[vchkpw] Hi all, problems with SPAM and Virus

2003-01-06 Thread hare ram



Hi all

its been long time iam using 
qmail+vpopmail+mysql+qmailadmin+sqwebmail
i have serious problem now is, iam getting lot of 
SPAM mail to mail box of user
ever iam not subscribed, and getting lot of email 
virus automatically

Does any one point me to sort out this problem with 
out troubling my existing setup
means, this server running live, i need to fix this 
problem on live

any help will appriciate in advance

thanks
hare


Re: [vchkpw] Hi all, problems with SPAM and Virus

2003-01-06 Thread Jens Gassmann
Hi,

take a look at http://www.messagewall.org , a SMTP-Proxy with spam and 
virusfilter.

Jens


hare ram wrote:
Hi all
 
its been long time iam using qmail+vpopmail+mysql+qmailadmin+sqwebmail
i have serious problem now is, iam getting lot of SPAM mail to mail box 
of user
ever iam not subscribed, and getting lot of email virus automatically
 
Does any one point me to sort out this problem with out troubling my 
existing setup
means, this server running live, i need to fix this problem on live
 
any help will appriciate in advance
 
thanks
hare


--

Jens Gassmann		Mobil: (0179) 136 10 16
Benfleetstr.14 		50858 Köln-Weiden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 	http://www.atomix.de/






[vchkpw] User defined black lists

2003-01-06 Thread Anton G. Popov



Hi all

Is therea technology with wich to allow 
users to create their own lists of senders they don't want to get mail 
from.
The perfect behaviour of the server would be 
after it gets the mail from: and rcpt to: to check in a databse and reject the 
mail defore it arrives, if the rcpt and sender mach a user-defined 
pair.
Or do I have to write this whole thing from 
scratch...

Thanks,
Anton


Re: [vchkpw] User defined black lists

2003-01-06 Thread Photocon
Take a look at TMDA (tagged message delivery agent). It does what you want, 
and a lot more. And it integrates very well with vpopmail/qmail

www.tmda.net

At 13:31 1/6/2003 +0200, you wrote:
Is there a technology with wich to allow users to create their own lists 
of senders they don't want to get mail from.

The perfect behaviour of the server would be after it gets the mail from: 
and rcpt to: to check in a databse and reject the mail defore it arrives, 
if the rcpt and sender mach a user-defined pair.

Or do I have to write this whole thing from scratch...

--Photocon
Conrad Hunziker III
www.nightskyent.com 




RE: [vchkpw] User defined black lists

2003-01-06 Thread Anton G. Popov
Hi agin.

It seems that the server gets the message and then TMDA decides weather to
deliver it.
I am more interested in a solution, where the server rejects the mail right
after it gets the from: and to: lines, if the combination is banned.

...or am I wrong?

Anton.

-Original Message-
From: Photocon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 ßíóàðè 2003 ã. 13:44
To: Anton G. Popov
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] User defined black lists


Take a look at TMDA (tagged message delivery agent). It does what you want,
and a lot more. And it integrates very well with vpopmail/qmail

www.tmda.net

At 13:31 1/6/2003 +0200, you wrote:
Is there a technology with wich to allow users to create their own
lists
of senders they don't want to get mail from.

The perfect behaviour of the server would be after it gets the mail
from:
and rcpt to: to check in a databse and reject the mail defore it arrives,
if the rcpt and sender mach a user-defined pair.

Or do I have to write this whole thing from scratch...

--Photocon
Conrad Hunziker III
www.nightskyent.com










RE: [vchkpw] User defined black lists

2003-01-06 Thread Photocon
I could be wrong - but I believe you want to accept/deny based on the 
Return-Path header, which would require that the whole email be transmitted.

I think tmda is a better solution anyways, as it is an intelligent system 
(i.e. auto-blacklisting based on rules), can filter on headers or on 
message content, has a whitelist system and can re-write outgoing message 
headers to provide one-time message reply acceptance... yadda yadda.

At 14:14 1/6/2003 +0200, Anton G. Popov wrote:
Hi agin.

