Dear Colleagues
The latest issue of Computers in Classrooms is now available and
contains articles on the following subjects:
A news update, including the chance to get your students to take part
in a survey about social networking, and a prize draw.
FlashMeeting in Education -- a wonderful
Hi Nick:
One idea is to post the video at the beginning of each post, then a
short description/info, followed by a Read More. This will create a
full page with about 4 videos, and when they read more, then they
will see the whole post.
Hope that helps,
Andrew
I was wondering if anyone knows a solution, aside from Brightcove
and Blip, that will enable the video content provider to host his
own videos that can have auto-modular pre-roll, mid-roll, and post-
roll clickable video ads.
In other words here is a scenario that would really hit home for a
Our little web efforts from suburban Melbourne have resulted in Rupert Murdoch
having to
be questioned at his annual general meeting about why (after advocating
bringing
democracy to Iraq) he won't bring democracy to his own company News Corp and
insists
on a jerrymander of votes in his own
Super use it all the time for video transcoding
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, schlomo rabinowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all
I ran into this and thought some of you PC users may be interested
in it:
http://www.erightsoft.com/Superdc.html
Looks pretty robust and its free!
These are all interesting ideas, but I think they're too intricate to
be feasible right now. I don't know that there's such a thing as
Brazilian local video ad providers, for instance. The way it seems
right now is that there are a couple of groups that serve a bunch of
different videos and are
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, schlomo rabinowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all
I ran into this and thought some of you PC users may be interested
in it:
http://www.erightsoft.com/Superdc.html
Looks pretty robust and its free! Basically, it looks like it gives an
easy-to-use
But what about hyper local markets? I'm thinking North New Jersey for
example.
Skype me. We'll talk. See sig for skype info.
Jan
On 10/17/07, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These are all interesting ideas, but I think they're too intricate to
be feasible right now. I don't know that
I can imagine ... but
Total speculation follows
Google today more so than with any other product they bought or
created looks to/could be headed in this direction with the recent
purchase of Jaiku http://www.jaiku.com/ Combining what they already
have in their bag o tricks with Jaiku, Google
Hi everyone:
On 10/15/07, J. Rhett Aultman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since Greentime is supported in (a very, very tiny) part by Google Ads, we
did not feel right installing Akismet to handle our spam for us. I've
gotten pretty good at weeding through Greentime's spam, but I came across
9PM Eastern tonight. A great opportunity to learn about the weird
wonderful world o' YouTube with tour guide comedian Mark Day.
http://tinyurl.com/ywml8t
for me (avi to mp4) is tooo slow :(. squared5 is great.
thanks!
On 10/17/07, schlomo rabinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah ok, great. I use VisualHub all the time. Glad this is like it so I
can
recommend it to my nonMac using friends.
thanks!
On 10/17/07, Stan Hirson, Sarah Jones
I've mainly lurk on this group but have benefited from your comments
and suggestions which I appreciate.
Quick question, are most of you still using .com domains or are you
migrating to .tv domains.
If you are not migrating to the .tv domains, is it because of the
domain name cost? Thanks
I own schlomo.tv for only one reason: schlomo.com is taken. Of course, I
don't do anything with schlomo.tv because I'm happy with my blogspot
account, so it just sits around being a waste of money on a yearly basis.
Since I can't own schlomo.com, godaddy was nice enough to inform me that I
can
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, bordercollieaustralianshepherd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was posted to another group. Upcoming stuff in Flash.
http://www.peterelst.com/blog/2007/10/03/adobe-max-chicago-sneak-peeks/
The guy (Peter Elst) has a lot to say on his blog, may be worth a
The US House of Representatives recently passed a Federal Shield law for
journalist.
It's doesnt seem to please anyone fully, but it is a start.
The interesting part is how they defined Journalist:
In its current form, the law protects only a person who, for financial gain
or livelihood, is
I'm in a class on documentary research and writing, and I was trying to
whittle down my final choice for a focus from a couple of ideas, and as
anyone on the Internet knows, you can't start a project until you've
purchased an appropriate domain name. A quick search told me my first
choice .com
Interesting ... reads as though you have to be getting paid to do it though.
On 10/17/07, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The US House of Representatives recently passed a Federal Shield law for
journalist.
It's doesnt seem to please anyone fully, but it is a start.
