I use VisualHub for the mac to make all of my versions. Flip4Mac handles the
WMV encoding (enables it for VisualHub, IIRC). The only time I'll use
quicktime player, FCP or Compressor is when I need to make sure I have control
over keyframes, etc.
As far as quicktime, I found out from Justin
1. Why are you double-compressing? If you know you want to end up @ 640x360,
do your initial AIC compression to that size. Maybe I missed that you want to
have an HD version as well as a 640x360 version?
2. My workflow with FCP is Flip - 1280x720 AIC - edit in FCP - output
1280x720 AIC
Does anyone know how to properly set up and serve .AMC files so they can be
viewed on Japanese cell phones?
http://www.filesuffix.com/extension/amc.html
~Bill
http://billcammack.com/
of the work, but
at any point you can 'stretch' it to make that sequence or content
area longer by getting more material, and so on until you may (in
theory) view all the footage for that sequence. Bit like svg for video
I guess.
On 24/05/2009, at 5:56 AM, Bill Cammack wrote:
I
I think it really does require a tiered approach, which would be similar to
what you're saying... Small clips, tagged and warehoused, and then making
larger programs out of the smaller clips. Not necessarily like a playlist
function like YouTube uses, but focusing information into interesting
??
Renat Zarbailov of Innomind.org
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Cammack billcammack@ wrote:
Hey All! :D Hope everyone's well and in good spirits. I haven't been
around the email group, but I've been on the scene this whole time.
Actually, recently, I had the pleasure
on one topic
that I filmed two weeks ago for an entire month, because I'm trying to output
only 1-3 episodes per day.
If anybody has any ideas, I'd love to hear them. I'll read back to see if
there are any recent threads I can contribute to.
Cheers! :D
~ Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com/
contacts are in the jabber
section of my iChat, so I haven't bothered to do it through the actual
Google Mail website.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, schlomo rabinowitz
schl...@... wrote:
I don't know about you, but I've always had problems with iChat
://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/30931vid=570971mode=info
If you want complete instructions, I posted them @
http://billcammack.com/2008/12/30/perian-v-113-breaks-incoming-ichat-video/
Good Luck and Best Success in 2009! :D
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
-professionals-avoid-web-video/
or
http://peaurl.com/YKvV
Basically, the point of the post and comments is the over-emphasis
of marketing when it comes to web video and the under-emphasis of
VIDEO when it comes to web video. :D
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
you feel like the pros outweigh the
cons. If I felt like I was getting garbage from my viewers/readers,
I'd shut off comments immediately and let people email me if they
wanted to discuss anything.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, schlomo rabinowitz
Yeah, Marcus. That's the group. :)
Does anyone know how much they charge? Is it per DAY of checking the net?
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 31, 2008, at 3:54 AM, Bill Cammack wrote:
Yeah, Adam's right. Ultimately, this is all
that's
going to cost you.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If All Rights Reserved, then he can't use your photo without your
permission, whatever he says.
Not to split hairs with Mr. Howe, but he definitely
mentioning what the widescreen ratio would be. The
NV3 doesn't do widescreen at all.
Good Luck!
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, daveacbliptv
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Cammack billcammack@
wrote:
720x480
difference, so I use 640x480.
FYI, widescreen would be 853x480.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, daveacbliptv
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert rupert@ wrote:
Dave, never be afraid to add a link to your videoblog
You have to do it like this
http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/kevin_kelly_on_the_next_5_000_days_of_the_web.html
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
platform?? site, whatever, blah
On 26-Aug-08, at 8:51 AM, Rupert wrote
the videos in the first
place. (Again, having nothing specifically to do with boingboing)
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am glad jay and ryanne are back safe, I am glad that boing boing
and others are trying to report
hmm... I had assumed that Heath was talking about overlay ads DURING
the program. I don't have a problem with pre-roll and post-roll ads
of whatever type. They just have to be integrated properly with the
subject matter. I say if pre-roll's going to be peppy and bouncy, get
it out of the way in
We're going to do one
solemn video out of 100, maybe... so pay us to advertise your product
once in a blue moon.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh indeed I do know that is the nature of the biz but I can't help
but think
of the art, but like I said, it's not about the art. It's about hits
and ad sales. By the time you press play, they've already got you.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Cammack
billcammack@ wrote:
Well, like I said, I agree with you entirely. I
of versions of ads and applying the appropriate
mood to videos that are somber or comedic or whatever ESPECIALLY
if they're being burned in by human editors.
