Hi everybody,
yesterday I asked you if there is a problem in vdelivermail of handling EXITCODEs in
.qmail files and I discovered that in my installed version 5.2 no checking of the
EXITCODE was possible.
So I upgraded to the last "stable" version 5.2.1 whereas the changelog said that
within 5.
Jesus Ruiz writes:
> The problem is that my clients don't want to lose the email they save in
> the old server. When we change they account to the new server.
>
> Any suggestion?
Copy the existing mail over. Rsync is your friend...
--
Paul Allen
Softflare Support
Feucht, Florian writes:
> > Perhaps he did, but "locked out CONNECTIONS from that IP for 10
> > minutes" reads differently to me. If Tom had meant what you said, then
> > I would have expected something like "locked out authentication attempts
> > from that username/IP pair for 10 minutes."
>
Thank you, it worked out
At 05:57 AM 30/09/2003, Paul L. Allen wrote:
Jesus Ruiz writes:
> The problem is that my clients don't want to lose the email they save in
> the old server. When we change they account to the new server.
>
> Any suggestion?
Copy the existing mail over. Rsync is your frien
Something to look at:
it seems to stand out in my memory as ive had this same problem, but i dont
recall a resolve for it..
basically if you are having the same problem i was, then you cannot have
anything in your .qmail processing fork..
it must continue to run in the foreground or the mail will
Hi,
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 10:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So I upgraded to the last "stable" version 5.2.1 whereas the
> changelog said that within 5.2.1 the EXITCODE checks would be
> performed.
Vpopmail 5.2.1 fails to catch exitcode 100. Here is a patch:
http://fmail.dk/stuff/vpopmail-5.2.1-v
Is there any way to use the commands in /home/vpopmail/bin to setup domain
catch-all accounts? We're trying to automate conversions from sendmail's
virtusertable and are stuck on the catch-all accounts.
Best Regards,
Jeff Koch
Jeff Koch writes:
> Is there any way to use the commands in /home/vpopmail/bin to setup domain
> catch-all accounts?
When I was stuck with this problem quite a while ago I just wrote a bit of
perl to do the job for me. As others suggested in another thread, it was
smart enough to ask for dom
Hi,
,- - [ Le mardi 30 septembre 2003 vers 18:40 Jeff Koch écrivait: ] - -
|
> Is there any way to use the commands in /home/vpopmail/bin to setup domain
> catch-all accounts? We're trying to automate conversions from sendmail's
> virtusertable and are stuck on the catch-all accounts.
|
`- - - -
> Russ,
> Try changing these lines in vpopmail.mysql.
> FROM
> localhost|0|vpopmail_read||vpopmail
> localhost|0|vpopmail_edit||vpopmail
>
> TO
> localhost|mysql|vpopmailuser|vpoppasswd|vpopmail
> localhost|mysql|vpopmailuser|vpoppasswd|vpopmail
>
> -Tom
Tom,
Thanks, I made those changes -
yes.. mine were created on the fly too before changing to mysql. but my
files are there and owned by vpopmail:vpopmail (i dont have vchkpw group).
even the tmp files being created were owned by vpopmail.
since vpopmail has to be able to write a open-smtp open-smtp.lock and
open-smtp.tmp.
ill send
-rw-r--r--1 vpopmail vchkpw 25 Sep 29 14:40 inc_deps
-rw-r--r--1 vpopmail vchkpw 32 Sep 29 14:40 lib_deps
-rw-r--r--1 vpopmail vchkpw 0 Sep 30 12:40 open-smtp
-rw-r--r--1 vpopmail vchkpw 0 Sep 30 13:37 open-smtp.lock
-rw-r--r--1 root root
Russ,
This may be because you are setting the pop3 user in your run
script. Look at mine and try removing the vpopmail user.
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 300 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver \
-H -l mailhost.net \
-v -x /etc/tcp.pop3.cdb -c 50 -R 0 pop3 \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail
Changed from xinetd.d/ipop3 to /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3/run
So I still don't really know what the problem was .. but it is working. Can
anyone see why it wasn't working?
/etc/xinetd.d/ipop3
---
# default: off
# descr
I'm using spamcontrol 2.0.9, but i receive a lot of spam mail from the ip
address block that i allow to relay through my MTA.
The problem is that the client receive they ip address dinamically when
they connect with dialup or ADSL. Is there away to block and IP address
dinamically, when they se
On Monday, September 29, 2003, at 11:35 PM, Jonathan Viney wrote:
The problem is that if I put 'to "! "' in the if statement it
will bounce for aliases (because vuserinfo doesn't check if the email
is
an alias). I could run valias -s but the valias exit code is
always 0 even if it is an invalid
>I know this may sound redundant or silly but check your permissions
> on qmail-pop3d and the vckpwd binary. Maybe your permissions on
> those files are the problem. Cuz by the looks of what you sent in
> email so far you have done it right. It's gotta be something
> stupid.
>
> Yes, tcp.p
Jesus Ruiz wrote:
I'm using spamcontrol 2.0.9, but i receive a lot of spam mail from the
ip address block that i allow to relay through my MTA.
The problem is that the client receive they ip address dinamically
when they connect with dialup or ADSL. Is there away to block and IP
address dinami
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 17:44:21 -0400
X-Istence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jesus Ruiz wrote:
>
> > I'm using spamcontrol 2.0.9, but i receive a lot of spam mail from
> > the ip address block that i allow to relay through my MTA.
> >
> > The problem is that the client receive they ip address dinami
Jacob S. wrote:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 17:44:21 -0400
X-Istence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jesus Ruiz wrote:
I'm using spamcontrol 2.0.9, but i receive a lot of spam mail from
the ip address block that i allow to relay through my MTA.
The problem is that the client
Hi Anders,
thanks for that hint, I think I´ll give it a try next weekend.
To be honest, what I´ve done to get rid of that problem is let qmail do the whole
stuff with interpreting the EXITCODE from my spamfilter script.
Instead of putting the .qmail file in
/path-to-vpopmail/domains/domain1/ema
21 matches
Mail list logo
