Re: [vchkpw] Qmail SMTP AUTH + vchkpw on 64 bit...

2004-08-27 Thread Linux-Guru
Am Mittwoch, 25. August 2004 19:20 schrieb Jacob S.: Is an strace from a working 64 bit installation of any help? Don't know. It's on Tom Collins to decide whether he wants it or not. I'm unable to duplicate this bug on a new vpopmail 5.4.5 installation using the qmailrocks.org toaster on a

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail SMTP AUTH + vchkpw on 64 bit...

2004-08-20 Thread Linux-Guru
Am Donnerstag, 19. August 2004 19:36 schrieb Tom Collins: Could someone with this problem use strace (or ptrace?) to get a trace of what happens when vchkpw is called? It should be as easy as adding: /usr/bin/strace -ff -o /tmp/vchkpw.dump right before /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw in the

Re: [vchkpw] Qmail SMTP AUTH + vchkpw on 64 bit...

2004-08-19 Thread Linux-Guru
Am Mittwoch, 18. August 2004 23:22 schrieb Matthew Walker: I saw this was discussed a month or two ago, but no conclusion seemed to be reached. I have been the one who had this problem. We reached some kind of conclusion (see below). I have qmail 1.03, and vpopmail 5.4 installed, and

[vchkpw] qmailmrtg not showing some graphs

2004-06-29 Thread Linux-Guru
Hi list, I am running qmailmrtg 4.0 on a 64bit-Linux (Gentoo) and have been running into the following situation: qmailmrtg works, but graphs which have to be read out of logfiles (such as msgs, local/remote concurrency) are not shown. Graphs which are processed from other resources (CPU load

[vchkpw] Making qmail check for existant user against vpopmail _before_ accepting mail

2004-05-27 Thread Linux-Guru
Hi list, I found a patch [1] at [2] which enables qmail to first check against vpopmail if the user (email-address) is existant before accepting mail for it. Yesterday I asked in #qmail (IRC-channel) for any experiences and/or recommendations with this patch and have been told by Jeremy Kitchen

Re: [vchkpw] Making qmail check for existant user against vpopmail _before_ accepting mail

2004-05-27 Thread Linux-Guru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2004 11:26 schrieb Tonix: Tobias, it looks like there is a trust against this patch, just saying generically it's ugly, but not beeing able to say why, and not beeing able, mainly, to make another one working. This patch

Re: [vchkpw] Re: SMTP Auth HOW? *UPDATE* AMD64

2004-05-25 Thread Linux-Guru
Am Dienstag, 25. Mai 2004 19:18 schrieb Peter Palmreuther: Hello Blist, On Tuesday, May 25, 2004 at 6:22:11 PM you wrote (at least in part): After tyring with these values I get: [...] If this segfaults too, one /might/ be able to guess why from the strace and the last action done. If

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP Auth HOW? *UPDATE* AMD64

2004-05-24 Thread Linux-Guru
Am Sonntag, 23. Mai 2004 21:28 schrieb blist: First of all: I have the same problem - also on Dual-Opteron machines. I also have been in contact with blist and X-ISTENCE... Ok, after the huge number of irrevlent replies to my last thread I am attempting to post an update on my SMTP Auth

Re: [vchkpw] Re: SMTP Auth HOWTO?

2004-05-24 Thread Linux-Guru
Am Sonntag, 23. Mai 2004 03:02 schrieb Eric Ziegast: I know this is a shameless plug, but I'm a happy customer. Have Inter7 do a SugarBox install for less time/money than it takes to figure it out using online resources and googled howtos. I didn't have to second-guess or debug anything.