On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 08:08:07PM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
> 于 2012-5-2 19:53, Dan Kenigsberg 写道:
> >On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 08:36:18AM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
> >>于 2012-4-30 17:26, Dan Kenigsberg 写道:
> >>>On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:19:21AM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
> 于 2012-4-26 21:57, Ad
于 2012-5-2 19:53, Dan Kenigsberg 写道:
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 08:36:18AM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
于 2012-4-30 17:26, Dan Kenigsberg 写道:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:19:21AM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
于 2012-4-26 21:57, Adam Litke 写道:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 05:24:29PM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 08:36:18AM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
> 于 2012-4-30 17:26, Dan Kenigsberg 写道:
> >On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:19:21AM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
> >>于 2012-4-26 21:57, Adam Litke 写道:
> >>>On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 05:24:29PM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
> Hello,
> vdsm now
于 2012-4-30 17:26, Dan Kenigsberg 写道:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:19:21AM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
于 2012-4-26 21:57, Adam Litke 写道:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 05:24:29PM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
Hello,
vdsm now have UT suits for developer, but sometimes building and
installation machine is n
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:19:21AM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
> 于 2012-4-26 21:57, Adam Litke 写道:
> >On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 05:24:29PM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
> >>Hello,
> >> vdsm now have UT suits for developer, but sometimes building and
> >>installation machine is not the same one, and addit
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:22:20AM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
> 于 2012-4-27 5:13, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden 写道:
> >On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:11:49AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> >>On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:12:06PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
> >>>One more comment about the test package version. Most li
roducing a
validation test packa
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:23:49AM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
> 于 2012-4-26 22:35, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden 写道:
> >On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 08:57:55AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> >>On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 05:24:29PM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
> >>> It is just a scratch from my mind, so I'd like hea
于 2012-4-26 22:35, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden 写道:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 08:57:55AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 05:24:29PM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
It is just a scratch from my mind, so I'd like hear your opinions.
Thanks for the idea! Do you have a sample test for
于 2012-4-27 5:13, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden 写道:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:11:49AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:12:06PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
One more comment about the test package version. Most likely, the
package version will be the same version as the VDSM package
于 2012-4-26 21:57, Adam Litke 写道:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 05:24:29PM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
Hello,
vdsm now have UT suits for developer, but sometimes building and
installation machine is not the same one, and additional check is need
which is ignored at building time, so I think some test
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:11:49AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:12:06PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
> > One more comment about the test package version. Most likely, the
> > package version will be the same version as the VDSM package
> > version. The rule we need to consider
On 04/26/2012 10:35 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 08:57:55AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 05:24:29PM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
It is just a scratch from my mind, so I'd like hear your opinions.
Thanks for the idea! Do you have a sample te
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:12:06PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
> One more comment about the test package version. Most likely, the
> package version will be the same version as the VDSM package
> version. The rule we need to consider is: Should we keep the back
> compatibility with the VDSM files? Say
One more comment about the test package version. Most likely, the
package version will be the same version as the VDSM package version.
The rule we need to consider is: Should we keep the back compatibility
with the VDSM files? Say allow newer version test package running on
older VDSM files?
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 08:57:55AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 05:24:29PM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
> > It is just a scratch from my mind, so I'd like hear your opinions.
>
> Thanks for the idea! Do you have a sample test for the verification test
> suite?
> Will it be yo
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 05:24:29PM +0800, wenchao xia wrote:
> Hello,
> vdsm now have UT suits for developer, but sometimes building and
> installation machine is not the same one, and additional check is need
> which is ignored at building time, so I think some test cases should be
> also run on
Hello,
vdsm now have UT suits for developer, but sometimes building and
installation machine is not the same one, and additional check is need
which is ignored at building time, so I think some test cases should be
also run on target machine to check potential errors, Then I want to
introduce a s
18 matches
Mail list logo