The interesting part
So legally, you aren't a journalist unless you're a commercial journalist,
huh? Funny, other 'professions' like medicine and the law aren't tied to
such mercenary considerations.
On 10/17/07, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting ... reads as though you have to be getting paid to
I've not bothered with a .tv domain because I think it's got a
connotation of episodic content or shows etc ... and that doesn't
really describe my stuff.
Also I guess I have always had the its a website that has video
perspective rather than the I've got videos that need a website
perspective
Good point Rox, these will primarily be short 5 minute weekly clips
on 3 different sites. One weekly clip is based on historical stuff.
The other two are weekly summaries of industry stuff (2 different
industries - connecting the dots kinda things.)
On Oct 17, 2007, at 1:02 PM, Roxanne
Wednesday, October 17, 2007, 7:02:50 PM, Jay dedman wrote:
I do agree that it's trubling to read for financial gain or livelihood.
does this mean you must get paid by a commercial company?
can you just get donations from the community?
can you have a day job and blog at night?
In some ways
If you are producing an internet video series or show aka Internet TV,
I think.tv helps communicate that message much more effectively than a
dot com address.
If you have a blog that sometimes includes video, dot com is more suitable IMO.
Aloha,
Rox
On 10/17/07, Jackson West [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So legally, you aren't a journalist unless you're a commercial journalist,
huh? Funny, other 'professions' like medicine and the law aren't tied to
such mercenary considerations.
im not sure i read it that way.
i think they define it as someone who regularly reports on something,
has a
Thanks Schlomo, Jackson, and David - I appreciate your quick
responses. I've mainly used .com and snagged a .tv when GoDaddy still
had it for 9.95...but their .tvs are now $39 so I was wondering if I
am missing something. I'll stick with the .com but include tv in
the domain name so people
well you left out the last part of the sentence :-P It says for
financial gain or livelihood, is engaged in journalism ... if you're
livelihood is gained from a day job, and you aren't getting paid to
cover a story ...you' aren't engaged in journalism for financial gain
or livelihood and it
I guess my reaction is born from two things: one, there's no such
requirement in California's shield law, and two, in the Apple v. Does case,
the judge opted to protect the bloggers under that shield law (instead of
trade secrets laws) since they'd committed an act of journalism,
regardless of
By the way, really looking forward to what Josh has to say in all this.
On 10/17/07, Jackson West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess my reaction is born from two things: one, there's no such
requirement in California's shield law, and two, in the Apple v. Does case,
the judge opted to protect
I just don't see how a free and independent press doesn't include people
who get a bug up their rear and publishing something, with no regard for
their livelihood or personal financial gain. What about journalism
students, who often take chances on writing provocative stuff -because- they
It would be great if as many bloggers could show the world's most powerful
media
operator the power and independence of the video blog by showing up, taping
him and
each expressing their own opinion about anything Murdoch, from Fox News,
20th Century
Fox to the New York Post.
Here's CNET's take on the issue and how it was watered down. As noted
earlier, this will go to the courts...
http://www.news.com/8301-13578_3-9799178-38.html?
part=rsssubj=newstag=2547-1_3-0-5
How politicians weakened a legal shield for bloggers
Posted by Declan McCullagh
The House of
Here's CNET's take on the issue and how it was watered down. As noted
earlier, this will go to the courts...
http://www.news.com/8301-13578_3-9799178-38.html?part=rsssubj=newstag=2547-1_3-0-5
Thanks for the link.
Much better breakdown of the new Shield law that still needs to be
approved by
The website I work for, ElasticWaist http://elasticwaist.com ,
launched a new daily web show this week, called
the Daily Special. It is funny, smart take on all kinds of stuff
going on in the world today, particularly affecting women. Check it
out! Here is the link where you can find today's
I use a program called SUPER (uses ffmpeg,
Mencoder,MPlayer,x264,ffmpeg2theora, libavcodec)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SUPER_%28software%29
cool.
I found a cross platform transcoding tool here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avidemux
I made a list here:
I'll tell you what they're trying to accomplish.
They're trying to make sure that nobody reports on anything explosive
that is not a corporate sponsored journalist.
Media markets have a beautiful mechanism for controlling thought. If
it costs important artificial people profit, it's not
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, long time lurker, rare poster here,
IANAL ... but I wouldn't count on this wording protecting a blogger
from the DOJ if they've got some other day job and nobody is paying
them to over a given story.
