Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-25 Thread Guy Roussin
Klaus Schmidinger a écrit : On 24.01.2009 23:23, Guy Roussin wrote: ... Why this 1TB limitation ? The index file uses 8 byte per entry, two of which are now used for the file number, one bit is used to identify independent frames, and 40 bits are used for the actual file offset.

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-24 Thread Udo Richter
On 06.01.2009 16:06, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: - Recording files larger than 4GB or with more than 255 separate files hasn't been tested yet. + The index file format has been changed to support file sizes of up to 1TB (previously 2GB), and up to 65535 separate files per recording

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-24 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 24.01.2009 15:19, Udo Richter wrote: On 06.01.2009 16:06, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: - Recording files larger than 4GB or with more than 255 separate files hasn't been tested yet. + The index file format has been changed to support file sizes of up to 1TB (previously 2GB), and up to

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-24 Thread Guy Roussin
Klaus Schmidinger a écrit : On 24.01.2009 15:19, Udo Richter wrote: On 06.01.2009 16:06, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: - Recording files larger than 4GB or with more than 255 separate files hasn't been tested yet. + The index file format has been changed to support file sizes of up to

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-24 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 24.01.2009 23:23, Guy Roussin wrote: ... Why this 1TB limitation ? The index file uses 8 byte per entry, two of which are now used for the file number, one bit is used to identify independent frames, and 40 bits are used for the actual file offset. The remaining 7 bits are reserved for

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-18 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 13.01.2009 10:44, Oliver Joa wrote: Klaus Schmidinger wrote: [...] Ok, then let's have another id for this... What about an id which can be set in the config-file? Should be the easiest thing to implement. I was more thinking of a command line option, because this is an instance

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-16 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 08.01.2009 07:32, gimli wrote: Hi, on playback old HDTV recordings the timline is wrong. From a first look it seems to show the double length of the recording. I assume those old HDTV recordings were done in PES. VDR 1.7.3 and up is probably not compatible with such recordings. Klaus

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-16 Thread Tony Houghton
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:53:36 +0100 Klaus Schmidinger klaus.schmidin...@cadsoft.de wrote: I assume those old HDTV recordings were done in PES. VDR 1.7.3 and up is probably not compatible with such recordings. Are you planning to add backwards compatibility or will we need to convert our old

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-16 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 16.01.2009 16:07, Tony Houghton wrote: On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:53:36 +0100 Klaus Schmidinger klaus.schmidin...@cadsoft.de wrote: I assume those old HDTV recordings were done in PES. VDR 1.7.3 and up is probably not compatible with such recordings. Are you planning to add backwards

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-16 Thread Tony Houghton
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:19:27 +0100 Klaus Schmidinger klaus.schmidin...@cadsoft.de wrote: On 16.01.2009 16:07, Tony Houghton wrote: On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:53:36 +0100 Klaus Schmidinger klaus.schmidin...@cadsoft.de wrote: I assume those old HDTV recordings were done in PES. VDR 1.7.3

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-16 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 16.01.2009 18:14, Tony Houghton wrote: On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:19:27 +0100 Klaus Schmidinger klaus.schmidin...@cadsoft.de wrote: On 16.01.2009 16:07, Tony Houghton wrote: On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:53:36 +0100 Klaus Schmidinger klaus.schmidin...@cadsoft.de wrote: I assume those old HDTV

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-13 Thread Oliver Joa
Klaus Schmidinger wrote: [...] Ok, then let's have another id for this... What about an id which can be set in the config-file? Should be the easiest thing to implement. Olli ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-13 Thread Johann Friedrichs
Hi, with vdr 1.7.3 I had no directory display in the pictures-plugin and crashes in dvdswitch, while it initially scanned the defined base directory for DVD-Images. I found, that with the LARGEFILE options I had to change cReadDir accordingly to use dirent64 and readdir64_r (tools.h, tools.c)

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-12 Thread Gregoire Favre
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:27:42AM +0100, jean-p...@goedee.nl wrote: What must I do to make it work with 64bits system? I?m a simple user with no coding experience. Could you post your error, I am under x86_64 and only patch I needed was one found on vdrportal.de : --- tools.c

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3 (streamdev)

