[vchkpw] quota
Hi, I`m using vpopmail-5.2 with qmail. The problem is that vuserinfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] sais that customer has used let`s say 50% of his mail quota, although cd ~vpopmail/domains/domain.tld/user ls -lasR */* shows that there are no messages and no files at all. Maildir/maildirsize shows that there are messages. Is this is a bug or a feature? How to cope with this? The problem disappears if Maildir/maildirsize is deleted. As it is written in vpopmail documentation quota gets updated every 15 minutes, but on my system (debian woody) this never happens. User quotas are qreated with vsetuserquota [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4000 Any ideas? -- Augustas Gutautas UAB Baltnetos komunikacijos GalvydÅžio g. 5, Vilnius Tel. 2745444 Fax. 2745440 Mob. 8614 63487 http://www.balt.net
[vchkpw] Re: LDAP working :(
Zitat von Remo Mattei [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I do not thing that my server is working ok since I cannot set quota, I cannot see clear passwd (it says null) Thanks for your help. Hi, There another issue concering clear passwd. This is until now not supported by LDAP-backend. It is on my TODO-List to add this, but it means some major rewrite of the LDAP-backend. It is currently in _my_ CVS-Tree, but it needs some more testing. As soon as it proves stablility and backward compatiblilty I will let this list know. Cheers Jens
Re: [vchkpw] is vpopmail support to get the full header withvpopmail domain + qmail ??
Hi Jerry, On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 09:10:37 +0800 Jerry Chou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fox example, that is the one mail of mailling list of sqwebmail sent to me that is the first two lines(header): Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the From and To lines: From: Some David somebody@somewhere To: sqlwebmail list [EMAIL PROTECTED] if forward with .qmail, no treated with | /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail there is no the first two lines, and I do not know which the real destination of the mail. and in mailling list, the Delivered-To is always different from other mail. it is important clue. OK. I think it's time you re-read your qmail documentation and visit a qmail specific resource, like news://alt.comp.mail.qmail forwarding with dot-qmail is a pure qmail topic, and nb: it works. Delivered-To is inserted by qmail if it found a delivery instruction to an incoming mail. If it ain't you're doing something strange. As you did not even provide _complete_ examples of your .qmail and two mails, one stored locally and forwarded by the provided .qmail file we're not able to guess what could be wrong. Nevertheless it's still a qmail issue, not vpopmail. Next thing is: Return-Path is written to the stored message by the last SMTP that receives the message and stores it. If this storage operation is done by 'qmail-local' this line _is_ inserted. If you forward these messages to an external host it's up to _THIS_ MTA to provide that line; qmail running on your server ain't responsible. Return-Path ain't a header line as From that is transported with the mail, it is only a manifestation of Envelope From in SMTP-level written to the mail when final destination is reached. Please read RFC-822 (esp. sec. 4.3.1) for further information. To make another concrete statement: I'm using the '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' forwarding in dozens, if not hundred of dot-qmail files by myself. And Delivered-To and Return-Path are present every time as they should. So please provide your concrete setup to the experts on a qmail-list, they'll for sure now where to look for a possible point of failure. -- Regards Peter
Re: [vchkpw] The header info lost ? what is the progress betweenqmail-local and vdelivermail ?
