Livejournal should work, but I suspect that might be blocked as well.
-mOn 11/19/05, jonny goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know of free blog that is password protected so people have to
log in to view it? 360.yahoo.com is can do this, but I can't use Yahoo
for this as it's
dear sir,I may have liked Star Trek in the past, but I never wore the uniform. In the past I have smoked a canabis cigarette and and I did inhale.On 19 Nov 2005, at 01:34, Mario Drucker wrote: Hello fellow vloggers! I heard the rumor that every one who is doing a video blog got his own Star
i tell you what i dont like aubot flash, i cant do nothing with the file
exept to watch it. any one have any ideas on how to save it to a qt or some
other format (mp4 ect?)
From: Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject:
just a reminder from the wiki: no vid conferences this weekend as the
system is offline for maintenance
back online for tuesday conference @ 5pm pacific (8pm eastern)
markus
--
My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us
http://apperceptions.org
http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com
agreed on all counts. but the paint can go a lng way depending on
how big of an area you need to cover. or if you're setting up a
studio, then you're done once you've painted it.
here is a link with some of the chroma key paint:
http://shop.store.yahoo.com/cinemasupplies/chromkeyfab.html
it
I've had good luck with the chroma fabric from this store: J and K Video GroupTomás--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Knight" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wish to utilize my capability of doing croma (green screen) special effects. However I wondered what is the best shade of green
the only thing i was looking forward too all week
From: Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] No Saturday Video Conference
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 01:40:44 -0800
just a reminder from the wiki: no vid
so this brings up an interesting question (that i believe has been
discussed here but no solid answers have been given) I know it is
different for each country, but Gabe, and Nathan Peters have both run
into police/civil workers saying that they do not want to be recorded...
What are our
Fair use guidelines are used to determine what is okay and what is not. Its a gray area to some degree. 'Having been worried about this same question, esp here in NYC where it is almost impossible NOT to capture someone else, surprisingly, I have found that when "news gathering", or creating
On 11/19/05, andrew michael baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would assume Josh that
someone could make the claim from looking through your videoblog that,
as a whole, your videoblogging activity does not include fair use
because your intent is thepursuit of personal celebrity.
HaHa!! What does
The case of the stolen identity; innocent bystander sues videoblogger
for internet distribution. Quote the prosecutor: Exhibit A. The
defendant, Josh Leo's description of his videoblogging activity:
On Nov 19, 2005, at 10:15 AM, Josh Leo wrote:
I was just making friends and sharing my life
Regarding US law I think this site sums things up very well:
http://fairuse.stanford.edu/Copyright_and_Fair_Use_Overview/chapter12/index.html
Intent is important, I think its actually 'free speech' (rather than
fair use) things in your constitution which make this stuff
acceptable, but it should
Since my friend Steve Schalchlin is not on this
list, I will pass along a challenge he has issued on Blip. The link for
this challenge is: http://steveshack.blip.tv/file/4740
For this Thanksgiving / Hanukkah / Christmas /
Kwanzaa / Solstice etc. holiday that is coming up, I am offering a
I wanted to add that if you play the song from the
site itself, you only get a small portion of it. You have to download it
to get the full version. Check http://steveshack.blip.tv/file/get/Steveshack-VeteransDay2005Mpeg675.mpgto
see how he used it and to hear the whole song (in this
I think you are making an err if you think the overall intent of all
of a persons works are the main key to whether they can invoke a 'fair
use' defense for anything that might otherwise be questionable.
If the law is even half-sane then it will come down to stuff like
intent with that particular
On Nov 19, 2005, at 11:30 AM, Steve Watkins wrote:
I think you are making an err if you think the overall intent of all
of a persons works are the main key to whether they can invoke a 'fair
use' defense for anything that might otherwise be questionable.