On 26-Aug-08, at 1:57 PM, Bill Cammack wrote:
As far as Rupert's suggestion of several versions of a commercial,
you're asking the company
Thanks for the link. So interesting. I'm glad they were able to
avoid detention.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://tv.boingboing.net/2008/08/25/boing-boing-tv-proti.html
Last week, eight American citizens were detained in Beijing for
and trying to make it which AREN'T
being faked and ARE way more interesting.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, that's how you make money. These people aren't doing it for
the thrill or the art. They don't care about
in the industry, I'll
go watch Can We Do That http://www.veoh.com/channels/canwedothat.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
On 24-Aug-08, at 4:08 AM, Bill Cammack wrote:
I agree with Dan, entirely. That was the point of my previous post on
this topic. In case people watched that and thought
Dude... That's Hilarious AND Brilliant! hahaha :)
Hey baby... How's about a little pre-roll? ;)
hahahaha Oh Man! Nice! :D
..
um... Make sure you wear a condom, so there's no Revenue-Sharing! :D
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Surely:
Pre-roll,
into the web video space.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
has anyone seen... http://www.clarkandmichael.com/index.php
Interesting because many of us have always imagined that younger
Hollywood would not have a problem
BoingBoing reports that Brian Conley Jeff Rae were detained in
Beijing yesterday.
Digg link = http://peaurl.com/4U5Z
BoingBoing link =
http://www.boingboing.net/2008/08/19/beijing-alive-in-bag.html
Good Luck, fellaz. Safe return home!
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
with too many eyes on too many things and
too many outlets for immediately getting that information to others
for journalists who specialize in spinning stories to remain credible
if they keep it up.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED
A new media website? :D Sounds rather headhunterish... not that
there's anything wrong with that, haha.
Perhaps a google search for Video Editor Resume would turn something
up =
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enfkt=1183fsdt=3946q=video+editor+resumebtnG=Google+Search
Bill Cammack
http
-a-presidential-candidate/
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting article today about photojournalism, but I think it also
applies to video as well. I always think about criminal cases, when
does someone alter a digital
from the
sights and sounds, the final product is going to be affected by their
perception of what they want it to portray.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But if you know what the spin is or the person who is giving you
glimpse of
Hunter, earning part of her $114,000 behind the camera...
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
No problem, man. Good luck! :D
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, hoclides [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many thanks to Irina, M.J. Loheed, Bill Comack, Jamison and the Wreck
and Salvage Crew!
In the past 2 days, I've been sending weblinks to everyone I
V. Cool! :D
Good luck with the broadcast! :D
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, noel hidalgo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
from 09h00 on i'll be qik'n the day around opening day of the '08
olympics.
http://qik.com/noneck
and if anyone can tell a way
are and figure out how
you're going to attempt to achieve that and how long you're willing to
apply yourself to making that happen.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jeffrey Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well.
First and foremost, Steve W. has it right ï
Try http://www.tilzy.tv/
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, M.J. Loheed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Felipe,
I'm new video blogger and I'm in the same boat. I'm trying to create a
reality series for the web and I'm having a difficult time locating
good spots to mention my series, get a
WooT!! :D
Congrats to Drew, Kenyatta, Ellie, Jamie, Joanne Sarah! :D
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just saw this..First off congrats to Andrew and Joanne.
Second.this just confirms my belief that online content
. :)
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, caminofilm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying a new venture. I want to have my videos available for
download on my website. So I am going to need about 5gb of hosting
space. Most of my website viewers are from the USA
http://zaproot.com/
Part of the NNN ViroPop network. http://www.viropop.com/blog
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Eric Rochow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'd be interested in who else out there is dealing with green issues
as a videoblog, podcast
.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, schlomo rabinowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, Ive been on it a bit; theres a couple others on this list
using it as
well. I'm still having problems with the 12sec limit..sometimes I need
17secs to accomadate all my
A Rupert's gone and DONE IT, NOW! :D
... Yes... You're Right!... I SHOULD be making videos!
hahahahahahaha oh no. :)
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just used YouTube's new Annotations tool to create a little
Yeah man. It's a drag, but considering that you can buy at least
*FOUR* HV20s for the price of one XHA1, it's clearly the way to go for
the budget-conscious that are willing to deal with the extra hassle.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Eric Rochow
that are common to your
new and old equipment.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) I've only used a PAL HV20, but even with the US version, you don't
*have* to shoot in Progressive, do you? It's just an option, isn't
it? (And one
going for style or speed. If you
have all the extra time and drive space, do your thing with 24p. :)
Otherwise, shoot 1080/60i.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
I use 24p because of its flexibility, its efficiency for transcoding
(progressive and fewer fps both make for better quality encodes
=en_US
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So here's the deal...
