Re: [videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-24 Thread Deirdre Straughan



On 2/24/06, Soumyadeep Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Well... since you mention A.R.Rahman, I thought perhaps the (only?) Indian here should pitch in his two cents. ...And welcome! Thanks for the interesting stuff about Bollywood. I suspected, but didn't know it went that far, and my perception of Indian films is a bit warped (see 
http://www.beginningwithi.com/Woodstock/bollywood.htm )
Obviously, things are not as they should be. We all know that... and I believe that at the very heart, this ongoing media revolution is nothing but letting the market decide what's right and wrong instead of corporate players. So, whatever your policy is Dierdre, I don't think there is a black-or-white explanation.
No, there never is. In a way, I was hoping that those 37 seconds would give AR Rahman a bit of exposure to audiences who probably don't know him. From the opening bars of Lagaan, I thought This composer is amazing! He should be working in Hollywood! Andrew Lloyd Weber and a few others agreed, and I'm very much looking forward to hearing his work (co-composer) on the new Lord of the Rings musical. The snippet they used to have on the website was amazing.
-- best regards,Deirdré Straughanwww.beginningwithi.com (personal)www.tvblob.com (work)





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-24 Thread Soumyadeep Paul


37 seconds is all you need for fame... yeah. :) Well... watch Hari Om if you can. While there are narcissistic monkeys in Bollywood who run photocopy-machines for films as production houses, there's a great revolution going on here in terms of media and films... the number of western/indian-indie filmmakers I have met in last one here in Bombay itself surpasses the number I met when I was living in Bay Area. Rahman is one of those guys who is going to win out this anyway... he's been doing great composition for last 10 years or so now. And of course, now Shantaram is going to be shot in Mumbai... cool J. Depp. stuff. So, future is bright and the Bollywood dirt is going to get cleaned up pretty soon, I feel.  Cheers,de Soumhttp://csfvlog.blogspot.comOn 24-Feb-06, at 5:11 PM, Deirdre Straughan wrote: On 2/24/06, Soumyadeep Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well... since you mention A.R.Rahman, I thought perhaps the (only?) Indian here should pitch in his two cents. ... And welcome! Thanks for the interesting stuff about Bollywood. I suspected, but didn't know it went that far, and my perception of Indian films is a bit warped (see http://www.beginningwithi.com/Woodstock/bollywood.htm ) Obviously, things are not as they should be. We all know that... and I believe that at the very heart, this ongoing media revolution is nothing but letting the market decide what's right and wrong instead of corporate players. So, whatever your policy is Dierdre, I don't think there is a black-or-white explanation.  No, there never is. In a way, I was hoping that those 37 seconds would give AR Rahman a bit of exposure to audiences who probably don't know him. From the opening bars of Lagaan, I thought "This composer is amazing! He should be working in Hollywood!" Andrew Lloyd Weber and a few others agreed, and I'm very much looking forward to hearing his work (co-composer) on the new "Lord of the Rings" musical. The snippet they used to have on the website was amazing. -- best regards,Deirdré Straughanwww.beginningwithi.com (personal)www.tvblob.com (work)  SPONSORED LINKS  Individual  Fireant  Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 




  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








Re: [videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-23 Thread Deirdre Straughan



On 2/22/06, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I really wish it would stop. I cringe every time I see a video bysomeone in this group that is using music they obviously do not have theright to use. If we are supposed to be here helping newbies get into
videoblogging, what sort of example does that set?I plead guilty, and state (again) my reasons:1. Sometimes you have to use well-known music to get a particular effect (often humor). Fanvids are an example in which neither the video nor the music belongs to the fanvid creator, who puts the two together to create something new and wonderful which is usually a compliment to (and advertising of) both sources. 
2. Sometimes you just want music to create an atmosphere, but it's too hard/time consuming to find safe music to use. For my trailer, I wanted something Indian because a lot of the footage was shot in India. I did a bit of searching around on various podsafe sources, but there didn't seem to be any Indian music available except 5-second instrument samples. So I used music I was already familiar with, and kept it short (37 seconds out of a 5- or 6-minute piece), in hopes that AR Rahman would see this as fair use and a compliment - if, indeed, he ever sees it at all!
3. I own thousands of CDs and know by heart many more thousands of songs. It's a lot easier and faster for me to search this interior catalog (and/or my iTunes library) than to listen to hours of new music  to try to find something suitable for whatever project. Editing video already takes more time than I have - I don't have time to audition the music as well!
Of course anything can be abused, but I would argue that much of the use of music in vlogs is part of the fast-growing and creatively fertile mash-up culture. We can hope (faintly!) that the music industry will eventually come around to seeing it my way. In any case, so far no one has complained about music in any of my videos (have they about anyone else's?), nor have they been removed from any service, to my knowledge, for copyright reasons.
-- best regards,Deirdré Straughanwww.beginningwithi.com (personal)www.tvblob.com (work)





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-23 Thread Brett Gaylor



On 2/22/06, Chuck Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's absolutely a good idea to make your own music, or find/buyroyalty-free podsafe music. If you do anything else, you're takinga risk. But also keep in mind, the boundaries of Fair Use have notbeen fully tested in court. I sometimes choose to take the risk
on my non-commercial personal vlog, crediting the artist, ratherthan inhibit my creativity. No cease-and-desists, so far.
I'm with Chuck. I think sometimes the fair use argument needs to
be tested (although, I'm not sure Zadi's would hold up, at least on the
green day side of things...the footage yes).

