On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 03:36:04PM -0600, Adam Litke wrote:
>
> Hopefully monitorCommand will not be too bad, since vdsm should be asking
> libvirt for the VM details when they are needed. Of course we'll need to be
> testing to make sure we aren't keeping state around. Also, I would expect
> mo
On 11/30/2011 10:52 AM, Adam Litke wrote:
>> I'm not sure how hard it is technically. But for ISV's, I can tell
>> > you that almost nobody has experience with it.
> That is not a good sign. Certainly there must be some sort of standardized
> and
> well understood API transport that we can use.
On 11/30/2011 11:00 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
> On 11/30/2011 10:52 AM, Adam Litke wrote:
>>> I'm not sure how hard it is technically. But for ISV's, I can tell
you that almost nobody has experience with it.
>> That is not a good sign. Certainly there must be some sort of standardized
>> an
On 11/30/2011 04:09 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>> How easy is QMF to consume from a software development perspective?
>> Would it be
>> easy for someone to write a virsh-like tool against a QMF-based vdsm
>> API? Would
>> such a tool be able to run on multiple Linux distributions?
>
> it is supposed
We had a very useful discussion on IRC regarding these ideas. Here is that
transcript for those of you who are interested:
aglitke: I have, thanks to Chris Write
I know I should chime in, as well as smizrahi I suppose.
yep... Would be good to get some additional perspectives.
QMF is being pus
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:09:12PM -0500, Keith Robertson wrote:
> On 11/30/2011 10:50 AM, Adam Litke wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 04:32:41PM +0100, Geert Jansen wrote:
> >> On 11/30/2011 04:09 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> >>
> How easy is QMF to consume from a software development perspecti
On 11/30/2011 10:50 AM, Adam Litke wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 04:32:41PM +0100, Geert Jansen wrote:
>> On 11/30/2011 04:09 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>
How easy is QMF to consume from a software development perspective?
Would it be
easy for someone to write a virsh-like tool again
* Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> I don't think this is mutually exclusive with having AMQP used for comms
> between VDSM & ovirt-engine. One possible implementation strategy would
> be to have a 'vdsm-qmf' agent running on the node which talks REST to
> VDSM and translate it to Q
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:44:19AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 11/30/2011 09:09 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > On 11/30/2011 05:00 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
> >>> single node and exposing the exact same REST API and behavior of the
> >>> multi-node ovirt engine would be easier to cosnume for someone
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 04:32:41PM +0100, Geert Jansen wrote:
>
> On 11/30/2011 04:09 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>
> >>How easy is QMF to consume from a software development perspective?
> >>Would it be
> >>easy for someone to write a virsh-like tool against a QMF-based vdsm
> >>API? Would
> >>such a
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 04:32:41PM +0100, Geert Jansen wrote:
>
> On 11/30/2011 04:09 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>
> >>How easy is QMF to consume from a software development perspective?
> >>Would it be
> >>easy for someone to write a virsh-like tool against a QMF-based vdsm
> >>API? Would
> >>such a
On 11/30/2011 09:09 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 11/30/2011 05:00 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
>>> single node and exposing the exact same REST API and behavior of the
>>> multi-node ovirt engine would be easier to cosnume for someone that
>>> wants to interact with a single node same way they would intera
On 11/30/2011 05:32 PM, Geert Jansen wrote:
>
> On 11/30/2011 04:09 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>
>>> How easy is QMF to consume from a software development perspective?
>>> Would it be
>>> easy for someone to write a virsh-like tool against a QMF-based vdsm
>>> API? Would
>>> such a tool be able to run
On 11/30/2011 05:15 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 03:21:07PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote:
>> On 11/30/2011 11:29 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:14:16AM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 11/29/2011 11:36 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 03:21:07PM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 11/30/2011 11:29 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:14:16AM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote:
> >>On 11/29/2011 11:36 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:54:44PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> * A
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:29:23AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:14:16AM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > On 11/29/2011 11:36 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:54:44PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> > >> * Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
> > >>> O
On 11/30/2011 05:00 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:14:16AM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote:
>> On 11/29/2011 11:36 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:54:44PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
* Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:39:08AM
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:14:16AM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 11/29/2011 11:36 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:54:44PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> >>* Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:39:08AM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Adam Litke (
On 11/30/2011 11:29 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:14:16AM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote:
>> On 11/29/2011 11:36 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:54:44PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
* Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:13:24PM +0200, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> On 11/30/2011 11:41 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:54:44PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> >>* Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:39:08AM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Adam
On 11/30/2011 11:41 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:54:44PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
>> * Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:39:08AM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
* Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
> https://github.com/aglitke/vd
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:54:44PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:39:08AM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> > > * Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/aglitke/vdsm-rest/
> > > >
> > > > Today I am rele
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:14:16AM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 11/29/2011 11:36 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:54:44PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> >> * Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:39:08AM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Adam Lit
* Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
>
> https://github.com/aglitke/vdsm-rest/
>
> Today I am releasing a proof of concept implementation of a REST API for vdsm.
> You can find the code on github. My goal is to eventually replace the current
> xmlrpc interface with a REST API. Once completed,
* Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:39:08AM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> > * Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/aglitke/vdsm-rest/
> > >
> > > Today I am releasing a proof of concept implementation of a REST API for
> > > vdsm.
> > >
On 11/29/2011 11:36 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:54:44PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
>> * Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:39:08AM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
* Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
>
> https://github.com/aglitke/vdsm
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:54:44PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:39:08AM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> > > * Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/aglitke/vdsm-rest/
> > > >
> > > > Today I am rele
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:39:08AM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
> >
> > https://github.com/aglitke/vdsm-rest/
> >
> > Today I am releasing a proof of concept implementation of a REST API for
> > vdsm.
> > You can find the code on github. My goal is to event
On 11/14/2011 07:53 AM, Adam Litke wrote:
> I haven't thought about the authentication method I would use very much yet
> but
> I know there will need to be one. CherryPy's minimalism cuts both ways in
> this
> regard since I will need to incorporate my own security code. Luckily python
> shoul
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 04:53:40PM -0600, Tony Asleson wrote:
> On 11/11/2011 04:01 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
> >
> > https://github.com/aglitke/vdsm-rest/
> >
> > Today I am releasing a proof of concept implementation of a REST API for
> > vdsm.
> > You can find the code on github.
>
> I have cons
On 11/11/2011 04:01 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
>
> https://github.com/aglitke/vdsm-rest/
>
> Today I am releasing a proof of concept implementation of a REST API for vdsm.
> You can find the code on github.
I have considered providing a RESTful interface for a project I am
working on. I am intereste
https://github.com/aglitke/vdsm-rest/
Today I am releasing a proof of concept implementation of a REST API for vdsm.
You can find the code on github. My goal is to eventually replace the current
xmlrpc interface with a REST API. Once completed, ovirt-engine could switch to
this new API. The ma
32 matches
Mail list logo