Hi Lisa,
You might like to look into Participatory Video:
http://insightshare.org/
Would seem to be a good fit for your scenario.
Cheers,
Christian
On 4 Apr 2010, at 03:33, Lisa Harper wrote:
Very helpful pointers, Gena and Jay.
I'm a bit embarrassed to say this is research for a final
Very helpful pointers, Gena and Jay.
I'm a bit embarrassed to say this is research for a final project in an
information architecture class. The makers of a small, independent film
focused on events surrounding a middle school, urban kid want to develop
their original concept into an educational
I can't agree with this thread.
If you're focused on your stats or If you make some kind of regular show and
you're worried about losing viewers then yes maybe you should make some kind
of notice if you pause for a bit. But to expect everyone to know that you're
taking a break if you make some
I especially like the awareness you made Mike about the energy that
viewers actually create and input _by watching_. Too often it is easy
to see us as the makers/givers, and the viewers as the takers. This
is a good stretch for a few of my brain cells that are stuck in old
thinking.
Thanks,
Somehow I had missed this. It's great. Thanks for managing it Jan.
Aloha Friday,
Rox
On 2/16/07, humancloner1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jan,
I've been following several of your links.
I'm not that computer literate.
When i clicked on the links to subscribe to the delicious
The addresses you clicked on are raw RSS feeds, Randy.
Copy that URL into a newsreader - I'm really liking Google Reader these days
- thanks Scoble.
Not sure, but I think you have to have a Google Account to use the Google
Reader. It rocks - for so many reasons.
Let me know if that clears up
You're welcome. I think I''ve gotten nearly everything that's come through
this list and more since I've a Google clipping service that notifies me
when vlog-related keywords are used.
My pleasure.
Now, don't forget to post here when you get written up.
You wanna be an editor? Hmmm?
Jan
On
Editor? I will think. I am so freakishly behind on things. I do add
events to vlog calendar which you have feeding in there so nicely too.
Please bug me again in about a month and I will see what I can do!
r
On 2/16/07, Jan McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're welcome. I think
You are also a human, like it or not. And you can call it what you
want but its a website you are talking about when you say 'my site'.
You could take your site off the web but right now its there and
that's what it is.
You vlogger, you.
:P
On Dec 9, 2006, at 3:56 PM, David Howell wrote:
I feel like I'm eavesdropping at a mid-90s meeting of the College
Democrats.
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Howell
Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2006 4:48 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject:
Spirit of vlogging
In my (old) experience i could say that vlogging is only a spirit
In France nobody use these word
They said podcasting or Video blog
For me Vlogging is :
BliptTV
International conversation
Josh Wolf
Think different
Paul, Bil, Mickael, Mike, Jan
A new way
PROTECTED]: Sat,
9 Dec 2006 16:06:05 -0500Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: vlog
You are also a human, like it or not. And you can call it what you
want but its a website you are talking about when you say 'my site'.
You could take your site off the web but right now
: [videoblogging] Re: vlog
You are also a human, like it or not. And you can call it what you
want but its a website you are talking about when you say 'my site'.
You could take your site off the web but right now its there and
that's what it is.
You vlogger, you.
:P
On Dec 9, 2006, at 3:56 PM
they're vloggers or bloggers but rather because they're
consistent content providers of interesting media. To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] videoblogging%40yahoogroups.comFrom:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] andrew%40rocketboom.comDate: Sat, 9 Dec 2006
16:06:05 -0500Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: vlog
You are also
media. To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sat, 9 Dec
2006 16:06:05 -0500Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: vlog
You are also a human, like it or not. And you can call it what
you
want but its a website you are talking about when you say 'my site'.
You could
i dont know but i love vlog santa
thinking you can do a video message for boris in russian?
On 11/29/06, Chuck Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, no Schlitz deal... I barely had time to get the site up. :-)
Beer sponsorships often mean getting lots of free beer. Do I
really need a
On Fri, 12 May 2006 06:48:47 +0200, Adrian Miles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
smil does not let you add links on parts of video, only the entire video.
That depends a lot on how creative you get with it. :o)
If you use the a element on the video layer, then you can only make the
entire video
On Thu, 11 May 2006 23:41:35 +0200, awarner20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I'm looking to put text links now at the end of the video. I
will be using original music from local bands and would likr to link
to their websites with a text link. Eventually, I'd like to put in an
image link,
Yeah I love the eZedia program, I use it for all my videos.