It seems that the server gets the message and then TMDA decides weather to
deliver it.
I am more interested in a solution, where the server rejects the mail right
after it gets the from: and to: lines, if the combination is banned.

...or am I wrong?

Anton.


--Photocon
Conrad Hunziker III
www.nightskyent.com 




RE: [vchkpw] Hi all, problems with SPAM and Virus

2003-01-06 Thread Worldwide Telemedia

Use rblsmtpd to stop spam in your qmail-smtpd/run script and here is example

/usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -r relays.ordb.org -r relays.osirusoft.com -r
sbl.spamhaus.org -r bl.spamcop.net \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 21

-Original Message-
From: hare ram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 January 2003 10:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [vchkpw] Hi all, problems with SPAM and Virus


Hi all

its been long time iam using qmail+vpopmail+mysql+qmailadmin+sqwebmail
i have serious problem now is, iam getting lot of SPAM mail to mail box of
user
ever iam not subscribed, and getting lot of email virus automatically

Does any one point me to sort out this problem with out troubling my
existing setup
means, this server running live, i need to fix this problem on live

any help will appriciate in advance

thanks
hare





RE: [vchkpw] Hi all, problems with SPAM and Virus

2003-01-06 Thread Tom Walsh
Hare,

Another one to check out is BlackHole
(http://the.groovy.org/blackhole.shtml).

I have done several fixes to make this work with vpopmail 5.2.1 (shame on
you inter7 guys for treating a exit status 99 as a deferal... Bad
programmer... no Jolt for you).

BlackHole works great... and has many features including moving spam and
viruii to an IMAP folder rather than the normal inbox to prevent POP3
download (a big plus in an ISP enviroment). Blacklist, whitelists, advanced
dns filtering... and so on.

All that and opensource too... it even can use an opensource virus scanner
(clamscan, which is just a cool name for a virus program anyways... ;)

Check it out, if you run into any trouble getting it to work with vpopmail,
drop a line to the Blackhole mailing list... I am on both (vchkpw and
blackhole)...

Tom Walsh
Network Administrator
http://www.ala.net/

-Original Message-
From: hare ram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 4:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [vchkpw] Hi all, problems with SPAM and Virus


Hi all

its been long time iam using qmail+vpopmail+mysql+qmailadmin+sqwebmail
i have serious problem now is, iam getting lot of SPAM mail to mail box of
user
ever iam not subscribed, and getting lot of email virus automatically

Does any one point me to sort out this problem with out troubling my
existing setup
means, this server running live, i need to fix this problem on live

any help will appriciate in advance

thanks
hare






[vchkpw] POP before SMTP

2003-01-06 Thread Daniel Corbe

Is there any way to get vpopmail to stamp the E-Mail address of the person
who popped into the server on any outgoing messages?






Re: [vchkpw] POP before SMTP

2003-01-06 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi Daniel,

On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 12:22:54 -0500
Daniel Corbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Is there any way to get vpopmail to stamp the E-Mail address of the
 person who popped into the server on any outgoing messages?

Not yet. But an idea would be to modify vpopmail to not only put the
IP-address and RELAYCLIENT= of the caller into tcp.smtp.cdb but also
TCPREMOTEINFO=username.
Should be a rather easy patch.
-- 
Pit




Re: [vchkpw] POP before SMTP

2003-01-06 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi Peter,

On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 18:51:29 +0100
Peter Palmreuther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Is there any way to get vpopmail to stamp the E-Mail address of the
 person who popped into the server on any outgoing messages?
 
 Not yet. But an idea would be to modify vpopmail to not only put the
 IP-address and RELAYCLIENT= of the caller into tcp.smtp.cdb but also
 TCPREMOTEINFO=username.
 Should be a rather easy patch.

One addition: if several person are using a PROXY or NATtin gateway to
check theyr mail the information put into TCPREMOTEINFO will be probably
wrong!
-- 
Pit




[vchkpw] Vpopmail 5.2.0 -- 5.2.1

2003-01-06 Thread Malcolm
Hi there,

We're going to be upgrading a few mail servers from 5.2.0 to 5.2.1 and
just wanted to check if there were any gotchas we should watch out for?

