Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8 + syslog

2005-05-18 Thread Jimmy Stewpot
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 17.59 17/05/2005, you wrote: On Tuesday 17 May 2005 11:47 am, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Hi Jimmy, this does not look as a chkuser problem, but as a general qmail problem (as chkuser uses same logging routines of qmail). chkuser log goes whenever qmail logs

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8 + syslog

2005-05-18 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 08.52 18/05/2005, you wrote: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 17.59 17/05/2005, you wrote: On Tuesday 17 May 2005 11:47 am, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Hi Jimmy, this does not look as a chkuser problem, but as a general qmail problem (as chkuser uses same logging routines of qmail). chkuser

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8 + syslog

2005-05-18 Thread Jimmy Stewpot
Thanks that worked really well! tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 08.52 18/05/2005, you wrote: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 17.59 17/05/2005, you wrote: On Tuesday 17 May 2005 11:47 am, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Hi Jimmy, this does not look as a chkuser problem, but as a general qmail problem

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8 + syslog

2005-05-18 Thread Jimmy Stewpot
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 08.52 18/05/2005, you wrote: tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 17.59 17/05/2005, you wrote: On Tuesday 17 May 2005 11:47 am, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Hi Jimmy, this does not look as a chkuser problem, but as a general qmail problem (as chkuser uses same logging

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8 + syslog

2005-05-18 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 10.48 18/05/2005, you wrote: I currently have no problems with email logging. I have also got the rblsmtpd syslogd patch working its only the chkuser stuff that does not end up in syslog. This is my configuration for qmail-smtpd. It logs everything (chkuser included). I don't use supervise,

[vchkpw] smtp authentication

2005-05-18 Thread Payal Rathod
Hi, Can someone tell me which kind of SMTP-Auth patch (or qmail-smtpd replacement) integrates properly with vpopmail+qmail setup? I don't want to use mailfront for the same but I am open to other ideas where SMTP-Auth module can check the password from vpasswd files of vpopmail. Thanks for

Re: [vchkpw] smtp authentication

2005-05-18 Thread DAve
Payal Rathod wrote: Hi, Can someone tell me which kind of SMTP-Auth patch (or qmail-smtpd replacement) integrates properly with vpopmail+qmail setup? I don't want to use mailfront for the same but I am open to other ideas where SMTP-Auth module can check the password from vpasswd files of

Re: [vchkpw] smtp authentication

2005-05-18 Thread Kyle Wheeler
On Wednesday, May 18 at 09:12 AM, quoth Payal Rathod: Can someone tell me which kind of SMTP-Auth patch (or qmail-smtpd replacement) integrates properly with vpopmail+qmail setup? I don't want to use mailfront for the same but I am open to other ideas where SMTP-Auth module can check the

[vchkpw] PATCH: Fix to vpopbull to multiple domains in the argument!

2005-05-18 Thread Pedro Ribeiro
Hello , This patch makes vpopbull work with multiple domains in the argument The base 5.4.10 only processes the first domain due to nested use of strtok --- ../vpopmail-5.4.10-IPLNet-9/vpopbull.c 2004-01-11 09:16:53.0 + +++ vpopbull.c 2005-05-18 14:00:30.0 +0100

Re: [vchkpw] smtp authentication

2005-05-18 Thread Payal Rathod
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 08:54:15AM -0500, DAve wrote: Payal Rathod wrote: We have been very happy with the smtp-auth that is included in the contrib directory of vpopmail. It uses vchkpw so checking against the system users, vpopmail users in cdb, vpopmail users in SQL, all work fine.

[vchkpw] many roaming users

2005-05-18 Thread Payal Rathod
Hi, The other day a friend showed interest in qmail server. He is running sendmail for many years and wants to shift to a better MTA (for his moderately loaded server of 3 thousand users) during hardware change. I have advised him qmail + vpopmail combo, but am scared of one thing only. Can

Re: [vchkpw] many roaming users

2005-05-18 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 12:45 pm, Payal Rathod wrote: Hi, The other day a friend showed interest in qmail server. He is running sendmail for many years and wants to shift to a better MTA (for his moderately loaded server of 3 thousand users) during hardware change. I have advised him qmail +

Re: [vchkpw] many roaming users

2005-05-18 Thread Payal Rathod
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:15:22PM -0500, Jeremy Kitchen wrote: don't use vpopmail's roaming-users functionality if you want pop-before-smtp authentication, use Bruce Guenter's relay-ctrl package. Any particular reason why? However, I wouldn't even use pop-before-smtp.. I would set up SMTP

Re[2]: [vchkpw] many roaming users

2005-05-18 Thread Sylwester S. Biernacki
On Wednesday, May 18, 2005, 8:26:08 PM, Payal wrote: On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:15:22PM -0500, Jeremy Kitchen wrote: don't use vpopmail's roaming-users functionality if you want pop-before-smtp authentication, use Bruce Guenter's relay-ctrl package. Any particular reason why? because

Re: [vchkpw] many roaming users

2005-05-18 Thread Davide Giunchi
Payal Rathod ha scritto: Hi, The other day a friend showed interest in qmail server. He is running sendmail for many years and wants to shift to a better MTA (for his moderately loaded server of 3 thousand users) during hardware change. I have advised him qmail + vpopmail combo, but am scared

Re: [vchkpw] many roaming users

2005-05-18 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 01:26 pm, Payal Rathod wrote: On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:15:22PM -0500, Jeremy Kitchen wrote: don't use vpopmail's roaming-users functionality if you want pop-before-smtp authentication, use Bruce Guenter's relay-ctrl package. Any particular reason why?

Re: [vchkpw] many roaming users

2005-05-18 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 01:50 pm, Davide Giunchi wrote: Payal Rathod ha scritto: Hi, The other day a friend showed interest in qmail server. He is running sendmail for many years and wants to shift to a better MTA (for his moderately loaded server of 3 thousand users) during hardware

Re[2]: [vchkpw] many roaming users

2005-05-18 Thread Sylwester S. Biernacki
On Wednesday, May 18, 2005, 9:46:30 PM, Jeremy wrote: http://www.tnpi.biz/internet/mail/toaster/patches/tcpserver-mysql.shtml that's a hack, and I would not recommend using it. it's not tcpserver's job to handle specific functions such as this. However sometimes you have to do sth even if it

Re: [vchkpw] many roaming users

2005-05-18 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 02:57 pm, Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote: On Wednesday, May 18, 2005, 9:46:30 PM, Jeremy wrote: http://www.tnpi.biz/internet/mail/toaster/patches/tcpserver-mysql.shtml that's a hack, and I would not recommend using it. it's not tcpserver's job to handle specific