Need participants. Please. This is only one week old. Please go to my
site to see and hear me live
http://FutureMedia.org
--
Taylor Barcroft
New Media Publisher, Editor, Video Journalist, Podcaster, Futurecaster
Santa Cruz CA, Beach of the Silicon Valley
URL http://FutureMedia.org
RSS
Pretty choppy.On 3/11/06, Kunga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Need participants. Please. This is only one week old. Please go to my
site to see and hear me live
http://FutureMedia.org
--
Taylor Barcroft
New Media Publisher, Editor, Video Journalist, Podcaster, Futurecaster
Santa Cruz CA,
It would be nice if we could set it up to be private somehow. Everytime I go in there I get random people calling me babe. Some stranger's naked torso first thing in the morning was a little much (let's keep our orgies just for us bona fide videobloggers!).
On 2/16/06, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think we can respectfully make suggestions regarding how some vloggers view the set of needs for video publishing however IMHO we should not tell them how to run their businesses. If a host wants to show their logo or use Flash it's their business decision, it doesn't make them bad or evil, the
I'll hang out in the Node 101 chatroom for a while, if anyone's around...On 2/16/06, Deirdre Straughan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/16/06, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm intrigued by how successful these new Flash hosting companies aredoing, look at the youtube growth figures,
We have a chat room!?On 2/16/06, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll hang out in the Node 101 chatroom for a while, if anyone's around...-- Me:
http://michaelverdi.comRD: http://evilvlog.comLearn to videoblog: http://freevlog.orgLearn to videoblog in person:
http://node101.org
http://stickam.com/editChatRoom.do?method=loadroomId=170594616 - see if that link works
On 2/16/06, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a chat room!?On 2/16/06, Deirdre Straughan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll hang out in the Node 101 chatroom for a while, if anyone's
Also check out http://beginningwithi.com/vlog/livecam.htmlOn 2/16/06, Deirdre Straughan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://stickam.com/editChatRoom.do?method=loadroomId=170594616 - see if that link works
On 2/16/06, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a chat room!?On 2/16/06,
this might help:
http://snipurl.com/mmv3>
On Feb 16, 2006, at 3:53 AM, Deirdre Straughan wrote:
On 2/16/06, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm intrigued by how successful these new Flash hosting companies are
doing, look at the youtube growth figures, look at how cool the vsocial
Yeah, it's undisputed here, Fireant's the dog's bollocks of aggregators.
I'm suggesting we invite the innovators into the conversation, from the
outside it looks like the Stickam peeps are on the ball and have ideas
and tech know how.
Let's get them in here and talk. Just because NIH it'ss no
i agree with josh except for this statement:If I have to come to your website to watch it, then it ain't really distributing.
depends how you look at 'distributing content'. i tend to look at it from a more loose and general side. web publishing and blogging are a form of content distribution.
FireAnt is still the only aggregator around that supports playback of FLV
not all aggregators are desktop aggregators that download media. aggregation does not have to mean that. aggregation is also mefeedia and vlogdir etc... and if you bundle all aggregator services, then fireant is not the
this is a cool app actually.i also want to point out again... thing slike vsocial.com and its VideoRoll tool. Its great and IS beneficial to the vlogosphere... along with other vsocial tools.
i am also working on a similar feature, using RSS, flv and a flash player... playlists/channels
I'm suggesting we invite the innovators into the conversation, from the
outside it looks like the Stickam peeps are on the ball and have ideas
and tech know how.
agreed.
we should invite all new technology makers to this group.
i bet many of them are/have been here, but lurking.
Anyway we can
obviously I meant desktop aggregator.We also have a web-based aggregator... http://FireAnt.tv-JoshOn 2/15/06,
Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FireAnt is still the only aggregator around that supports playback of FLV
not all aggregators are desktop aggregators that download media.
yes, obviously. many people on this listjust clarifying for the collective. ;-)On 2/15/06, Joshua Kinberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
obviously I meant desktop aggregator.We also have a web-based aggregator... http://FireAnt.tv-Josh
On 2/15/06,
Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not a good user experience so far. The site looks nice and bright and clean, but... I did all the usual stuff (so BORED of filling in profile information...), uploaded a short video. They want avi, mov, wmv, 3gp, or mpeg. Fortunately, I have a MOV version of my trailer. Unfortunately, it
josh -- yeah, the widget is cool.
and they host video, audio and stills (i.e. services for distributing media).
is your problem with it the fact it's video is flash flv or arfe you unsupportive for another reason?
--
cheers
r
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
my vlog:
I don't have any use for services that take freedom away from the creator.
If I put my video in their service, can I get it back? They turn it
into Flash, where does my original go? Can I really distribute it
using the shared standards of the blogosphere like RSS.
Put it this way, why don't I
Now to argue my point from the other side... This may be a great
service for some people. The basic step of putting video on a website
can be solved in a number of ways. This may be a nice widget for doing
just that.
But your question was if this service had any value to videobloggers.
To that
with the breakneck innovation I've seen in just the last few months, it
won't be long before someone wraps an RSS/email container 'round
services like this...then what happens?On 2/14/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now to argue my point from the other side... This may be a
It's interesting. I find the experience of viewing a video within the
original blog entry more satisfying than moving that video into an
off-line state divorced from the host. When you break the vlog like
that you're unable to comment, you have disconnected the media.
You can argue all you
I'm open to FLV... that's not what is being discussed here. Does
Stickam distribute the FLV files? It doesn't look like it does...
FireAnt is still the only aggregator around that supports playback of
FLV (not many people choose to implement FLash in such a distributable
way though... usually
I think that, once again, we're splitting hairs. If you ask is this useful to the videoblogging community, when some people definte videoblogging as (roughly) having all the features of a blog AND including video, then perhaps Stickam is not useful.
But I suspect that the average citizen
this looks like an amazing communications tool that is portable
across various hosting services. You can set it to play a video
mail message - could be a vlog, and of course you could use it to
vchat too...wow..On 2/13/06, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all
Just came across a
I don't see how this is helpful to videoblogging.Its a nice widget that i can stick on a webpage... seems more useful to MySpace, Ebay Auctions, Craigslist pages... stuff like that, but has little to do with distribution of media and the supporting the shared standards of the blogosphere.
26 matches
Mail list logo
