Wow.So after reading all this, I decided to send my subscribers to Feedburner with a .htaccess redirect as per Rick's advice. It seems to be working fine, although my subscriber count has not climbed much as I assumed it would.
And, yeah, for the record, I care about my stats because it's my we
Andrew -
Thanks for the heads up on adding a href track! I promise to use my powers for good, never for evil... ;)On 11/12/05, andrew michael baron <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David, Ted, I'm not here to pick fights. . .but. . . :P
I dont know. Its sounds cool and you know advertisers would
On 11/12/05, andrew michael baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First, I just want to distance myself from your voice below which assumed
> that marketing is the basis for my interests.
Ok - not that I think knowing marketing data is bad. I think its
something that an ubber-popular show like rocke
Oh, for sure, it's easy to make SOME differenciation. Except for
jackasses like me with 4 machines, with 3 different OS' and 4 different
aggregators. I presume the level of jackassness is on par with mine,
too, which is why subscribers=1 in anything I throw together. =)
David Meade wrote:
>On
On 11/12/05, Brad Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The short answer to this is.. unique IPs that hit multiple times over
> the last 24 hour period. That's what I can determine to be feedburner's
> technique.
>
> That, at least, is how I'm going to be doing the calculation. =)
>
> It doesn't accoun
P.S.How do you know if you are a videoblogger? If you never ask yourself "Is all of this really worth it?"On Nov 12, 2005, at 7:20 PM, andrew michael baron wrote: Ok, fair enough. We are talking about two different things now. However! I can't just let it die and move on. :P :P :PPP First, I
Ok, fair enough. We are talking about two different things now. However! I can't just let it die and move on. :P :P :PPP First, I just want to distance myself from your voice below which assumed that marketing is the basis for my interests.Setting aside any marketing data that other people ma
The short answer to this is.. unique IPs that hit multiple times over
the last 24 hour period. That's what I can determine to be feedburner's
technique.
That, at least, is how I'm going to be doing the calculation. =)
It doesn't account for aggregators that cache, NAT'd IPs, or anything of
the
I'm not sure how this topic got so confused ... :-P
The question asked was NOT "how can I get detailed viewer stats that
have enough data I could use it when talking to
marketing/sponsorship/advertisemnt/etc people" ... the question was
simply "has anyone figured out a way to get feedburner like s
David, Ted, I'm not here to pick fights. . .but. . . :P
I dont know. Its sounds cool and you know advertisers would love to
know if a commercial was watched. This can be done easily with adding
an href track to the video at a certain time interval. You can ping a
count to your server at any
wouldn't it be nice if a movie would ping the creator after it had been viewed on the network!On 11/12/05, David Meade <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/12/05, andrew michael baron <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David, you are still missing some crucial background info regarding the
reports that
On 11/12/05, andrew michael baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David, you are still missing some crucial background info regarding the
reports that you are generating. While its true, everyone has a unique
IP at a certain time and those IPs can rotate, its a very regular
case to have the ISP "REPO
David Meade wrote:
>
> Rather than parse log files, I wrote a few php functions that are called
> each time the feed is acccessed. It then writes (or updates) a record of the
> request to the databse. I have another table of "rules" that the system
> checks these requests against to determine how
andrew michael baron wrote:
> I believe the most obscure statistic that hasnt been mentioned, which
> is desirable, especially when one has multiple feeds, is an aggregate
> of the amount of actual video downloads
To some degree, that's pretty much the only number I look at nowadays. I
run a
David, you are still missing some crucial background info regarding the reports that you are generating. While its true, everyone has a unique IP at a certain time and those IPs can rotate, its a very regular case to have the ISP "REPORT" an entire range of IPs as a single IP. For instance, out o
I never said I was going soly by IP address.
If one viewer pings my rss page 1 time or 137,256,748 times a day ...
they still count as 1 subscriber. I'm not concerned with how many
times they are pinging or how many times they are downloading, only
that this identifiable user is still pollin
But that doesnt work when go by IP addresses because the unique IP address count is too obscure.You may be pinging my xml page 12 times a day and only getting one video. And 1000 different people may be coming from the same IP.On Nov 11, 2005, at 9:42 PM, David Meade wrote: On 11/11/05, andrew mi
On 11/11/05, andrew michael baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ps. the main reason why the formula for comparing these numbers is
complex of course centers around the fact that xml pages are often hit
when there is no update, which leads to xml hits with no html hits or
video downloads.True. But
Good point andrew.
For some people, BlipTV can provide pretty good stats in this (although
I believe they are still fine tuning their stat system). They
list total number of views with a breakout of user agent (itunes,
fireant, IE, Firefox, etc).
I know RB doesnt use blip ... I'm just sayin
ps. the main reason why the formula for comparing these numbers is complex of course centers around the fact that xml pages are often hit when there is no update, which leads to xml hits with no html hits or video downloads.On Nov 11, 2005, at 9:19 PM, andrew michael baron wrote: I believe the mo
I believe the most obscure statistic that hasnt been mentioned, which is desirable, especially when one has multiple feeds, is an aggregate of the amount of actual video downloads against the number of xml page views against the number of html object views, something I would have to calculate by
That sounds great. I have no idea how to do any of it, but it sounds perfect.Are you going to release it anytime soon?On 11/11/05, David Meade
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I created a system to track / estimate subscribers on my site. I
still consider it testing, but I think it works pretty g
I created a system to track / estimate subscribers on my site. I
still consider it testing, but I think it works pretty good. I
dont use log files however.
Rather than parse log files, I wrote a few php functions that are
called each time the feed is acccessed. It then writes (or
updates) a
I would like to know how many views a beginning
vlogger might get? How many views would indicate a vlogger building
readership after 6 or 10 vlogs?
I know I view certain vlogs because I have come to
know and like other vlogs by that person. I am rarely
disappointed.
I know vlogging r
24 matches
Mail list logo