The end of my videos has a single frame with my logo, url, cc license
info, and a comment button. Each is clickable and takes you to
the appropriate place.
The demo can do up to 5 items on a frame. I think my frame has 6
itmes :-P
On 5/11/06, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
more ...
unfortunately, upon testing with win2k/ie6, the object's onclick did
*not* fire
microsoft's doc says it should handle the onclick with object and so i
wonder if the flash movie is consuming the event in this caseInteresting!
On 5/12/06, Lucas Gonze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting! It is is the flash movie, then a WMP embed/object should let
the onclick pass through.
I tried this out in both IE 6 and FF, but no luck:
object classid="">
id=EXAMPLE_OBJECT_ID height=286 width=320 >
captured in object
So, not to wander or digress or anything, I swear, but what's the
chance an onclick on an html object/embed element will work?
SPONSORED LINKS
Fireant
Individual
more ...
unfortunately, upon testing with win2k/ie6, the object's onclick did
*not* fire
microsoft's doc says it should handle the onclick with object and so i
wonder if the flash movie is consuming the event in this case
Markus Sandy wrote:
tried it with jeroenwijering's flash xspf
around the 11/5/06 awarner20 mentioned about ===SPAM===
[videoblogging] Re: Vlog with html links? that:
Hmmm...wrap the mp4 in a MOV file eh? I'll have to start googling
around for info on that. Thanks! Anyone know of any tutorials
available?
open mp4 in quicktime, file save as. now wrapped
pontificate away, Gena! it's important to have these kinds of discussions on the group, too, i think.i believe that economics has a huge role to play in who videoblogs. not just because of of the amount of money it takes to get hardware and software and a decent internet connection but, also,
also, the amount of time it takes to make video, manage a site, and
promote your stuff through social structures (like this list, for
example). this is time that some cannot afford with any consistency and
one of the reasons for that can be economic.
no doubt !especially if you're like a video
On 4/19/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also, the amount of time it takes to make video, manage a site, and
promote your stuff through social structures (like this list, for
example). this is time that some cannot afford with any consistency and
one of the reasons for that can
Ok. I might have lied and edited a little
bit.
_David
Howellhttp://www.davidhowellstudios.com
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
missbhavens1969Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 12:26
PMTo: videoblogging@yahoogroups.comSubject:
Friday, March 31, 2006, 8:50:33 PM, Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
Everyone will be able
to see videos immediately by going to technorati and mefeedia tag pages
(because waiting for a human curate the videos sucks). During the week
these two places are the best place to go. *After* the week a place
I'm happy to admit that the only editting in ours was a wee trim on one bit.On 4/3/06, David Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ok. I might have lied and edited a little
bit.
_David
Howellhttp://www.davidhowellstudios.com
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 09:19:57 +0200, Frank Carver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Where is the mefeedia metadata about each post? How do I apply
a tag to a particular post?
It is more confusing. You click the little thumbnail (top left of each
item) to go to the view page. Then the video will
Tuesday, April 4, 2006, 4:29:14 PM, Devlon wrote:
From your feed page, at the end of hte post item text, you should see some
text like My Tags: Click to tag javascript://. If you click the 'click
to tag' you should be able to enter in tags. No?
Um. No. All I can see is two links Download
On 4/4/06, Frank Carver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tuesday, April 4, 2006, 4:29:14 PM, Devlon wrote:
From your feed page, at the end of hte post item text, you should see
some
text like My Tags: Click to tag javascript://. If you click the
'click
to tag' you should be able to enter
Ah, you have to log in before you can tag Frank.
On 4/4/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/4/06, Frank Carver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tuesday, April 4, 2006, 4:29:14 PM, Devlon wrote:
From your feed page, at the end of hte post item text, you should see
some
text like My
i have a feedburner feed now which is probably better. also, my first vid didn't even go to my site when (i thought!) i had crossposted from blip...but it's there now. geez. i have to get my head out of the clouds!
anyway, here's the feedburner one: http://feeds.feedburner.com/NoPracticei think
ok ... I couldn't resist, I made a day before video blogging week promo for my vlog ...http://www.richardshow.com/?p=54... and (though I probably shouldn't admit it), I definately took some time to edit ... Richard
On 4/1/06, David Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ya...watch me go down in
: [videoblogging] Re: Vlog
Week 2006!! April 3-9!!!
ok ... I couldn't resist, I made a day before video blogging week
promo for my vlog ...http://www.richardshow.com/?p=54...
and (though I probably shouldn't admit it), I definately took some time to edit
... Richard
On 4/1/06, David
Howell [EMAIL
: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Richard
ShowSent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 2:11 PMTo:
videoblogging@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Vlog
Week 2006!! April 3-9!!!
ok ... I couldn't resist, I made a day before video blogging week
Very nice. That will be huge.On 3/31/06, david_dudas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes it would be. :)
This is one of the things we're working on. We will soon support feeds
and downloads in multiple formats.