The center for social media (http://www.centerforsocialmedia.org)
published a very good Best Practices For Fair Use that would an
interesting thread topic.

And on the other hand, I think we should be using podsafe music as a
matter of principle as well. If we want to start sowing the
future with work that others can freely sample, we have to make
completely CC Safe stuff, music included.

Not sure about Deidre's argument - just because you like a song, or its
the best one for your vlog, doesn't qualify it as fair use. Now,
if you want to push or argue for some ammendment to the law that makes
an exemption for personal or non-commercial use, I could get behind
that. The problem there is where do you draw the line? Would you
want someone using your work in a homophobic film, or a KKK
video? My personal feelings tend toward anarchy, but I'm not sure
you can build a system on that :)

By the way, you guys are LUCKY to have this argument. In Canada, our fair use rights are extremely narrow.

and PS, sorry couldn't change the title of the thread, gmail doesn't seem to allow that when you reply?

The perfect example of a potentially legitimate use of copyrightedmusic is Zadi's When September Ends video, which was written
about in the NY Times Critic's Notebook:http://smashface.com/vlog/20050924nytimes.htmlThen of course there's my Welcome to the Future video
which deals with this whole clash between copyright and ourdesire to capture, share, remix:http://blogumentary.typepad.com/vlog/2005/03/videoblog_week__2.html
Keep in mind Zadi and I could hear from record company lawyers.Maybe we could get the EFF to defend, but more likely it'seasier to simply remove the video. Worst case scenario would behaving to pay a fine, if the RIAA charges we're illiegally distributing
music. That would suck.-chuckhttp://mnstories.com--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 And I really wish it would stop. I cringe every time I see a video by someone in this group that is using music they obviously do not have the right to use. If we are supposed to be here helping newbies get into
 videoblogging, what sort of example does that set?Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/-- ---
Brett Gaylorhttp://www.etherworks.cahttp://www.homelessnation.org





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-23 Thread Ms. Kitka
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Brett Gaylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 The problem there
 is where do you draw the line? Would you want someone using your
work in a
 homophobic film, or a KKK video?  My personal feelings tend toward
anarchy,
 but I'm not sure you can build a system on that :)

But most of our Creative Commons licenses allow people to use our work
in a homophobic and KKK videos as well... as long as they attribute
us, don't make money from their work and share alike, they are
following copyright laws to a tea.

This is the price we pay for free speech, I guess... 

Kitka
http://www.kitkast.com/






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-23 Thread Brett Gaylor




But most of our Creative Commons licenses allow people to use our workin a homophobic and KKK videos as well... as long as they attribute
us, don't make money from their work and share alike, they arefollowing copyright laws to a tea.
Good point, but i'm talking about work that isn't released under a CC
license. What I was getting at was that if they didn't intend
their work to be used this way, how would one feel if their work was
used in a way they didn't intend or disagreed with? 

Actually playing devil's advocate in this case, anyway.

---Brett Gaylorhttp://www.etherworks.cahttp://www.homelessnation.org





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-23 Thread Pete Prodoehl
Brett Gaylor wrote:
 On 2/22/06, Chuck Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It's absolutely a good idea to make your own music, or find/buy
 royalty-free podsafe music. If you do anything else, you're taking
 a risk. But also keep in mind, the boundaries of Fair Use have not
 been fully tested in court. I sometimes choose to take the risk
 on my non-commercial personal vlog, crediting the artist, rather
 than inhibit my creativity. No cease-and-desists, so far.
 

 I'm with Chuck.  I think sometimes the fair use argument needs to be tested
 (although, I'm not sure Zadi's would hold up, at least on the green day side
 of things...the footage yes).

If it's really fair use. I've seen plenty of uses of copyrighted music 
where it does not seem to be for criticism, comment, news reporting, 
teaching, scholarship, or research and more for the fact that the 
person creating the video liked the music and thought it complemented 
their visuals.


 And on the other hand, I think we should be using podsafe music as a matter
 of principle as well.  If we want to start sowing the future with work that
 others can freely sample, we have to make completely CC Safe stuff, music
 included.

Agreed. I'm working towards a future where artists can control how their 
work is used, easily and clearly. Today too many artists have no control 
over the things they create.


 Not sure about Deidre's argument - just because you like a song, or its the
 best one for your vlog, doesn't qualify it as fair use.  

