Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-18 Thread Ronen



On 12/16/05, Randolfe Wicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In an interview (podcast) with Michael Verdi, they talked about sixdifferent books on vlogging being in the works.(aside from a 'how-to' book)I think the best thing would be for a few people to take a week and just edit the best bits of this list into a conversation book about themedium / subject matter and its potential.
Randolfe (Randy) Wicker
http://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/- Original Message -From: Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: 
videoblogging@yahoogroups.comSent: Friday, December 16, 2005 9:50 AMSubject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:47:07 +0100, Michael Sullivan
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: speaking of the vloggy vastness... what up with the book of vlog?is that still being compiled?
 As far as I know it got picked up by a new publisher and is currently being (re)written. - Andreas -- URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
 Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM~-
Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-18 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:57:28 +0100, Matthew Clayfield  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm going to be writing my postgraduate theses on videoblogging, just
 for the record.

I'm putting finishing touches (okay, last minute frantic writing) on a  
paper about videoblogging right now (in Danish, but...). It's a warm-up  
for my master's thesis that I'll start working on in February (it  
definately won't include large sections on cinema, or Birth of a Nation!).

I know there are a small handful of people working with videoblogging in  
graduate programs. Maybe we should create a place to geek out?

- Andreas
-- 
URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/u8TY5A/tzNLAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-18 Thread Markus Sandy
that's interesting
may i ask who is sponsoring your work?


Matthew Clayfield wrote:

I'm going to be writing my postgraduate theses on videoblogging, just
for the record.

  



-- 

My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us

http://apperceptions.org
http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com
http://node101.org
http://spinflow.org
http://wearethemedia.com
http://xpressionvlog.blogspot.com

aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
skype: msandy
spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-18 Thread Richard Show



On 12/16/05, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



I have a job, Will be graduating next week and then going full time...so there is my jobas for my life...Well I have a full and fulfilling life...oh yeah, I almost forgot. To the rest of the in-crowd: we have a meeting next weekend in NYC where we will be discussing self-promotion, ego-building, how to start hype about your crappy content, and how to make sure that newbies never get any attention at all. Please bring your in-crowd notebooks and magic rings. 
this is a private party...only the elite vloggers are allowed to attend (that means no Richard Show you talentless, un-funny little puke!)... dang it! ... I always got picked last in soft ball too! ... and no body invited me to join evil vlog ... woh is me ... but I must say I have always been one to appreciate attention however I can get it, he did say I was little, which I like, and he did use the words Richard Show :) ... 
Richard, of the Richard Show (the real vlog father, and inventor of pretty much everything)-- Richard http://www.richardshow.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-18 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:41:07 +0100, Matthew Clayfield  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Maybe we should create a place to geek out?

 Most definitely.

 In fact, perhaps the two of us should start a new Yahoo group? We
 could call (however unoriginally) Vlog Theory.

Done and done. I've invited you already and any interested parties can  
point their browser to:

URL: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vlogtheory/ 

I'll need to approve your membership because I don't want spam-bots to  
join the list.

- Andreas
-- 
URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Michael Meiser