Been a while since I've played around with vpopmail (almost a year) and
just wanted to make sure before I trash everything.

I still have my original configure options saved.  Can I just use those
same configure options? and then a 'make' and 'make install'?  I'm
assuming I need to stop qmail before doing the 'make install'?

Thanks
Malcolm




[vchkpw] Roaming users

2003-01-06 Thread Anthony Aveley








I am using FreeBSD 4.7 and have configured vpopmail with
enable-roaming=y and still roaming (Alternate ISP Clients) cannot
authenticate.



What am I missing?





Anthony Aveley








[vchkpw] TMDA or somthing like it

2003-01-06 Thread no-exit
Hi,
Is there any compatible filtering extension like TMDA or spamassassin
that works with Vpopmail?

I tried setting up TMDA-0.67 with Vpopmail-5.3.12, but to no avail.

There is a TMDA+Vpopmail HOWTO located at
http://www.visca.com/tmda/tmda_vpop.html
but this is out of date and looks to be incomplete.

I love vpopmail, but i really want some kind of filtering or
confermation capability.

Thanks in advance.
-- 
no-exit [EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: [vchkpw] Hi all, problems with SPAM and Virus

2003-01-06 Thread Michael Bowe
I am in the process of documenting how you can add qmail-scanner
(anti-virus) and spamassassin (anti-spam) to my qmail mail toaster doc

If you are interested, you can read the info at
http://www.pipeline.com.au/staff/mbowe/isp/webmail-server.htm

Michael.


- Original Message -
From: hare ram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 9:53 PM
Subject: [vchkpw] Hi all, problems with SPAM and Virus


Hi all

its been long time iam using qmail+vpopmail+mysql+qmailadmin+sqwebmail
i have serious problem now is, iam getting lot of SPAM mail to mail box of
user
ever iam not subscribed, and getting lot of email virus automatically

Does any one point me to sort out this problem with out troubling my
existing setup
means, this server running live, i need to fix this problem on live

any help will appriciate in advance

thanks
hare





Re: [vchkpw] TMDA or somthing like it

2003-01-06 Thread MalcolmDevLinux
Well I know TMDA works with the vpopmail 5.2 series.  Not sure what's
changed in the 5.3 that would prevent it from working.

On 06 Jan 2003 12:13:54 -0800
no-exit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 Is there any compatible filtering extension like TMDA or spamassassin
 that works with Vpopmail?
 
 I tried setting up TMDA-0.67 with Vpopmail-5.3.12, but to no avail.
 
 There is a TMDA+Vpopmail HOWTO located at
 http://www.visca.com/tmda/tmda_vpop.html
 but this is out of date and looks to be incomplete.
 
 I love vpopmail, but i really want some kind of filtering or
 confermation capability.
 
 Thanks in advance.
 -- 
 no-exit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 




Re: [vchkpw] TMDA or somthing like it

2003-01-06 Thread MalcolmDevLinux
Well here's how my .qmail files look.

|preline /home/vpopmail/tmda/bin/tmda-filter -c
/home/vpopmail/domains/lds.dyndns.org/.tmdarc
| /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox

I'm sure there's going to be some wrapping in the email but there are
only two lines above.  The second line starts with the |  /home.

We have vpopmail installed in /home/vpopmail
Our .qmail files exist in /home/vpopmail/domains/lds.dyndns.org/ (which
I'm sure is pretty standard).

On 06 Jan 2003 12:25:01 -0800
no-exit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 So I should just use a standard install of TMDA or do I need to do
 anything special to get it to work with vpopmai.
 
 do you have an example of how I need to setup the .qmail files?
 
 On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 12:21, MalcolmDevLinux wrote:
  Well I know TMDA works with the vpopmail 5.2 series.  Not sure
  what's changed in the 5.3 that would prevent it from working.
  