I dont think its the main key. But I
Welcome and thanks for asking these questions. I got some stuff for
you. I don't know if you know of these resources or not so I'm just
gonna list what I know and keep track of:
Amy Garah has a CJ blog called IReporter http://www.ireporter.org/
She is a journalist who is helping to
From MacDevCenter.com, this article explains how to get the video off
your iPod.
http://tinyurl.com/bnuxp
-Matt
---
http://ridertech.com
http://leanbackvids.com
http://vlogmap.org
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Fair play? Video
I would love to have Uhura's uniform. It does have meaning to me and
heck yeah I would do a video about it from a cultural, technological,
afro-centric oh my god I am in the future kind of thing. Then again,
Counselor Troi had some nice threads too.
That program for a certain segment of the
The TV out is really gorgeous quality with the ipod, its the feature
Im most impressed with for sure.
Cheers for the link to the article, I can confrm that a normal
(non-apple) av cable works as long as you swap the connections round
as suggested.
For quality viewing of footage on TV Im using
Thanks for that info Steve.
-Verdi
On Nov 19, 2005, at 11:17 AM, Steve Watkins wrote:
For quality viewing of footage on TV Im using mpeg4 @ 1.5Mbits/sec at
resolutions of 624x352 for 16:9 stuff and 512x384 for 4:3 stuff.
320x240 still looks pretty good on the TV though, so Im not suggesting
On Nov 19, 2005, at 8:48 AM, andrew michael baron wrote:
your videoblogging activity does not include fair use because your
intent is the pursuit of personal celebrity.
Why is it that you seem to think that individuals that videoblog are
doing it in the pursuit of personal celebrity? Why
Having strayed pretty far off this topic, I did want to say Josh,
that I don't in any way mean to devalue self-fufillment - self
fufillment is something that I hope all of here have as a component
of what we are doing with all of this.
On Nov 19, 2005, at 11:52 AM, andrew michael baron
On Nov 19, 2005, at 12:43 PM, Verdi wrote:
Why can't they be
doing it to document their lives or to connect with friends and
family?
Why they can and I think that is great! Show me where I said they
they coudlnt? Ir even implied?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
On Nov 19, 2005, at 12:43 PM, Verdi wrote:
On Nov 19, 2005, at 8:48 AM, andrew michael baron wrote:
your videoblogging activity does not include fair use because your
intent is the pursuit of personal celebrity.
Why is it that you seem to think that individuals that videoblog are
doing it
On Nov 19, 2005, at 12:43 PM, Verdi wrote:
Are you saying that anyone who publishes a blog, podcast or
videoblog that contains information about their lives is aiming for
personal celebrity?
Eh, no. Did you see something?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
On Nov 19, 2005, at 12:43 PM, Verdi wrote:
, couldn't someone make a case that
Rocketboom is a vehicle to enhance Amanda's personal celebrity
thereby hopefully producing offers of acting jobs?
Yes, in fact that is one of the many elements to what we are doing.
There are so many I wont
On Nov 19, 2005, at 12:43 PM, Verdi wrote:
It seems to me
that you throw around these comments (this one and others in the
past) about individuals videoblogging as if what they (we) are doing
is less valid, less bloggy, and now, it seems, to advance our own
personal celebrity as if we were
My Groups |
videoblogging Main Page
Reminder from
the Calendar of videoblogging
This is my frustration with trying to work inside a school system and
why I don't even try anymore. It's ridiculous that they think that
young people aren't capable of doing this stuff by themselves without
anyone's permission. That being the case why try to control it so
much? Sure,
In (my) conclusion, I'm seeing a lot of really horrible backlash from
people lately and its a bummer because I don't find any reason behind
the inferences that people are making. It reminds me of how the
media likes to reshape and reformat what they see into their own
hypothesis.
Verdi,
On Nov 19, 2005, at 11:47 AM, andrew michael baron wrote:
On Nov 19, 2005, at 12:43 PM, Verdi wrote:
Why can't they be
doing it to document their lives or to connect with friends and
family?
Why they can and I think that is great! Show me where I said they
they coudlnt? Ir even
On Nov 19, 2005, at 12:01 PM, andrew michael baron wrote:
Verdi, you came to this post with a hypothesis and you stripped out
of context fragments to support your claims.
