Just out of curiosity, are you videos online?
--
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
http://ChangeLog.ca/
Motorsport Videos
http://TireBiterZ.com/
Vlog Razor... Vlogging News... http://vlograzor.com/
On Feb 8, 2008 12:38 AM, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions!
Again,
Thanks for the suggestions!
Again, though, this series is more Mature than Adult. Meaning it
falls well within the PG-13 to R range.
So I'd be pretty wary of signing onto any adult-specific revenue
system. My actresses would have my head on a platter if they went to
watch their videos and saw
I've been watching all the networks web shows on and off from the beginning.
The least intrusive of them is :05
The longest, :15
All the mid-roll ads are :30
Jn
On Feb 7, 2008 6:09 PM, Irina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yeah, anything longer than 5 seconds gets skipped.
thats from a much more
Pre-roll? Preferably 3-5 seconds. First Position? 5-10 seconds. I
really don't enjoy watching 15 seconds of show and then 15 seconds of
commercial.
Depending on how long your show is, you can get away with another 15
second spot in the middle or near the end, but those are less coveted
by
No, actually, I'm just this week in the middle of shooting my first
18-episode mini season. I'm going to be wrapping the first phase of
production next Wednesday.
I hope to have at least the first couple of episodes online before the
end of February. There's a song I want to use over the end
Hey folks;
While peeking at the traffic for our web series, Something to Be
Desired, I noticed some traffic to our Blip videos from a site called
http://webmunism.com
I checked them out and, now, I'm a bit confused.
If you search their site for a tag -- in our case, stbd -- you'll see
these
We've got ads working on all of our YouTube videos.
There are several components to this. Ads on the videos on YouTube
site, ads on the YouTube videos off-site on embeds, and ad-sense
share which allows you to have your content sent through the ad-sense
pipes onto other peoples sites.
wow. we'll be in LA sunday.
id love to see what they pull off.
Jay
On Feb 7, 2008 7:42 PM, Andrew Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This Sunday there will be an amazing protest of Scientology by the
Anonymous group. If anyone in the US can make it out to capture some
footage in your own
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Cheryl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because before the newer gear, Apple sold a bunch of older model video
iPods. I have one. It won't play the 'big' files, even after updates.
Some people need the little ones or they have to manually convert.
Since I'm one
There's supposedly going to be a new online video site that features
short videos made by professional directors.
http://tinyurl.com/33eug9
Cinelan will focus on professionally produced, three-minute
nonfiction films that will be distributed worldwide on multiple
platforms, including the
If you're looking for music. I've found usable music at...
http://stockmusic.net/
It's cost money though but it's affordable. (You can music song
for under $30.)
(Although I make Motorsport videos so I found stuff appropriate
for that. But you'll have to look around to see if
Hi Jay,
we started publishing (professional !?) independant video art on the
web some time ago. since this is done in connection with a full
database and thesaurus work, it does take a long time. we've got 1500
videos ready but only 300 or so are on line and ca be seen at :
On Feb 7, 2008 3:53 PM, influxxmedia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But here's my problem. I'm a graphic designer with intermediate web
coding skills. I
I also ran across this site: http://wpcustomization.com/
WordPress is certainly a great blogging platform - many of us use it and
love it.
Nothing really new here for followers of the copyright argument, but
good to see these conversations getting into mainstream publications:
http://tinyurl.com/2j2js5
Im glad the arguments are being laid more and more clear.
This is a genuinely radical idea: individuals should hire lawyers to
After being threatened with an investigation, Comcast has, subtly, written
in their contract with users that they do manage traffic.
*http://tinyurl.com/2cyjub
*
**Comcast's decision to affirm its traffic management practices in the
newly revised ToS is a welcome baby step towards greater
Thanks!
I have plenty of music at my disposal... lots of friends with long
defunct (but excellent) bands.
This one song would be perfect, though... it's also from a defunct
indie band, but in this case the singer was only ever a casual - but
friendly - acquaintance of mine.
And she's also done
Well, I don't have that kind of cash to dedicate to a site design. Yet. But it
is not a bad
idea. You are absolutely right when you look at TIME == MONEY and we can all be
putting
our time into more productive ventures. I absolutely have ZERO plans of
monetizing my
site or work, and the
This will be the a good real test of whether or not the FCC will follow up
on their promise to enforce network neutrality, in terms of penalties for
comcast. I'm not holding my breath.
... Richard
On Feb 8, 2008 10:17 AM, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After being threatened with an
Whoa...there's going to be 2 protests here in Cedar Rapids!? I didnt even know
there was a
Scientology Church here.
I'll be venturing out there Sunday to get this on video!
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wow.
Oops. Nevermind. Just noticed that there arent Churches here. The red markers
on that
COS map are Anonymous members. *duh*
My bad.
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whoa...there's going to be 2 protests here
Hey, that WP/SIAB tutorial was great. Makes it seem very straighforward. I
would be tempted
to give it a whirl. But as was discussed earlier it is also the time. Still
might be worth putting
away some coin to pay a WP dude to do it.
Great suggestions, thanks everyone
Or jump into
I think it's weird that so many people are up in arms over Scientology, when
other religions have been practicing equally cult-like behavior for
centuries. And the fact that this 'anonymous' group is most concerned over
their tax-free status is hilarious. Look how much money the Catholic church
Here's a question for the YouTuber's in the group, especially those who
are
partners. Have you ever uploaded videos to YouTube that included your
own
sponsor prerolls built in?
Yes, although I generally run them following a brief intro.
Does YouTube care if you do that?
I'm not sure if
There's some here in Indy ... but I dunno if I want the scary
Scientology people to be able to film me filming them filming the
protest ... somehow I'm pretty sure that ends with me being tied to a
chair in over lit basement room being forced to confess my deepest
fears and flaws to an ash tray.
I have jim, and while I am not a partner, youtube doesn't seem to
care...though once again, I think it can hinder viewership, perhaps
especially on youtube..
best!
kathryn
http://www.synchronis.tv
On Feb 8, 2008, at 12:37 PM, Jim Kukral wrote:
Here's a question for the YouTuber's in the
We ran homemade prerolls for a few months last year and uploaded to 10 or 12
different sites/services (ex. http://youtube.com/watch?v=mRABQOh5z1Q ).
Nobody seemed to mind. And although we made a bit of money from them, we
decided they weren't worth the aesthetic bad taste it left in our mouths.
Having watched Steve Fishman's video deposition in full, I can no longer
support this point of view. I guess I should first off mention that I
have no love for the Catholic church in its current incarnation, so even
given what I'm about to say, there is no inherent hypocrisy.
There are three
great questions Justin and we are back to the discussion of hijacked feeds.
Rox
On Feb 8, 2008 5:43 AM, stbdpittsburgh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey folks;
While peeking at the traffic for our web series, Something to Be
Desired, I noticed some traffic to our Blip videos from a site called
Dudesyou guys are spoiling me :)
Thanks for the link. A ton.
adam
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 7, 2008 3:53 PM, influxxmedia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But here's my problem. I'm a graphic designer with intermediate web coding
Yes. I should have mentioned that those were my personal preferences
as far as watching ads on shows. I don't buy or sell ads and have
nothing to do with that industry.
Some sites actually throw 30 second ads up before the video plays, as
if you're about to watch an entire 30-minute television
I reckon its because:
Unlike other religions it has a more blatant business model involving charging
for access
to their version of the holy scriptures.
It doesnt have the benefit of hundreds or thousands of years to obscure the
origins of the
texts. Having been a science fiction author does
Standard time for pre-roll is :10 or :15 seconds.
We buy media for clients, and I placed several :15 ads this month.
Best,
Zachary
On Feb 8, 2008 2:46 AM, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pre-roll? Preferably 3-5 seconds. First Position? 5-10 seconds. I
really don't enjoy watching 15
Okay, I really got no excuse now. Thats wicked. Thanks a million. This groups
rocks!!
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also ran across this site: http://wpcustomization.com/
Just to be clear: all video iPods and iPhones, oldest to newest and
regardless of their actual screen size, are quite happy with a 640x480
file of the specs I've mentioned.
I make smaller mp4, Flash and wmv files for people who want to watch
directly at the site. The 640x480/h.264/baseline lc
Here's a question for the YouTuber's in the group, especially those who are
partners. Have you ever uploaded videos to YouTube that included your own
sponsor prerolls built in?
Does YouTube care if you do that?
Jim
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I have the oldest video iPod too, and I produce a single big video
of each episode that will play on all video iPods and the AppleTV as well.
Can you clarify what you mean by big videos? I mean 640x480 and
compressed in H.264, baseline low-complexity. I open my full AVI
version of the
I mean if I use QuickTime Pro's iPod export option, resulting m4v
files won't play on my older iPod Video. I have not tried further
crunching it with Videora iPod Converter because I don't have it.
Sounds like I should, though.
Cheryl
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, wazman_au [EMAIL
just wanted to pass this along to anyone who is interested
cheers!!
-- Forwarded message --
From: WGBH Lab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Feb 4, 2008 6:30 AM
Subject: WGBH Lab Announces New Open Call for Short Films
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So far I have not found any settings I can export from QuickTime that
play on my older iPod Video at 640x480, but I haven't tried very hard.
I just keep making smaller versions. 320x240 or 365x205. One day when
I have a whole afternoon to kill, I might experiment. But that day
isn't on the
That's pretty odd. Have you ever updated the software on your iPod? I
have that same model and mine can play the 640 x 480 videos exported
with QuickTime Pro.
- Verdi
On Feb 8, 2008 7:02 PM, Cheryl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So far I have not found any settings I can export from QuickTime
Yup, can't remember if its a software or firmware update, but
basically the old video ipods magically become 640x480/1500k/h.264 (of
a sort) happy once they are updated with it.
On 2/8/08, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's pretty odd. Have you ever updated the software on your
41 matches
Mail list logo
