples of this approach and from
memory there are some slides from a wicket presentation in London on the
same thing floating about so I think we can conclude it is a common
Hello,
One of our applications has to be internationalized. For this we use the out
of the box Wicket solution (1.3.5) We don't set the locale anywhere. The
application is deployed on Tomcat.
When testing, we found out that the first user that accesses the application
is going to set up the
Hi.
Is it possible to use both?
CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy understands only
QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy (i.e. params encoded in x=1so=on format).
Do I need to provide my own extension to
CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy to support hybrid, or are there any
existing ones?
Is it
Seems so, my experience are that it should be working.
However if your default language are spanish (default.properties) and
you do not support english us(default_en_us.properties) it will
fallback to default.. But seems you are relying on something static?
How did you test this?
2009/6/10
why would you encrypt the hybrid?
2009/6/10 Vytautas Čivilis vytautas.civi...@gmail.com
Hi.
Is it possible to use both?
CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy understands only
QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy (i.e. params encoded in x=1so=on format).
Do I need to provide my own extension to
for the same purpose, one would encrypt QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy.
e.g., if you have /path1/path2/param1/value1
and param1/value1 might expose some business logic or security related
concerns.
in the same manner as /path1/path2/param1=value1 would
cvl
Johan Compagner wrote:
why would you
Hello,
We have properties as xml. Default is English. But we provide for instance
the translation for Argentinean Spanish:
SomePage.html
SomePage.xml
SomePage_es_AR.xml
We test using two computers, one with IE (configured as is - defaults to
English) and another FF (primary language set to
Hi Vytautas,
You can not encrypt bookmarkable URLs as encryption is done per session.
So if you're URLs need to be secure you are limited to regular Link's.
Regards,
Erik.
Vytautas Čivilis wrote:
for the same purpose, one would encrypt QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy.
e.g., if you have
It is not my choice ... I just have to make it work, so I thought there are
certain specifications that would make it work.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dasho...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Juni 2009 11:45
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff:
Hmm could you try to switch it around? So the IE uses default and FF
uses the Argentinean Spanish locale..? Just wondering about ie..
Which version of ie are it?
And could you try these:
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/hellobrowser/howdy/HelloBrowser/
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/pub/
On
Sounds like a very strange request. Government?
On Jun 10, 2009 8:37 AM, Dorothée Giernoth dorothee.giern...@kds-kg.de
wrote:
It is not my choice ... I just have to make it work, so I thought there are
certain specifications that would make it work.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von:
Hi Erik,
that's not a concern for me really - I'm providing static application
specific key (not uber secure I know), this let's me have a bookmarkable
page even with encrypted key (as enc key does not change).
The issue (more like a feature request :]), is that hybrid
encodes/decodes params in
this is how free I felt:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2321
I'd be looking forward for that especially in the context of Ajax and
keeping control over JavaScript objects on the browser side. Like
components that induce the instation of JavaScript objects in the
Browser.
No, worse, my boss :( he doesn't think tomcat is safe enough and doesn't know
how tomcat works and what's going on behind the scenes ... and we can't have
that I bet he won't let me use wicket ... b/c it's not safe enough either
*shakes head* weirdo Paranoid? I bet ...
Hi Martin,
Could you please provide an example of how you could be able to control
javascript object if you would have onRemove method?
Thanks!
Alex
Martin Funk-3 wrote:
this is how free I felt:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2321
I'd be looking forward for that especially
That'll be the first... a home built server being more secure than
tomcat, which has been around for ~6 years, and is in use by millions
of people? I thought we already were already past the idea that
security through obscurity is considered safe... It's not.
Martijn
2009/6/10 Dorothée Giernoth
In some sense it gives reason.. If you use something thats not
mainstream then the chance to get hacked are less. How development
cost must be high.
2009/6/10 Dorothée Giernoth dorothee.giern...@kds-kg.de:
No, worse, my boss :( he doesn't think tomcat is safe enough and doesn't know
how tomcat
Erik is right it doesnt make any sense to encrypt Bookmarkables
And we never encrypt /xxx/yyy/zzz anyway as far as i know
only params like x=?
And those are only for internal urls
And for hybrid the internal urls are first a bookmarkable part and then a
wicket part and if those where params
i
thats however development cost must be high (thats star high, not sky
high), since you have to implement all things your own way. But then
why use wicket? You could just do your own thing there too...
2009/6/10 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com:
In some sense it gives reason.. If
Well, for what you're going to spend to build it, you could buy one of the
big dog application servers. That way, if you get hacked, you have
someone to complain to. However, you'll find that a lot of those bigger
guys are based on open source technologies, such as tomcat or jetty.
