Re: [vdr] CAM auto resetting - feature request??

2010-12-27 Thread Simon Baxter
Btw, I'm not sure if I mentioned, but this is happening in VDR 1.6, and I belive Halim has it on 1.7? So it has been around for quite a while. I can try patches if needed, as it should be pretty straight forward applying them on Gentoo, but 1.6 would be prefered. Yip - I've been experiencing

Re: [vdr] dvbscan vs builtin update generates double entries.

2010-12-27 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 19.12.2010 02:46, Oliver Schinagl wrote: I have created a channel.conf from dvbscan and used the built update function from VDR. All channels seem to be added/modified properly, but the FTA channels are different. Instead of modifying my current entry, it created new ones. Nederland

Re: [vdr] Request: E parameter in channels.conf for epg scan

2010-12-27 Thread Jochen Dolze
Am 12.12.2010 16:19, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger: Hmm, I see. So how about changing cEIT in such a way that it never overwrites any events in a schedule if the first existing event in that schedule has a table id of 0? There are three usecases for adding EPG-Data: 1. Using EIT-EPG as it is 2.

Re: [vdr] dvbscan vs builtin update generates double entries.

2010-12-27 Thread Oliver Schinagl
On 19.12.2010 02:46, Oliver Schinagl wrote: I have created a channel.conf from dvbscan and used the built update function from VDR. All channels seem to be added/modified properly, but the FTA channels are different. Instead of modifying my current entry, it created new ones. Nederland

Re: [vdr] dvbscan vs builtin update generates double entries.

2010-12-27 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 27.12.2010 14:10, Oliver Schinagl wrote: On 19.12.2010 02:46, Oliver Schinagl wrote: I have created a channel.conf from dvbscan and used the built update function from VDR. All channels seem to be added/modified properly, but the FTA channels are different. Instead of modifying my

Re: [vdr] Request: E parameter in channels.conf for epg scan

2010-12-27 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 14.12.2010 12:18, Dominic Evans wrote: On 14 December 2010 10:49, Eric Valette eric.vale...@free.fr wrote: On 17 March 2010 07:59, williamk...@cobradevil.org wrote: I have made some other changes. and also got an update from Rob Davis. which added ratings and credits see:

Re: [vdr] Request: E parameter in channels.conf for epg scan

2010-12-27 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 27.12.2010 13:07, Jochen Dolze wrote: Am 12.12.2010 16:19, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger: Hmm, I see. So how about changing cEIT in such a way that it never overwrites any events in a schedule if the first existing event in that schedule has a table id of 0? There are three usecases for

Re: [vdr] projects.vdr-developer.org

2010-12-27 Thread Tobias Grimm
Am Sonntag, den 26.12.2010, 09:57 -0800 schrieb VDR User: You'd think there are more interesting websites to target then a VDR plugin source repository. :\ And according to Murphy's Law I've also found some hard drive / file system issues :-( So sorry guys, it took a little bit longer. But

[vdr] Architecture difference between recording and viewing?

2010-12-27 Thread Torsten Kunkel
Hello, I still have problems with my Tevii S470 with DVB-S2-channels. The problem (as already posted long ago at http://www.vdr-portal.de/board/thread.php?threadid=93713) is: The buffer runs full buffer usage: 70% (tid=12493) buffer usage: 60% (tid=12493) buffer usage: 70% (tid=12493)

[vdr] Framerates

2010-12-27 Thread Tobias Grimm
Hi! I have tiny question: When recording from a HD channel (720p50), the *.rec/info -file tells me the recording has a framerate of 25 fps. mediainfo or ffmpeg detect 50 fps. Why such a difference? And what's the framerate the frame number in the *.rec/marks -file is based on? Tobias