[vchkpw] Migrating to a new server
Hi, has someone ever successfully migrated to a new server? I have installed my current server with MySQL support and now my question is what I must do to migrate to a new server? I wanted to install the new server with MySQL support and then dump the databases? What else must I do? Do I need the learn passwords option? Thanks and bye, Werner.
[vchkpw] vpopmail and chroot
Hi, has anyone ever installed vpopmail and/or qmail in a chroot environment? Has anyone got a howto or something? Bye and thanks, Werner.
Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw authentication fails - more info
Se ahead for answers to your questions...
On Thursday 03 July 2003 19:23, Kiril Todorov wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 10:02:54AM +0100, Howard Miller wrote:
Hi again,
Further to my previous email (follows), I have discovered something else.
I created a new user. I can send mail to that user and it correctly ends
up in the Maildir. BUT vchkpw does not authenticate that user ever -
always an error. Stranger still, the failure is *not* logged (unlike the
intermittent users).
Something is broken!! Any pointers appreciated.
Howard
Hello Howard, give us more info first?
what is the _exact_ error message on the client side?
Messages - this is what I think, I am about 80% sure
==
When POP3 authentication fails, maillog file contains the line..
vchkpw: login success [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On my Mac at home the mail app polls every couple of minutes, so I get quite a
few of these messages (c. 10 an hour?), but it does not materially affect the
operation of mail.
sqwebmail sometimes does not authorise but AFAIK there is never an error
message, so it may be something else - but it seems a bit of a coincidence.
When this does not work, my feeling is that you have to try loads of times
before it does, or just leave it for ten minutes, but again its hard to put
my finger on.
what happens if you telnet to port 110 of the server and try to
auth the user manualy?
It works fine, but it might well do anyway as the problem is intermittent.
what options did you compile vpopmail with?
--enable-logging=y --enable-default-domain=alicats.org
what's your pop3d run script?
I am using xinet, so...
service pop3
{
disable = no
socket_type = stream
protocol= tcp
wait= no
user= root
server = /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
server_args = www.alicats.org /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir
log_type= FILE /var/log/xinetd.log
log_on_success = HOST
log_on_failure = HOST RECORD
}
(There are no errors in xinetd.log)
stuff like that ;
...again, any help appreciated!
Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw authentication fails - more info
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 08:52:56AM +0100, Howard Miller wrote: what's your pop3d run script? I am using xinet, so... And that's exactly your problem : cut from xinetd.conf (5) cps Limits the rate of incoming connections. Takes two arguments. The first argument is the number of connections per second to handle. If the rate of incoming connections is higher than this, the service will be temporarily disabled. The second argument is the number of seconds to wait before re-enabling the service after it has been disabled. The default for this setting is 50 incoming connections and the interval is 10 seconds. As written on qmail.org, qmail is recommended to be run with tcpserver and daemontools, and inetd, xinetd are not supported anymore. If you need a hand how to set up daemontools and ucspi-tcp heres is a good howto on that: http://flounder.net/qmail/qmail-howto.html G'luck : -- Kiril Todorov-+- +359 2 9712013 Bulgaria Online -+- http://home.online.bg /* waiting... dreaming... wishing... */
Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw authentication fails - more info
Mmm Thanks, yes, but, I have set up a similar system many times previously and always used SuSE Linux with daemontools and ucspi-tcp, no problems at all. However this particular system is RedHat 8, and I was having big problems with daemontools processes just dying (big list of defunct processes). This was reported by others here and there but I never saw (or found) a decent explanation - I rather came to the conclusion that daemontools was broken in some way. Hence backing off to the old fashioned solution. It is worth noting that this is a *very* low-use mail server, its just used for a small department/project and only has about 6 users, which is why I wasn't too worried in the first place. 50 incoming connections strikes me as extremely unlikely, unless of course something else nasty has happened. Howard On Friday 04 July 2003 09:39, Kiril Todorov wrote: On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 08:52:56AM +0100, Howard Miller wrote: what's your pop3d run script? I am using xinet, so... And that's exactly your problem : cut from xinetd.conf (5) cps Limits the rate of incoming connections. Takes two arguments. The first argument is the number of connections per second to handle. If the rate of incoming connections is higher than this, the service will be temporarily disabled. The second argument is the number of seconds to wait before re-enabling the service after it has been disabled. The default for this setting is 50 incoming connections and the interval is 10 seconds. As written on qmail.org, qmail is recommended to be run with tcpserver and daemontools, and inetd, xinetd are not supported anymore. If you need a hand how to set up daemontools and ucspi-tcp heres is a good howto on that: http://flounder.net/qmail/qmail-howto.html G'luck :
Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw authentication fails - more info
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 09:51:06AM +0100, Howard Miller wrote: Mmm However this particular system is RedHat 8, and I was having big problems with daemontools processes just dying (big list of defunct processes). This was reported by others here and there but I never saw (or found) a decent explanation - I rather came to the conclusion that daemontools was broken in some way. Hence backing off to the old fashioned solution. trust me.. daemontools aren't broken :) if theres anything broken that might be RedHat's config, a bunch of defuncts might come from wrong run files for example, but without detailed look at them I can't say for sure. It is worth noting that this is a *very* low-use mail server, its just used for a small department/project and only has about 6 users, which is why I wasn't too worried in the first place. 50 incoming connections strikes me as extremely unlikely, unless of course something else nasty has happened. Well, give it a try with daemontools, I'll be glad to help with anything you might need there. I bet it's xinetd causing the problems, still it's kinda weird if there are really just 6 users. -- Kiril Todorov-+- +359 2 9712013 Bulgaria Online -+- http://home.online.bg /* waiting... dreaming... wishing... */
Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw authentication fails - more info
Thanks for your all your help, by the way :-) I actually spent *days*, and lots of digging on the Net, trying to get it to work with daemontools. As I say I have a number of working systems to compare and contrast with, and I do generally stick closely to Mr. McKenna's howto. What I mean to say is that it ain't going to work at all if I go back. Its starting to look like the way forward is to rebuild the box with something other than RedHat and start again, although this feels even more like admitting defeat. I could always put W2000 on it and run Exchange :-) Oh well.. H. On Friday 04 July 2003 10:03, Kiril Todorov wrote: On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 09:51:06AM +0100, Howard Miller wrote: Mmm However this particular system is RedHat 8, and I was having big problems with daemontools processes just dying (big list of defunct processes). This was reported by others here and there but I never saw (or found) a decent explanation - I rather came to the conclusion that daemontools was broken in some way. Hence backing off to the old fashioned solution. trust me.. daemontools aren't broken :) if theres anything broken that might be RedHat's config, a bunch of defuncts might come from wrong run files for example, but without detailed look at them I can't say for sure. It is worth noting that this is a *very* low-use mail server, its just used for a small department/project and only has about 6 users, which is why I wasn't too worried in the first place. 50 incoming connections strikes me as extremely unlikely, unless of course something else nasty has happened. Well, give it a try with daemontools, I'll be glad to help with anything you might need there. I bet it's xinetd causing the problems, still it's kinda weird if there are really just 6 users.
[vchkpw] Qmail + Vpopmail
Hi! I can`t find help! Mayby you will know the answer. I`m runing qmail with vpopmail. I wanted to install rav antivirus and then s*** happed. Qmail stoped to deliver messages, sp I repleaced qmail-local with vpoplocal or sth. like that. Now I have in qmail logs sth. like that: @40003f054b3e2d3d98ac info msg 625: bytes 795 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] qp 40950 uid 82 @40003f054b3e2d8ea2c4 starting delivery 1: msg 625 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] @40003f054b3e2d92e49c status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 @40003f054b3e306a5b14 new msg 982 @40003f054b3e30799584 info msg 982: bytes 884 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] qp 40954 uid 81 @40003f054b3e30c7a9cc starting delivery 2: msg 982 to remote @host.domain.pl @40003f054b3e30cbdc04 status: local 1/10 remote 1/20 @40003f054b3e30d6fbac delivery 1: success: /var/qmail/alias,maciej.nadolski,intelinet.pl/ @40003f054b3e311eab3c status: local 0/10 remote 1/20 Thanks for answer! -- Best regards, Maciej Nadolski
Re: [vchkpw] Qmail + Vpopmail
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 12:11:29PM +0200, Maciej Nadolski wrote: Hi! I can`t find help! Mayby you will know the answer. I`m runing qmail with vpopmail. I wanted to install rav antivirus and then s*** happed. Qmail stoped to deliver messages, sp I repleaced qmail-local with vpoplocal or sth. like that. Now I have in qmail logs sth. like that: rav antivirus installs fine, but did you remember to stop qmail before running the rav installer? also.. rav replaces qmail-queue not qmail-local also .. don't anonymize your logs, you're hiding information that might lead us how to fix your problem:) -- Kiril Todorov-+- +359 2 9712013 Bulgaria Online -+- http://home.online.bg /* waiting... dreaming... wishing... */
Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail quota problem