Hi Jerry, On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:55:16 +0800 Jerry Chou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but I go to see the copy of owner's, only diffrence is there are two lines than above: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MANPATH=/var/qmail/man man preline make your command | preline /home/test_sms/to_file.pl and you should be done. Both, Return-Path and Delivered-To, are headers whichs values are in %ENV. They're prepended to the mail when stored to final recipients mailbox by qmail-local (respectivly vdelivermail) by fetching the values from environment and prepending the lines to the mail. They are _NOT_ part of the mail itself. how vdelivermail knows who is the real destination of mail if it get a mail from mailling list? MANPATH=/var/qmail/man man qmail-command -- SENDER and RECIPIENT Again: this is a qmail-issue, not vpopmail. For further qmail related questions I'd suggest you ask the qmail-experts; this list is intended to help with vpopmail specific issues, keeping the overview if all mail delivery issues are mixed is quite hard, so I'd be happy if you could keep the list as clean as possible related to vpopmail. -- Thanks, Peter
Re: [vchkpw] Re: LDAP working :(
Hi, Zitat Zitat von Remo Mattei [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I do not thing that my server is working ok since I cannot set quota, I cannot see clear passwd (it says null) Thanks for your help. you can use clear passwd with my patch. Please Try this patch. It is for 5.3.9. http://www.ofug.net/~koj/vpopmail-ldap-apop/vpopmail-ldap-apop-20020917.tar.gz it is working for about 3 month with like 5,000 account. --- Sunagawa Koji[EMAIL PROTECTED] Okinawa FreeBSD Users Group http://www.ofug.net/~koj/
[vchkpw] problem with vpasswd
Dear All I allready upgrade vpopmail and done. But I got a trouble with my vpasswd when i added new email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) with qmailadmin. The vpasswd comes like this : user:OI4qOJa1GAAzg:1:0:user:/var/vpopmail/domains/protika.com/user: 300 : a new line A new line cause qmailadmin won't read another line below it. Why it happened ? Should I upgrade my qmailadmin ? Thanks welly~
Re: [vchkpw] Re: LDAP working :(
Zitat von Sunagawa Koji / $B:=@n(B $B9';y(B [EMAIL PROTECTED]: you can use clear passwd with my patch. Please Try this patch. It is for 5.3.9. http://www.ofug.net/~koj/vpopmail-ldap-apop/vpopmail-ldap-apop-20020917.tar.gz Hi, good job ! But it wont apply against 5.3.12. - In my CVS-Tree I thought about dynamically using LDAP-entries, because hardcoding a special row for a special entrie makes it worse to add more new LDAP-entries, because you have a bunge of #ifdefs and you will have to doublecheck the whole code where direct access to an LDAP-entry is made As a result I think it is nice to just address an LDAP-Entrie via pointers. e.g. QMAILDOMAIN = 1; CLEAR_PW = 2; qmailUID = 3; etc which are dynamically setup. So general access to it would be #ifdef CLEAR_PW lm[CLEAR_PW]-mod_values[0] = strdup(password); #endif next would be lm[QMAILDOMAIN]-mod_values[0] = strdup(password); no matter if I ifdefed CLEAR_PW or not. This make code much more easy and readable. Hope you understand my point and tell me what do you think. I will release a patch for vpopmail-5.3.12 that uses your way, but I am of the opinion to have a clear interface to what is used or not is better than using static addresses. Cheers Jens
Re: [vchkpw] is vpopmail support to get the full header with vpopmail domain + qmail ??
MANPATH=/var/qmail/man man qmail-command Hi, Peter You are so kind and I can not discribe my thanks for you!!! : Jerry
[vchkpw] Vpasswd maildir auto deleted!