Yup, see above. :)


Now, if you want to
 push or argue for some ammendment to the law that makes an exemption for
 personal or non-commercial use, I could get behind that.  The problem there
 is where do you draw the line? Would you want someone using your work in a
 homophobic film, or a KKK video?  My personal feelings tend toward anarchy,
 but I'm not sure you can build a system on that :)

I wouldn't want my work used in a homophobic film or KKK video, but as 
mentioned, if they followed the licensing terms, etc. it's sort of the 
price of freedom. Since my stuff is cc:by-nc-sa they'd have to follow 
the 'by' by mentioning/linking to me, I'd be pretty sure to publish 
something stating my own beliefs on the matter.


Pete

-- 
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-23 Thread Devlon



Don't forget about Technorati's new Favorites feature.http://technorati.com/help/favorites.htmlAnd with their widget, you could have your Technorati faves on your site:
http://technorati.com/account/favwidget.html...no, I don't work for technorati :)On 2/23/06, 
Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Hallelujah, a message On Topic. thanks Susan.blogrolls are a great example. This year. I predict some nice enhancements to this piece of the discovery puzzle. i will share some thoughts on this when i have more time. time to clock out!
sullOn 2/23/06, Susan 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Ugh.Bubbling hurts my tummy.I'm such an un-avid-fan of popularity contests... so here's the best Ican offer, from an I-don't-have-the-time working mother.I have a vlogroll, which is actually powered by 
blogrolling.com .Many people have a vlogroll--a list of links on the sidebar of theirpage--say, their ten favorite vlogs.
If I like the vlog I'm reading, maybe I'll venture to check out one of
the vlogs on that person's vlogroll.They would only put vlogs upthere they liked, right?And then from that vlog, I could click on a link from theirvlogroll... and so on...That's about as good a reference as I can suggest--friend to friend.
There's not much else that will work for me personally--or that I willtake the time to learn.Susan
http://vlog.kitykity.com--- In 
videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Most have agreed, we need to have systems in place to bubble up video. The idea is to help find so-called 'good stuff'.Granted, that
depends on who you'r e asking but we need to speak in generalities too.It's not so much good as it is contagious. We talk about how viral video hosting services are mostly filled
with video that is more entertaining to teens goofing around and not so in tunewith quality content creation.The ratio is heavily tilted. Some will use the youtubesque services as a stepping stone if at
some point they want to take things more seriously then they willalso want more control and more flexibility.They will stop using youtubesand start looking at the other options commonly discussed here.Once people
have an idea and want to start a project an Internet Video Channelthey will abandon their sole use on youtubes.I truly do not feel any concernabout this. I do't worry about these big projects damaging the ultimate vision
of the open media revolution Vlogging et all.It will co-exist.Some good comes out of it even if its difficult to see.Like I said, they canbe a sort of launch pad for some people.Its our job to continue to
evolve the tools and services more applicable to vlogging and they will come looking for them.And we will welcome them and show them how to take advantage of the technologies of our time.
 But still, the issue of bubbling up video.We have various popularity metering techniques but they rely on people and assume that people will actively participate in giving their input by way of a click here and a
 click there and comment here etc... Such systems can work well in some environments... like productpurchases on Amazon or eBay.But will the masses do the same for Internet videoto the

 point where it actually helps?Even if so. How often will theserandom people who are ranking random videos actually synchronize with what you think is good? Do we subscribe instead to trusted sources? Do we need more of a
system that utilizes a broader view of the network subscribe to people who can choose to 'spread' anything that they think is worthy of spreading? If they blog and create content do they click 'spread this' if they
truly think they ought to? And that alerts anyone who has chosen to subscribe tothis 'person'.. not this blog in particular, but this person.Maybe.They could be posting a new video, a podcast, a picture or linking/quoting an
 article whatever the format and whatever the content theymay choose to give the content that extra 'push' by using this hypothetical'spread' feature.By default, their blog will ping other sites and offer
core RSS feeds etc... but this would be different this would be tappinginto the intentionality of the trusted source.And you could be doing the same thing.And those you trust may trust you as well.And turning off
these sources should be 2 clicks away.New concept unlikely.butmaybe its a good path to work on. What else could we do?Rely on technical algorithms? 5 star rankings? i
 dont think so.diggs and bombs and karma? is it too easy to digg
something? who are these people that are into ranking pieces of content?do they matter?does this only work best for some nicehes and not others? Does it provide enough of a natural cohesion of the conversphere?
Are Human Filters better? Will any of this matter in 6 months or 2 years?Maybe we will all be focusing on our favorite web sites that we have chosen to trust and that will be enough.They may not exist yet, but sites that monitor the
pulse... 

