Re: [videoblogging] Skype With Video

2005-12-09 Thread Michael Meiser
Clint out of curiosity, when was the last ime you tried it... And what was the exact client you used on windows? Would be helpful if you had a version number too. -Mike On Dec 8, 2005, at 4:48 PM, Clint Sharp wrote: Michael Meiser wrote: ROCK! Good bye mac platform isolationism... hello

Re: [videoblogging] Skype With Video

2005-12-09 Thread Kunga
Just make sure it's the newest windoze version possible. I do it with a friend regularly. Works fine. Also should probably have at least Panther 10.3.9 iChat AV on the Mac. -- Taylor Barcroft http://www.blogger.com/profile/11159903 New Media Publisher, Editor, Video Journalist, Podcaster,

Re: [videoblogging] another win for Andrew and Amanda

2005-12-09 Thread Kunga
This is huge. Congrats Andrew and Amanda. Circulation will go through the roof. -- Taylor Barcroft http://www.blogger.com/profile/11159903 New Media Publisher, Editor, Video Journalist, Podcaster, Futurecaster Santa Cruz CA, Beach of the Silicon Valley URL http://FutureMedia.org RSS

[videoblogging] Advice on m4v MIME types

2005-12-09 Thread Eric Rice
Hi folks, I'm almost back from the great white north (calgary at the moment) and I posted the first of a few dog sledding videos. Problem is, the link to download returns jibberish text in the browser (and feedburner doesn't currently treat .m4v as video files). Here's the stitch: In order

Re: [videoblogging] Advice on m4v MIME types

2005-12-09 Thread Joshua Kinberg
mime-type for m4v is actually video/mp4 m4v is not really a new anything.. apple just made up a new file extension for the heck of it. FeedBurner should recognize the video and make an enclosure as soon as you give it a mime-type. If you are getting gibberish in your browser it means that the

Re: [videoblogging] hi guys, how about this meet the vloggers in NY, then?

2005-12-09 Thread Paul Knight
markus,deal, let me set up a pay pal thingy, I'll do it later on, maybe tomorrow now, 'cos i have done something nice in france and there is a vid conf tonight, i will get round to it.  I promise.Paul On 8 Dec 2005, at 23:17, Markus Sandy wrote: ok, but i do get the furry cup, right? Paul

[videoblogging] Wired interview: Soderbergh

2005-12-09 Thread Digital
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.12/soderbergh.html Questions include: Have you thought about making a mash-up? with the followup of: Give me one idea for a video mash-up. Good stuff! Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households

Re: [videoblogging] Advice on m4v MIME types

2005-12-09 Thread Michael Meiser
I've banned the great white north. Cameras don't work well below 32 degrees. It's bad enough here in michigan where it gets down to like ten degrees. As for this MIME thing... I'm thinking it's the extentsion not the MIME type. Now feedburner IS turning it into an enclosure right? What

[videoblogging] Re: Advice on m4v MIME types

2005-12-09 Thread Eric Rice
I check the camera ratings and most are rated to -40 below C (I believe that at -35 C and F the temperatures become the same? I had all systems go, although there are steps to take to protect gear. Put 'em in the bag when they aren't in use, avoid frost etc. I tried Josh's suggestion and no

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Advice on m4v MIME types

2005-12-09 Thread Michael Meiser
Really, WMV's on phones? Have you seen any open mechanisms for getting videos on phones coming out of japan? I'm thinking at the very least you can sends someone an SMS with a link to a simple little phone compatible page with a list of videos like rboom... But I'm always looking for

[videoblogging] Re: Advice on m4v MIME types

2005-12-09 Thread Eric Rice
Not mechanisms to get video like that, but some capture and save to WMV. ER --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Really, WMV's on phones? Have you seen any open mechanisms for getting videos on phones coming out of japan? I'm thinking at the