The Canon HV20 really does shoot in 24P - it just does it in a weird
way. The stuttering you are seeing is partly because that's what 24P
looks like
hahaha Thanks, Brook. I was like ??? :D
Bill
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Brook Hinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oops just saw that Bill gave you the scoop on the compressor method,
didn't mean to repeat!
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Brook Hinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're right. Apparently, the file uploaded to blip is a PDF.
http://blip.tv/file/get/Reeltoreel-dVStartStopDetectInFinalCutPro304.pdf
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, John Halcyon Styn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What format is your video? I cannot
make a lot of sense to me unless you have content that
people are going to buy YOUR service and YOUR compatible phones and
YOUR extra subscription services for.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, mjcarrasquillo2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Bill! I use V
and frame rate requirements and do ok with it.
It's also good to have a MacBook Pro so you have the right video card
to run Motion, which does a much better job at keying than FCP does.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice
Media Video 9 and developed by PacketVideo.
So, yeah, we know there are tons of Verizon Wireless customers, and
I'm sure there are lots of people who bought phones that work with V
Cast... but most people that I randomly ask don't even know what V
Cast is.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
Yeah, they seem to advertise it as Television, but on your phone,
but even people who watch television have CABLE, which means they have
tons of choices.
I suppose they're relying on exclusive content to make people want to
up the subscription fee. Dunno.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
to stand for.
http://www.lizburr.com/2008/07/better-late-than-never.php
or
http://peaurl.com/6rF6
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
which just came back to bite him a year later.
http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/07/1938
Canon ZR900 - $218.95
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/539205-REG/Canon_2487B001_ZR_900_MiniDV_Camcorder.html
or
http://tinyurl.com/2grezq
I don't believe it gets any more reasonable than that. :)
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ron Watson
that the words are turning colored at the right time.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Brian Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hey guys,
I'm making a video and wanted to know how to make karaoke text
-not the
bouncing ball but color solids that move through
The way to zoom images and keep them sharp is to use high resolution
images. Even if you zoom them, they're still larger than the video's
frame size, so they look crisp.
So basically, make sure that you're using images that are way larger
than your final output video size.
Bill Cammack
http
hahaha UH-O... I detect a remix! :D
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Irina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
whoa thanks so much!
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 9:50 PM, jarosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a resource on the web that has over 700 video of McCain
from
events he
+1. Excellent basic tutorial, Bre! :D
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bre Petis (OG videoblogger and Etsy.com guru) recently made a post
about how to videoblog:
http://www.imakethings.com/2008/06/19/getting
they send another email back when you can post a
question to twitter, and one of your followers might respond to it
within 5 minutes. This list is a MAJOR reason I knew who to follow on
twitter in the first place.
Anyway... Wanted to +1 what Schlomo was saying.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
You should throw that on Vimeo. They call that type of video a
Lip-Dub, and have a bunch of them already:
http://www.vimeo.com/videos/search:lip%20dub
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Moon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the help of Linkin Park's
no actual traction. The
traction comes from people bookmarking and RSSing your site, using the
videos as a back end, so it really doesn't matter where the videos are
parked, and you're not seeing much return from the community aspect of
the sites as a destination.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
on their videos, or turn
off commenting altogether.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that is really one of the greatest failures of YouTube, how
to deal with all those really nasty comments. I will be honest, I
can't
are going to click on that image to see what they can get from
the chick... making their video look popular and getting them the
potential to become featured and get all those extra hits.
It's all a scam.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
They just don't do anything to promote the producer
Nice find, Mike. :)
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, mjcarrasquillo2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone,
Caleb, great to meet you, digitally... Instead of memorizing
everything and just get things
done, you could grab the aspect ratio calculator...