yeah I'm sure, it should be -- Best Regs, Masood Ahmad Shah System Administrator ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * | Fibre Net (Pvt) Ltd. Lahore, Pakistan | Tel: +92-42-6677024 | Mobile: +92-300-4277367 | http://www.fibre.net.pk | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie) All I want is a few minutes alone with the source code for the universe and a quick recompile. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ahmad Masood Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 9:02 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail quota problem | Yeah, i recompile my qmail and now may be work ... #vuserinfo condor | quota: 1000S | usage: 40% | | The problem has been in patches that i applayed. Last patch is not | applayed correct because previous patch are change lines and struct of | file. | I make changes by hand and now may be work. | | | Regards, | Condor | | problem can be in your quota patch plzz patch your qmail source again and | it | will work I'm sure ..:) | | -- | | Best Regs, | Masood Ahmad Shah | System Administrator | | ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ | | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * | | Fibre Net (Pvt) Ltd. Lahore, Pakistan | | Tel: +92-42-6677024 | | Mobile: +92-300-4277367 | | http://www.fibre.net.pk | | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * | ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ | Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. | (Dennis Ritchie) | All I want is a few minutes alone with the source code for the universe | and | a quick recompile. | | | - Original Message - | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 5:37 PM | Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail quota problem | | | | Yes, i applayed this patch: | | qmail-maildir++.patch from: | | http://www.shupp.org/patches/qmail-maildir++.patch | | | | Regards, | | Condor | | | | have you ptached your qmail with qmailquota patch...?? | | | | -- | | | | Best Regs, | | Masood Ahmad Shah | | System Administrator | | | | ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ | | | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * | | | Fibre Net (Pvt) Ltd. Lahore, Pakistan | | | Tel: +92-42-6677024 | | | Mobile: +92-300-4277367 | | | http://www.fibre.net.pk | | | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * | | ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ | | Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the | simplicity. | | (Dennis Ritchie) | | All I want is a few minutes alone with the source code for the | universe | | and | | a quick recompile. | | | | | | - Original Message - | | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:40 PM | | Subject: [vchkpw] vpopmail quota problem | | | | | | | Hello, | | | i use vpopmail + mysql and mau be my quote not work. | | | In my email i have 4 emails with total size 16 MB, my quota i set to | 10 | | MB. | | | # vuserinfo condor | | | name: condor | | | passwd: x | | | clear passwd: x | | | uid:0 | | | gid:0 | | | all services available | | | dir: /var/vpopmail/domains/mydomain.org/condor | | | quota: 1000S | | | usage: 0% | | | last auth: Thu Jul 3 10:27:34 2003 | | | last auth ip: imap | | | | | | When i compile vpopmail i set paramaters to 10 MB quota | | | | | | Any body have idea what is wrong? | | | | | | Regards, | | | Condor | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Re: [vchkpw] Catch all domain account
Hi Kiril, On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 21:24:20 +0300 Kiril Todorov wrote: How can I get the bounced mail from each domain delivered to the Postmaster of the coresponding domain instead of having all the bounced mail delivered to me? that's in the FAQ I belive, but oh well - since you're running qmailadmin you would notice theres a button named catchall account on the user listing I don't think that's what he wants. He does _NOT_ want to 'catch all' mail for a domain, but instead have the doublebounces addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's not possible with qmail. A bounce will have no envelope sender and therefore the doublebounce does not know where it should be addressed too. If you want to get rid of doublebounces completely (I don't know what I need them for; once the system is configured correctly double bounces only indicate spam or something cause by spam; everything else that could warn me of anything is addressed correctly) make use of qmails 'doublebounceto' and maybe 'doublebouncehost' control files and an appropriate alias. E.g. echo doublebounce /var/qmail/control/doublebounceto echo '#' /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-doublebounce eah.. it's that easy :) Sometimes it is, IF done correctly and not only somehow. -- Ciao, Pit
Re: [vchkpw] Catch all domain account