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Advice on m4v MIME types

2005-12-09 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 10:58:56 +0100, Michael Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Really, WMV's on phones? Have you seen any open mechanisms for getting videos on phones coming out of japan? I'm thinking at the very least you can sends someone an SMS with a link to a simple little phone

[videoblogging] Re: Advice on m4v MIME types

2005-12-09 Thread Steve Watkins
No dont rename to .mov, its not a technically valid thing to do and causes player errors. Have you tried renaming the m4v's to .mp4 instead? Its valid to do that as m4vs are just mp4's anyway. Steve of Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What

[videoblogging] Re: New poll for videoblogging

2005-12-09 Thread Bill Streeter
I agree that it is a question that comes up again and again. But, I think rather than a poll, a list of editing software options for different platforms and their pros and cons might be more useful. Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, WWWhatsup

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Advice on m4v MIME types

2005-12-09 Thread T.Whid
How are you setting the mime-type? I had the same issue and setting the .htaccess file fixed it (both in browsers and so that wordpress recognized it and created the enclosure tags). I first set it as video/quicktime and now just changed it to video/mp4 per Josh's suggestion. Are you certain

[videoblogging] Re: consistently kid friendly vlog links?

2005-12-09 Thread Gena
I started doing a list of places to point non-bloggers to various types of video, never finished it but I do have the following links. You might want to double check the surrounding videos before you link to these. I wasn't thinking kid safe at the time, just diversity. ==Sports== JD's Blog, he

[videoblogging] Re: MP4 compatibility

2005-12-09 Thread Bill Streeter
My points were made from the point of view that you have to assume that the vast number of viewers of any particular video content aren't going to know, want or be able to trouble shoot why an MP4 isn't going playing on their machine. It's easy for us geeks to over look this. My mom, for instance

Re: [videoblogging] another win for Andrew and Amanda

2005-12-09 Thread David Meade
wow very cool! Way to go RB! - Dave -- http://www.DavidMeade.com Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM

[videoblogging] Re: MP4 compatibility

2005-12-09 Thread Richard Bennett-Forrest
It is ironic that Apple and Microsoft are mainly to blame for holding back the video revolution, by not joining hands on a single compatable format that plays in QuickTime for Mac and Windows Media Player for Windows. It just plain sucks, and if they're not careful the video version of mp3

Re: [videoblogging] another win for Andrew and Amanda

2005-12-09 Thread Michael Sullivan
The best part about this is that they are giving all of us a new TiVo for Christmas!Thanks Andrew and Amanda!Serious BIG CONGRATS to this new phase of success for rboom. Your project has epitomized the power of the videoblog/vodcast medium. sullOn 12/9/05, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL

[videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Michael Sullivan
So, who is going to coin a new Year of for 2006? Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ? Year of the Video Podcast ? (redundent, hey?) Year of the Portable Vlog ? Year of the Video Filters ? Year of Grassroots Media ? -- sull - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:40:39 +0100, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, who is going to coin a new Year of for 2006? Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ? Year of the Video Podcast ? (redundent, hey?) Year of the Portable Vlog ? Year of the Video Filters ? Year of

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Michael Sullivan
Or Corporate handover ? ;-) On 12/9/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:40:39 +0100, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, who is going to coin a new Year of for 2006? Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ? Year of the Video

[videoblogging] Re: Advice on m4v MIME types

2005-12-09 Thread Eric Rice
Using CPANEL to set it. I did this whole process before with 3GP files no problemo. ER --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, T.Whid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How are you setting the mime-type? I had the same issue and setting the .htaccess file fixed it (both in browsers and so that

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Richard Bennett-Forrest
Or corporate passover... At 9:56 -0500 9/12/05, Michael Sullivan wrote: Or Corporate handover ? ;-) On 12/9/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:40:39 +0100, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, who is going to coin a new Year of for