Dan, Sorry to hear that. I remember W.O. from Late Nite Mash.
Bill
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, danielmcvicar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I received an email message from W.O. Thompson's email with this
message:
CELEBRATION OF LIFE FOR W.O. THOMPSON
will be held
Hey Caleb. Long time no see. :)
the dimensions are 16x9, across the board:
1920x1080
1280x720
960x540
720x400
600x360
480x270
If you're using AppleTV, the dimensions are dependent upon your frame
rate:
1280x720 @ 24fps
960x540 @ 30fps
Cheers!
Bill
http://billcammack.com
--- In
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey Caleb. Long time no see. :)
the dimensions are 16x9, across the board:
1920x1080
1280x720
960x540
720x400
error. This should read 640x360.
600x360
480x270
If you're using AppleTV, the dimensions
. Oh, that's another
thing. Translate the HDV footage into Apple ProRes.
Anyway, once all that's done, the video's great. :) Once you set it
up in Compressor, the process takes a long time, but your final
result's fantastic for $700.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging
those passwords to people that he wants to view the videos.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a pretty similar process. If he's using wordpress, he could
install vPIP and use that to embed the videos (the URL
-internet-video/
Same principle. Start the cameras, let them roll, drop all the
unwanted footage on the cutting room floor.
Bill Cammack
http://billcammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Amirault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: J. Rhett Aultman
are good in environments where you're
outputting a lot of videos using the same libraries. If you have two
producers working on the same series, they can avoid using the same
music in back-to-back episodes, for instance.
Bill Cammack
http://BillCammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Roxanne
+1. It's not worth it to have to wonder WHETHER your next episode is
going to be accepted or rejected. Find another company with similar
functionality that you like and repost or move your materials there.
Bill Cammack
http://BillCammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Roxanne
You could try http://soundwriters.com/ and speak to Emilio Mahomar.
Bill Cammack
http://BillCammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Deirdre Straughan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...and I have money to pay for it.
--
best regards,
Deirdré Straughan
living travelling in Italy
is that they're incentive to
buy the DVD after you've already seen the movie in the theater. The
extras are thrown in FREE, not something that people pay for. It's
more like IF you pay for the DVD, you get these free episodes.
So, yeah... Good luck with your project. Should be interesting. :D
Bill
out over the last couple of months, quality
costs money. There's no way around it. Either the professionals are
expensive, or the equipment's expensive. Other than that, you get
what you can, when you can, in the quality you can, and consistency is
completely out the window.
Bill Cammack
http
That's really good looking video. Also, GeekBrief is shot using that
camera: http://www.geekbrief.tv/about/our-setup
Very crisp, vivid video.
Bill Cammack
http://BillCammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Scott Parent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Harold,
Yes, the XH-A1 was used
I agree. Save yourself the trouble and the extra rendering of every
single frame with an effect on it. Make an image with the highlights
already created and use that for your panscan.
Bill Cammack
http://BillCammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
or HDV footage.
Bill Cammack
http://BillCammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ruperthowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Apple Apps all have means to ingest AVCHD footage.
Not quite true. The *newest* Apple apps support AVCHD, but with
limitations. The terrible (in my view) new
Entertaining.
http://www.microsoft.com/canada/home/contests/shareyourpassion/viewallsubmissions.aspx?vidId=d038ef22-1ff7-4e66-9c3c-acdb0cbdb750
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ruperthowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hah! :D Thanks, Irina. But it should have been so much better. The
I don't know of a video that describes the situation, but the basics
are here, in text:
http://billcammack.com/2008/05/04/demographics-monetization/
Bill
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, michael_aivaliotis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you know of any online video that gives a good
That was obviously mixed. It's still a good performance, but it's not
what they want you to believe it is.
If you'd like to see something actually done in that fashion, using a
sampler, check out Reggie Watts = http://www.vimeo.com/134034 Out Of
Control.
Bill Cammack
http://BillCammack.com
that the female can be just as quick and
deadly.
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Not really. Same title, different functionality.
Like I said, this isn't the forum to discuss this, but guys are still
responsible for war.
