[vchkpw] Hi all, problems with SPAM and Virus

2003-01-06 Thread hare ram
Hi all its been long time iam using qmail+vpopmail+mysql+qmailadmin+sqwebmail i have serious problem now is, iam getting lot of SPAM mail to mail box of user ever iam not subscribed, and getting lot of email virus automatically Does any one point me to sort out this problem with out

Re: [vchkpw] Hi all, problems with SPAM and Virus

2003-01-06 Thread Jens Gassmann
Hi, take a look at http://www.messagewall.org , a SMTP-Proxy with spam and virusfilter. Jens hare ram wrote: Hi all its been long time iam using qmail+vpopmail+mysql+qmailadmin+sqwebmail i have serious problem now is, iam getting lot of SPAM mail to mail box of user ever iam not

[vchkpw] User defined black lists

2003-01-06 Thread Anton G. Popov
Hi all Is therea technology with wich to allow users to create their own lists of senders they don't want to get mail from. The perfect behaviour of the server would be after it gets the mail from: and rcpt to: to check in a databse and reject the mail defore it arrives, if the rcpt and

Re: [vchkpw] User defined black lists

2003-01-06 Thread Photocon
Take a look at TMDA (tagged message delivery agent). It does what you want, and a lot more. And it integrates very well with vpopmail/qmail www.tmda.net At 13:31 1/6/2003 +0200, you wrote: Is there a technology with wich to allow users to create their own lists of senders they don't want to

RE: [vchkpw] User defined black lists

2003-01-06 Thread Anton G. Popov
Hi agin. It seems that the server gets the message and then TMDA decides weather to deliver it. I am more interested in a solution, where the server rejects the mail right after it gets the from: and to: lines, if the combination is banned. ...or am I wrong? Anton. -Original Message-

RE: [vchkpw] User defined black lists

2003-01-06 Thread Photocon
I could be wrong - but I believe you want to accept/deny based on the Return-Path header, which would require that the whole email be transmitted. I think tmda is a better solution anyways, as it is an intelligent system (i.e. auto-blacklisting based on rules), can filter on headers or on

RE: [vchkpw] Hi all, problems with SPAM and Virus

2003-01-06 Thread Worldwide Telemedia
Use rblsmtpd to stop spam in your qmail-smtpd/run script and here is example /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -r relays.ordb.org -r relays.osirusoft.com -r sbl.spamhaus.org -r bl.spamcop.net \ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 21 -Original Message- From: hare ram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06

RE: [vchkpw] Hi all, problems with SPAM and Virus

2003-01-06 Thread Tom Walsh
Hare, Another one to check out is BlackHole (http://the.groovy.org/blackhole.shtml). I have done several fixes to make this work with vpopmail 5.2.1 (shame on you inter7 guys for treating a exit status 99 as a deferal... Bad programmer... no Jolt for you). BlackHole works great... and has many

[vchkpw] POP before SMTP

2003-01-06 Thread Daniel Corbe
Is there any way to get vpopmail to stamp the E-Mail address of the person who popped into the server on any outgoing messages?

Re: [vchkpw] POP before SMTP

2003-01-06 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi Daniel, On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 12:22:54 -0500 Daniel Corbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any way to get vpopmail to stamp the E-Mail address of the person who popped into the server on any outgoing messages? Not yet. But an idea would be to modify vpopmail to not only put the IP-address

Re: [vchkpw] POP before SMTP

2003-01-06 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi Peter, On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 18:51:29 +0100 Peter Palmreuther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any way to get vpopmail to stamp the E-Mail address of the person who popped into the server on any outgoing messages? Not yet. But an idea would be to modify vpopmail to not only put the

[vchkpw] Vpopmail 5.2.0 -- 5.2.1

2003-01-06 Thread Malcolm
Hi there, We're going to be upgrading a few mail servers from 5.2.0 to 5.2.1 and just wanted to check if there were any gotchas we should watch out for? Been a while since I've played around with vpopmail (almost a year) and just wanted to make sure before I trash everything. I still have my

[vchkpw] Roaming users

2003-01-06 Thread Anthony Aveley
I am using FreeBSD 4.7 and have configured vpopmail with enable-roaming=y and still roaming (Alternate ISP Clients) cannot authenticate. What am I missing? Anthony Aveley

[vchkpw] TMDA or somthing like it

2003-01-06 Thread no-exit
Hi, Is there any compatible filtering extension like TMDA or spamassassin that works with Vpopmail? I tried setting up TMDA-0.67 with Vpopmail-5.3.12, but to no avail. There is a TMDA+Vpopmail HOWTO located at http://www.visca.com/tmda/tmda_vpop.html but this is out of date and looks to be

Re: [vchkpw] Hi all, problems with SPAM and Virus

2003-01-06 Thread Michael Bowe
I am in the process of documenting how you can add qmail-scanner (anti-virus) and spamassassin (anti-spam) to my qmail mail toaster doc If you are interested, you can read the info at http://www.pipeline.com.au/staff/mbowe/isp/webmail-server.htm Michael. - Original Message - From: hare