The most
New York Noise, NYC TV's hit indie music show, is launching a
weekly video blog, Weekly Noise, available at
http://www.nyc.gov/weeklynoise. Each episode will feature insights about
the City's indie music scene, information on new bands, upcoming
events, new venues, and more. In the same style of
Hi guys, I'm at work -- just getting a chance to check my e-mail now.
here's a link to what I wrote on my CNET blog: http://blogs.cnet.com/
8301-13508_1-9798084-19.html?tag=head
Basically the latest iteration of this bill only protects those who
earn a substantial amount of money from their
The emphasis on financial gain is extremely weird and pretty much
unjustifiable. I can see
lots of reasons why you need to discriminate between someone who works (for
love,
money, or bee in bonnet) as a journalist and someone who doess not. Not all
bloggers
qualify as journalists
On 10/17/07, Kenya Allmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Google's new content id tool YouTube Video Identification is now in beta.
It will find and block exact same copies of videos by hash value. I don't
see it mentioned but they are developing an audio matching tool as well that
finds videos
Actually, the original language of the bill, the very same language
that defines a journalist under the Senate version of the bill is
quite well articulated in that it defines a covered person under the
act of journalism as opposed to tying it to the profession and the
economics entailed
Hi everyone:
On 10/17/07, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/17/07, Kenya Allmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Google's new content id tool YouTube Video Identification is now in
beta. It will find and block exact same copies of videos by hash value. I
don't see it mentioned but they
+1 to what Rox said.
It depends on what you're branding.
If you're branding your videos, go with .TV.
If you're branding a wide selection of items or ideas that *happen* to
include video, go with .COM.
--
Bill Cammack
http://reelsolid.tv
http://billcammack.com
--- In
Hi everyone:
On 10/17/07, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The US House of Representatives recently passed a Federal Shield law for
journalist.
It's doesnt seem to please anyone fully, but it is a start.
The interesting part is how they defined Journalist:
In its current form, the
around the 17/10/07 Jay dedman mentioned about [videoblogging] What
is a journalist--Defined that:
So this could include bloggers if what you do is regularly cover topics as
your livelihood.
well, as long as you do news and information which in journalism
speak is not opinion and commentary :-)
around the 17/10/07 Jackson West mentioned about Re: [videoblogging]
What is a journalist--Defined that:
So legally, you aren't a journalist unless you're a commercial journalist,
huh? Funny, other 'professions' like medicine and the law aren't tied to
such mercenary considerations.
no, but
Hey Ricky.
I like the overall format of the show. When I saw the still, it
looked like the generic host on the edge, graphic over the shoulder
situation, but you guys went for some interesting stuff. I'll stay
tuned. :)
Make sure you tell whomever shoots the show to compensate for that
Pat,
Would I have been covered under the law? Possibly, due to the fact
that I sold stringer footage of the protest that night, but even that
is unclear due to the addition of the word substantial to the text
of the law.
I've discussed this briefly with one of my attorney's and he's a
oh, that title got me all excited.
great idea.
wish i could make it.
On 17 Oct 2007, at 19:59, Jay dedman wrote:
It would be great if as many bloggers could show the world's most
powerful media
operator the power and independence of the video blog by showing
up, taping him and
each
Interesting post, Kenya.
Blocking exact same copies of videos is of zero value.
Whether you can find one example of a copyrighted song or eight of
them makes no difference whatsoever.
As far as the audio-matching tool, I haven't researched stuff like
this, but I say it's impossible... at least
Hi everyone:
On 10/17/07, Josh Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pat,
Would I have been covered under the law? Possibly, due to the fact
that I sold stringer footage of the protest that night, but even that
is unclear due to the addition of the word substantial to the text
of the law.
Hi everyone:
On 10/17/07, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's CNET's take on the issue and how it was watered down. As noted
earlier, this will go to the courts...
http://www.news.com/8301-13578_3-9799178-38.html?part=rsssubj=newstag=2547-1_3-0-5
Thanks for the link.
Much
around the 17/10/07 John Oeffinger mentioned about [videoblogging]
Domain question that:
If you are not migrating to the .tv domains, is it because of the
domain name cost? Thanks for your insight...John
no, because it isn't tv :-), (and neither do I live or work in
Tuvalu). Don't get me
i think this is the event of the year
http://youarethewinner.org/
On 10/17/07, Chumley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You see so many podcamps and such floating around, there is the
podcasting track at DragonCon, PNME, once upon a time the Vloggies,
and I've only ever been to DragonCon and thats
It already happened: Vloggercon:)
Relive it through the videos of the event:
http://vloggercon.com
And yes, it will happen again. Just like Friday the 13th, right when you
think its over, it rears its head again.
