[vchkpw] warning: trouble injecting bounce message, will try later

2004-12-03 Thread Bernd
Hi there! After recompiling all the packages I solved my OpenEFilter problem, but yesterday at exactly 9 pm a new error came up, although I was far, far away from my PC :-) For every mail that should be received/sent I get a warning: trouble injecting bounce message, will try later. Right now

[vchkpw] courier-imap

2004-12-03 Thread Oden Eriksson
Hi. I don't know if this has been addressed before, but I couldn't find anything related using google searches. I use latest vpopmail+courier-imap and the pop-before-smtp method. This has worked great during the past four or so years. The problem I'm experiencing is that the relay file seems

Re: [vchkpw] warning: trouble injecting bounce message, will try later

2004-12-03 Thread Eduardo Ribeiro da Silva
Hi, I´ve had some problems with QMail showing this message trouble injecting bounce message on qmail´s log too. I´ve took a long time to discover what did I do wrong, and after googling and asking some friends I´ve realized that my qmail-scanner instalation was completely wrong. All related with

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail domain folder

2004-12-03 Thread Gilcio Grella
Thanks a lot Jeremy! I didn't know about directory hashing! Now I understand it a bit :) By the way, I'm using ext2 and I'm sure I won't use more than 600 files in a directory. I know I can have problems, but I'll try not hashing :) Do you know the hashing limit of ext2? (But this is not the

Re: [vchkpw] warning: trouble injecting bounce message, will try later

2004-12-03 Thread Clayton Milos
First thing to do is to check how much memory you've allocated smtp with tcpserver. Give it more and see if that helps. Try with around 40M per session. Virus scanning uses ram. Especially with large attachemnts it chews up memory. - Original Message - From: Bernd [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [vchkpw] warning: trouble injecting bounce message, will try later

2004-12-03 Thread Bernd
Hi Eduardo! Thanks for your mail. I already tried the same at morning and after replacing my qmail-queue with the default qmail-queue I moved from the trouble injecting bounce message, will try later to mail server temporarily rejected message. So also in my case it had to do something with

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail domain folder

2004-12-03 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Friday 03 December 2004 05:22 am, Gilcio Grella wrote: Thanks a lot Jeremy! I didn't know about directory hashing! Now I understand it a bit :) good :) qmail does the same thing with its queue, only it's a little bit different. By the way, I'm using ext2 and I'm sure I won't use more

Re: [vchkpw] warning: trouble injecting bounce message, will try later

2004-12-03 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Friday 03 December 2004 05:55 am, Clayton Milos wrote: First thing to do is to check how much memory you've allocated smtp with tcpserver. that has nothing to do with qmail-send. -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [vchkpw] courier-imap

2004-12-03 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Friday 03 December 2004 05:05 am, Oden Eriksson wrote: Hi. I don't know if this has been addressed before, but I couldn't find anything related using google searches. I use latest vpopmail+courier-imap and the pop-before-smtp method. This has worked great during the past four or so

Re: [vchkpw] courier-imap

2004-12-03 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Friday 03 December 2004 09:39 am, Jeremy Kitchen wrote: On Friday 03 December 2004 05:05 am, Oden Eriksson wrote: Hi. I don't know if this has been addressed before, but I couldn't find anything related using google searches. I use latest vpopmail+courier-imap and the

Re: [vchkpw] courier-imap

2004-12-03 Thread Oden Eriksson
Friday 03 December 2004 18.10 skrev Jeremy Kitchen: On Friday 03 December 2004 09:39 am, Jeremy Kitchen wrote: On Friday 03 December 2004 05:05 am, Oden Eriksson wrote: Hi. I don't know if this has been addressed before, but I couldn't find anything related using google searches.

Re: [vchkpw] courier-imap

2004-12-03 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Friday 03 December 2004 01:42 pm, Oden Eriksson wrote: Thanks Jeremy, but smtp auth isn't the answer I was looking for. I know mr. sam and some other profilic people in this sphere thinks pop-before-smtp is dead, is silly and obsolete, but I can say it isn't. The question still, is how to

Re: [vchkpw] courier-imap

2004-12-03 Thread Tom Collins
On Dec 3, 2004, at 11:42 AM, Oden Eriksson wrote: The question still, is how to make this work, not to make me start using smtp auth. It sounds like (from Jeremey's email) that kmail leaves its IMAP connection open at all times and that's the problem. One solutions would be to patch

Re: [vchkpw] courier-imap

2004-12-03 Thread X-Istence
On Dec 3, 2004, at 2:42 PM, Oden Eriksson wrote: Thanks Jeremy, but smtp auth isn't the answer I was looking for. I know mr. sam and some other profilic people in this sphere thinks pop-before-smtp is dead, is silly and obsolete, but I can say it isn't. The question still, is how to make this

Re: [vchkpw] vdelivermail, user quotas and the maildirsize file

2004-12-03 Thread Dave Goodrich
[intentionaly top posted] You are my new hero Mr. Collins. If you are in or near central Indiana, my wife makes apple pie and vegetable soup that grown men will crawl through broken glass for, there are a few servings waiting for you. Can't wait to give it a try. DAve Tom Collins wrote: I've

RE: [vchkpw] vdelivermail, user quotas and the maildirsize file

2004-12-03 Thread shadowplay.net
Title: Message does this change take into account the ablity for multi processing on the maildirsize and 2 vdeliverers attempting to add to the mailbox at near simultaneous time... think multiple mailservers with a nfs connection to the maildirectories... ie at this time if i accept

Re: [vchkpw] vdelivermail, user quotas and the maildirsize file

2004-12-03 Thread Tom Collins
On Dec 3, 2004, at 3:01 PM, shadowplay.net wrote: does this change take into account the ablity for multi processing on the maildirsize and 2 vdeliverers attempting to add to the mailbox at near simultaneous time... think multiple mailservers with a nfs connection to the maildirectories...