Bill Cammack
http
Joshua Kinberg Jennifer Myronuk
PodCampNYC
April 25, 2008
http://www.flickr.com/photos/billcammack/2441534417/
Bill Cammack
http://BillCammack.com
But like you said, not the place ;)
Heath
http://batmangeek.com
http://heathparks.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Cammack
billcammack@ wrote:
Not really. Same title, different functionality.
Like I said, this isn't the forum to discuss this, but guys are
still
LOL I know you hate it, Jan, and this isn't the forum to discuss it
in, but that's how we're built. :)
Leaders Followers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_male
Bill
http://BillCammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jan McLaughlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OT
Hey fellas, why
Not really. Same title, different functionality.
Like I said, this isn't the forum to discuss this, but guys are still
responsible for war.
Bill Cammack
http://BillCammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cross-gender, yo.
the *alpha male* or *alpha
Nice work, Drew! :D
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, schlomo rabinowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Drew Olanoff has released a nice show template that is open source
and ready
for use:
http://www.getassplay.org/assplay.html
And no, its not dirty. Go to the site it see what the name
Drew Olanoff just told me that it was actually Adam Plante who made it.
Bill
http://BillCammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, schlomo rabinowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Drew Olanoff has released a nice show template that is open source
and ready
for use:
Congrats on the show launch! :D
~Bill
http://BillCammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Kathryn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
ok guys.. I mentioned last week that I would be launching a new live
talk show tonight... now the truth is I'm not so much of a host type
of gal, my
and it looks great, and then
when you output it, it looks like garbage.
Trust what the video looks like in quicktime player, not FCP.
Bill Cammack
http://BillCammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im aassuming that this is a normal interlacing issue
I don't do anything with swf files, but I second visualhub as a
converter.
Bill
http://BillCammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Kathryn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have a mac and use visual hub http://www.visualhub.net
love it...
kathryn
http://www.synchonis.tv
Nice work on the interview. http://www.pathbreaker.tv
Bill Cammack
http://BillCammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey everyone,
I recently posted a video interview with Blip.tv's CEO, Mike Hudack.
For those of you who haven't met him
LOL @ Beer Budget! :D
Poor choice of words. You'd be surprised how much some of us can
drink! ;)
I'll take this oppornity to do like Mission Impossible and say
Good Luck, Jim...
Is Eddie Codel a Video Engineer?
Bill
http://BillCammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, jlouderb
Check http://emmyonline.org/
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Irina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
do you know offhand how much it costs to submit your name?
i think someone sent me and eddie a form from the emmy's last year,
but it was $450 to say hey, look at me
we decided we're ok
Amazingly detailed article, Jan. Thanks for the link. :)
Bill
http://BillCammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jan McLaughlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.kenstone.net/fcp_homepage/lavs_brockett.html
Dan Brockett's article Includes prices, tech specs, photographs, and
that people with 800 mHz iMacs can watch. For
instance, I encode my flash around 1400 kbps, which is a strain on
older systems.
I'll be interested to find out if my videos DON'T play on iPhones,
because I'm *still* not going to make lower-resolution videos. :D
Bill Cammack
http://BillCammack.com
I use a mac. I don't know it that makes instructions different from a
PC. I've never clicked anything that says low complexity. When you
get to the selection area, Main is selected by default. I click
Baseline and that's it. From FCP, for instance:
Export to Mpeg4
Compression: h.264
640x360
That's a really good idea, Rox. You already have an infinite
catalogue, and you're still doing episodes on a regular basis. Since
your content is evergreen, they could start with episode 001 and never
catch up. You can already guarantee them a full year's worth of daily
content.
I would assume
://BillCammack.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Bill - does that size make it back through itunes onto an ipod? I
thought
ipod compatible videos had a smaller kbps cap, like around 6-700?
David
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 6:28 AM, Bill Cammack [EMAIL
done this with 5th Gen iPods and my Nano, so I can't say
that the specs I gave work for older iPods. I also don't use a PC, so
I can't say whether there are different requirements because of that.
Check http://freevlog.org
Bill
http://BillCammack.com
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 6:28 AM, Bill Cammack
Try this page, where Tyler Loch of http://www.techspansion.com writes:
http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2006-September/015930.html
Baseline Low-Complexity is something they made up. It basically
means Baseline with 1 reference frame.
After a weekend of trial, error, hex
1 - 100 of 629 matches
Mail list logo
