be?
Brian
--
Brian Feeny, CCIE #8036, CISSP e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer p: 318.213.4709
ShreveNet Inc. f: 318.221.6612
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Brian Feeny, CCIE #8036, CISSP e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer p: 318.213.4709
ShreveNet Inc. f: 318.221.6612
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
.dir-control in mysql, then putting the
vpasswd's in mysql...isn't there something else that is usually
put in mysql, like maildir quota files?
Brian
On Sep 24, 2004, at 3:44 PM, Dave Goodrich wrote:
Brian Feeny wrote:
Can someone post the .dir-control format (the format of the file
-
Brian Feeny, CCIE #8036, CISSP
Network Engineer
ShreveNet Inc.
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
Brian Feeny, CCIE #8036, CISSP
Network Engineer
ShreveNet Inc.
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
the name is of the domain, or if the hash has nothing to do with the
structure of the domain
name.
Brian
--
Brian Feeny, CCIE #8036, CISSP e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer p: 318.213.4709
ShreveNet Inc
On Sep 23, 2004, at 10:18 AM, Dave Goodrich wrote:
Brian Feeny wrote:
Does the hashing that is used by .dir-control depend at all on the
actual domain name? For example, if it came up with a hashed
directory structure in which to put foobar.com, would it matter if
I went in to /var/qmail
,
is that going to make bad things happen?
Brian
On Sep 23, 2004, at 10:57 AM, Dave Goodrich wrote:
Brian Feeny wrote:
On Sep 23, 2004, at 10:18 AM, Dave Goodrich wrote:
Brian Feeny wrote:
Does the hashing that is used by .dir-control depend at all on the
actual domain name? For example, if it came
can give me.
Brian
--
Brian Feeny, CCIE #8036, CISSP e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer p: 318.213.4709
ShreveNet Inc. f: 318.221.6612
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed
Is it possible so that when someone creates an account in qmailadmin, I
can have an external program fired off to do some task?
Brian
-
Brian Feeny, CCIE #8036, CISSP
Network Engineer
ShreveNet Inc.
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed
--
Brian Feeny, CCIE #8036 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineerp: 318.213.4709
ShreveNet Inc. f: 318.221.6612
--
Brian Feeny, CCIE #8036 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineerp: 318.213.4709
ShreveNet Inc. f: 318.221.6612
Thanks Charles,
These days instead of battling usr-tc's i am battling mail server
stuff, but
things are going smooth with vpopmail so far, this list is a great help.
Brian
On Jul 8, 2004, at 5:35 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Brian Feeny wrote:
I am moving customers over from
2004 19:45:16 -0500, Brian Feeny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When you use vpopmail, does it still use an LDA like mailfilter to
deliver the mail,
or is that now handled by vpopmail up until the very end? I ask
because I am migrating
a bunch of users to vpopmail who now have .mailfilter files
When you use vpopmail, does it still use an LDA like mailfilter to
deliver the mail,
or is that now handled by vpopmail up until the very end? I ask
because I am migrating
a bunch of users to vpopmail who now have .mailfilter files to sort
mail etc, and want to know
if vpopmail just does the
are creating are predictable
since we are determining them
instead of dir control/vadduser.
Brian
--
Brian Feeny, CCIE #8036 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineerp: 318.213.4709
ShreveNet Inc
it creates this
file
again. Not sure why ./vdeldomain would be complaining when there
wasnt a .dir-control in the first place associated with the domain I was
deleting.
Any ideas?
Brian
On Jun 30, 2004, at 5:27 PM, Ken Jones wrote:
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 03:37 pm, Brian Feeny wrote:
First
On Jun 30, 2004, at 6:18 PM, Tom Collins wrote:
What version of vpopmail? I thought we took care of that error
message (Warning: Failed to delete dir_control for test.com) during
the development cycle leading up to 5.4.0. It was due to the domain's
directory getting deleted before the
18 matches
Mail list logo