Hi We have a strange problem. Sometimes the vpasswd file gets deleted. The vpasswd.cdb file are not touched. Concurrent with this (some times!) the email directories of the email accounts gets deleted! Most of the times it is only the cur tmp Dir.'s, however a couple of occasions the new dirs was also deleted. There is about 89 email accounts, sometimes only 3 of 4 will be affected on other times about 80% is affected. No particular order is found ie: accounts with letters starting with a to k is affected, then a couple is skipped and t to z is again affected. I wonder if there might not be a timestamp problem. I once created a new forward and then could not manage any of the email. Using the command line tools I found out that the timestamp for vpasswd and the .qmail file was 3 months IN THE FUTURE!. Restoring the correct time stamp (ie: 'touch file name') established normal order. In the logrotate logs I also find entries like: 'log file xxx has a date in the future. Rotation forced'. Testing with normal command line tools does not produce any timestamp abnormalities. I have 3 machines with this behavior, build using the same tools. Details: OS = RH7.3 Kernel 2.4.17 Vpopmail-5.3.8 qmailadmin-1.0.6 ucspi-tcp-0.88 daemontools-0.76 functions-4.2 Kaspersky AVP antivirus software ( modified qmail que) V 4.0.0.0 All compile from tar files. Has any one else experienced these type of symptoms? Any suggestions The only idea I have is perhaps Vpopmail should be downgraded to V5.2
[vchkpw] Re[2]: [qmailadmin] Real Forwarders (not just aliases) in 1.0.6=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Ken, Friday, January 10, 2003, 5:09:04 PM, you wrote: I'm trying to get [EMAIL PROTECTED] to forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but for some weird reason, qmailadmin 1.0.6 doesn't seem to be able to do that anymore. It seems like there is only more Alias possible (i.e. domain.li to domain.li) no matter whether I chose to use Forwarder or Alias. What's wrong here? This used to work in older Versions! Use the Modify User page. That page allows you to set forwards and keeps the main directory clear of .qmail-username files. That's a god damn hack. What user is gonna figure this out? Best regards, Gabriel -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.0.2i iQEVAwUBPh7k7MZa2WpymlDxAQF8Fgf9F3jn7XONPP/MqbPAl4o1WV2jjUt7xnQQ LCVbnryFl9bWcLUNRU01SBgT5bwxTZsDlelNp7Q8etTSgqIEudf0uCoGbrkx+6z1 j6wRM2JRSOivD3zmHWlvAW5D0ypf3vOtczuwsMZ3cfgE0zNnLNWIsKfIzqmqMFyr 28JvrCGAre+wrtZGz7NHqLm9dhyJEw02pobFfvPdYOAONrd0QCZtLcsqo6JsNXoW lFJ+jrF99WNdACUuFFHXQj0U8ybqu9QN1LjqhUgi/nF+/znFcL67d7DeAEEYeAEv FBw+ZZHOFukyABEwMdrYVb4D4eheMt9ZK+Iqp0UFIm5CpfIaA4Ossw== =z63h -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[vchkpw] Re[4]: [qmailadmin] Real Forwarders (not just aliases) in 1.0.6=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Ken, Friday, January 10, 2003, 5:20:05 PM, you wrote: It's been that way for quite a while. No complaints from anyone. If a user logs in, they can only see the modify user page. Perhaps you are talking about postmasters logging in. A postmaster still only is a user to the ISP. Besides, it kinda makes the distinction between Alias and Forwarders moot (I've always found it to be kinda silly to have it but now it's really weird). Best regards, Gabriel -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.0.2i iQEVAwUBPh7m08Za2WpymlDxAQGfYQgAtaj4c+uj4wqyiaKHuK2yv/SZiRjmzIKR oNfzSF4p4NnpCLVLRF7X8Tl4+7M51UCzmtTB4EC5hVB8LQpuOxOgxMtgljZy/ITx tR6kjKfnf5ildiUFuXNDP6j0O7YQfYVOT1sAAqdqBx9EHif9RNMEHy961oXqJ6Ag KAC9s2edinODv/sfdyqDjnKTXo+T6huSSy8FJSSfzUV0Qpy4BbyfFEgrrXxVsOsV tVg0/JPAKICr74szokV+vt+bxRPp5bXUW/OhmGU2/VHmNpbTmDZFKEIIp7qZsvNg fgRRawVwNEFcB2hgemMb0Ovr0eYtyEIuVzniUOEt8iozUUoQYbSUKg== =gCkO -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [vchkpw] Re[2]: [qmailadmin] Real Forwarders (not just aliases) in 1.0.6=
At 08:21 AM 01-10-2003, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: That's a god damn hack. What user is gonna figure this out? Best regards, Gabriel hey gabriel, lighten up. how much did you pay for the software? cursing at the developers is rude, and unlikely to motivate them to continue providing FREE SOFTWARE AND FREE SUPPORT for you. if you don't like the functionality, either inquire politely or fix it yourself. better yet, send the developers money to fix it - then you can curse all you want! ;^) Paul Theodoropoulos http://www.anastrophe.com http://folding.stanford.edu The Nicest Misanthrope on the Net