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-23 Thread Soumyadeep Paul


Well... since you mention A.R.Rahman, I thought perhaps the (only?) Indian here should pitch in his two cents. I would say that the temptation is huge, but then as any video/film creator would say, sound contributes a huge lot to the video itself. If that's the case, whenever we take music from anyone else (royalty free or not), we don't remain the sole creators. Hence attribution is a must. The difficult question to answer, however, is whether we *should* use it at all or not. While, like most questions in the universe, there is no right or wrong answer to this, but (just in case you feel that you did something wrong):1. The entire Indian music and film industry is based on copyright violation -- every film that comes out of the west is copied, remixed, scenes stolen frame-to-frame, stories lifted right out and pasted with Indian dialogues... it doesn't stop at that. The entire Indian music industry picks up songs from 1960s/70s (the golden era of Indian music and films) and remixes them and makes money. I can hardly remember the last original piece of work I saw. Is that a copyright violation? One of the most successful films that came out last year - Black - by Sanjay Leela Bhansali, is a straight off lift from Miracle Worker (Helen Keller stuff), and the director had the audacity to send the film to Cannes/Academy awards with the hope of winning best foreign film. I wish someone just listed out the copies floating around in the market and found out a way to catch the thieves. But then again...2. In a world where we all know each other, copyright would become useless because we would know if its your original or not. As it is, the copyright laws are highly skewed, and so is the entire economics around the media industry -- for instance, I understand paying $15 for an album in US... but when you go to Asian countries and the same album sells at a similar price (where the dollar conversion is 50 times the currency!), I start wondering if this is "right" (Rs 700 of album price buys probably 70 meals for some sections of society). Obviously, things are not as they should be. We all know that... and I believe that at the very heart, this ongoing media revolution is nothing but letting the market decide what's right and wrong instead of corporate players. So, whatever your policy is Dierdre, I don't think there is a black-or-white explanation.  On 23-Feb-06, at 3:38 PM, Deirdre Straughan wrote: On 2/22/06, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And I really wish it would stop. I cringe every time I see a video bysomeone in this group that is using music they obviously do not have theright to use. If we are supposed to be here helping newbies get into videoblogging, what sort of example does that set?I plead guilty, and state (again) my reasons:1. Sometimes you have to use well-known music to get a particular effect (often humor). Fanvids are an example in which neither the video nor the music belongs to the fanvid creator, who puts the two together to create something new and wonderful which is usually a compliment to (and advertising of) both sources. 2. Sometimes you just want music to create an atmosphere, but it's too hard/time consuming to find "safe" music to use. For my trailer, I wanted something Indian because a lot of the footage was shot in India. I did a bit of searching around on various "podsafe" sources, but there didn't seem to be any Indian music available except 5-second instrument samples. So I used music I was already familiar with, and kept it short (37 seconds out of a 5- or 6-minute piece), in hopes that AR Rahman would see this as fair use and a compliment - if, indeed, he ever sees it at all! 3. I own thousands of CDs and know by heart many more thousands of songs. It's a lot easier and faster for me to "search" this interior catalog (and/or my iTunes library) than to listen to hours of new music  to try to find something suitable for whatever project. Editing video already takes more time than I have - I don't have time to audition the music as well! Of course anything can be abused, but I would argue that much of the use of music in vlogs is part of the fast-growing and creatively fertile mash-up culture. We can hope (faintly!) that the music industry will eventually come around to seeing it my way. In any case, so far no one has complained about music in any of my videos (have they about anyone else's?), nor have they been removed from any service, to my knowledge, for copyright reasons. -- best regards,Deirdré Straughanwww.beginningwithi.com (personal)www.tvblob.com (work)  SPONSORED LINKS  Individual  Fireant  Use YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 




  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-22 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 07:10:32 +0100, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Of the first ten videos, only one is clearly copyrighted with a second
 one probable.  The rest are original, amateur works to share with
 friends and others with similar intrests.

What are you trying to say? All those videos are covered by copyright -  
doesn't matter if you make it for friends or MTV.

- Andreas
-- 
URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-22 Thread davecircumnavigator
Here's the scenario: I've finished shooting material for tomorrow's 
vlog, but I haven't edited it.  It's dinner time.  It's so much 
easier to let American Idol wash over me while I eat than to seek 
out new material on the Internet because I'm not well set up for the 
latter, while I've got a TV in my kitchen where I dine and I just 
want to plotz and relax and not do anything for a few minutes.  Okay, 
a few minutes turns into a few too many and then into a half-hour, 
but I want to just sit and digest and drink my coffee before I get up 
to edit and Idol will be over in fifteen minutes at this point which 
serves as a sort of milepost that I can use to hoist myself back into 
action at the computer for editing.  It doesn't matter that Idol is 
in its 5th year and the format is stale and the forced relationships 
between the superficial characters is hackneyed.  It's on when I sit 
down and nothing else better is on and 4 of the women sing pretty 
damn well anyway.  So what if Ryan Seacrest has the charm of an organ 
grinder's monkey; it's on.  So I suffer a stultifying program that 
anesthetizes me a little more every time I passively consume it and 
diminishes my artistic and social vigor bit by bit.  I do this 
because of conditioning, because I'm accustomed to it, because it's 
easier than alternatives and because I'm not interested in watching 
Internet footage of teenagers skateboarding.  I'm not interested in 
watching adults skateboard either, by the way.  I don't find watching 
skateboarding interesting.  And, anyway, I'm not well set up to watch 
Internet video while I sit and eat.  So that's part of what anyone 
producing video for the Ineternet (whether it's art, comedy, news, 
etc), is fighting.  Meanwhile, check the time stamp on this post.  I 
just finished writing tomorrow's show.  And the most viewed show on 
Ifilm is of two adolescent girls kissing.  Well at least they're not 
skateboarding while they kiss.