On Jun 10,
Thanks for your help. I will try to see more into it. If i cannot solve it,
I will prepare a quickstart.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:40 PM, nino martinez wael
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm could you try to switch it around? So the IE uses default and FF
uses the Argentinean Spanish
I skipped the AJDT plugin and am doing LTW (Load-Time Weaving) now, it works.
In my case I added: (It might be of use to someone)
-javaagent:/home/kent/.ivy2/cache/org.springframework/spring-agent/jars/spring-agent-2.5.6.SEC01.jar
To the Server Overview / Open launch configuration /
Regarding Open Session in View type patterns for JPA as Adrian mentioned,
there are slides from the London Wicket event here:
http://londonwicket.googlecode.com/files/LondonWicket-OpenSessionInView.pdf
http://londonwicket.googlecode.com/files/LondonWicket-OpenSessionInView.pdf
There is a
The answer is clear.
Thanks for the answers.
cvl
Johan Compagner wrote:
Erik is right it doesnt make any sense to encrypt Bookmarkables
And we never encrypt /xxx/yyy/zzz anyway as far as i know
only params like x=?
And those are only for internal urls
And for hybrid the internal
Martjin already say that:
so you should call:
urlFor(dlink, ILinkListener.INTERFACE)
not dlink.urlFor.
Bas Vroling wrote:
Thanks for the extensive feedback, but urlFor() does not accept that
as input...
I tried being smart and did this (please correct me if this is
nonsense):
Of course I tried Martijn's suggestion, but the urlFor() function does
not accept both the dlink ILinkListener.INTERFACE arguments.
On 10 Jun, at 16:19, freak182 wrote:
Martjin already say that:
so you should call:
urlFor(dlink, ILinkListener.INTERFACE)
not dlink.urlFor.
Bas Vroling
Hi all,
Are there by any chance available slides, or a video, or code from the
last London Wicket meetup?
londonwicket hasn't been updated for a while now.
I am particularly interested in the *Bookmarkable Everything*.
Thanks!
Francisco
2009/6/2 Alastair Maw m...@almaw.com:
Hi, folks.
Unless you really enjoy rewriting things that have already been very
well written, consider finding employment doing something enjoyable.
Yeah, it's a weak market right now, but it seems unlikely that this
job is really what you are looking for. Or, perhaps we are
underestimating your boss'
Try securing the link on your HomePage and do not secure the HomePage
itself. The link has to implement ISecureComponent.
Add the permission for the link to your basic principal.
org.apache.wicket.security.hive.authorization.SimplePrincipal basic
{
//Permission for link on HomePage
hm...
how about this (i changed the method naming from onRemove to
onRemoveFromHierarchy):
@Override
protected void onRemoveFromHierarchy()
{
if (AjaxRequestTarget.get() != null) {
AjaxRequestTarget.get().appendJavascript(remove the JavaScript
Hi Francisco,
Code should be in the wiki, video unfortunately not, but next meeting
around I will try to borrow a camera
and record the proceedings..
On 10 Jun 2009, at 15:34, francisco treacy wrote:
Hi all,
Are there by any chance available slides, or a video, or code from the
last
Hi Adrian,
- Are you setting your entity manager on the threadlocal during
onBeginRequest by putting it on or relying on the inititalvalue for the
threadlocal.
I think you hit the problem here. The example I used (in German at
http://rattlab.net/2008/10/persistenz-fur-den-feedreader/)
Hi Ioannis,
What wiki? There's nothing at http://code.google.com/p/londonwicket.
Could you point me to it?
Thanks!
2009/6/10 Ioannis Mavroukakis imavrouka...@gameaccount.com:
Hi Francisco,
Code should be in the wiki, video unfortunately not, but next meeting around
I will try to borrow a
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Frank Tegtmeyerf...@fte.to wrote:
I think you hit the problem here. The example I used (in German at
http://rattlab.net/2008/10/persistenz-fur-den-feedreader/) implies
that every Request uses its own thread and I never expected threads to
be reused. I used
i dont really see what we can do to optimize this. i mean, it is
instanteneous in chrome and safari. in IE it is as slow removing all
these nodes as it is adding them so there it seems also we do not
incur any penalty. i am not sure how to optimize this loop for
firefox. we need the tree to be
Sorry I meant londonwicket ..pebkac :-) IIRC the code Al demo-ed is
probably going
to be included in Wicket, don't quite remember when though.
On 10 Jun 2009, at 16:36, francisco treacy wrote:
Hi Ioannis,
What wiki? There's nothing at http://code.google.com/p/londonwicket.
