Re: [vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name

2004-09-28 Thread kalin mintchev
> On Tuesday 28 September 2004 10:42 pm, kalin mintchev wrote: >> did the domain again (it had only 2 users). now it's working. >> thanks.. > > my guess is that your .qmail-default file was missing, but I guess we'll > never > know. i have a tar of that domain saved. i'm pretty sure i had one cau

Re: [vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name

2004-09-28 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 10:42 pm, kalin mintchev wrote: > did the domain again (it had only 2 users). now it's working. > thanks.. my guess is that your .qmail-default file was missing, but I guess we'll never know. -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Tec

Re: [vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name

2004-09-28 Thread kalin mintchev
did the domain again (it had only 2 users). now it's working. thanks.. > >> On Tuesday 28 September 2004 09:43 pm, kalin mintchev wrote: >>> > but is till get "Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name" . >>> > what am i missing? where else should i look? >> >> the domain in question is probably in the

Re: [vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name

2004-09-28 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 10:30 pm, kalin mintchev wrote: > > On Tuesday 28 September 2004 09:43 pm, kalin mintchev wrote: > >> > but is till get "Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name" . > >> > what am i missing? where else should i look? > > > > the domain in question is probably in the locals f

Re: [vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name

2004-09-28 Thread kalin mintchev
> On Tuesday 28 September 2004 09:43 pm, kalin mintchev wrote: >> > but is till get "Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name" . >> > what am i missing? where else should i look? > > the domain in question is probably in the locals file, or the locals file > doesn't exist and it's in the me file. it's

Re: [vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name

2004-09-28 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 09:43 pm, kalin mintchev wrote: > > but is till get "Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name" . > > what am i missing? where else should i look? the domain in question is probably in the locals file, or the locals file doesn't exist and it's in the me file. -Jeremy --

Re: [vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name

2004-09-28 Thread kalin mintchev
> hi all.. i must mention that apparently the problem is in the domain setup somewhere. i just added a new domain for tetsing and it works fine. i compared both set ups and i can't see any differences. help please.. thanks.. > > this is something very simple probably but can not figure it out.

[vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name

2004-09-28 Thread kalin mintchev
hi all.. this is something very simple probably but can not figure it out. i have vpopmail installed with qmail. it used to work a few weeks ago without any problem and i have not (or any body else) modified any of the files in the qmail/control directory. when i send mail to the machine that has

Re: [vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name

2003-09-14 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 21:34, Fast Johnny wrote: > Oh geez. That was pretty bad. Although the error messages didn't give me much to > go by, I needed to go back to simple control files. Sorry to waste everyone's time > on this. Thanks Jeremy for your help. it's ok, everyone makes mistakes. and we

Re: [vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name

2003-09-14 Thread Fast Johnny
Oh geez. That was pretty bad. Although the error messages didn't give me much to go by, I needed to go back to simple control files. Sorry to waste everyone's time on this. Thanks Jeremy for your help. --- Jeremy Kitchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 20:17, Fast Johnny wrote:

Re: [vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name

2003-09-14 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 20:17, Fast Johnny wrote: > users/assign file has the domain name of the mail being rejected. > ok [snip] > locals: > Messages for mail.whippersnapper.com are delivered locally. > Messages for localhost are delivered locally. > Messages for whippersnapper.com are delivered

Re: [vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name

2003-09-14 Thread Fast Johnny
users/assign file has the domain name of the mail being rejected. === qmail home directory: /var/qmail. user-ext delimiter: -. paternalism (in decimal): 2. silent concurrency limit: 120. subdirectory split: 23. user ids: 500, 501, 502, 0, 503, 504, 505, 506. group ids: 500,

Re: [vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name

2003-09-14 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 16:21, Fast Johnny wrote: > I have a fresh install of qmail/vpopmail. For about 3 months now, I > have had users logging in a getting/sending mail with no problem. I have > gone over LWQ many times and I don't know why but when sending email to > some users I get this in the

[vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name

2003-09-14 Thread Fast Johnny
I have a fresh install of qmail/vpopmail. For about 3 months now, I have had users logging in a getting/sending mail with no problem. I have gone over LWQ many times and I don't know why but when sending email to some users I get this in the log: Sep 14 15:24:19 mail qmail: 1063574659.626616 deli

Re: [vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name

2003-08-14 Thread Tom Collins
On Monday, August 11, 2003, at 01:45 PM, Mike Robin Haller wrote: main:/var/qmail/control # cat defaultdomain localhost main:/var/qmail/control # cat plusdomain localhost main:/var/qmail/control # cat me localhost main:/var/qmail/control # cat helohost localhost That's probably not a good idea. d

Re: [vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name

2003-08-14 Thread Ajai Khattri
Mike Robin Haller wrote: NOW the problem is, that he does not seem to recognize the directory. i can add successfully the domain with /home/vpopmail/bin/vadddomain haller-systemservice.net SECRETPW i can also get the infos: -

Re: [vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name

2003-08-14 Thread Mike Robin Haller
Hello i finally got the problem. i tried to delete and re-add another domain with a "-" in it. and it worked. under the new version of vpopmail. so it was not that problem. i then thought about, what the heck is the difference between haller-systemservice.net and all the others? sure, it is my ma

[vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name

2003-08-14 Thread Mike Robin Haller
Hi vpopmail mailing list, i have this problem and i hope someone can help me fast, because after an update to 5.3.23, i cannot add any domains. vadddomain always crashed with an segmentation fault. i debugged it and the segfaults were caused by two free(in_domain) and another free(..). i commented

Re: [vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name

2003-08-11 Thread Cream[DONut]
It seems to me to be a trend of people with domain names containing a "-" are reporting problems? Cream At 20:11 11-08-2003 +0200, you wrote: Hi vpopmail mailing list, i have this problem and i hope someone can help me fast, because after an update to 5.3.23, i cannot add any domains. vadddomai

Re: [vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name

2003-08-11 Thread Tom Collins
On Monday, August 11, 2003, at 11:11 AM, Mike Robin Haller wrote: i have this problem and i hope someone can help me fast, because after an update to 5.3.23, i cannot add any domains. vadddomain always crashed with an segmentation fault. i debugged it and the segfaults were caused by two free(in_d

Re: [vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name ???

2003-02-02 Thread Rick Updegrove
- Original Message - From: "J. Kendzorra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 2:26 AM Subject: [vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name ??? > starting delivery 7: msg 1097818 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] > st

Re: [vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name ???

2003-02-02 Thread Jesse Guardiani
--- Original Message - From: "J. Kendzorra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 5:26 AM Subject: [vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name ??? > Hi List, > i don't know why it happened, but the following came up today: >

[vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name ???

2003-02-02 Thread J. Kendzorra
Hi List, i don't know why it happened, but the following came up today: I've got 5 virtual domains that all worked very well. When I looked into the log-files today, i saw the following: starting delivery 7: msg 1097818 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 delivery 7: failure:

Re: [vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name

2002-12-21 Thread Hugo Escobar
There's only one file in users/. The file is .vpasswd.lock. rcpthosts and virtualdomains remain the same. On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 23:31, Steve Fulton wrote: > At 16:19 20/12/2002 -0500, Hugo Escobar wrote: > > Check the Qmail control files (rcpthosts, virtualdomains), as well the > "assign" file i

Re: [vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name

2002-12-20 Thread Steve Fulton
At 16:19 20/12/2002 -0500, Hugo Escobar wrote: Check the Qmail control files (rcpthosts, virtualdomains), as well the "assign" file in the users/ subdirectory of your Qmail directory. Specifically, look for the domain in question, and make sure it is there. -- Steve Hi list: It's been now a

[vchkpw] Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name

2002-12-20 Thread Hugo Escobar
Hi list: It's been now almost a year bash-2.05# uptime 3:56pm up 345 days, 4:13, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 since our mail server started. Everything has been OK until now. Suddenly, the users of one of the virtual domains are now facing a problem. They cannot receive m