We do not want to hold media hostage on our site. Our goal is to make
it easy to share
Ya...watch me go down in flames in the process
;)
_David
Howellhttp://www.davidhowellstudios.com
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
missbhavens1969Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 12:26
PMTo:
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:07:26 +0200, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But the question is: where do we post our content? It would be nice
if we could all post it ourselves on the same blog... I know it
possible to program WordPress to create accounts, but I don't know if
you can do
I think it is cooler to just have people's blogs filled with videos, then people will know that it is something huge... maybe someday someone will post it to one like ryanne did with
videobloggingweek2005.blogspot.com last yearOn 3/31/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But the question
This is what tagging it will do. It will allow us to get them all in one place/listing/feedOn 3/31/06, Casey McKinnon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:But the question is: where do we post our content?It would be nice
if we could all post it ourselves on the same blog... I know itpossible to program
also the cool thing about tagging your vids in mefeediais that you can subscribe to the videobloggingweek2006 tagand get all the videos from everyone who participates in FireAnt, Mefeedia or itunesthis is how i was able to compile
http://videobloggingweek2005.blogspot.com/-ryOn 3/31/06, Devlon
I'll take on the task of compiling something that will be viewable all in one place. URL to go up on Monday.On 3/31/06, ryanne hodson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also the cool thing about tagging your vids in mefeediais that you can subscribe to the videobloggingweek2006 tagand get all the
Schlomo ... what are you talking about! ... I would watch a video an hour from you (or two an hour if it includes your mom) ... Richard, schlomo fanOn 3/31/06,
johngaltsjournal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm in!But really, I don't think anyone but my mom would want to watch a video a day from
Careful there Richard,
the federal government has recently established "safe schlomo dosages"
and two hours of schlomo and his mom are considered "potential harmful"
(that's yellow on the new fed chart) unless you smoke a lot of
something during the experience
please use with caution ;)
Don't add bureaucracy (bureaucrazy) and don't worry. Everyone will be able
to see videos immediately by going to technorati and mefeedia tag pages
(because waiting for a human curate the videos sucks). During the week
these two places are the best place to go. *After* the week a place with
On 3/31/06, David Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And it was said...
There is no edit. There is only shoot and post.
And it was good.
That's the approach we're taking.
I've always fussed with editing (not that you would be able to tell),
time to break out of that for a bit.
'rough and
On 3/31/06, david_dudas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the main reason that eyespot exists is because video editing is too
time consuming and difficult
eyespot has a super easy to use video editor
it took me about 30 seconds to carve up the clips i posted in the group
of course if you need to
That is correct.Question: If eyespot is about the remix culture, wouldn't it be better to send a QT file out the RSS feed?I mean, unless you only want to allow users to manipulate the videos within your site.
On 3/31/06, david_dudas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll fix this right away, although
teaser...but it looks impressive.dont know how bloggy it will be, but it mentions the ability to tag and share media assets as well as generated rss feeds for each tag... wonder if it supports enclosures etc..we'll see.
sullOn 11/28/05, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
The for your enterprise indicates to me, at least, that we're not
really talking vlogginess. It's definately on my watchlist, tho.
Michael Sullivan wrote:
teaser...
but it looks impressive.
dont know how bloggy it will be, but it mentions the ability to tag
and share media assets as well
Bill Streeter wrote:
I would submit my cat videos but I'm worried about Josh misusing my
cats in some catsploitation videos.
You are referring to 'kitty p0rn' I assume?
Pete
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Fair play? Video games influencing
I'd think that giving it away in small chunks would be a great idea.It will bring you a larger audience than you would if you charged people.I'd say break it up, serialize it, and for money just sell the DVD.
If you serialize, and people get into it, they may fork up the money to watch the
gmjoyce_y wrote:
I'd love to get your opinions about something I've been planning that
ties right into this idea.