On Nov 19, 2005, at 9:15 AM, Josh Leo wrote:
HaHa!! What does that even mean? personal celebrity I guess we
have said
Shameless plug... tell people to download FireAnt, and then it doesn't
matter what codec or video format you use.
:-)
-Josh
On 11/18/05, Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is a challenge, We were doing a presentation at the Apple Store/The
Grove and Zadi was showing the audience how to use the
On Nov 19, 2005, at 12:12 PM, andrew michael baron wrote:
Is this videoblogging list topic? Someone tell me if we have
transcended, I'm not sure. Seriously.
I think the discussion of why people videoblog is very on topic.
On Nov 19, 2005, at 12:12 PM, andrew michael baron wrote:
On Nov 19,
On Nov 19, 2005, at 12:15 PM, andrew michael baron wrote:
No, I was talking about Josh. He is a unique individual and I think
he has one of the most spirited uses of a videoblog I have seen. When
I look around at videobloggers, I do not see sameness. I see people.
I'm referring to how you
Hi all,
I was walking to the east village yesterday and noticed the cube has
returned to Astor Place. I whipped out my cam and shot 30 seconds,
posted it last night after reading more in the news the details.
Hope you enjoy, and hope it works in fireant, I haven't had time to
check yet.
yes, it does work in FireAnt.
-Josh
On 11/19/05, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I was walking to the east village yesterday and noticed the cube has
returned to Astor Place. I whipped out my cam and shot 30 seconds,
posted it last night after reading more in the news the
My Groups |
videoblogging Main Page
Reminder from
the Calendar of videoblogging
Saturday, November 19, 2005, 6:11:05 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
Shameless plug... tell people to download FireAnt, and then it doesn't
matter what codec or video format you use.
So does FireAnt for Windows include Quicktime now?
Last time I looked I still needed to download and install
Install Wordpress on your own server, and then password protect it
with .htaccess. That should work reasonably well. You'll need to pay
for the server, but the school might cover that coast. Dreamhost is
around 7 dollars a month.
Wordpress is free.
-Josh
On 11/19/05, Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this actually happening? I don't see the Sat 19 link.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
wrote:
Reminder from the Calendar of videoblogging
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/cal
Bi-Weekly Vlog Videoconference
Saturday November 19, 2005
huh? i get codec format errors in fireant all the time. i don't see
this as a fireant problem, but it does not solve it for me either.
Joshua Kinberg wrote:
Shameless plug... tell people to download FireAnt, and then it doesn't
matter what codec or video format you use.
:-)
-Josh
FireAnt uses the Quicktime API, so yes you will need to install
Quicktime if you wish to view Quicktime videos (if you have iTunes
then you also have Quicktime).
We are not illegally reverse engineering any codecs, but rather using
the native APIs that support the various codecs/formats.
-Josh
Hey Markus,
Please send us bug reports if you encounter errors.
I've had no problems playing Quicktime, Windows Media, Real, Flash, AVI, DivX, Xvid, etc.. with FireAnt.
iTunes only plays Quicktime.
-Josh
On 11/19/05, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
huh? i get codec format
One exception to throw into the mix... APple made up a whole new codec
and file extension/mime-type for the new video iPod, which certainly
didn't help video codec matters.
There was no such thing as m4v a few weeks ago before the video iPod.
The next release of FireAnt will support m4v...
They only made up a new extension/mimetype, its not a new codec, its
h264 mpeg4.
Actually the extension m4v should really mean mpeg4 video stream (no
audio) so apples use of this extension is confusing and silly.
Personally I recommend that people dont bother with using .m4v even if
you want
They only made up a new extension/mimetype, its not a new codec, its
h264 mpeg4
Yes, this is correct.
Unfortunately because many people are likely to just use the apple
ipod export in qt703, m4v's are going to appear. So I appreciate very
much you adding m4v support to fireant.
Yep, this
I found this out few days ago as i was embarrassed not to know the scoop on m4v besides it being for video iPod. I laughed when I learned this.I was not sure if simply changing file name would work though, so thanks for clarifying that, Steve.