  On 06 Jan 2003 12:13:54 -0800
  no-exit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Hi,
   Is there any compatible filtering extension like TMDA or
   spamassassin that works with Vpopmail?
   
   I tried setting up TMDA-0.67 with Vpopmail-5.3.12, but to no
   avail.
   
   There is a TMDA+Vpopmail HOWTO located at
   http://www.visca.com/tmda/tmda_vpop.html
   but this is out of date and looks to be incomplete.
   
   I love vpopmail, but i really want some kind of filtering or
   confermation capability.
   
   Thanks in advance.
   -- 
   no-exit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   
   
 -- 
 no-exit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 




Re: [vchkpw] TMDA or somthing like it

2003-01-06 Thread no-exit
Ok that worked... almost.
I did get it working however, I did what you suggested plus
added the line:
DELIVERY = | /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox
to my /home/vpopmail/domains/plunge.net/.tmdarc

Thanks alot!

On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 12:41, MalcolmDevLinux wrote:
 Well here's how my .qmail files look.
 
 |preline /home/vpopmail/tmda/bin/tmda-filter -c
 /home/vpopmail/domains/lds.dyndns.org/.tmdarc
 | /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox
 
 I'm sure there's going to be some wrapping in the email but there are
 only two lines above.  The second line starts with the |  /home.
 
 We have vpopmail installed in /home/vpopmail
 Our .qmail files exist in /home/vpopmail/domains/lds.dyndns.org/ (which
 I'm sure is pretty standard).
 
 On 06 Jan 2003 12:25:01 -0800
 no-exit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  So I should just use a standard install of TMDA or do I need to do
  anything special to get it to work with vpopmai.
  
  do you have an example of how I need to setup the .qmail files?
  
  On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 12:21, MalcolmDevLinux wrote:
   Well I know TMDA works with the vpopmail 5.2 series.  Not sure
   what's changed in the 5.3 that would prevent it from working.
   
   On 06 Jan 2003 12:13:54 -0800
   no-exit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
Hi,
Is there any compatible filtering extension like TMDA or
spamassassin that works with Vpopmail?

I tried setting up TMDA-0.67 with Vpopmail-5.3.12, but to no
avail.

There is a TMDA+Vpopmail HOWTO located at
http://www.visca.com/tmda/tmda_vpop.html
but this is out of date and looks to be incomplete.

I love vpopmail, but i really want some kind of filtering or
confermation capability.

Thanks in advance.
-- 
no-exit [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  -- 
  no-exit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
-- 
no-exit [EMAIL PROTECTED]



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[vchkpw] problems with rbls?

2003-01-06 Thread Brendan McAlpine
Does anyone know if any of the following rbls are slow or 
non-functional?

Starting at about 2PM EST, my smtp concurrency shot through the roof, 
which is usually a sign that one of the rbls i am using isn't working 
properly.  anyone know of any problems with the following rbls:

korea.services.net
relays.ordb.org
relays.osirusoft.com
sbl.spamhaus.org
spews.relays.osirusoft.com

If nothing is wrong, any reason why my smtp concurrency would shoot up 
to its maximum?  I am watching the smtp log roll by and it doesn't seem 
to be an attack from any one address..

TIA

Brendan




Re: [vchkpw] problems with rbls?

2003-01-06 Thread Rick Macdougall
Hi,

I removed relays.osirusoft.com this morning because of timeouts.

Regards,

RIck

- Original Message - 
From: Brendan McAlpine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 6:42 PM
Subject: [vchkpw] problems with rbls?


Does anyone know if any of the following rbls are slow or 
non-functional?

Starting at about 2PM EST, my smtp concurrency shot through the roof, 
which is usually a sign that one of the rbls i am using isn't working 
properly.  anyone know of any problems with the following rbls:

korea.services.net
relays.ordb.org
relays.osirusoft.com
sbl.spamhaus.org
spews.relays.osirusoft.com

If nothing is wrong, any reason why my smtp concurrency would shoot up 
to its maximum?  I am watching the smtp log roll by and it doesn't seem 
to be an attack from any one address..

TIA

Brendan







Re: [vchkpw] problems with rbls?