[videoblogging] NY Times Hosts Vids all on One Page

2005-12-09 Thread Jan McLaughlin
A link from David Pogue's Circuits column: http://video.on.nytimes.com/ifr_main.jsp;jsessionid=ai11I_FPY6T6? nsid=a2118ee73:1080e39f68b: 4276st=1134141350167mp=FLVcpf=falsefr=120905_101550_2118ee73x1080e39 f68bx4277rdm=131537.78814316625 Not only has the NY Times gathered all its

[videoblogging] a RSS2 feed with a download/viewing limit

2005-12-09 Thread bertrand
Hello,I have set-up a new functionnality for the Podesk Server that limit the number of download/viewing:Get the rss custom feed from that page : http://podesk.com/feed_generator.php (do not copy paste this adress in iTunes or FireANT ! It will not work).The feed created will allow 5

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
Corporate hangover if you're that kind of person. This is beginning to sound like the chorus of a song. On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:26:23 +0100, Richard Bennett-Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or corporate passover... At 9:56 -0500 9/12/05, Michael Sullivan wrote: Or Corporate handover ?

Re: [videoblogging] Re: MP4 compatibility

2005-12-09 Thread Pete Prodoehl
Richard Bennett-Forrest wrote: It is ironic that Apple and Microsoft are mainly to blame for holding back the video revolution, by not joining hands on a single compatable format that plays in QuickTime for Mac and Windows Media Player for Windows. It just plain sucks, and if they're not

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Pete Prodoehl
Michael Sullivan wrote: So, who is going to coin a new Year of for 2006? Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ? Year of the Video Podcast ? (redundent, hey?) Year of the Portable Vlog ? Year of the Video Filters ? Year of Grassroots Media ? 2006: Year of the Mundane... Pete

Re: [videoblogging] Clickable link on a video for comments in iTunes

2005-12-09 Thread bertrand
I will have a look at native QT files with links, but I don't think such movies will be playable by other players than quicktime...Bertrand2005/12/8, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 21:10:57 +0100, bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it's SMIL based, I've

Re: [videoblogging] Clickable link on a video for comments in iTunes

2005-12-09 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:41:08 +0100, bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I will have a look at native QT files with links, but I don't think such movies will be playable by other players than quicktime... They won't be. But SMIL won't either. Quicktime SMIL is not really SMIL (you have to break

Re: [videoblogging] Rec. Host Provider??

2005-12-09 Thread Harold Johnson
One solution is to go with Liberated Syndication (LibSyn), which provides unlimited bandwidth at a very low cost and is focused on serving podcasters, vodcasters, videobloggers, and other media types like us. I posted some info. about LibSyn yesterday: http://podcasterherald.com/?p=96I've been

Re: [videoblogging] Clickable link on a video for comments in iTunes

2005-12-09 Thread bertrand
Hello,I know, but the original movie inside the SMIL file will still be playable in other players (while using correct codecs), so maybe I will have to make a Real Player SMIL or a VLC SMIL or a WMV SMIL... The nice thing with SMIL is that it's really easy to make it server side, but I don't

[videoblogging] Re: New poll for videoblogging

2005-12-09 Thread Bill Streeter
Yeah I would contribute to that. I know that there are some open source editing suites that are coming along too that might be useful to some people that should probably get talked about some more. I can't think of names off hand but I have links to them at home that I can post in the wiki or

Re: [videoblogging] a RSS2 feed with a download/viewing limit

2005-12-09 Thread Pete Prodoehl
bertrand wrote: Hello, I have set-up a new functionnality for the Podesk Server that limit the number of download/viewing: Get the rss custom feed from that page : http://podesk.com/feed_generator.php (do not copy paste this adress in iTunes or FireANT ! It will not work). The feed

Re: [videoblogging] Rec. Host Provider??

2005-12-09 Thread Pete Prodoehl
Harold Johnson wrote: One solution is to go with Liberated Syndication (LibSyn), which provides unlimited bandwidth at a very low cost and is focused on serving podcasters, vodcasters, videobloggers, and other media types like us. I posted some info. about LibSyn yesterday:

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Markus Sandy
Year of the Node Michael Sullivan wrote: So, who is going to coin a new Year of for 2006? Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ? Year of the Video Podcast ? (redundent, hey?) Year of the Portable Vlog ? Year of the Video Filters ? Year of Grassroots Media ? -- sull - - - - - - - -

[videoblogging] M4v vs. MOV

2005-12-09 Thread Hal Goodtree
OHMO, .mov is a better codec for vlogging than .m4v. The files are smaller, cleaner and more universally compatible than .m4v. Just got to set the parameters for the right size. Works fine with iTunes. (BTW - I always tweak the settings to encode audio at 48k - it adds very little space to

Re: [videoblogging] Re: New poll for videoblogging

2005-12-09 Thread Pete Prodoehl
Bill Streeter wrote: Yeah I would contribute to that. I know that there are some open source editing suites that are coming along too that might be useful to some people that should probably get talked about some more. I can't think of names off hand but I have links to them at home that

Re: [videoblogging] M4v vs. MOV

2005-12-09 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 17:40:05 +0100, Hal Goodtree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OHMO, .mov is a better codec for vlogging than .m4v. The files are smaller, cleaner and more universally compatible than .m4v. Just got to set the parameters for the right size. Works fine with iTunes. Apples and

[videoblogging] Re: M4v vs. MOV

2005-12-09 Thread Steve Watkins
m4v is h264 in a mp4 container. So this discussion is really about mpeg4 vs h264 and the container format stuff cofuses the issue further. Steve of Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 17:40:05 +0100, Hal Goodtree

[videoblogging] Re: MP4 compatibility

2005-12-09 Thread Steve Watkins
he way I see it, mp3 support was an easy choice for podcasting to make, because mp3 had already become the standard for audio downloads, and portable hardware players. The same might happen with mp4 eventually, but it will take a while. We can actually find something to thank Apple for, as they

Re: [videoblogging] Clickable link on a video for comments in iTunes

2005-12-09 Thread bertrand
I'm using java client-side for the network connections.and I'm using QT pro features to encode movies.I found this tutorial that seems to be a good introduction to Quicktime API : http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2003/08/13/qtj_reintro.htmlBut I will check this out latter !Bertrand2005/12/9,

[videoblogging] Re: blogger template tinkering

2005-12-09 Thread missbhavens1969
Oh, this is perfect! Thanks so much! B --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Seiden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your fun has yet to begin: http://glish.com/css/ and: http://glish.com/css/7.asp Before you go any further: make a backup copy of your current template! JS

[videoblogging] Sound editor features (was Re: New poll for videoblogging)

2005-12-09 Thread Frank Carver
Friday, December 9, 2005, 4:46:13 PM, Pete Prodoehl wrote: Awesome... I've added links for many of the apps listed so it'll be easier for people to add reviews, and I also wrote up my review of Audacity:   http://www.voxmedia.org/wiki/Videoblogging_Software Cool. In your review of Audacity,

Re: [videoblogging] a RSS2 feed with a download/viewing limit

2005-12-09 Thread bertrand
Thanks for pointing this out !I have corrected it.this feed was for testing the limit of allowed downloads, so I forget about the validation.Bertrand2005/12/9, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:bertrand wrote: Hello, I have set-up a new functionnality for the Podesk Server that limit the number

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Advice on m4v MIME types

2005-12-09 Thread Joshua Kinberg
after you set the mimetype with cpanel you probably need to restart your apache server for the change to take effect. -Josh On 12/9/05, Eric Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Using CPANEL to set it. I did this whole process before with 3GP files no problemo. ER --- In

[videoblogging] Re: High Def over Internet.

2005-12-09 Thread Steve Watkins
Cheers :) By the way, the 2 links to samples on the following page dont work for me, they dont act as links: http://libsyn.com/podcasts/donmc/_static/page1/hidef.html Cheers Steve of Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Don McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steve, You might want

Re: [videoblogging] Jakob Nielson On Talking-Head Videos

2005-12-09 Thread Richard Show
Richard BF,(boy this is confusing with all these Richards :)First of all, I really enjoy your videos. I just became aware of them lately although it seems you've been doing this (video blogging) a lot longer than me. Second, I certainly think Jakob Nielson (whose name I'm constantly

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Ted Tagami
2006: IP Media.On 12/9/05, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, who is going to coin a new Year of for 2006? Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ? Year of the Video Podcast ? (redundent, hey?) Year of the Portable Vlog ? Year of the Video Filters ? Year of Grassroots

Re: [videoblogging] Sound editor features (was Re: New poll for videoblogging)

2005-12-09 Thread Pete Prodoehl
Frank Carver wrote: Friday, December 9, 2005, 4:46:13 PM, Pete Prodoehl wrote: I also wrote up my review of Audacity: In your review of Audacity, though, would you (or anyone else with the relevant experience) like to add a bit more detail about the things it _can't_ do. I've never used

[videoblogging] Re: DivX - Shameless Plug

2005-12-09 Thread Steve Watkins
Cheers :) My impression of things is probably a bit wrong, Im probably underestimating the number of DivX certified players etc that exist. And yes when thinking of videoblogging, Im not thinking of the billions of legacy files that consumers want to play, indeed Im avoiding talking about that

Re: [videoblogging] Jakob Nielson On Talking-Head Videos

2005-12-09 Thread Joshua Seiden
On 12/7/05, Richard Bennett-Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know for a while there people in the usability world were splitbetween being with Nielsen or against him, but I've been out of it for a few years now, so I don't know if that has changed. The feeling hasn't changed much, just

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Google analytics

2005-12-09 Thread Michael Sullivan
was google analytics service pulled down? i cannot find it On 11/25/05, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adaptive Path demoing Measure Map at BrainJams: http://techalley.cirne.com/index.php/2005/10/12/web-21-a-brainjam-adaptive-path-presentation/ http://tinyurl.com/ac96x ;) --- In

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Michael Meiser
.com bubble 2.0 In this one both the .com'ers and the investors will screw each other, because it's the two-way bubble. :) -Mike On Dec 9, 2005, at 10:38 AM, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote: Corporate hangover if you're that kind of person. This is beginning to sound like the chorus of a

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Richard Bennett-Forrest
.com bubble 2.0 In this one both the .com'ers and the investors will screw each other, because it's the two-way bubble. :) And then we clean up the mess with AJAX? (You do have Ajax the household cleanser in the U.S. right?) Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

[videoblogging] Is Flash the answer?

2005-12-09 Thread escorial1967
Ok, so I am not an expert on technologies and I may sound like a moron when posting this question, but anyway. I've been reading about the dilema with delivering video content for all platforms (Apple vs. Microsoft) and saw some mentioning of Flash as a technology that being so worldwide used

RE: [videoblogging] Re: DivX - Shameless Plug

2005-12-09 Thread Jim Vinson
We actually worked tightly with xvid specifically so that xvid stream would work in all DivX decoders also. Xvid obviously cant license to CE manufacturers because of mpeg-la niceties (mpeg-la is entitled to fees for just compiling the code). Competeing development towards commons goals

Re: [videoblogging] Jakob Nielson On Talking-Head Videos

2005-12-09 Thread Richard Bennett-Forrest
I just became aware of them lately I think that was the first time I got really pissed at Wikipedia and left this list for three months. My leaving has become shorter each time I get pissed at Wikipedia. :-) Regards, Richard Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

Re: [videoblogging] Re: mena trott

2005-12-09 Thread Richard Show
I suppose this, civility of online discourse, is something I feel pretty strongly about (to whatever extent I ever feel strongly about anything)I can tolerate dumb people, fat people, ugly people, geeky people, dirty people, people with different views, kids that climb on rocks; I like to think

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Markus Sandy
yes, the joke translates well here Richard Bennett-Forrest wrote: .com bubble 2.0 In this one both the .com'ers and the investors will screw each other, because it's the two-way bubble. :) And then we clean up the mess with AJAX? (You do have Ajax the household cleanser

Re: [videoblogging] Re: mena trott

2005-12-09 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:40:27 +0100, Richard Show [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a lot of trouble tolerating assholes and, especially, when it's online in an environment when they are not talking to someone face to face - it's too easy Once again it's time to bring out The Greater

[videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?

2005-12-09 Thread Eric Rice
I'm not going to necessarily proclaim flash the winner, but I'll just note that at Audioblog.com, you essentially can upload any video format and publish it and your blog post. The player in your blog post is flash. (And obviously, the same applies to audio). That's just *one* possible

[videoblogging] Re: mena trott

2005-12-09 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:40:27 +0100, Richard Show [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a lot of trouble tolerating assholes and, especially, when it's online in an environment when they are not talking

[videoblogging] Re: mena trott

2005-12-09 Thread Eric Rice
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Show [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: oh my God ... exercise my asshold demons! ah! Do you mean exorcise? Or are your assholed demons doing Pilates and Yoga? ;-) ER Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

[videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?

2005-12-09 Thread escorial1967
What plug in version of flash does the user need? 7 or 8? I am checking the Audioblog right now --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Eric Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not going to necessarily proclaim flash the winner, but I'll just note that at Audioblog.com, you essentially can

Re: [videoblogging] Re: mena trott

2005-12-09 Thread Deirdre Straughan
I wonder if part of the reason we're mostly fairly polite to each other in here is that we do see each other, in our recorded videos and during live video conferences. I think it's much harder to be an asshole to someone whose face you can actually bring to mind, even if you're not face-to-face

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?

2005-12-09 Thread Deirdre Straughan
I've been using Flash all along and never had a complaint about people not being able to view my video. People do complain that they'd like a scrubber/progress bar and other video controls. I've seen Flash videos that have a nice player like that, but so far haven't found one I can use myself -

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?

2005-12-09 Thread Joshua Kinberg
for newer flash videos that use the new flash video codec, the user must have flash 8 installed. I am one who does not think that Flash is the answer for individual videobloggers. Making flash video, embedding it inside a SWF controller, and then posting it on a blog is not easy for a casual user

[videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?

2005-12-09 Thread escorial1967
So Deirdr, what process do you use to create your videos? Could you give me some inside on how can I start? You can email me here: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would really appreciate any help and info. Thanks guys this message group is awesome --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Deirdre

[videoblogging] French flashmeeting LOL Now

2005-12-09 Thread Loiez D.
http://flash.kmi.open.ac.uk:8080/fm/flashmeeting.php?pwd=279921-2621 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery. http://us.click.yahoo.com/WpTY2A/izNLAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM

[videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?

2005-12-09 Thread escorial1967
I think you have a good point Josh, I know flash, it is my profession but I consider myself an average user and average vlogger who would not want to go through too many hours of painfull setting up my movies in flash. And I am thinking of a solution for the average user. Let's be hones

[videoblogging] Learning Annex class: videoblogging!

2005-12-09 Thread dinarebecca
Hey you guys - Jared from blip.tv and I are going to teach a class on videoblogging this Wednesday evening, December 14th for the Learning Annex. If you know anyone in the New York area who wants to learn how to videoblog...or if you want to help us teach the class...click here or e-mail us at

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?

2005-12-09 Thread Michael Sullivan
The approach vsocial.com takes is most logical (as a video hosting service). They transcode uploaded video to flv and the rss feeds hold more portable mp4 formats (and others?). flv works very well as an embedded video on the web and other formats are better suited for downloading and can be used

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?

2005-12-09 Thread Deirdre Straughan
How easy it is depends on the tools you're using. I'm not much of a website coder, but I post my videos to a website rather than a blog, and I was already using DreamWeaver to manage the site, which naturally handles Flash quite well. Here are the steps: 1. I edit my videos in Roxio VideoWave

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?

2005-12-09 Thread Michael Sullivan
You could use a free or cheap app to transcode your video into flv and utilize the free flash video player on your server. The very popular free flv player can be found here: http://www.jeroenwijering.com/?item=Flash_Video_Player if you are on windows, i suggest:

[videoblogging] Re: 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread johngaltsjournal
More like the Year of Corporate Handjobs as they wine and dine content creators with visions of advertising and circulation. As Yahoo and Hollywood share offices in Santa Monica and argue over parking spaces and window tables at Spago. Am I jaded? Or just persnickity before coffee? schlomo

[videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?

2005-12-09 Thread escorial1967
I have Flash MX 2004, so can I import a movie into flash and export it as flv? BUt then, I am using blogger so there is no way I can upload this flv to blip. tv or ourmedia and then make a posting into my blog as I do with a normal mov? Am I been too thick? --- In

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?

2005-12-09 Thread Joshua Kinberg
The problem with Flash and syndication is that most Flash developers architect their stuff so that its meant to be played in a web browser loaded from a specific location, not downloaded to your local machine and played from your hard drive. Flash files are typically filled with relative linked

[videoblogging] del.icio.us

2005-12-09 Thread robert a/k/a r
Hey all, Noticed that all of us tagging over at del.icio.us are now tagging at a new location :) http://blog.del.icio.us/blog/2005/12/yahoo.html Congrats! cheers r -- URL: http://r.24x7.com Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

Re: [videoblogging] another win for Andrew and Amanda

2005-12-09 Thread Deirdre Straughan
Aaaaddd it's the big sellout!From this weekend's NYT:Giving up no creative control, Ms. Congdon and Mr. Baron will get 50 percent of the revenue from ads sold by TiVo to appear before and after their newscast, and their show will gain access to more than 300,000 TV sets connected to

[videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?

2005-12-09 Thread escorial1967
Ok, so I get the syndication problem with flash movies, but using a service as Audioblog that problem is solved? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You could use a free or cheap app to transcode your video into flv and utilize the free flash

Re: [videoblogging] hi guys, how about this meet the vloggers in NY, then?

2005-12-09 Thread Richard Show
I think you will definately need space for that many people ... think how many just showed up spontaneously for vloggercue ... RichardOn 12/7/05, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: just to be clear...we are still making arrangements for Vloggecon.the challnge is finding an affordable space

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?

2005-12-09 Thread Michael Sullivan
I am not certain if you can export to flv from MX2004. But if not, try something that can, such as the riva encoder i pointed you too. I know there are other free flv trancoders too... google around if need be. If you dont have your own web server to hos the flv player, you could use mine until

[videoblogging] Meet the Vloggers - Tonight in L.A.

2005-12-09 Thread Zadi
Hey All: In case anyone is in the L.A. area and would like to drop by and say hola, there's a Meet the Vloggers tonight at 7pm at The Grove Apple Store. We've been having them on a monthly basis. Apple Store 189 The Grove Drive Los Angeles, CA 90036 323-965-8400

[videoblogging] Re: 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Eric Rice
I think you're being pre-coffee persnickety. Heh. I mean this morning I sorta told a big name sponsor 'no deal' since it wasn't on my terms. I have no problem being wined and dined, btw, but we all knew that. ;-) ER --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, johngaltsjournal [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [videoblogging] another win for Andrew and Amanda

2005-12-09 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:28:52 +0100, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aaaaddd it's the big sellout! Woohoo! It's the Adam Curry deal of videoblogging and it sounds like a very good deal to strike. But why'd we read about it in NYT and not on Rocketboom? Is this where I