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
I'm in total agreement with Michael's sentiment; to that end, I think
the best solution might just be Livejournal. Every kid could
establish his or her own live journal account, and make their entries
only viewable to friends. This provides the level of security that
the administration
Verdi, this is one of the few good parts of working where I do. It's
completely private My speech is more or less unrestricted, although I might
get talked to if I encouraged hate crimes. I can talk about sex, rubbers,
abstinence, drugs, murder - you name it. I get a young woman to talk to my
On Nov 19, 2005, at 1:31 PM, Verdi wrote:
I'm referring to how you have on a number of occasions (recently
even) made statements about how most everyone who videoblogs just
does a personal diary kind of thing
Thats true. So what?
and how you don't understand why
more people don't do
I'd just like to butt in for a second and say that snooping in on this thread
has been
a strange experience. AMB--hostile, much?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
I'd just like to butt in for a second and say that snooping in on this thread
has been a strange experience. AMB--hostile, much?
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 19, 2005, at 12:12 PM, andrew michael baron wrote:
Is this videoblogging list
Try before you buy these $99 software:VideoStudio 9 by Ulead.com Studio 10 by Pinnaclesys.com Premiere Elements by Adobe.comThere are other descent consumer level out there, but you must buy before you try. So I advise these. Both Ulead and Pinnacle tend to release with bugs and then
Ah, the themed vs. personal debate again. This is the most
entertaining one so far.
On a somewhat related note, the December issue of Wired asks - What's
the most overhyped tech trend right now?...
Robert X. Cringely (Creator and host of NerdTV) answers...
There's nothing wrong with blogging
Schlomo, Markus, and Dave Toole put together a really cool event
yesterday at Expression College of Digital Arts in Emeryville, CA.
J.D. Lasica (Ourmedia.org) was there, as was Chris Rikte (49media.com)
and Mia Garlick (creativecommons.org)
Markus has a great preview vlog here:
To take this in a slightly different direction, I thought
Gabe's video was great. I would hope, at least in the USA, that if one
put this video of police misconduct on one's videoblog, no matter what
the overarching theme of most of the posts on that blog, that this
post would be considered news,
Actually, in my case this isn't about kids security---they will all
have blogger blogs, open for public viewing, and the schools where I'm
working, thus far, are cool with that, which is great. This is more
about keeping the details of our curriculum private, as the company
I'm working with has a
My 0.02 cents: Journalism is in flux - this new technology and access
to technology is changing a bunch of rules. Some for the worse and
some for the better. So in my opinion, CJ's and CJ Vloggers should
take what has worked - ethics, fact checking, responsibility, and
passion to heart. Some of
I'd just like to butt in for a second and say that snooping in on this thread
has been
a strange experience. AMB--hostile, much?
if you change the subject of the post...and dont include any of the
old emailwe cant tell what youre commenting on.
jay
--
Adventures in Videoblogging
URL:
How about VLC? that plays all QT including h.264
http://www.videolan.org/vlc/
It would be nice if fireant were able to offer filetype associations
and offer them as an external play option, wouldn't it?
joly
At 03:07 PM 11/19/2005, you wrote:
Saturday, November 19, 2005, 6:11:05 PM, Joshua
That's very odd, I just brought it in on my iMac, and it works fine.
I did re-ftp the file into archive.org, but how can that screw things up?
Doesn't appear to be anyone else on the list except you actually
has a G5 iPod, and is charitable enough to check, Steve.
Never mind, and thanks.
I'll
There are definitely parallels here with Ham Radio etc... but the
advantage here is that these Ham Radios (blogs) are already in many
homes and counting... and the cognitive overhead in blogging gives it a
memetic advantage... also folks overlook the simplification tools like
MySpace...
no conference this weekend
maintenance, i think
there was an earlier message to the group (plus wiki schedule)
ecomputerd wrote:
Is this actually happening? I don't see the Sat 19 link.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
wrote:
Reminder
65 matches
Mail list logo
