Rainer Zocholl schrieb:
>
>
> So how can i "nail" this moving DVB-T card to a fixed postition?
>
>
You might try to blacklist the driver modules used for the cards in
/etc/modprobe.d/blacklist and then enter them in /etc/modules in an order of
your liking. If you can read German, have a look
"Theunis Potgieter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> udev rules
ha, that was even funny. :)
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
udev rules
On 05 Feb 2008 00:27:00 +0100, Rainer Zocholl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> for years i was running VDR 1.4.3.
>
> Now i felt forced to use ctvdr and 1.4.7 with a
> Linux 2.6.23x2 #2 SMP PREEMPT on a
> Main Board: K7S8XE+ AMI BIOS P1.70 (04/27/2004)
> and an AMD Duron(tm) 1350
Hello Klaus,
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 11:17:05 +0100
Klaus Schmidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| So, here's the straw poll:
|
|Should there be a stable version 1.6.0 now, based on what's in
|version 1.5.14, but without DVB-S2 or even H.264 support?
|
| Yes or No?
|
| Kla
Hello
for years i was running VDR 1.4.3.
Now i felt forced to use ctvdr and 1.4.7 with a
Linux 2.6.23x2 #2 SMP PREEMPT on a
Main Board: K7S8XE+ AMI BIOS P1.70 (04/27/2004)
and an AMD Duron(tm) 1350MHz (under clocked from 1500)
with 512MB RAM
i found this miracle(?):
The systen has 4 cards:
For people who encounter this bug on recent kernels:
dvb_api_wrapper.c:189: error: '__invalid_size_argument_for_IOC' cannot
appear in a constant-expression
This is caused by an obscure kernel compile check that is supposed to do
macro parameter checking for ioctl constants, but also prevents
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Christian Schuld wrote:
> During tuning VDR selects the right device using the sourcecaps patch and
> looks up the right diseqc sequence for that satellite source in diseqc.conf.
> It should work right away, if you setup sourcecaps and disqec correctly.
It works :) Both of my
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Christian Schuld wrote:
On Montag, 4. Februar 2008, Füley István wrote:
Yes, thats true :) But IMHO implementing this feature would require only a few
dozen lines of addtional source code. May be someone else can do it?
Don't look at me ;-)
Lol :) That's a good one :)
On Montag, 4. Februar 2008, Füley István wrote:
> > implemented in VDR. More generally spoken VDR would need a separate
> > diseqc.conf for each receiving device.
>
> I know that. But I'm afraid that's not a priority for Klaus, at least not
> now when there's a war between features like H.26 and su
On Feb 4, 2008 7:15 PM, Sebastien Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> A side note : I think most of the No answer comes from people who were
> expecting specific modifications (txtsub, full dvb subtitle, dvb-s2,
> h264, ts recording, ...). IMHO answering no in that case is not very
> adult and
> implemented in VDR. More generally spoken VDR would need a separate
> diseqc.conf for each receiving device.
I know that. But I'm afraid that's not a priority for Klaus, at least not
now when there's a war between features like H.26 and subtitles :)
> To circumvent this situation with current
>> You're absolutely right. But:
>> UPC Direct removed couple of days ago the Czech and Hungarian DVB
>> subtitle from BBC Prime (on S19.2E) and now it only has teletext subtitles
>> :( This means that after about a year I have to install teletext subtitle
>> plugin again.
>
> Did they give any rea
On Montag, 4. Februar 2008, Füley István wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Füley István wrote:
>
> > I have one issue with my dishes. I know that few of the vdr users have
> > motorized dish, well I have two of them :) The first one, a 1.8m prime
> > focus is controlled fine with Diseqc 1.2 commands in
On 02/04/08 18:11, Füley István wrote:
>>> I'm not sure about that. At least the ZDF here in Germany uses DVB
>>> subtitles now, but I don't think the other broadcasters will follow very
>>> fast.
>> I believe the ARD is also looking into this.
>>
>> At any rate, using DVB subtitles would be the op
>> I'm not sure about that. At least the ZDF here in Germany uses DVB
>> subtitles now, but I don't think the other broadcasters will follow very
>> fast.
>
> I believe the ARD is also looking into this.
>
> At any rate, using DVB subtitles would be the optimal solution.
>
> Klaus
You're absolute
In any case - thanks to Klaus that community were involved in this
process. IMHO feature requests polls will also be useful. As we see
now, teletext subtitles are also important feature for many of VDR
users, may be there are others too :)
___
vdr mail
On Feb 3, 2008 11:17 AM, Klaus Schmidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, here's the straw poll:
>
>Should there be a stable version 1.6.0 now, based on what's in
>version 1.5.14, but without DVB-S2 or even H.264 support?
>
> Yes or No?
In my opinion, Yes (a stable release never hurts).
On 02/04/08 10:15, Tobi wrote:
> Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>> I believe there is a patch for that, but that's not the way I want to
>> implement it.
>
> Yes we have this patch in the (unofficial!) Debian package to support
> the ttxtsubs plug-in. The Patch is maintained by Rolf Ahrenberg.
>
> http
On 02/03/08 11:17, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> ...
> So, here's the straw poll:
>
>Should there be a stable version 1.6.0 now, based on what's in
>version 1.5.14, but without DVB-S2 or even H.264 support?
>
> Yes or No?
Here's the result of this poll:
totalyesno
V
On Feb 4, 2008 12:06 AM, Jukka Vaisanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes to stable 1.6.0 with current kernel-drivers - VDR needs new users
> that can get it running easily out of the box with a debian bare bones
> install. The people who want HDTV support are going to go with the
> dev-releases any
> XXV has'nt at present UTF8 support, this feature is planned but not
> released. Only latin1 charset work up to the present.
as VDR is UTF-8 now and as I see there are much chances that there
will be new stable 1.6 with UTF-8 soon, please move this feature
higher in your list :) XXV looks really
Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>>Should there be a stable version 1.6.0 now, based on what's in
>>version 1.5.14, but without DVB-S2 or even H.264 support?
