Hey David-
Please don't take me out of context:
I see Lucas' argument that its crazy for a vlogger to whine when his video
is posted by another site.
But i think its important that we try to help educate on linking or giving
attributing.
I understand the argument that I cannot stop people from
Question for Blip: Somewhere in my blip profile I told it my itunes
URL is http://www.davidmeade.com/itunes and this is the itunes URL
that is shown on my 'show' page.
Is there some reason my show page doesn't similarly use my feed URL
(http://www.davidmeade.com/feed) that I've also specified?
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay dedman
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 12:56 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: videoronk our cc licences
I don't think the issue
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Cammack
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 23:08
On top of all that, in this case, when you told them about
your issue, they told you I can't do nothin' for ya, man,
and claimed to
Den 31.01.2007 kl. 05:11 skrev Dean Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Or of course you could just work with people tring to standardise all
meta data for video which would include a license portion.
Please don't. There are already standards for attaching licensing
information to web content (in
Andreas, what should we be doing in our RSS?
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andreas Haugstrup
Pedersen
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 2:45 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: videoronk our
Den 31.01.2007 kl. 23:48 skrev Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Andreas, what should we be doing in our RSS?
I was thinking about the Creatice Commons namespace. You guys are already
using that so those who subscribe to RSS feeds from blip are already
getting that information.
--
Andreas
Of Andreas Haugstrup
Pedersen
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 3:00 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: videoronk our cc licences
Den 31.01.2007 kl. 23:48 skrev Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Andreas, what should we be doing in our RSS?
I was thinking about
Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andreas Haugstrup
Pedersen
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 3:00 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: videoronk our cc licences
Den 31.01.2007 kl. 23:48 skrev Mike Hudack
?
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andreas Haugstrup
Pedersen
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 3:00 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: videoronk our cc licences
Den 31.01.2007 kl. 23:48 skrev
Yes, all of that information is in the feed. It includes the permalink
to the post on blip in the item:link element, and also includes special
metadata that's presently unique to blip for credit. Here's an example
from a random video I picked on blip:
blip:userthatphoneguy/blip:user
David,
We will block these guys on our end if we have to.
- Original Message -
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue Jan 30 10:59:46 2007
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: videoronk our cc
We do not have an agreement with them. Purely a defensive move on their
part.
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of johnleeke
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:09 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging]
Bill, I think that's exactly right. While there is a great deal of education
that needs to occur around CC licensing, I'm not sure that's the issue at
play here. Videoronk is pulling videos from all over the place - they
certainly aren't all covered by CC.
And frankly, I'm a little concerned
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: videoronk our cc licences
Bill, I think that's exactly right. While there is a great deal of education
that needs to occur around CC licensing, I'm not sure that's the issue at
play here. Videoronk is pulling videos from all over the place - they
certainly aren't
] Re: videoronk our cc licences
Bill, I think that's exactly right. While there is a great deal of
education
that needs to occur around CC licensing, I'm not sure that's the issue at
play here. Videoronk is pulling videos from all over the place - they
certainly aren't all covered by CC
Of Micki Krimmel
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 9:49 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: videoronk our cc licences
And I'm saying I think we have the tools to correct that
ourselves which in the long run will better serve us than
hunting down every aggregator
17 matches
Mail list logo