-David
A man alone.  Around the world.
The smallest boat.  A world record.

www.capatainhumphreys.com


--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, robert a/k/a r
 robert.videoblogging@ wrote:
 
  I completely agree with Josh, re-posting the intellectual 
property of 
  others is wrong.
  
 
 It is.  But most of the postings are personal moments that mean 
things
 to a those of similar interests.  Looking right now at lastest posts
 on YouTube I find:  
 
 The Worm - a kid squirming like a worm in tha back of a 
classroom. 
 Hilarious to those who are friends and were there.
 
 Summit View Documentary a kid skateboarding with proprietary 
music.
  While the music shouldn't be used, it's a practice that's been
 happening in some popular videoblogs.
 
 Love two girls and a guy driving in a car, listening to music 
while
 he holds the camera out in front of them from the back seat.  
They're
 having fun and grooving.
 
 iam only one a rap music video.  It's roughly made, but could very
 likely be copyrighted material taken from an artist.
 
 ii SED WAZZ GOOD is two girls playing at hip hop recorded on
 probably a camera phone -- amateur and high spiritied.
 
 Mammoth Feb 06 two skiers going down a slope.
 
 Big 4 is a skateboarder going over some steps.
 
 chueco vs cali el cuarto is a soccer game that sounds like it's in
 Spanish language recorded off TV -- copyrighted material.
 
 Me in Pump It Up Dancing, Tashannie - Don't Bother Me is a kid
 recording himself playing a dance videogame with some speed and 
precision.
 
 sk8allDay has titling, with music by Queen and the camera 
following
 a skater try different challenges.  He describes what he's trying to
 do.  Slow motion is used to emphasize sections.  A crowd reacts as 
he
 keeps trying and failing.  It ends with the camera coming up to the
 upside down skateboard on another failure which he picks up and goes
 to try again.
 
 Of the first ten videos, only one is clearly copyrighted with a 
second
 one probable.  The rest are original, amateur works to share with
 friends and others with similar intrests.  
 
   -- Enric
   -==-
   http://www.cirne.com
 
  BTW, wasn't this a great video moment?
  
  http://www.apollopony.net/2006/02/frank_zappa_on.html
  
  
  
  
  
  On Feb 21, 2006, at 11:56 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
  
   I agree with this... yet I also think there are some cases where
   bubbling up is important.
  
   But you are correct that bubbling up doesn't satisfy the 
needs of
   the individual and their immediate social circle. It doesn't 
help
   people share their lives through video. I feel this aspect is 
being
   lost we need more good examples. Maybe that has to do with 
my own
   aesthetic concerns though. I feel like some of that spirit is 
being
   lost amidst the wave of lipsyncing teens and plaigarized video.
  
   -Josh
  
  
   On 2/21/06, Peter Van Dijck petervandijck@ wrote:
  
  
   On 2/21/06, Michael Sullivan sulleleven@ 

[videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-22 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 07:10:32 +0100, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Of the first ten videos, only one is clearly copyrighted with a second
  one probable.  The rest are original, amateur works to share with
  friends and others with similar intrests.
 
 What are you trying to say? All those videos are covered by
copyright -  
 doesn't matter if you make it for friends or MTV.
 
 - Andreas
 -- 
 URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
 Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.


How are they all covered by copyright if some of them are completely
original works?  Do you mean by the person who made the video?  I was
showing that most YouTube videos, though rough, are not straight
copies of broadcast media like the SNL clips, commercials, sports
events, music video clips, etc.  Most of them are rough, personal
works intended for friends and people with similar interests.  I think
if YouTube is successful, it should be understood why.

  -- Enric
  -==-
  http://www.cirne.com







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-22 Thread Joshua Paul
I've mentioned this to a small amount of people, but I'll put it out  
there to the 2000+ of the group.

I think there is a great opportunity for the aggregators to use  
Bayesian-type filtering (think email spam filters) to help gather  
videos of interest to the viewer. If the aggregator can ascertain the  
context from the blog post (and possibly the related tags in a  
directory like MeFeedia or FireAnt), then it can use that context to  
determine the type of video. It could then filter the videos  
appropriately.

Right now I have 373 unwatched videos in FireAnt. If it had a way to  
learn what I like, it could then bubble up the videos I want to  
watch.

Hopefully someone will run with this (MeFeedia, FireAnt, I/ON...anyone?)

My 2¢.

--
joshpaul

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-22 Thread David Dundas
Working on it :). I love reading this group because you all are so far
ahead of regular people. I love it because it is what is driving
mainstream 6-12 months out. Believe it or not I still have a hard time
explaing RSS to my friends and family! 