Re: [videoblogging] another win for Andrew and Amanda

2005-12-09 Thread T.Whid
Link to the NYT?On 12/9/05, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aaaaddd it's the big sellout!From this weekend's NYT:Giving up no creative control, Ms. Congdon and Mr. Baron will get 50 percent of the revenue from ads sold by TiVo to appear before and after their newscast, and

Re: [videoblogging] Re: 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread Michael Sullivan
Apparently, it'll be the Year of the rBoom, and thats fudging sweet. On 12/9/05, Eric Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you're being pre-coffee persnickety. Heh. I mean this morning I sorta told a big name sponsor 'no deal' since it wasn't on my terms. I have no problem being wined and

[videoblogging] streaming movie staggers with DSL

2005-12-09 Thread thebossa
Hi, I made this at the community media center, then brought it into iMovie and compressed out to MP4, following the freevlog iMovie tutorial. It plays fine on my machine, but in the new google video streaming location where it's hosted, it staggers when viewing online:

Re: [videoblogging] another win for Andrew and Amanda

2005-12-09 Thread Michael Sullivan
Ain't no blog, yo.sure it is well i mean rocketboom.com is a vlog... so, the content is derived from a vlog... where it ends up doesnt change that fact.it can end up on tivo, video iPod, or a digital satellite theatre...its videoblog derived video content. that is unless they drop the vlog

[videoblogging] Re: 2006: Year of...

2005-12-09 Thread johngaltsjournal
You are right Eric. If I had some coffee beforehand, I would have made sure I mentioned that, Corporate or not, I do enjoy a good handjob. I definitely don't shirk away from the intersection of Art and Commerce. Often, that is some of the most entertaining moments in the process of

[videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?

2005-12-09 Thread escorial1967
Michael, I am checking vsocial and it looks quite promissing. Just a couple of questions I could not find answers in their site and maybe you know. Do they copyright the videos under Creative Commons? It seems I can cross-post into my vlog at blogger right? I don't understand very well the

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Google analytics

2005-12-09 Thread WWWhatsup
http://www.google.com/analytics/ was google analytics service pulled down? i cannot find it --- WWWhatsup NYC http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com ---

Re: [videoblogging] another win for Andrew and Amanda

2005-12-09 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 22:27:46 +0100, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ain't no blog, yo. sure it is well i mean rocketboom.com is a vlog... so, the content is derived from a vlog... where it ends up doesnt change that fact. Yes, it does. The video isn't the blog entry. Inbound

Re: [videoblogging] another win for Andrew and Amanda

2005-12-09 Thread Michael Sullivan
so then, what you mean to wsay is, each video... when watched on the tivo, is not a videoblog post. fine, we can all live with that for awhile... until tivo get bloggy with it. akimbo might already? just to be clear though, lets not say that rboom is no longer a videoblog... we'll agree that

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?

2005-12-09 Thread John Dowdell
Background info below: What plug in version of flash does the user need? 7 or 8? Macromedia Flash Player 6 and above include the Sorenson Sparc video codec, and Macromedia Flash Player 8 also includes the On2 VP6 video codec. (Audio codecs include MP3, Nelly-Moser for speech, one or two

Re: [videoblogging] another win for Andrew and Amanda

2005-12-09 Thread robert a/k/a r
heh, can one make rocketboom a v/blog again by, after watching an episode on tivo, then comment on rocketbooms site or ones own site? rocketboom reborn On Dec 9, 2005, at 4:52 PM, Michael Sullivan wrote: so then, what you mean to wsay is, each video... when watched on the tivo, is not a

[videoblogging] Re: Is Flash the answer?

2005-12-09 Thread escorial1967
jd, you rock man I am checking it right now. So much info --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, John Dowdell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Background info below: What plug in version of flash does the user need? 7 or 8? Macromedia Flash Player 6 and above include the Sorenson Sparc

  1   2   >