On 10/17/07, Chumley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You see so many podcamps and
You see so many podcamps and such floating around, there is the
podcasting track at DragonCon, PNME, once upon a time the Vloggies,
and I've only ever been to DragonCon and thats only because I was
going anyway. (and that mostly focuses on audio podcasting).
I'd love to find out what the big
Josh is a journalist.
It even says on the San Francisco ballot
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ari/1606818196/
--
Steve Rhodes
http://flickr.com/photos/ari/ photos
http://ari.typepad.com
http://tigerbeat.vox.com blogs
http://del.icio.us/tigerbeat interesting articles sites
Wasn't that back in 2006? Its almost 2008 and I don't see any coming
soon stuff on the website or anything.
Rev. Chumley
Cult of UHF
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, schlomo rabinowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It already happened: Vloggercon:)
Relive it through the videos of the event:
I have a .tv domain (and I'm happier to contribute to the Tuvaluan
economy than to whomever gets .com fees)
Some bastard or robot stole twittervlog.com. i didn't buy it quick
enough after launching as twittervlog.blogspot.com
So I got twittervlog.tv instead
and only later realised the
Thanks Bill for helpful insight into this subject, as well as the
link to Jonnygolstein.com interview with Dina Kaplan.
The thing is that I just brought up Brazil as an example. What I
actually meant is demographic-targetted video ads. The show creators
buy this backend video-ad serving
Instead of turning conference-making into a job/career, we took the year
off.
Believe me when I say this: Labors of Love makes a day job a little harder.
And we do love it madly and deeply.
On 10/17/07, Chumley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wasn't that back in 2006? Its almost 2008 and I don't
Hi everyone:
On 10/17/07, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use a program called SUPER (uses ffmpeg,
Mencoder,MPlayer,x264,ffmpeg2theora, libavcodec)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SUPER_%28software%29
cool.
I found a cross platform transcoding tool here:
This is exactly the issue I am deliberately to raising by bloggers seeking
admission to the
News Corp meeting in whatever capacity they choose. A For-Profit intention
should be
irrelevant and the method of distribution should be too.
Hope you all can join us.
Paul Bendat
Thank you Josh!
If I could I'd vote for you for Mayor!
Unfortunately, for myself, I've given up fighting.
I don't have the time or the energy, and I have to make a living.
It's a real shame too. I'm pretty good at seeing the big picture...
finding, seeing, and connecting the dots and drawing
I posted this as there has been much discussion about YouTube, take down
notices, and copyright infringement.
- Original Message
From: Patrick Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 7:05:43 PM
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] YouTube's
For that, post your videos on http://blip.tv and pay them to serve
post-roll advertisements that YOU choose/create yourself.
--
Bill Cammack
http://reelsolid.tv
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Renat Zarbailov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks Bill for helpful insight into this subject, as
Once again, the whole thing's retarded. None of this would even be
happening if YouTube hadn't been *BUILT* on blatant piracy from day 1.
I agree. The exact matching is ridiculous and isn't going to find anything but
videos that are either directly from the studios or mass downloaded from
oh what a pretty site
looks like u have plenty of room on the sides as well
i like the idea of having the videos across the top like
http://newteevee.com or down the side in a similar fashion!
On 10/16/07, Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm after some advice on the design of our
oh i would totally do this if i was in the city!
is anyone going?
On 10/17/07, wabyradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our little web efforts from suburban Melbourne have resulted in Rupert
Murdoch having to
be questioned at his annual general meeting about why (after advocating
bringing
On 10/15/07, Karine G. Barzegar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'll be in Marrakech from October 22nd till October 27. I don't
know the city and would love to meet up for a mint tea or a couscous
in town... Also if anybody knows a good fixer/reporter, Moroccan and
anglophone, able to
they can try to define it however they want but bloggers report the news and
thats what journalism is money or not see this article in the post today
*Crackdowns On Bloggers Increasing, Survey Finds*
By Nora Boustany
Washington Post Foreign Service
Wednesday, October 17, 2007; A14
Government
71 matches
Mail list logo