2003-01-06 Thread Brendan McAlpine
Yeah, since I couldn't load osirusoft.com in my browser, I figured they 
were having a problem.

So, since removing those entries, my concurrency is back at normal 
levels, although spam is now higher.

argh

Brendan
On Monday, January 6, 2003, at 07:04 PM, Rick Macdougall wrote:

Hi,

I removed relays.osirusoft.com this morning because of timeouts.

Regards,

RIck

- Original Message -
From: Brendan McAlpine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 6:42 PM
Subject: [vchkpw] problems with rbls?


Does anyone know if any of the following rbls are slow or
non-functional?

Starting at about 2PM EST, my smtp concurrency shot through the roof,
which is usually a sign that one of the rbls i am using isn't working
properly.  anyone know of any problems with the following rbls:

korea.services.net
relays.ordb.org
relays.osirusoft.com
sbl.spamhaus.org
spews.relays.osirusoft.com

If nothing is wrong, any reason why my smtp concurrency would shoot up
to its maximum?  I am watching the smtp log roll by and it doesn't seem
to be an attack from any one address..

TIA

Brendan











RE: [vchkpw] TMDA or somthing like it

2003-01-06 Thread John Johnson
 I use TMDA with vpopmail... There is a nice tool that will
Help you A LOT with this. It's called qadmin-tmda.  What
It does is setup a basic config and all your files you need
Then adds menus to qmailadmin for it so you can just login to
Qmailadmin and change your settings, add/remove from whitelist
Or blacklist, view what is in the pending queue.. I Love it
And would not be able to use tmda with out it.
 The url is http://qadmin-tmda.samstech.net/

-John

 -Original Message-
 From: no-exit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 12:14 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [vchkpw] TMDA or somthing like it
 
 
 Hi,
 Is there any compatible filtering extension like TMDA or 
 spamassassin that works with Vpopmail?
 
 I tried setting up TMDA-0.67 with Vpopmail-5.3.12, but to no avail.
 
 There is a TMDA+Vpopmail HOWTO located at 
 http://www.visca.com/tmda/tmda_vpop.html
 but this is out of 
 date and looks to be incomplete.
 
 I love vpopmail, but i really want some kind of filtering or 
 confermation capability.
 
 Thanks in advance.
 -- 
 no-exit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 





Re: [vchkpw] problems with rbls?

2003-01-06 Thread Bill Shupp

On Monday, January 6, 2003, at 03:42  PM, Brendan McAlpine wrote:


Does anyone know if any of the following rbls are slow or 
non-functional?

Starting at about 2PM EST, my smtp concurrency shot through the roof, 
which is usually a sign that one of the rbls i am using isn't working 
properly.  anyone know of any problems with the following rbls:

korea.services.net
relays.ordb.org
relays.osirusoft.com
sbl.spamhaus.org
spews.relays.osirusoft.com

If nothing is wrong, any reason why my smtp concurrency would shoot up 
to its maximum?  I am watching the smtp log roll by and it doesn't 
seem to be an attack from any one address..

I got paged at 3 am because sbl.spamhaus.org was not responding, 
causing the smtp to stall.  The frustrating part is that the -t option 
(timeout) for rblsmtpd doesn't appear to work.  Anyone taken a stab at 
fixing this?  I'd prefer that rblsmtpd default to allow the connection 
if the rbl cannot be reached in x seconds.

Regards,

Bill Shupp




Re: [vchkpw] TMDA or somthing like it

2003-01-06 Thread Remo Mattei
BTW there is a security hole in the script for qadmin-tmda. Moreover, you
cannot use it with the later version only with the version that was design
for. I have modified it to work with newer version until I found the hole,
then I stop using it. You can use tmda-cgi now, which I have not used yet
but seems really good.

