Just working on what people said here and on Twitter, we had 4 votes
for 1 minute, 5 for 90 seconds (or 1-2 minutes), and 3 for no limits
at all. Which means most participants didn't really have a view about
length.
So I say we go for 90 seconds. I think that's a good length. That
way
Hi all,
I'm disappointed to learn that Blip.tv is discouraging me from hosting my
videos. I'm especially disappointed because I have been using Blip since the
beta days (under two accounts). I feel like I've just been kicked in the gut.
This email to the group is intended to ask your opinion
Adam
Where can I see some of the video tutorials?
Sent via BlackBerry by ATT
-Original Message-
From: Adam Warner awarne...@yahoo.com
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:24:09
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Where to Host Videos Now that My Beloved Blip.tv
Doesn't Love
Sorry, I should have included that in the original email. As I said, I'm still
experimenting with presentation/quality etc., but these show the basic format.
http://wordpressmodder.org/how-to-add-a-sticky-post-to-a-wordpress-category-archive-page-719.html
Are the the 90 seconds a top limit? Can I make less?
Miguel.
Just working on what people said here and on Twitter, we had 4 votes
for 1 minute, 5 for 90 seconds (or 1-2 minutes), and 3 for no limits
at all. Which means most participants didn't really have a view about
Adam
Interesting.
Take a look at www.nyvs.com
If you find it of interest, get in touch with me.
mich...@rosenblumtv.com
Sent via BlackBerry by ATT
-Original Message-
From: Adam Warner awarne...@yahoo.com
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:46:08
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re:
Yes.
On 28-Oct-09, at 1:48 PM, miglsd27 wrote:
Are the the 90 seconds a top limit? Can I make less?
Miguel.
Just working on what people said here and on Twitter, we had 4 votes
for 1 minute, 5 for 90 seconds (or 1-2 minutes), and 3 for no limits
at all. Which means most participants
If you round it out to 100 seconds it would dovetail into an ongoing project
that could use a shot in the arm.
http://100seconds.org/
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Rupert Howe rup...@twittervlog.tv wrote:
Yes.
On 28-Oct-09, at 1:48 PM, miglsd27 wrote:
Are the the 90 seconds a
Seems to me that you're being misunderstood. The weird thing is that
it seems almost deliberate. It reads like their stock position is
that if anybody asks whether something they're doing breaches the ToS,
they should err on the side of caution in their response and just say
No. My
Oh my god, *now* you suggest this, just as we've decided?! ;)
90 seconds videos would still qualify under your rules, though,
wouldn't they?
On 28-Oct-09, at 2:40 PM, Jason Daniels wrote:
If you round it out to 100 seconds it would dovetail into an ongoing
project
that could use a shot
Hi Rupert,
Thanks for your reply and sharing your knowledge. You make many good points. I
do have advertising turned on in my videos but did just realize that one was
set as Private and therefore didn't display the ads. I've changed that video
to Public and now the ads are showing.
I am
Just to be clear, re-reading this - I didn't mean to sound properly
exasperated. Was laughing.
I do like the whole concept of the 100seconds film festival - should
have said this. It's an outlet that a lot of us could submit videos to.
But the 90 seconds videos would still qualify for the
I think the original idea is to participate ..it doesnt matter time
limits...fuck them...just make your video in the way you want and like and
acknowledge your presence to the world...just be sure to be there everyday or
whenever you can do it-during November... no rules...just your will to be
Sure. This thread was about the parameters for the other 30 day game,
not the full NaVloPoMo. If you're doing a video every day in November
for NaVloPoMo - go for it, do whatever you want!
On 28-Oct-09, at 5:13 PM, John Cardenas wrote:
I think the original idea is to participate ..it
I'm sure we're all aware that they've been switching their focus away
from people like us and from YouTube clip content, to position
themselves more strongly as The Web TV Show People. It's obvious that
videoblogging isn't going to make anybody any money by itself, but on
the other
SInce you are a WordPress guy, why not try using VideoPress?
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Adam Warner awarne...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Rupert,
Thanks for your reply and sharing your knowledge. You make many good
points. I do have advertising turned on in my videos but did just realize
Seems like the 80/20 rule will likely apply here. 20% of the content should
have enough viewers and ad revenues to subsidize the rest of us little guys.
Not that I'm looking to free load. I use Blip not only because it's free,
but because it has cool features that YouTube can't match. However,
Yes, by all means, do stop by!
Eric Mortensen wrote a response to the original thread, but his answer
seems to be awaiting moderation?
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:videoblogg...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of hpbatman7
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 16:13 PM
To:
Hi gang!
Has anyone tried using 1and1's web hosting to host videos on their servers
after they announced Unlimited traffic feature?
I wonder what would be the best workflow as far as using a very good flash
video player embeddable everywhere like youtube's.
Any comments?
Thanks
-Renat
I love blip.tv because the video quality looks great (closest to source) I
like how they post the embed codes download links as I'm basically a lazy
(timepoor) person and like them so I don't have to think as much. youtube
compresses a lot. I suppose the other option is to upload onto our own
personally I'd treat the 90 secs as max...
On 29/10/2009, at 12:48 AM, miglsd27 wrote:
Are the the 90 seconds a top limit? Can I make less?
Yes, this has me concerned as well. I'm learning to do tutorial/screencast
videos but I'm not going to be selling a product just demonstrating how the
software and hardware work, i.e. maybe a screencast of Super(C) for an overview
of compression for newbies.
I do understand that there are
22 matches
Mail list logo