2009-01-12 Thread Frank Schmirler
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:30:36 +0100, jean-paul wrote Thanks its compiling but I get now a error with compiling streamdev. Patch: http://www.vdr-developer.org/mantisbt/view.php?id=506 Cheers, Frank ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-12 Thread Nicolas Huillard
Klaus Schmidinger a écrit : On 08.01.2009 18:50, user.vdr wrote: On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Klaus Schmidinger klaus.schmidin...@cadsoft.de wrote: + The directory name for a recording has been changed from -MM-DD-hh[.:]mm.pr.lt.rec (pr=priority, lt=lifetime) to

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-12 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 12.01.2009 13:41, Nicolas Huillard wrote: Klaus Schmidinger a écrit : On 08.01.2009 18:50, user.vdr wrote: On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Klaus Schmidinger klaus.schmidin...@cadsoft.de wrote: + The directory name for a recording has been changed from -MM-DD-hh[.:]mm.pr.lt.rec

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-12 Thread Nicolas Huillard
Klaus Schmidinger a écrit : On 12.01.2009 13:41, Nicolas Huillard wrote: -MM-DD-hh.mm.ch-ri.rec does not solve the problem of multiple VDR instances recording the same show. This is a usual problem of multiple instances sharing a single /video dir. As we're talking about safety here, why

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-12 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 12.01.2009 16:01, Nicolas Huillard wrote: Klaus Schmidinger a écrit : On 12.01.2009 13:41, Nicolas Huillard wrote: -MM-DD-hh.mm.ch-ri.rec does not solve the problem of multiple VDR instances recording the same show. This is a usual problem of multiple instances sharing a single /video

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-12 Thread Frank Schmirler
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:04:09 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote On 12.01.2009 16:01, Nicolas Huillard wrote: The resume ID is described excactly as I use it : Defines an additional ID that can be used in a multi user environment, so that every user has his/her own resume files for each

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-12 Thread Magnus Hörlin
Klaus Schmidinger wrote: On 12.01.2009 16:01, Nicolas Huillard wrote: Well, I thought that this id could also be used here, but apparently I was wrong. Ok, then let's have another id for this... Klaus Thanks. There aren't too many projects of this magnitude that responds this

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-12 Thread user . vdr
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Magnus Hörlin mag...@alefors.se wrote: Thanks. There aren't too many projects of this magnitude that responds this quickly to user wishes. Even though I would have liked to see teletext subs recorded by default and multiple frontend support I fully

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-11 Thread Udo Richter
On 10.01.2009 21:58, Johann Friedrichs wrote: there seems to be problem in pausing replays of new recordings (output to FF). 4 out of 5 times vdr freezes when trying to continue the replay. Poll in PlayVideo runs into a timeout and a new write gives EAGAIN. This does not happen with old

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-09 Thread Richard Lithvall
On 08.01.2009 20:41, Alex Betis wrote: If the recording timer was set manualy, maybe it should include all programs that lay between start and end of the recording. On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 10:17:45PM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: It stores the EPG data of the longest broadcast within the

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-09 Thread Christian Tramnitz
reinhard.buch...@rw-buchner.de schrieb: Hmm, I thought it wasn't possible to have two identical channels (even IF soley the name is different). Has this changed? You can have multiple channels with the same name, i.e.: Das

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-08 Thread Frank Schmirler
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:06:02 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote Instead of Priority and Lifetime, the directory name now contains the channel number from which the recording was made, and the resume id of this instance of VDR. This avoids problems if several VDR instances record the same show

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-08 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 08.01.2009 18:50, user.vdr wrote: On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Klaus Schmidinger klaus.schmidin...@cadsoft.de wrote: + The directory name for a recording has been changed from -MM-DD-hh[.:]mm.pr.lt.rec (pr=priority, lt=lifetime) to -MM-DD-hh.mm.ch-ri.rec (ch=channel,

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-08 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 08.01.2009 20:41, Alex Betis wrote: On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:50 PM, user. vdr user@gmail.com mailto:user@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Klaus Schmidinger klaus.schmidin...@cadsoft.de mailto:klaus.schmidin...@cadsoft.de wrote: + The directory

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-08 Thread Alex Betis
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Klaus Schmidinger klaus.schmidin...@cadsoft.de wrote: On 08.01.2009 20:41, Alex Betis wrote: On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:50 PM, user. vdr user@gmail.com mailto:user@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Klaus Schmidinger