REMO

 From: John Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 18:24:05 -0800
 To: 'no-exit' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [vchkpw] TMDA or somthing like it
 
 I use TMDA with vpopmail... There is a nice tool that will
 Help you A LOT with this. It's called qadmin-tmda.  What
 It does is setup a basic config and all your files you need
 Then adds menus to qmailadmin for it so you can just login to
 Qmailadmin and change your settings, add/remove from whitelist
 Or blacklist, view what is in the pending queue.. I Love it
 And would not be able to use tmda with out it.
 The url is http://qadmin-tmda.samstech.net/
 
 -John
 
 -Original Message-
 From: no-exit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 12:14 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [vchkpw] TMDA or somthing like it
 
 
 Hi,
 Is there any compatible filtering extension like TMDA or
 spamassassin that works with Vpopmail?
 
 I tried setting up TMDA-0.67 with Vpopmail-5.3.12, but to no avail.
 
 There is a TMDA+Vpopmail HOWTO located at
 http://www.visca.com/tmda/tmda_vpop.html
 but this is out of
 date and looks to be incomplete.
 
 I love vpopmail, but i really want some kind of filtering or
 confermation capability.
 
 Thanks in advance.
 -- 
 no-exit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




Re: [vchkpw] problems with rbls?

2003-01-06 Thread Paul Theodoropoulos


I got paged at 3 am because sbl.spamhaus.org was not responding, causing 
the smtp to stall.  The frustrating part is that the -t option (timeout) 
for rblsmtpd doesn't appear to work.  Anyone taken a stab at fixing 
this?  I'd prefer that rblsmtpd default to allow the connection if the rbl 
cannot be reached in x seconds.

the -t option has to go at the _end_ of the declarations, rather than at 
the beginning where most options go. not sure why. but works for me:

-rorbs.dorkslayers.com -rrelays.ordb.org -rrelays.visi.com -t15

will end the conversation at precisely fifteen seconds if it's not complete 
by then.

Paul Theodoropoulos
http://www.anastrophe.com
http://folding.stanford.edu
The Nicest Misanthrope on the Net 





Re: [vchkpw] problems with rbls?

2003-01-06 Thread Bill Shupp
On Monday, January 6, 2003, at 07:51  PM, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:




I got paged at 3 am because sbl.spamhaus.org was not responding, 
causing the smtp to stall.  The frustrating part is that the -t 
option (timeout) for rblsmtpd doesn't appear to work.  Anyone taken a 
stab at fixing this?  I'd prefer that rblsmtpd default to allow the 
connection if the rbl cannot be reached in x seconds.

the -t option has to go at the _end_ of the declarations, rather than 
at the beginning where most options go. not sure why. but works for  me:

-rorbs.dorkslayers.com -rrelays.ordb.org -rrelays.visi.com -t15

will end the conversation at precisely fifteen seconds if it's not 
complete by then.

Excellent, thanks for the tip.  I'll try that.

Regards,

Bill Shupp





[vchkpw] Help with smtp after pop?

2003-01-06 Thread Anthony Aveley








OS FreeBSD 4.7

Vpopmail 5.3.X

Qmail 1.03

Qmail pop3d



Users outside of my network are able to relay but not able
to access their their pop3 accounts?



Any ideas



\Anthony Aveley/








Re: [vchkpw] Help with smtp after pop?

2003-01-06 Thread David Phillips
Anthony Aveley writes:
 Users outside of my network are able to relay but not able to access
 their their pop3 accounts?

So you're an open relay?

Please consider writing a message that contains the information we need to
help you:

http://www.qcc.ca/~charlesc/writings/12-steps-to-qmail-list-bliss.html

--
David Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://david.acz.org/





Re: [vchkpw] problems with rbls?

2003-01-06 Thread Paul Theodoropoulos

thanks. that entry was from a two year old rc script from an ISP i no 
longer run. i haven't used the timeout in so long i had to email my protege 
and ask him to send me that line from the old servers. i'll let him know.

At 11:26 PM 01-06-2003, David Phillips wrote:
Paul Theodoropoulos writes:
 -rrelays.visi.com

FYI:  http://relays.visi.com/

--
David Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://david.acz.org/


Paul Theodoropoulos
http://www.anastrophe.com
http://folding.stanford.edu
The Nicest Misanthrope on the Net