Hi,
Been a while since I've used VDR. Have it setup after scanning using
the scan program, however something is strange.
There are multiple versions of some channels, such as BBC
One/Two/News, Channel 4 etc. Some of these either have video and no
EPG, have video and EPG, or have EPG and no
On 3 November 2010 20:48, Luca Olivetti l...@ventoso.org wrote:
Al 03/11/10 21:31, En/na Alasdair Campbell ha escrit:
There are multiple versions of some channels, such as BBC
One/Two/News, Channel 4 etc. Some of these either have video and no
EPG, have video and EPG, or have EPG and no video
On 3 November 2010 23:18, Torgeir Veimo torg...@netenviron.com wrote:
From memory, I think the frequencies in channels.conf ends up being
166khz off the actual frequency. I remember having to tweak the
channels.conf file manually, then turn off automatic updates. Can you
post your file here?
Lauri Tischler wrote:
Füley István wrote:
Oops, that's really not so good... one can't comment about HDTV with a
resolution which is not full HDTV : 1920x1080...
Ok, this means that my setup is a low-end instead of being average as I
stated before, therefore my considerations about HDTV was
Lauri Tischler wrote:
Alasdair Campbell wrote:
Lauri Tischler wrote:
Not really, FullHD also means large, minimum 42, it is quite senseless
to to watch good picture on a postcard, so you start at €1500
You forgot to add the €20,000 building an extension to your house, if
you don't want
VDR User wrote:
On Nov 22, 2007 7:30 AM, Füley István [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be clear: I did not say, that we don't need HD at all. I just said,
that normal TV stations should stay in SD, and only a couple of premium
(PPV, etc) channels should go HD. But the situation is more clear: not
Beside all that, I do believe VDR needs to integrate H264 HD
recording, along with support built-in for multiple frontends. Hopefully
I can lend a hand with the coding (in about 6 years).
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
On Nov 18, 2007 9:54 PM, Klaus Schmidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/18/07 19:16, Alasdair Campbell wrote:
On Nov 19, 2007 2:08 AM, Halim Sahin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm HDTV with a matrox card
What I mean is H264 video gets decoded by the extra horsepower of the
P4
On 21/08/07, JJussi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And how you do that with Gentoo... If I change something, gentoo compile
process will notice that..
Suspend the emerge just after the source has been unpacked and any
patches applied. Might take you a couple of times to get it just
before it starts
On 18/06/07, Alasdair Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16/06/07, Petri Hintukainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 19:16 +0100, Alasdair Campbell wrote:
Is it possible to have one of the VDR 'servers/instances' to be
running on one of the clients rather than the main
On 09/06/07, Petri Hintukainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 18:15 +0100, Andrew Herron wrote:
I have several networked vdr machines that i want to use to connect
back to the 'server' vdr machine. The networked vdr machines will have
no dvb cards (they will all be located
On 13/06/07, Andrey Vlassov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
could somebody point me in right direction?
lots of useful info here:
http://www.linuxtv.org/vdrwiki/index.php/Main_Page
I am looking into configuring a second DVBS card to use with vdr.
Configuration:
Athlon 1.2GHz
MB: ABIT
On 13/06/07, Klaus Schmidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no such option in VDR's Setup menu.
Sorry, I was thinking of Primary DVB interface - something totally different..
--
A l a s d a i r C a m p b e l l
r a g a w u @ g m a i l . c o m
On 25/05/07, Petri Hintukainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, patch against xine-lib 1.1.6 is available from
http://phivdr.dyndns.org/xine-lib/directfb/
Thanks so much for that!
I'll be able to try it over the weekend and I'll let you know how I get on.
many thanks
--
A l a s d a i r C a m
On 21/04/07, Petri Hintukainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 19:21 +0100, Alasdair Campbell wrote:
I'll have a look at the softdevice src this weekend compare with
xineliboutput.
Better to compare with xine-lib (src/video_out/video_out_directfb.c), as
there's not even
On 21/04/07, Markus Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, this changes are more than 7 month old, maybe there have been some
changes to DirectFB to make it work in the meanwhile... As far as I saw it's
only a two line patch, so I could try to manually revert it and compile
xine-lib again...
On 21/04/07, Tony Houghton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alasdair Campbell wrote:
Because I'm using a 550Mhz P3, my only option is to use the
xineliboutput until I figure out what is causing the big CPU load
variations. As I've never had softdevice successfully running
On 21/04/07, Petri Hintukainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 19:21 +0100, Alasdair Campbell wrote:
I'll have a look at the softdevice src this weekend compare with
xineliboutput.
Better to compare with xine-lib (src/video_out/video_out_directfb.c), as
there's not even
On 20/04/07, Markus Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 19. April 2007 15:06:54 schrieb Alasdair Campbell:
config_xineliboutput
# field parity
# { none top bottom }, default: 0
#video.device.directfb_field_parity:none
That's funny, my config_xineliboutput doesn't have
On 19/04/07, Torgeir Veimo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19 Apr 2007, at 09:41, Alasdair Campbell wrote:
In the original post I was just wondering if xineliboutput has been
written with the matrox specific instructions that softdevice's -vo
dfb:mgatv uses. As I don't understand
Sorry for replying to myself, but in the meantime, while waiting for
xineliboutput to work again, anyone reading know if I can use df_xine
for the video display, while retaining xineliboutput as the lirc
transport to my headless server running vdr-xineliboutput.
** I know there has been a
ignore that, I was being an idiot, set to 'top' now.
--
A l a s d a i r C a m p b e l l
r a g a w u @ g m a i l . c o m
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Can vdr-xineliboutput utilize the excellent interlaced output of a
Matrox G450 with VGASCART cable?
I'm seeing what I can only describe as video stutters/shakes with
interlaced video and quick movements, long camera pans.
Using latest vdr-xineliboutput, DirectFB-1.0.0 xine-lib-1.1.5 using
23 matches
Mail list logo