[vchkpw] Enable Clear test passwords in LDAP
Bill, this a patch for vpopmail, which enables the storage of clear passwords in LDAP. It is against vanilla vpopmail-5.3.12 and is based on the work from koj ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) Fixes includes: - clear password storage in LDAP operational I send another patch you - and because I want to do some additional work that is based on it, please let me know if you like it or if you disagree. Note that this patch is against vanilla vpopmail-5.3.12. It also requires a modified qmailUser.schema. I have basically tested it and it worked for: vadduser/vsetuserquota/vuserinfo/vpasswd Download: Patch: http://www.tiski.de/linux/patches/vpopmail/patch-vpopmail-clear.gz qmailUser.schema http://www.tiski.de/linux/patches/vpopmail/qmailUser.schema Cheers Jens
[vchkpw] [Fwd: DOS attack]
First sorry me if this messages is out of topic for some email-lists, but if some one know a solution, please help me. Hi was victim of a DOS attack, my server was out for about 5 hours, services like web and email where down. I am using round robind dns for a load balancing, but this only help for my web services, any idea on how can i make a redundant service for web and email services? something like mysql does with his replication function? I don't want to use hardware only software regards
Re: [vchkpw] [Fwd: DOS attack]
There are no truly robust software solutions for this. Hardware really is the best way to go. You can pick up a redundant pair of Big/IP traffic directors for less than $3000 on ebay. in fact, here's a pari of them for $2,500: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=3706item=2086973488 i used the big/ip's in production for three years for a national ISP. they are still in service, a year after i left. i swear by the big/ip's, they are a fantastic product. At 11:04 AM 01-10-2003, you wrote: First sorry me if this messages is out of topic for some email-lists, but if some one know a solution, please help me. Hi was victim of a DOS attack, my server was out for about 5 hours, services like web and email where down. I am using round robind dns for a load balancing, but this only help for my web services, any idea on how can i make a redundant service for web and email services? something like mysql does with his replication function? I don't want to use hardware only software regards Paul Theodoropoulos http://www.anastrophe.com http://folding.stanford.edu The Nicest Misanthrope on the Net
[vchkpw] auto responder
Running qmailadmin 1.0.6 and vpopmail 5.3.6 with the auto responder according to Bill Shupp's toaster instructions. I click on Enable Vacation and put in in subject and message. Click on Modify User and Enable Save Copy and Forward gets checked automatically. Send 3 messages to mailbox and get 3 replies w/vacation message. Mailbox gets the three messages. All looks good. The fourth message (and subsequent messages) doesn't get a reply, which is OK. But, the message doesn't go to the mailbox - it goes to the queue. When Enable Vacation gets unchecked, the messages get delivered according to the queue schedule. And messages older than queuelifetime are deleted. Is that what is supposed to happen?
Re: [vchkpw] auto responder
Hi, Same thing happens here. Rick - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 4:07 PM Subject: [vchkpw] auto responder Running qmailadmin 1.0.6 and vpopmail 5.3.6 with the auto responder according to Bill Shupp's toaster instructions. I click on Enable Vacation and put in in subject and message. Click on Modify User and Enable Save Copy and Forward gets checked automatically. Send 3 messages to mailbox and get 3 replies w/vacation message. Mailbox gets the three messages. All looks good. The fourth message (and subsequent messages) doesn't get a reply, which is OK. But, the message doesn't go to the mailbox - it goes to the queue. When Enable Vacation gets unchecked, the messages get delivered according to the queue schedule. And messages older than queuelifetime are deleted. Is that what is supposed to happen?