Re: [vchkpw] TMDA or somthing like it

2003-01-06 Thread MalcolmDevLinux
Well I know TMDA works with the vpopmail 5.2 series. Not sure what's changed in the 5.3 that would prevent it from working. On 06 Jan 2003 12:13:54 -0800 no-exit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Is there any compatible filtering extension like TMDA or spamassassin that works with Vpopmail? I

Re: [vchkpw] TMDA or somthing like it

2003-01-06 Thread MalcolmDevLinux
Well here's how my .qmail files look. |preline /home/vpopmail/tmda/bin/tmda-filter -c /home/vpopmail/domains/lds.dyndns.org/.tmdarc | /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox I'm sure there's going to be some wrapping in the email but there are only two lines above. The second line

Re: [vchkpw] TMDA or somthing like it

2003-01-06 Thread no-exit
Ok that worked... almost. I did get it working however, I did what you suggested plus added the line: DELIVERY = | /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox to my /home/vpopmail/domains/plunge.net/.tmdarc Thanks alot! On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 12:41, MalcolmDevLinux wrote: Well here's

[vchkpw] problems with rbls?

2003-01-06 Thread Brendan McAlpine
Does anyone know if any of the following rbls are slow or non-functional? Starting at about 2PM EST, my smtp concurrency shot through the roof, which is usually a sign that one of the rbls i am using isn't working properly. anyone know of any problems with the following rbls:

Re: [vchkpw] problems with rbls?

2003-01-06 Thread Rick Macdougall
Hi, I removed relays.osirusoft.com this morning because of timeouts. Regards, RIck - Original Message - From: Brendan McAlpine [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 6:42 PM Subject: [vchkpw] problems with rbls? Does anyone know if any of the

Re: [vchkpw] problems with rbls?

2003-01-06 Thread Brendan McAlpine
Yeah, since I couldn't load osirusoft.com in my browser, I figured they were having a problem. So, since removing those entries, my concurrency is back at normal levels, although spam is now higher. argh Brendan On Monday, January 6, 2003, at 07:04 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote: Hi, I removed

RE: [vchkpw] TMDA or somthing like it

2003-01-06 Thread John Johnson
I use TMDA with vpopmail... There is a nice tool that will Help you A LOT with this. It's called qadmin-tmda. What It does is setup a basic config and all your files you need Then adds menus to qmailadmin for it so you can just login to Qmailadmin and change your settings, add/remove from

Re: [vchkpw] problems with rbls?

2003-01-06 Thread Bill Shupp
On Monday, January 6, 2003, at 03:42 PM, Brendan McAlpine wrote: Does anyone know if any of the following rbls are slow or non-functional? Starting at about 2PM EST, my smtp concurrency shot through the roof, which is usually a sign that one of the rbls i am using isn't working properly.

Re: [vchkpw] TMDA or somthing like it

2003-01-06 Thread Remo Mattei
BTW there is a security hole in the script for qadmin-tmda. Moreover, you cannot use it with the later version only with the version that was design for. I have modified it to work with newer version until I found the hole, then I stop using it. You can use tmda-cgi now, which I have not used yet

Re: [vchkpw] problems with rbls?

2003-01-06 Thread Paul Theodoropoulos
I got paged at 3 am because sbl.spamhaus.org was not responding, causing the smtp to stall. The frustrating part is that the -t option (timeout) for rblsmtpd doesn't appear to work. Anyone taken a stab at fixing this? I'd prefer that rblsmtpd default to allow the connection if the rbl

Re: [vchkpw] problems with rbls?

2003-01-06 Thread Bill Shupp
On Monday, January 6, 2003, at 07:51 PM, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote: I got paged at 3 am because sbl.spamhaus.org was not responding, causing the smtp to stall. The frustrating part is that the -t option (timeout) for rblsmtpd doesn't appear to work. Anyone taken a stab at fixing this?

[vchkpw] Help with smtp after pop?

2003-01-06 Thread Anthony Aveley
OS FreeBSD 4.7 Vpopmail 5.3.X Qmail 1.03 Qmail pop3d Users outside of my network are able to relay but not able to access their their pop3 accounts? Any ideas \Anthony Aveley/

Re: [vchkpw] Help with smtp after pop?

2003-01-06 Thread David Phillips
Anthony Aveley writes: Users outside of my network are able to relay but not able to access their their pop3 accounts? So you're an open relay? Please consider writing a message that contains the information we need to help you:

Re: [vchkpw] problems with rbls?

2003-01-06 Thread Paul Theodoropoulos
thanks. that entry was from a two year old rc script from an ISP i no longer run. i haven't used the timeout in so long i had to email my protege and ask him to send me that line from the old servers. i'll let him know. At 11:26 PM 01-06-2003, David Phillips wrote: Paul Theodoropoulos writes: