Ok folks. Santa brought me a 4gig MBP and a copy of FCE 4. I've been using
Premiere Pro 1.5 for the past few years and wanted to switch to something
that can handle HD.
I'm working on a simple sequence using a green screen and some simple
graphics. My problem is in rendering. First, Real Time
The problem is likely the result of your sequence settings not
matching the settings of your captured footage. When footage of type
A is added to a sequence of type B (ie. HDV footage to a DV sequence),
FCE will force you to transcode the footage to type B before playing
back in real-time (in
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Kris Boustedt
k...@firstsightproductions.com wrote:
The problem is likely the result of your sequence settings not
matching the settings of your captured footage.
Thanks! I'll check that out.
Shel.
--
www.icenrye.com
www.icenrye.blogspot.com
I¹m considering this machine for video editing as I found a great deal at
macdoc.com (which is a super shop for those in Ontario) but wondering about
some of the specs
MacBook Pro 17 2.5GHz 4GB/ 250GB / 512VRM/ Super 1680x1050 Matte
What¹s VRM? Is 512 a lot?
At this screen resolution, is HD
VRM is video RAM, your video card's memory. 512 is great. The video card
should be able to pump out full HD resolution to an external monitor. I
don't know what the Super is in there for, other than marketing purposes.
The 17-inch MBP should offer 1920x1200 resolution, I'm not sure what they
are
. John's, NL
A1C 4A8
T. 709-726-6178
C.709-699-8205
From: Dom Zook d...@gadzookfilms.com
Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:48:25 -0800
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Macbook pro questions
VRM is video RAM, your video card's
%40gadzookfilms.com
Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:48:25 -0800
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Macbook pro questions
VRM is video RAM, your video card's memory
Just sounds like its the older version with the matte instead of glossy
screen.
For pro work, glossy sucks. So you may be better off with this older version
than a new one.
On the other hand its always better to buy from Apple if you can because
there's so much less hassle if you have to return a
-0800
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Macbook pro questions
Just sounds like its the older version with the matte instead of glossy
screen.
For pro work, glossy sucks. So you may be better off with this older version
than a new one.
On the other hand its always
-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:55:40 -0800
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Macbook pro questions
The older version, my version, had a 1440x900 max. resolution, but the video
card could pump out a hefty 1920x1200 to an external monitor
-726-6178
C.709-699-8205
From: Dom Zook d...@gadzookfilms.com
Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:55:40 -0800
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Macbook pro questions
The older version, my version, had a 1440x900 max. resolution
: [videoblogging] Macbook pro questions
Apart from anything else, it's worth using a monitor for editing work
because working for prolonged periods at a laptop is very bad for
your neck and back. I've managed to eliminate headaches and neck
pain by connecting my powerbook to a monitor. It also
The only way you would edit HD while viewing it at its native resolution is
with an external monitor no matter what. And plenty of us do most of our HD
editing on portable systems, though Rupert's ergonomic advice is indeed
sage.
Also, if you are thinking you need HD resolution to see what your
-726-6178
C.709-699-8205
From: Brook Hinton bhin...@gmail.com
Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:21:22 -0800
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Macbook pro questions
The only way you would edit HD while viewing it at its native
Just checking to see if the Macbook pro can handle pro video editing with
FCP. Anything I should know about?
I have a 4 year old G5 duo tower now, so am thinking a prezzie for me would
be nice this time of year. And a portable video editing machine would be
super nice - if it could do the work.
A MacBook Pro can handle FCP and HD without a problem. I've been
editing with some version of FCP and Mac laptop since the G3 Pismo
came out in 2000.
- Verdi
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Irene Duma ir...@strangeduck.com wrote:
Just checking to see if the Macbook pro can handle pro video
Ok. That¹s what I wanna hear ;)
Irene
A MacBook Pro can handle FCP and HD without a problem. I've been
editing with some version of FCP and Mac laptop since the G3 Pismo
came out in 2000.
- Verdi
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Irene Duma ir...@strangeduck.com
mailto:irene%40strangeduck.com
I have access to discounted pricing on mac equipment if you are interested?
On 12/16/08, Irene Duma ir...@strangeduck.com wrote:
Just checking to see if the Macbook pro can handle pro video editing with
FCP. Anything I should know about?
I have a 4 year old G5 duo tower now, so am thinking a
-6178
C.709-699-8205
From: Steve Eisenberg steve.eisenb...@gmail.com
Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:30:12 -0500
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Macbook pro for video editing
I have access to discounted pricing on mac
] Macbook pro for video editing
I have access to discounted pricing on mac equipment if you are interested?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
--
Sent from my mobile device
Hey everybody,
I'm looking to pick up a macbook pro in the not too distant future
and was hoping to get some feedback as to how the new machines are
performing, and any config suggestions.
I'm looking at the 15 2.4Ghz 200GB with 4 MB of ram.
Any help would be appreciated...
I'll be taking a
I have a Macbook Pro and I love it (love it love it). It's the first
mac I've ever owned, so I can't really compare it to others for you
but I can tell you how mine has performed...
I have the 2.4 GHz (Intel Core 2 Duo) with 2 GB of RAM
(I assume you meant to say yours would have 4GB no MB)
I have a G4 with 2 G ram and an Intel mac also with 2 G ram. I can't
remember how fast my G4 is, as I rarely use it, but the Intel mac has a 2.16
Ghz processor (dual core of course). Anyhoo, it's more than fast enough for
any video I do, though admittedly I'm not really doing super long or super
No tax if you buy it in Delaware. Christiana Mall.
Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey everybody,
I'm looking to pick up a macbook pro in the not too distant future
and was hoping to get some feedback as to how the new machines are
performing, and any config suggestions.
I'm
24 matches
Mail list logo
