Hello everyone!
Later today I am heading out to court for the hearing in Brooklyn, NY.
The lawsuit is for use of intellectual property without the creator's
consent.
BTW, the Judge Joe Brown show in LA never came through due to
defendant's denial to do it on TV.
A mutual friend of ours, who
What you, Liza, numerously failed to understand here is that I am
suing for the video, NOT for the music that comes along with it. It's
a cease and desist of the video. And this video will NOT be used by me
in any way after the lawsuit. Deleted, gone forever.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com,
most assuredly, some failure of understanding.
-- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Renat Zarbailov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What you, Liza, numerously failed to understand here is that I am
suing for the video, NOT for the music that comes along with it.
It's
a cease and desist of the
Good looking out Irina,
Thanks so much!
It's written in the producers letter that they guarantee the payment
should I win the case. As far as ridiculness of the correspondence I
exchanged throughout the last couple of weeks with the defendant;
this must be televised... I will though ask the
Renat,
How many of these shows have you watched? Are you watching them now,
all the time, while you prepare this? Because you should be.
Look how silly the people in the show look. That's going to be
*you* in the box. However justified you feel now - however
ridiculous you think the
he seems determined to try.
i wonder how he's gonna pay for the music rights once whoever owns
copyright gets wind of renat's winnings?
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Renat,
How many of these shows have you watched? Are you watching them
now,
i have to agree with rupert
i would never go on this show (or any reality show for that matter)
but especially not in a case were the outcome meant something to me
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:57 AM, liza jean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
he seems determined to try.
i wonder how he's gonna pay
Rupert,
You have pointed out interesting thoughts. I have accepted the fact
that this court TV show will be cut, this is America after all. I
don't take this very seriously though, if it happens it happens, if
not I will not spend the rest of my life blogging about it. Speaking
of blogging, I did
here's some practice for court: young man please prove the
defendents own said music.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Renat Zarbailov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rupert,
You have pointed out interesting thoughts. I have accepted the fact
that this court TV show will be cut, this is
If you do it, it would be fascinating for us if you video blog the
experience. I wonder if they have you sign away all your rights to
shoot and distribute your own video about the experience.
John
www.HistoricHomeWorks.com
Well,
If supposedly the defendant agrees to do it on TV then there's no need
to blog the hearing in court since the cameras will already tape it.
There's a bit of complication in regards to serving the papers to
appear in court. The letter returned back to court on Nov. 18. When I
was filing the
who owns the music on these videos?
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Renat Zarbailov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well,
If supposedly the defendant agrees to do it on TV then there's no
need
to blog the hearing in court since the cameras will already tape it.
There's a bit of
renat, i know a good friend who was a producer for one of the judges' shows
his job was to make sure the show was as ridiculous and insane as possible,
even if it meant humiliation and horror for the participants, even if it
meant
kind of lying to them
just do not think the producers are on your
Judge Joe Brown? Dear God stay away from the TV in this situation.
Matthew
From: Rupert
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 10:05 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Defending Videographer's Rights in Court
Seems like a very bad deal to me. I don't see what
I called the producer today and asked about what court costs meant
in the letter he sent me. He said that if I win they cover the cost of
filing the lawsuit ($20) as well. So, he confirmed that they will
cover travel to and from LA, lodging (2 days in LA), even $35/day cash
for food.
It all
Today I received a DHL letter from Judge Joe Brown. Asking if I want
to fly to LA to tape the hearing. The producer of this show promises
in this letter that they will pay for travel and all expenses
associated doing it this way, and guarantee the appearance fee for
appearing on this program.
i almost spilled my small claims court guts last time you posted, now
seems more timely.
1- once upon a time my landlady (dorothy frooks), in return for
recruiting some 30,000 folks to serve in WWI, got to create small
claims court. that's American justice for you. need to learn more?
read
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Renat Zarbailov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today I received a DHL letter from Judge Joe Brown. Asking if I want
to fly to LA to tape the hearing. The producer of this show promises
in this letter that they will pay for travel and all expenses
associated doing it
as i have not actually watched your vids i have to ask-
1- is there music?
2- do you own it?
if yes then no try to stay off network television.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Renat Zarbailov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seems like a very bad deal to me. I don't see what you get to gain -
how they guarantee the payment any more than a regular court does.
And sounds like 'court costs' get covered by the loser. Are there
extra TV court costs that you wouldn't be liable for otherwise?
Also seems to me that
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Renat Zarbailov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is that synchmaster, you speak of?
i wish i knew. youtube won't tell. there is no evidence they
review our work, because if they did they would know there are no TOS
violations in what we post. we are
all they have to do to get them back up is shave a few frames off the
front and make a new account. works for us every time, and then every
time (a million channel views and thousands of happy subscribers)
synchmaster finds them and flags them and it all disappears. . . .
--- In
What is that synchmaster, you speak of?
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, liza jean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
all they have to do to get them back up is shave a few frames off the
front and make a new account. works for us every time, and then every
time (a million channel views and
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Renat Zarbailov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with you. I guess I was in the heat of the moment with this
situation, calling blogging - whining... :) My apologies...
I will make a post on my personal blog. I guess google will crawl for
this company's name and
good luck with your complaint to youtube. please let us know if they
take the videos down for you.
have you tried flagging them as inappropriate? works every
time synchmaster wants to get rid of our videos. our videos
disappear as if by magic, our accounts cancelled. seems to be
automatic
Amazingly Youtube removed all 3 videos I requested without even
notifying me. The reason why I think the removal was from Youtube's
side and not from flakes I was dealing with is because they also had
one of these videos on Vimeo. And when I checked the Vimeo video was
still there. They would have
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Renat Zarbailov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amazingly Youtube removed all 3 videos I requested without even
notifying me. The reason why I think the removal was from Youtube's
side and not from flakes I was dealing with is because they also had
one of these videos
- Original Message -
From: Renat Zarbailov
Amazingly Youtube removed all 3 videos I requested without even
notifying me. The reason why I think the removal was from Youtube's
side and not from flakes I was dealing with is because they also had
one of these videos on Vimeo. And when
to add a bit to the good advice Kris gave, when you structure your
progress payments,include an initial deposit which will cover all
your out of pocket costs. if the client refuses, it's a nice early
warning that you won't be getting paid.
i hope you take Jay's advice - it will transform that
Thanks everyone so much for the wisdom shared here.
I just filed a DMCA Youtube complain hoping that they honor my
request. Here is what I wrote;
*
Dear Youtube, I am the creator of the following 3 videos (shot and
edited). It took me at least 3-4
Great post Jay...
I thought the same thing.
It's a small world for us independent content creators.
I'm constantly running into folks from this list all over the place.
Take it to them, Renat.
peace,
Ron Watson
http://k9disc.blip.tv
http://k9disc.com
http://discdogradio.com
I agree with you. I guess I was in the heat of the moment with this
situation, calling blogging - whining... :) My apologies...
I will make a post on my personal blog. I guess google will crawl for
this company's name and will bring up this page anytime someone makes
a search on them.
Thanks
As far as whining about this experience on blogs to create bad rep for
them; It is an option, but I think it only creates more PR for them in
the end. And what are the chances that the future videographers
they're about to hire will see those blogs? They might, if they ever
gotten screwed
33 matches
Mail list logo