So while all of these features are being built and considered,
aggregators are still learning how people are using the site, and what
their habits are. For example. I love dig as a site. But because its
so seeming teen/tech heavy the only articles that bubble are about
Apple, Linux, or Google. 
So now I try Newsvine, and its more progressive news with a NY times
slant because of the types of people using it. 

I have said this in past posts...but give us some time to mature a bit
and the audience to moderate a bit, and our offerings will improve.
But these ratings types really only work when you get a fair cross
sampling of users. 

-David 
www.youare.tv
Get your video out there
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I've mentioned this to a small amount of people, but I'll put it out  
 there to the 2000+ of the group.
 
 I think there is a great opportunity for the aggregators to use  
 Bayesian-type filtering (think email spam filters) to help gather  
 videos of interest to the viewer. If the aggregator can ascertain the  
 context from the blog post (and possibly the related tags in a  
 directory like MeFeedia or FireAnt), then it can use that context to  
 determine the type of video. It could then filter the videos  
 appropriately.
 
 Right now I have 373 unwatched videos in FireAnt. If it had a way to  
 learn what I like, it could then bubble up the videos I want to  
 watch.
 
 Hopefully someone will run with this (MeFeedia, FireAnt, I/ON...anyone?)
 
 My 2¢.
 
 --
 joshpaul







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-22 Thread Michael Sullivan



I've thought about bayesian too.I had actually done some work on a blogging engine using this for comment spam control. Its def something to consider working off of..as part of the mix. Might help. Not too simple to do, however.
sullOn 2/22/06, Joshua Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've mentioned this to a small amount of people, but I'll put it outthere to the 2000+ of the group.I think there is a great opportunity for the aggregators to useBayesian-type filtering (think email spam filters) to help gather
videos of interest to the viewer. If the aggregator can ascertain thecontext from the blog post (and possibly the related tags in adirectory like MeFeedia or FireAnt), then it can use that context todetermine the type of video. It could then filter the videos
appropriately.Right now I have 373 unwatched videos in FireAnt. If it had a way tolearn what I like, it could then bubble up the videos I want towatch.Hopefully someone will run with this (MeFeedia, FireAnt, I/ON...anyone?)
My 2¢.--joshpaulYahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/-- - - - - Sullhttp://vlogdir.com
 





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-22 Thread Michael Sullivan



But these ratings types really only work when you get a fair crosssampling of users.
this is key. btw, keep up the good work on youare.tv. i enjoy it.sullOn 2/22/06, David Dundas
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Working on it :). I love reading this group because you all are so far
ahead of regular people. I love it because it is what is drivingmainstream 6-12 months out. Believe it or not I still have a hard timeexplaing RSS to my friends and family!So while all of these features are being built and considered,
aggregators are still learning how people are using the site, and whattheir habits are. For example. I love dig as a site. But because itsso seeming teen/tech heavy the only articles that bubble are about
Apple, Linux, or Google.So now I try Newsvine, and its more progressive news with a NY timesslant because of the types of people using it.I have said this in past posts...but give us some time to mature a bit
and the audience to moderate a bit, and our offerings will improve.But these ratings types really only work when you get a fair crosssampling of users.-Davidwww.youare.tv
Get your video out there--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've mentioned this to a small amount of people, but I'll put it out
 there to the 2000+ of the group. I think there is a great opportunity for the aggregators to use Bayesian-type filtering (think email spam filters) to help gather videos of interest to the viewer. If the aggregator can ascertain the
 context from the blog post (and possibly the related tags in a directory like MeFeedia or FireAnt), then it can use that context to determine the type of video. It could then filter the videos
 appropriately. Right now I have 373 unwatched videos in FireAnt. If it had a way to learn what I like, it could then bubble up the videos I want to watch.
 Hopefully someone will run with this (MeFeedia, FireAnt, I/ON...anyone?) My 2¢. -- joshpaulYahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
-- - - - - Sullhttp://vlogdir.com 





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Use
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-22 Thread Pete Prodoehl
Enric wrote:
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, robert a/k/a r
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I completely agree with Josh, re-posting the intellectual property of 
 others is wrong.

 Summit View Documentary a kid skateboarding with proprietary music.
  While the music shouldn't be used, it's a practice that's been
 happening in some popular videoblogs.

And I really wish it would stop. I cringe every time I see a video by 
someone in this group that is using music they obviously do not have the 
right to use. If we are supposed to be here helping newbies get into 
videoblogging, what sort of example does that set?


Pete

-- 
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-22 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Enric wrote:
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, robert a/k/a r
  robert.videoblogging@ wrote:
  I completely agree with Josh, re-posting the intellectual
property of 
  others is wrong.
 
  Summit View Documentary a kid skateboarding with proprietary music.
   While the music shouldn't be used, it's a practice that's been
  happening in some popular videoblogs.
 