[vchkpw] Re: auto responder
Hello Rick, On Friday, January 10, 2003 at 10:15:04 PM you wrote: Same thing happens here. [Full quote snipped] What's in the qmail log files? If autorespond exits w/ code 111 (temporary failure - requeue) it prints a message to stderr which should be logged. -- Best regards Peter Palmreuther
Re: [vchkpw] Re: auto responder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sends a seventh message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the vacation message checked 2003-01-10 15:06:41.020422500 new msg 523474 2003-01-10 15:06:41.020439500 info msg 523474: bytes 1473 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] qp 23961 uid 508 2003-01-10 15:06:41.026392500 starting delivery 34218: msg 523474 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-01-10 15:06:41.026409500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 2003-01-10 15:06:41.072815500 delivery 34218: deferral: AUTORESPOND:_too_many_received_from_[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]/ Pat On 10 Jan 2003 at 23:39, Peter Palmreuther wrote: Hello Rick, On Friday, January 10, 2003 at 10:15:04 PM you wrote: Same thing happens here. [Full quote snipped] What's in the qmail log files? If autorespond exits w/ code 111 (temporary failure - requeue) it prints a message to stderr which should be logged. -- Best regards Peter Palmreuther
RE: [vchkpw] auto responder
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 11 January 2003 8:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [vchkpw] auto responder Running qmailadmin 1.0.6 and vpopmail 5.3.6 with the auto responder according to Bill Shupp's toaster instructions. I click on Enable Vacation and put in in subject and message. Click on Modify User and Enable Save Copy and Forward gets checked automatically. Send 3 messages to mailbox and get 3 replies w/vacation message. Mailbox gets the three messages. All looks good. The fourth message (and subsequent messages) doesn't get a reply, which is OK. But, the message doesn't go to the mailbox - it goes to the queue. When Enable Vacation gets unchecked, the messages get delivered according to the queue schedule. And messages older than queuelifetime are deleted. Is that what is supposed to happen? This autoresponder behaviour was discussed a while ago Perhaps take a look at this thread in the archives : http://bluedot.net/mail/archive/read.php?f=2i=7953t=7953 If I understand the info there correctly, the fix for this problem has been built into vpopmail 5.3.9 and later Looking at the vpopmail changlog confirms this http://www.inter7.com/vpopmail/ChangeLog Hope that helps! Michael.
Re: [vchkpw] Re: auto responder
Hi, Same as Pat, @40003e1f5db2387af624 starting delivery 194212: msg 2464150 to local trio-se [EMAIL PROTECTED] @40003e1f5db2387b05c4 status: local 1/10 remote 2/60 @40003e1f5db311a3b57c delivery 194212: deferral: AUTORESPOND:_too_many_recei ved_from_[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]/ I'll take a look at upgrading and see if that fixes it since I'm already running 5.3.8. Just one patch had to be made for something, now I have to remember what it was before upgrading. Regards, Rick - Original Message - From: Peter Palmreuther [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 5:39 PM Subject: [vchkpw] Re: auto responder Hello Rick, On Friday, January 10, 2003 at 10:15:04 PM you wrote: Same thing happens here. [Full quote snipped] What's in the qmail log files? If autorespond exits w/ code 111 (temporary failure - requeue) it prints a message to stderr which should be logged. -- Best regards Peter Palmreuther
[vchkpw] Autoresponder problem
Hi, I upgraded to 5.3.12 and that fixed the problem. As mentioned in a previous post, upgrading to 5.3.9 apparently would have fixed it, but I also needed the courier fix for vipmap domains which Bill added in 5.3.12 (Thanks Bill! Another virtual beer for you). Regards, Rick
RE: [vchkpw] auto responder
If I understand the info there correctly, the fix for this problem has been built into vpopmail 5.3.9 and later Looking at the vpopmail changlog confirms this http://www.inter7.com/vpopmail/ChangeLog Didn't realize I was falling behind! Can I change to vpopmail 5.3.12 and qmailadmin 1.0.7 without breaking the rest of it which is working great?
[vchkpw] vpopmail - setting mailquota after thousands of NOQUOTA accounts created
Hi! I have a problem here. I have 2 e-mail accounts with NOQUOTA (yeah, it's stupid, i know that :) I need to change *all* to 10mb's. I tried to use vqadmin to set the default user quota for my domain but seems to have NO effect on existing accounts nor new accounts. I can't recompile vpopmail because I have another domains that I need to have no quota limits. My users sign up their e-mails using vqregister, so I need a default value since vqregister has no quota setting when creating accounts. Thank's in advance.