I've got a full-length movie I made called Working Stiff
(http://www.workingstiff.org) that I was thinking of putting up on the
Web someday so people could download it for a
Friday, October 21, 2005, 8:00:07 PM, Dave Huth wrote:
I'm trying something like this right now on my vlog. I've been thinking a lot
lately about
show formats and talking to other vloggers about it in the flashmeetings
and through e-
mail. I completed a short film this year and have broken
Chris Nolan.ca wrote:
I guess one has to balance the viewers, do most watch the video on the
webpage, or through the feed?
A few weeks ago, I started using a different url for the video I linked
to on the site versus the video I linked to as an enclosures. It's still
a little early, but for
Remy Chevalier wrote:
Guys,
Thanks for all the help!!!
Check it out, my first real Vlog!
http://www.remyc.com/Scion66_riseshine.html
See you on Route 66!!!
RemyC.
RemyC, I had a few problems...
I went to:
http://www.remyc.com/Scion66_riseshine.html
and just saw a big pink square on
I think you mean http://www.freevlog.org
Yes, I'd been there, but they only teach you how to upload videos
onto their own server, not a do-it-yourself on your own website
instruction. Unless I didn't quite understand what their site is
about... do you have a direct url you're thinking about?
On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 15:35:08 +0200, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
most of us dont embed the videos in the page because:
1. there is no obvious permalink to the video.
2. it doesnt show up in RSS feed for syndication.
(someone correct me if im wrong)
While you're not wrong per se...
Embedding a video vs. popping it in another window or player does not
pose any technological back-end restrictions or problems. Its a
choice for user interface and design. Whatever you would like can
work just fine.
On Oct 1, 2005, at 11:11 AM, LeanBackVids.com wrote:
--- In
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 01:07:55 +0200, Dan R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In Quicktime it's posible to create a movie ( my vlog ) that
incorporates files or portions thereof found on a network ( the
internet ) through url referencing. Is it okay to do this for purposes
of quoting other's vlogs?
Personally I think the method Verdi is using for this is very
constructive and helpful. I can't see anyone being 'put-off' by this.
On 9/27/05, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah I wouldn't want to be too critical of a beginning vlogger. People
get better at it the more they do it.
You're wearing that spiffy red frock, right? I'll take it.
Jan
--
It isn't done alone. Pay more.
http://fauxpress.blogspot.com - motion
http://blog.urbanartadventures.com - sound
http://vlogpresskit.blogspot.com - community
http://the-hold.blogspot.com - literature
.
- Original Message
Hey Troy, all
I have to respond to this, even though we have moved on. I hope you
are still reading this, Troy.
Firstly, my screencast was pretty sarcastic, but it doesn't mean that
I have totally written off your site or that there is ill will as
such. I have no intention to be just some
Well! Okay Troy, you passed the first test, which was that you read the list
rather than just leaving your request for help populating your site /
moderators, dusting off your hands and walking away.
And the second test, you replied to our skepticism / cynicism with humor.
The third test:
ok. relax. you wont be booted.
now people know your site exists... if they want to add thier vlogs, they will.
you will be one of hundreds of new directories that will surface in the
coming months mostly from people looking for new ad revenue.
alright, carry on.
sullOn 8/5/05, troylemaire
Right. I opened my 5 minutes by emphasising how important and fucking
cool videoblogging is, then showed a few things on mefeedia, then
closed with reminding everyone and the newcomers to visit freevlog,
the best site ever :)
we have made plans to present again at the Soho Apple store the
Is there anyone in LA that would like to help present on September 10th?- joshOn Aug 1, 2005, at 8:14 AM, Jay dedman wrote: Right. I opened my 5 minutes by emphasising how important and fucking cool videoblogging is, then showed a few things on mefeedia, then closed with reminding everyone
i would like to participate
Joshua Paul wrote:
Is there anyone in LA that would like to help present on
September 10th?
- josh
On Aug 1, 2005, at 8:14 AM, Jay dedman wrote:
Right. I opened my 5 minutes by
emphasising how important and fucking
cool videoblogging is,
Please represent! That's why Verdi, Jay, and Ryanne, and others are out there.
You west coasters need to pick up some F'ing slack!
:-)
-Josh
On 7/30/05, johngaltsjournal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No offense Josh, but the one in San Francisco is going to kick your little Soho funtime in the
72 matches
Mail list logo