 And I really wish it would stop. I cringe every time I see a video by 
 someone in this group that is using music they obviously do not have
the 
 right to use. If we are supposed to be here helping newbies get into 
 videoblogging, what sort of example does that set?
 
 
 Pete
 
 -- 
 http://tinkernet.org/
 videoblog for the future...



I completely agree and have been using pod/vlogsafe music from
magnatune.com.

  -- Enric






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-22 Thread Caution Zero
--- Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I completely agree and have been using pod/vlogsafe
 music from
 magnatune.com.

given that someday we might want to try to sell our
stuff, i've a) asked a composer to do some original
music, but equally fun has been b) using royalty-free
music.  i love how easy it is to find on the net now. 
it ain't as cheap as 'free!' but it's really really
good when you need very specific moods to be able to
just keyword search off things like nostalgic or
adventurous and get zip files with 15 sec, 30 sec,
and 60 sec versions.  we have a running gag going
right now where a melodramatic piece of music called
Thrill Seekers is going to appear in every single
episode of our first season... getting our money's
worth on that one at least...

-scotto

--
CHERUB - the vampire with bunny slippers
http://www.cautionzero.net/cherub/

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-22 Thread Pete Prodoehl
davecircumnavigator wrote:
 Here's the scenario: I've finished shooting material for tomorrow's 
 vlog, but I haven't edited it.  It's dinner time.  It's so much 
 easier to let American Idol wash over me while I eat than to seek 
 out new material on the Internet because I'm not well set up for the 
 latter, while I've got a TV in my kitchen where I dine and I just 
 want to plotz and relax and not do anything for a few minutes.

I know the feeling... Too many times I really *want* to get some 
editing/work done, but after 10+ hrs slaving for the man and 90 minutes 
of driving, I barely have the strength left to lift the remote.

 And the most viewed show on 
 Ifilm is of two adolescent girls kissing.  Well at least they're not 
 skateboarding while they kiss.

Now that would be worth watching!


 www.capatainhumphreys.com

Did you mean www.captainhumphreys.com ?


Pete

-- 
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-22 Thread Pete Prodoehl
Caution Zero wrote:
 --- Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I completely agree and have been using pod/vlogsafe
 music from
 magnatune.com.
 
 given that someday we might want to try to sell our
 stuff, i've a) asked a composer to do some original
 music, but equally fun has been b) using royalty-free
 music.  i love how easy it is to find on the net now. 
 it ain't as cheap as 'free!' but it's really really
 good when you need very specific moods to be able to
 just keyword search off things like nostalgic or
 adventurous and get zip files with 15 sec, 30 sec,
 and 60 sec versions.  we have a running gag going
 right now where a melodramatic piece of music called
 Thrill Seekers is going to appear in every single
 episode of our first season... getting our money's
 worth on that one at least...

Don't forget that if you do get to the point of selling your stuff, you 
can try to work out a deal with the copyright holder. Most of my stuff 
is CC Non-Commercial, but if you used it, and later had a chance to make 
money with it, I'd gladly work something out to supply you with a 
commercial license.


Pete

-- 
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-22 Thread Caution Zero
--- Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Don't forget that if you do get to the point of
 selling your stuff, you 
 can try to work out a deal with the copyright
 holder. Most of my stuff 
 is CC Non-Commercial, but if you used it, and later
 had a chance to make 
 money with it, I'd gladly work something out to
 supply you with a 
 commercial license.

it's probably a lot less risky to work that out in
advance rather then when you decide to sell your work,
but yeah.  i could do that, but what i like about the
royalty-free music sites i'm using is how easily
searchable they are and how reliable they are.  that
was one of the main reasons i wanted to mention that
type of music as a resource.  that said, read the
small print if you go that route - not all
royalty-free licenses are equally friendly; one site
in particular, for instance, forced you to declare
your finished product all rights reserved if you
wanted to use their music, which didn't work at all
with my CC plans.

that said, if we do a season two, i am hoping to put
out more of a call for composers - try to get some CC
savvy musicians who might want to help score specific
scenes or offer existing tunes that they think would
fit what we need.  i didn't really think i'd have much
luck with that approach until i'd built an audience,
so i just asked a buddy to score some scenes, but as
we got into editing, it became clear we needed extra
stuff.  actually, one of our editors has gotten really
damn savvy just using soundtrack to get beds and loops
going that sound really professional.  it still kind
of stuns me how cool the tools / options are these
days; fun stuff indeed.  

-scotto

--
CHERUB - the vampire with bunny slippers
http://www.cautionzero.net/cherub/

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-22 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:21:27 +0100, Joshua Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I think there is a great opportunity for the aggregators to use
 Bayesian-type filtering (think email spam filters) to help gather
 videos of interest to the viewer. If the aggregator can ascertain the
 context from the blog post (and possibly the related tags in a
 directory like MeFeedia or FireAnt), then it can use that context to
 determine the type of video. It could then filter the videos
 appropriately.

 Right now I have 373 unwatched videos in FireAnt. If it had a way to
 learn what I like, it could then bubble up the videos I want to
 watch.