>
> Yes.
>
> It would be pity if that means that the stable version stays at
> 1.6.0 and doesn't receive any more bu
Hello,
Am Sonntag, den 03.02.2008, 22:08 +0200 schrieb Andrey Kuzmin:
> I'm trying to setup XXV (latest SVN version). Everything seems to run
> OK, except I could not see russian EPG and channel list. Texts look
> like:
> ...
> so they are HTML encoded. How to fix that?
XXV has'nt at present UTF8
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Füley István wrote:
I have one issue with my dishes. I know that few of the vdr users have
motorized dish, well I have two of them :) The first one, a 1.8m prime
focus is controlled fine with Diseqc 1.2 commands in diseqc.conf. But I
have a second one connected to my S2-3200.
On Sonntag, 3. Februar 2008, Andrey Kuzmin wrote:
> What are chances that multiproto will be merged to kernel in the
> nearest time (1-2 months?) If chances are big, I don't think that it
> is a good time to lose valuable Klaus's time for releasing &
> supporting new stable version that will freeze
2008/2/3, Klaus Schmidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Should there be a stable version 1.6.0 now, based on what's in
>version 1.5.14, but without DVB-S2 or even H.264 support?
>
> Yes or No?
No. For reasons already mentioned in this thread.
Regards,
Joachim.
_
Hi,
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>Should there be a stable version 1.6.0 now, based on what's in
>version 1.5.14, but without DVB-S2 or even H.264 support?
yes
Best regards,
Matthias
--
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof
http://www.vdr-wiki.de/wiki/index.php/OpenSUSE_VDR_DVB-S2
/Magnus H
Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För serge
pecher
Skickat: den 4 februari 2008 13:07
Till: 'VDR Mailing List'
Ämne: [vdr] Howto vdr-xine installation
Hello,
I used to use
Sorry, I meant:
http://www.vdr-wiki.de/wiki/index.php/OpenSUSE_VDR_DVB-S2_-_xine
/Magnus H
Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För serge
pecher
Skickat: den 4 februari 2008 13:07
Till: 'VDR Mailing List'
Ämne: [vdr] Howto vdr-xine installation
serge pecher wrote:
> I used to use the "opensuse dvb-s2" wiki page to follow the instructions
> about the installation of xine-lib 1.2 and vdr-xine.
If you don't need dvb-s2 and hdtv you may use the vdr/vdr15 and
vdr-plugins packages from the build service:
http://download.opensuse.org/repositor
Hello,
I used to use the "opensuse dvb-s2" wiki page to follow the instructions
about the installation of xine-lib 1.2 and vdr-xine.
When I am looking for that page, I get an empty page now.
Can anyone point me out a location where to find the download commands (cvs
or hg ?) and the several c
Klaus Schmidinger a écrit :
>Should there be a stable version 1.6.0 now, based on what's in
>version 1.5.14, but without DVB-S2 or even H.264 support?
>
> Yes or No?
1) a stable release shouldn't stop the current development for a long
time, thus shouldn't delay the S2/H264 and other nea
Hello,
I vote with NO. For me there are important features missing and I fear a
slowdown of developement pace once vdr-1.6.0 is out.
Also the current situation with vdr-1.5.14 puts some kind of pressure on the
driver devs to get a working solution into the kernel.
S.
__
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> I believe there is a patch for that, but that's not the way I want to
> implement it.
Yes we have this patch in the (unofficial!) Debian package to support
the ttxtsubs plug-in. The Patch is maintained by Rolf Ahrenberg.
http://www.saunalahti.fi/~rahrenbe/vdr/patches/
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> On 02/04/08 09:46, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> > Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote:
> >> I've been using VDR for about a year and a half now and it's great. But
> >> with
> >> all due respect, I think you're doing this the wrong way around. At least
> >> here in Finland, decent DVB
On Sunday 03 February 2008 11:17:05 Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> So, here's the straw poll:
>
>Should there be a stable version 1.6.0 now, based on what's in
>version 1.5.14, but without DVB-S2 or even H.264 support?
>
> Yes or No?
Yes.
Cya, Ed
--
When the stars threw down their spears,
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 11:17:05AM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>Should there be a stable version 1.6.0 now, based on what's in
>version 1.5.14, but without DVB-S2 or even H.264 support?
>
> Yes or No?
Yes.
pgptdi5ZvSAJN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 02/04/08 09:46, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote:
>> I've been using VDR for about a year and a half now and it's great. But with
>> all due respect, I think you're doing this the wrong way around. At least
>> here in Finland, decent DVB subtitles support is pretty much the only
Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote:
> I've been using VDR for about a year and a half now and it's great. But with
> all due respect, I think you're doing this the wrong way around. At least
> here in Finland, decent DVB subtitles support is pretty much the only thing
> VDR needs to be usable out-of-the-b
> Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 10:06:19 +0200
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: vdr@linuxtv.org
> Subject: Re: [vdr] Straw poll: stable version 1.6.0 now?
>
> I usually lurk here so my vote represents the 'user' community more than
> the 'dev'..
>
> Yes to stable 1.6.0 with current kernel-drivers - VDR
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>Should there be a stable version 1.6.0 now, based on what's in
>version 1.5.14, but without DVB-S2 or even H.264 support?
Yes.
It would be pity if that means that the stable version stays at
1.6.0 and doesn't receive any more bugfixes though.
cu
Ludwig
--
(o_
41 matches
Mail list logo