At 04/07/03 04/07/03 +0200, Peter Palmreuther wrote: Hi Kiril, On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 21:24:20 +0300 Kiril Todorov wrote: How can I get the bounced mail from each domain delivered to the Postmaster of the coresponding domain instead of having all the bounced mail delivered to me? that's in the FAQ I belive, but oh well - since you're running qmailadmin you would notice theres a button named catchall account on the user listing I don't think that's what he wants. He does _NOT_ want to 'catch all' mail for a domain, but instead have the doublebounces addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's not possible with qmail. A bounce will have no envelope sender and therefore the doublebounce does not know where it should be addressed too. If you want to get rid of doublebounces completely (I don't know what I need them for; once the system is configured correctly double bounces only indicate spam or something cause by spam; everything else that could warn me of anything is addressed correctly) Mailbox full. When both sender and recipient have mailbox full, then you have a double bounce. In such a case, It should be better not to lose those messages. Ciao, Tonino
Re: [vchkpw] Catch all domain account
Hi tonix, On Fri, 04 Jul 2003 15:41:44 +0200 tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: If you want to get rid of doublebounces completely (I don't know what I need them for; once the system is configured correctly double bounces only indicate spam or something cause by spam; everything else that could warn me of anything is addressed correctly) Mailbox full. When both sender and recipient have mailbox full, then you have a double bounce. In such a case, It should be better not to lose those messages. If you want to play Mr. Postman: yes. Me personal wouldn't even want to get these messages, I don't care if users mailbox is full, they shall regularily clear it. And I couldn't care less if somebody's mailbox _not_ on my server is full. Somebody able to _send_ a message should be able to fetch it too. But that's only me, the one who likes dblbounces simply changes the '#' in .qmail-doublebounce to a concrete delivery instruction :-) -- Ciao, Pit
[vchkpw] chkuser patch
Hi, I think I just possibly found a bug in the chkuser patch. If you have a .qmail alias with a . in the name, it gives a 553 user unknown. Yes, the alias is correctly defined with : replacing the . I've tested this with Bill Shupp's modified patch and the easy-way patch. Running an strace on the qmail-smtpd-chkuser program locally works fine open(/home/vpopmail/domains/0/rkg-inc.com/.qmail-jerry.rosenblatt, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) access(/home/vpopmail/domains/0/rkg-inc.com/.qmail-jerry:rosenblatt, F_OK) = 0 alarm(1200) = 0 write(1, 250 ok\r\n, 8250 ok ) = 8 Doing it remotely gives mail from:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 ok rcpt to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 sorry, no mailbox here by that name (#5.1.1 - chkusr) qmail-smtpd-chkuser is suid root (multiple domains in seperate home directories) -r-sr-sr-x1 root nofiles 80572 Jul 3 10:52 qmail-smtpd-chkuser Any ideas? vpopmail 5.3.20 qmail 1.03 Oh, and using rcpt to:jerry:[EMAIL PROTECTED] does work, so it's not a permissions problem I don't think. Regards, Rick
[vchkpw] chkuser patch
Hi, Never mind, it was a permissions problem. I'm just slow sometimes :) Regards, Rick
Re: [vchkpw] chkuser patch
Hi Rick, read carefully the running instructions on my page at www.interazioni.it/qmail. You must not use SUID and GUID bits on qmail-smtpd with the Easy-version, but must run it directly as vpopmail root from tcpserver (or root if you have different users for different domains), and all will work nicely. (This specific problem is due to the access() routine, that does not care of SUID and GUID bits. In the next release I'll make a step back and will change the access() routine back to the open() I used in the first version.) Ciao, Tonino At 04/07/03 04/07/03 -0400, Rick Macdougall wrote: Hi, I think I just possibly found a bug in the chkuser patch. If you have a .qmail alias with a . in the name, it gives a 553 user unknown. Yes, the alias is correctly defined with : replacing the . I've tested this with Bill Shupp's modified patch and the easy-way patch. Running an strace on the qmail-smtpd-chkuser program locally works fine open(/home/vpopmail/domains/0/rkg-inc.com/.qmail-jerry.rosenblatt, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) access(/home/vpopmail/domains/0/rkg-inc.com/.qmail-jerry:rosenblatt, F_OK) = 0 alarm(1200) = 0 write(1, 250 ok\r\n, 8250 ok ) = 8 Doing it remotely gives mail from:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 ok rcpt to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 sorry, no mailbox here by that name (#5.1.1 - chkusr) qmail-smtpd-chkuser is suid root (multiple domains in seperate home directories) -r-sr-sr-x1 root nofiles 80572 Jul 3 10:52 qmail-smtpd-chkuser Any ideas? vpopmail 5.3.20 qmail 1.03 Oh, and using rcpt to:jerry:[EMAIL PROTECTED] does work, so it's not a permissions problem I don't think. Regards, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED]Interazioni di Antonio Nati http://www.interazioni.it [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vchkpw] Mailing list problem
On Thursday, July 3, 2003, at 03:16 PM, Tom Collins wrote: After a quick look at the qmailadmin source though, I see that it's completely broken for non-idx installations of ezmlm. I've posted a patch to SourceForge of qmailadmin so it will work with standard (non-idx) versions of ezmlm. It should work for 1.0.20 to 1.0.23. http://sourceforge.net/tracker/ index.php?func=detailaid=765760group_id=6691atid=306691 If you can't find it from that URL, go to http://sourceforge.net/projects/qmailadmin/ and click on the patches tracker. -- Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[vchkpw] What happened to the list?