Not knowing much about bayenesian filtering, but... Wouldn't a system like  
that just feed you more and more of the same stuff? And thus not giving me  
the videos I want to watch but videos almost like the ones I watched  
yesterday (those are usually different).

- Andreas
-- 
URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-22 Thread Chuck Olsen

It's absolutely a good idea to make your own music, or find/buy
royalty-free podsafe music. If you do anything else, you're taking
a risk. But also keep in mind, the boundaries of Fair Use have not
been fully tested in court. I sometimes choose to take the risk
on my non-commercial personal vlog, crediting the artist, rather
than inhibit my creativity. No cease-and-desists, so far.

The perfect example of a potentially legitimate use of copyrighted
music is Zadi's When September Ends video, which was written
about in the NY Times Critic's Notebook:

http://smashface.com/vlog/20050924nytimes.html

Then of course there's my Welcome to the Future video
which deals with this whole clash between copyright and our
desire to capture, share, remix:

http://blogumentary.typepad.com/vlog/2005/03/videoblog_week__2.html

Keep in mind Zadi and I could hear from record company lawyers.
Maybe we could get the EFF to defend, but more likely it's 
easier to simply remove the video. Worst case scenario would be
having to pay a fine, if the RIAA charges we're illiegally distributing
music. That would suck.

-chuck
http://mnstories.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 And I really wish it would stop. I cringe every time I see a video by 
 someone in this group that is using music they obviously do not have the 
 right to use. If we are supposed to be here helping newbies get into 
 videoblogging, what sort of example does that set?
 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[videoblogging] Re: Will The Bubble Up Fizzle Down?

2006-02-21 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, robert a/k/a r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I completely agree with Josh, re-posting the intellectual property of 
 others is wrong.
 

It is.  But most of the postings are personal moments that mean things
to a those of similar interests.  Looking right now at lastest posts
on YouTube I find:  

The Worm - a kid squirming like a worm in tha back of a classroom. 
Hilarious to those who are friends and were there.

Summit View Documentary a kid skateboarding with proprietary music.
 While the music shouldn't be used, it's a practice that's been
happening in some popular videoblogs.

Love two girls and a guy driving in a car, listening to music while
he holds the camera out in front of them from the back seat.  They're
having fun and grooving.

iam only one a rap music video.  It's roughly made, but could very
likely be copyrighted material taken from an artist.

ii SED WAZZ GOOD is two girls playing at hip hop recorded on
probably a camera phone -- amateur and high spiritied.

Mammoth Feb 06 two skiers going down a slope.

Big 4 is a skateboarder going over some steps.

chueco vs cali el cuarto is a soccer game that sounds like it's in
Spanish language recorded off TV -- copyrighted material.

Me in Pump It Up Dancing, Tashannie - Don't Bother Me is a kid
recording himself playing a dance videogame with some speed and precision.

sk8allDay has titling, with music by Queen and the camera following
a skater try different challenges.  He describes what he's trying to
do.  Slow motion is used to emphasize sections.  A crowd reacts as he
keeps trying and failing.  It ends with the camera coming up to the
upside down skateboard on another failure which he picks up and goes
to try again.

Of the first ten videos, only one is clearly copyrighted with a second
one probable.  The rest are original, amateur works to share with
friends and others with similar intrests.  

  -- Enric
  -==-
  http://www.cirne.com

 BTW, wasn't this a great video moment?
 
 http://www.apollopony.net/2006/02/frank_zappa_on.html
 
 
 
 
 
 On Feb 21, 2006, at 11:56 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
 
  I agree with this... yet I also think there are some cases where
  bubbling up is important.
 
  But you are correct that bubbling up doesn't satisfy the needs of
  the individual and their immediate social circle. It doesn't help
  people share their lives through video. I feel this aspect is being
  lost we need more good examples. Maybe that has to do with my own
  aesthetic concerns though. I feel like some of that spirit is being
  lost amidst the wave of lipsyncing teens and plaigarized video.
 
  -Josh
 
 
  On 2/21/06, Peter Van Dijck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  On 2/21/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   Most 
  have agreed, we need to have systems in place to bubble up video.
 
  My 2c: bubbling popular stuff up is stupid. It's about what YOU want 
  to see, and MOST of the time, that's *not* popular stuff. If it was, 
  you would be satisfied gazing at the various youtube/yahoo/aol/mtv.. 
  video pages. Hey, if it was, you'd watch tv for god sake!
 
  Forget about bubbling up popular stuff. We haven't nailed finding 
  video you want to watch, but it's worth trying. It's about what 
  communities recommend to each other. It's about your friends. It's 
  about your interests. At least shoot for something better than 
  bubbling stuff up.
 
  Bubbling stuff up is dead.
 
  Peter
  --
  http://mefeedia.com
 
 
 
 
 
   SPONSORED LINKS
Individual
 
   Fireant   Use
 
 
 YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
 
 
   Visit your group videoblogging on the web.
 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/