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-07 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 07.01.2009 12:42, lucian orasanu wrote: Hy Klaus, So with this version we wont need h264 patch? No, because the parts that patch addressed are gone. It's not yet totally clear, though, whether the new cFrameDetector actually works as expected for all HD broadcasts, but it did work as far

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-07 Thread jean-paul
Klaus, I get a error while compiling this version: g++ -g -O2 -Wall -Woverloaded-virtual -Wno-parentheses -c -DREMOTE_KBD -DLIRC_DEVICE=\/dev/lircd\ -DRCU_DEVICE=\/dev/ttyS1\ -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DVIDEODIR=\/video\

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-07 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 07.01.2009 13:43, jean-p...@goedee.nl wrote: Klaus, I get a error while compiling this version: g++ -g -O2 -Wall -Woverloaded-virtual -Wno-parentheses -c -DREMOTE_KBD -DLIRC_DEVICE=\/dev/lircd\ -DRCU_DEVICE=\/dev/ttyS1\ -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-07 Thread Mika Laitio
Try typecasting the first parameter, as in off_t headdrop = min(off_t(curpos - totwritten), off_t(totwritten * 2)); Klaus I think the compiler is not the problem (same version). Trying the next option. gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.3.1 20080507 (prerelease) [gcc-4_3-branch revision 135036]

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-07 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 07.01.2009 15:14, Mika Laitio wrote: Try typecasting the first parameter, as in off_t headdrop = min(off_t(curpos - totwritten), off_t(totwritten * 2)); Klaus I think the compiler is not the problem (same version). Trying the next option. gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.3.1 20080507 (prerelease)

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-07 Thread Oleg Roitburd
Hi I think the compiler is not the problem (same version). Trying the next option. gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.3.1 20080507 (prerelease) [gcc-4_3-branch revision 135036] Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. I had same problem with gcc 4.3.2 on Mandriva. (x86_64 env) Adding off_t()

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-07 Thread Mika Laitio
gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.3.1 20080507 (prerelease) [gcc-4_3-branch revision 135036] Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. I had same problem with gcc 4.3.2 on Mandriva. (x86_64 env) Adding off_t() typecasting for the first parameter as you suggested fixed it. Klaus do you remember to

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-07 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 07.01.2009 15:35, jean-p...@goedee.nl wrote: I'm using SuSe linux openSUSE 11.0 (X86-64) VERSION = 11.0 with Linux Baby 2.6.25.11-0.1-default #1 SMP 2008-07-13 20:48:28 +0200 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux and make for compiling. Noting spacial I guess I see now: the problem

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-07 Thread Nicolas Huillard
Klaus Schmidinger a écrit : If you're using the same compiler as I do, I don't see why such a typecast is necessary on your side, while on my side it compiles just fine. Are you using any different compiler options than me? Didn't I read x86_64 for Mika, when you may use x86_32, Klaus ? --

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-07 Thread gimli
Hi, Compiling on ARCH Linux x86_64 with gcc 4.3.2 also fails. So it must be the 64 bit compiler. mfg Edgar (gimli) Hucek On 07.01.2009 18:58, Nicolas Huillard wrote: Klaus Schmidinger a écrit : If you're using the same compiler as I do, I don't see why such a typecast is necessary on your

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-07 Thread Reinhard Nissl
Hi, according to documentation, cTsToPes::GetPes() shall return a complete PES packet. The attached diff fixes this. cDevice::PlayTsAudio() and cDevice::PlayTsSubtitle() have to return the Length passed as parameter. But cTsToPes::GetPes() modified this parameter. The attached diff fixes this

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-07 Thread gimli
Hi, on playback old HDTV recordings the timline is wrong. From a first look it seems to show the double length of the recording. cu Edgar (gimli) Hucek VDR developer version 1.7.3 is now available at ftp://ftp.cadsoft.de/vdr/Developer/vdr-1.7.3.tar.bz2 A 'diff' against the previous

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-06 Thread Rolf Ahrenberg
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: - cDvbDevice now uses the FE_CAN_2G_MODULATION flag to determine whether a device can handle DVB-S2. The #define is still there to allow people with older drivers who don't need DVB-S2 to use this version without pathcing. Sorry for hijacking

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.3

2009-01-06 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 06.01.2009 17:32, Rolf Ahrenberg wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: - cDvbDevice now uses the FE_CAN_2G_MODULATION flag to determine whether a device can handle DVB-S2. The #define is still there to allow people with older drivers who don't need DVB-S2 to use this