Could you point
which code would that be?
-igor
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Ioannis
Mavroukakisimavrouka...@gameaccount.com wrote:
Sorry I meant londonwicket ..pebkac :-) IIRC the code Al demo-ed is probably
going
to be included in Wicket, don't quite remember when though.
On 10 Jun 2009, at 16:36,
Bookmarkable everything.
On 10 Jun 2009, at 16:47, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
which code would that be?
-igor
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Ioannis
Mavroukakisimavrouka...@gameaccount.com wrote:
Sorry I meant londonwicket ..pebkac :-) IIRC the code Al demo-ed is
probably
going
to be included
Hi,
According to the docs [1], it should be enough to add this to your spring
XML configuration file:
context:load-time-weaver/
[1]
http://static.springframework.org/spring/docs/2.5.x/reference/aop.html#aop-aj-ltw
Maarten
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Kent Larsson
well, i hope al has been paying attention to what is happening in the
experimental branch which will be merged into trunk when 1.4 goes
final.
-igor
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Ioannis
Mavroukakisimavrouka...@gameaccount.com wrote:
Bookmarkable everything.
On 10 Jun 2009, at 16:47, Igor
Don't know if he has, care to elaborate? Are you hinting at some issue?
On 10 Jun 2009, at 16:53, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
well, i hope al has been paying attention to what is happening in the
experimental branch which will be merged into trunk when 1.4 goes
final.
-igor
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at
a lot of the code that has to do with urls, their generation, and how
they are processed, is going to change significantly in 1.5
-igor
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Ioannis
Mavroukakisimavrouka...@gameaccount.com wrote:
Don't know if he has, care to elaborate? Are you hinting at some issue?
I am looking for a good pattern/methodology to use when coding
services in small Wicket webapps. I want to use the services from
Wicket but it will also be exposed via RMI and SOAP/REST. For example,
a service for Houses and Inhabitants might have methods like this:
// Returns the houses
Hi,
Thanks for answering. But I tried that and it wasn't enough on my
computer at least. I think the documentation says that it works in
some environments but not all. Using Tomcat 6 I couldn't get it
working without the -javaagent parameter.
I'm writing from memory now so it's probably a little
http://faler.wordpress.com/2009/04/30/building-a-more-scalable-open-session-in-view/
Nice post. For some reason I thought Hibernate's Session could be configured
to do this sort of thing intrinsically (ie: starting and ending tx are
essentially noops unless something actually happened - part of
Indeed, it can seem *spooky* to start writing code at the ThreadLocal level
... but remember, threads are created, assigned, collected and reused by the
server - unless explicitly created by the application (which is highly
discouraged), they are managed by the server.
That said, the server
Jade,
There was a bug regarding this in one of the 1.4 rc's. I think it was
rc2. Could upgrade to a newer 1.4 version and try again?
Regards,
Erik.
Jade wrote:
Guys,
I am still struggling with the same :-( please advise.
Tia,
J
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Jade jada...@gmail.com
Hi Erik,
I am using version 1.3.4. And I guess migration it to version 1.4 would be
bit tough.
Anyways, that would have to be done if there is no other way around it.
Btw, any work around to over come this? Please suggest. Thanks all for your
time in educating me.
Regards,
Jade
On Thu, Jun
Ah, no that bug is not present in the 1.3 range. But upgrading to a
later 1.3 version would perhaps help as well.
See the migration guide on the wiki on how tough an 1.3 - 1.4 upgrade
will be for you. To give some perspective: I migrated a large project
within a few hours.
Regards,
Erik.
Oh yes will try to do that for sure Erik if my team and manager agrees for
it :-)
Otherwise, did you(guys) find any thing wrong in my code? or anything thats
fishy?? I am a beginner to wickets, so its obvious I must have made some
mistake :-s
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Erik van Oosten
My application must be 508 , we are using wicket , recentlyheard spring
dojo , or spring dwr provides rich UI and ajax support and its 90% 508
complaint is that true ? Please suggest us If we should go with spring
dojo or wicket ?
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:56:59 +0200, Dorothée Giernoth wrote:
No, worse, my boss :( he doesn't think tomcat is safe enough and doesn't
know how tomcat works and what's going on behind the scenes ... and we
can't have that I bet he won't let me use wicket ... b/c it's not
safe enough
If you're actually serious ... this might get you started - either way.
How Tomcat Works: A Guide to Developing Your Own Java Servlet Container
- http://my.safaribooksonline.com/097521280X
-Luther
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Sam Stainsby
s...@sustainablesoftware.com.au wrote:
68 matches
Mail list logo