I'm not sure what happened to the list to make it murder the To and CC headers, but can someone please fix it? --Doug
Re: [vchkpw] What happened to the list?
And my own message looks ok. Did everyone else just decide to start sending mails with BCCs? Here's some examples: From: Rudy G [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [vchkpw] vdelivermail can't deliver to domains added with -u option. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=--KIXNS1MBAUK38X Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 19:32:04 +0100 X-Spam-Status: Spam: False ; 0.1 / 5.0 From: Michael R. Bagnall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [vchkpw] 5.3.20 Quota Problem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=--JE6HKXSHNTWPAZ Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 19:27:11 +0100 X-Spam-Status: Spam: False ; 1.1 / 5.0 From: Emris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Unvalid users? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=--HZVSJ2XM9G21Y3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 19:19:08 +0100 X-Spam-Status: Spam: False ; 0.6 / 5.0 --Doug - Original Message - From: Doug Clements [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 11:30 AM Subject: [vchkpw] What happened to the list? I'm not sure what happened to the list to make it murder the To and CC headers, but can someone please fix it? --Doug
Re: [vchkpw] What happened to the list?
How very odd.. Seems the mails that are hosed up for me all come from this telepac.pt place: Received: from NetClube05 ([213.13.72.80]) by fep06-svc.mail.telepac.pt (InterMail vM.5.01.04.13 201-253-122-122-113-20020313) with SMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 19:10:22 +0100 Received: from NetClube05 ([213.13.72.80]) by fep03-svc.mail.telepac.pt (InterMail vM.5.01.04.13 201-253-122-122-113-20020313) with SMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 19:24:27 +0100 etc, etc, I guess maybe it's just coincidence that it's the last 10 mails or so to the list came from that ISP? Maybe the inter7.com dns got their MX hijacked down in that part of the world? --Doug - Original Message - From: Mark Nicholas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Doug Clements [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 12:33 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] What happened to the list? I'm not sure what happened to the list to make it murder the To and CC headers, but can someone please fix it? Doug, Below is what I am seeing in my headers is this not what you are seeing? - Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 21380 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2003 18:16:50 - Received: from unknown (HELO ns1.inter7.com) (209.218.8.2) by host115.tbd with SMTP; 4 Jul 2003 18:16:50 - Received: (qmail 14274 invoked by uid 511); 4 Jul 2003 19:45:33 - Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from unknown (HELO smtp2.linkline.com) (64.30.215.131) by evanston.inter7.com with SMTP; 4 Jul 2003 19:45:33 - Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Doug Clements [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 11:30:33 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: [vchkpw] What happened to the list? X-PM-PLACEHOLDER: - -- Blessed are they who have nothing to say, and who cannot be persuaded to say it. - James Russell Lowell *** * Mark Nicholas * MCSE MCP +I * Lawton Bros., Inc * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
[vchkpw] Permission $vpopmail/lib directory
[vpopmail - 5.3.20] So I installed vpopmail and now I'm compiling courier-IMAP as a non-root user (like a good boy). Problem is, /var/vpopmail/lib and the libvpopmail.a library are chmodded 700 without permissions besides root. Maybe this should be 755 or 750 by default to allow such problems to link with the static library. I of course changed the permissions to allow group permissions, but I think the default should allow. -M _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
