[vchkpw] qmail on 64 bits plataform

2007-10-10 Thread João Luiz - Terra
Hi all, Are there problems with qmail in redhat linux enterprise 64 bit? Thank you Joao

Re: [vchkpw] qmail on 64 bits plataform

2007-10-10 Thread DAve
João Luiz - Terra wrote: Hi all, Are there problems with qmail in redhat linux enterprise 64 bit? Thank you Joao I am running qmail on two SunFire servers under FreeBSD 64 with no issues and wonderful performance. I'd try it. DAve -- Three years now I've asked Google why they don't

Re: [vchkpw] qmail on 64 bits plataform

2007-10-10 Thread João Luiz - Terra
Hi DAve, Thank you! Regards, Joao - Original Message - From: DAve [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 12:59 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail on 64 bits plataform João Luiz - Terra wrote: Hi all, Are there problems with qmail in redhat linux

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.4.25 released

2007-10-10 Thread Allie D.
Is there any way to start getting SHA or even MD5 sums in these announcements ? Sourceforge has been cracked a few times so it makes me leary everytime. -- ~Allie D. On Tue, October 9, 2007 20:28, Rick Widmer wrote: http://vpopmail.sf.net/ 5.4.25 - released 9-Oct-07 Release Notes:

Re: [vchkpw] qmail high performance

2007-10-10 Thread João Luiz - Terra
Hi Tren, Thank you! I´m testing the sysstat Regards, Joao - Original Message - From: Tren Blackburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 11:51 PM Subject: RE: [vchkpw] qmail high performance -Original Message- From: João Luiz - Terra

[vchkpw] busy try again later error

2007-10-10 Thread Michael Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've been running into an issue on our mail server recently. As traffic has been increasing on it, I've been getting the response that I listed in the subject more often, and now customers are also seeing it (busy try again later!). Of course, this

Re: [vchkpw] busy try again later error

2007-10-10 Thread Rick Macdougall
Michael Johnson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've been running into an issue on our mail server recently. As traffic has been increasing on it, I've been getting the response that I listed in the subject more often, and now customers are also seeing it (busy try again

Re: [vchkpw] busy try again later error

2007-10-10 Thread Rick Macdougall
Michael Johnson wrote: I don't have that file, so I'm using the default (7200 then). How would this have an effect on POP3 connections? ___ Michael Johnson 909-740-3156 x3163 System Administrator

Re: [vchkpw] busy try again later error

2007-10-10 Thread Michael Johnson
Rick Macdougall wrote: Michael Johnson wrote: I don't have that file, so I'm using the default (7200 then). How would this have an effect on POP3 connections? ___ Michael Johnson 909-740-3156

Re: [vchkpw] busy try again later error

2007-10-10 Thread Rick Macdougall
Michael Johnson wrote: Rick Macdougall wrote: I've been running into an issue on our mail server recently. As traffic has been increasing on it, I've been getting the response that I listed in the subject more often, and now customers are also seeing it (busy try again later!). Of course, this

Re: [vchkpw] busy try again later error

2007-10-10 Thread Michael Johnson
Rick Macdougall wrote: And you have about 6K users ??? Our server with about 30K users almost never goes over 40 concurrent connections, and we do have quite a few users checking every minute. Are you sure there isn't some issue with authentication or perhaps I/O that is slowing down the

Re: [vchkpw] clamav: 0.90.2 is slow?

2007-10-10 Thread Quey
maybe you would get an answer if you asked on clamav list ;-) João Luiz - Terra wrote: Hi all, I read that the clamav version clamav: 0.90.2 has a bad performance. Is right? Which the better version of clamav? See:

Re: [vchkpw] clamav: 0.90.2 is slow?

2007-10-10 Thread João Luiz - Terra
Sorry :( Do you know the address of clamav list? Regards, Joao - Original Message - From: Quey To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 7:21 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] clamav: 0.90.2 is slow? maybe you would get an answer if you asked on clamav list ;-)

Re: [vchkpw] clamav: 0.90.2 is slow?

2007-10-10 Thread Quey
If you goto www.clamav.net there is a link to it. I heard they corrected the problem you mention in current, but clam is still way to slow compared to other scanners so I don't use it anymore. Q João Luiz - Terra wrote: Sorry :( Do you know the address of clamav list? Regards, Joao

Re: [vchkpw] clamav: 0.90.2 is slow?

2007-10-10 Thread Joshua Megerman
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 08:13:29 pm Quey wrote: If you goto www.clamav.net there is a link to it. I heard they corrected the problem you mention in current, but clam is still way to slow compared to other scanners so I don't use it anymore. Q Are you using clamscan or clamd/clamdscan?

[vchkpw] qmailadmin invalid user

2007-10-10 Thread João Luiz - Terra
Hi, Sorry. My english is not good :) I am using qmail toaster. (http://www.shupp.org/toaster) After the installation, it is all certainty smtp, pop3, webmail, but qmailadmin does not function. I enter postmaster, domain and password, but it returns invalid user. Can you help me? Regards, Joao