On Dec 16, 2005, at 6:30 PM, Michael I wrote:Uh not to flog a dead horse but I remember some time back when Josh Leo loudly said the same thing...same song, same arugement.   Is this something that should be addressed? I do not know the complete tift here but reading Manchessemo's complaint here has been metioned numerous times.  Why is this? does it put a black eye  the promotion of videoblogging? Do arugements like this leave a bad taste in peoples mouths? With this new "media" are people struggling to stay at the top? and in the mean time does this stiffle the creativity?has it created a hierarchary instead of a anarchy? as a particpant (since August 2004) and observer it seems that it's not making the most positive impression.   I am open to any honest and or creative disscussion. If you want to email me to mention any personal feelings I welcome that also.MickFirst of all I have to agree... this is a great topic... or rather when we shift away from talking about something we can't control... the press... something I'm not even sure why we're obsessed about... what with our being our own media and all... this becomes an very interesting topic... one we should talk about from time to time. That said...Well, since Josh Leo went from ranting about "a-list" to being one of the most popular vloggers I don't think it's as big an issue as people would make it out to be. But let's analyze anyway shall we? :)Where does this "a-list" establishment embed itself?1) our vlogrolls?2) directories - most popular?3) FireAnt's 10 default feeds?4) the recycled hot list of names used in previous articles on vloggers in the lexis nexus dbase?5) Where else? Our minds?or is it just active participants in the vlogosphere1) people who post videos a lot?2) people who chat here a lot?3) people who get active in lots of projects?4) or simply people who make videos people love?What else determines visibility... what else embeds the status quo into the system. What else indoctrinates?How can we break the status quo?As an example... Mefeedia is developing things like favoring, tagging, reviewing, and re-vlogging (aka. their "blog this" tool) so that anyone can quickly find and just as easily promote new vlogs and videos. And we're helping you do it because it helps us build a better directory... which is the vision of "social media"... self helping, self made... like wikipedia or any wiki... but different in form.Sure there's still a way to see the most popular video feeds... but we can't deny people that, it has it's utility. What we can do is develop tools that create "churn"... that agitate the status quo... so that the mix of vlogs doesn't become a homogenized flow of same same...  and meanwhile you can do the same... the best way of course it revlogging... promote other peoples videos... keep an up to date vlog roll.It's no secrete that re-vlogging is ALL I do with my blog... what's more I seek out other projects like evilvlog.com to "re-contextualize" and challenge norms and expectations... Evilvlog is now a wild and chaotic churn of media coming from all over the vlogosphere and we're going to keep adding adding editors until it implodes.. and/or people start creating their own "evilvlogs"... seek out people of shared interest and start your own multi-person vlog or blog and let's decentralize this conversation on this yahoo group a little... because it in my mind is perhaps the one thing most responsible for this cliquish insider feeling... that new visitors get... it's well beyond it's capacity... that said perhaps I shouldn't even be posting here... but to say... disperse.. find or build new fertile lands for conversation... it's completely within your power.BTW, some other ideas on creating more churn, in addition to AWSOME collaborative re-vlogging.Perhaps mefeedia and fireant should both create _javascript_ objects for dropping in the right hand sidebar of a vlog that would contain a list of vlogs one is currently subscribed to on mefeedia or fire ant... An up to the minute vlog roll.Perhaps also a tool for displaying the items in one's personal queue of media or playlist... to put in the right hand side bar of their vlog.Perhaps also a tool for displaying my recently favorited or tagged videos in the right hand side bar of my vlog.FireANT, Vlogdir, Blip, Audi blog and others might find ways to follow suit.These things like live vlog rolls would have a TREMENDOUS impact on search traffic and traffic flow. I would absolutely love to see what Steve Garfield, Ryanne, and Josh Leo and indeed all my friends are subscribed to at any different moment, what their tagging, what they're favoriting.  All this on the face of their vlog. The search engines would go NUTS!  I encourage you to look for other ways of promoting the mix and churn.The solution to this issue in my mind lies in ongoing work around the following fundamental systematic / architectural question.How can we drive traffic out to the edges of the network and 

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Michael I



Phenomenal response! Lets bring this together, expose the trials and triumphs. Your only as good as the tools provided and your only as good as the people around you.   What can be done to neutralize the negative emotions around this subject? Is this a medium that can change perception?   How easy it for us to find good content and make new people feel welcome? With so many variables, where or how can this been taken to the next level?  Michael Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   On Dec 16, 2005, at 6:30 PM, Michael I wrote:Uh not to flog a dead horse but I remember some time back when Josh Leo loudly said the same thing...same song, same arugement.Is this something that
 should be addressed? I do not know the complete tift here but reading Manchessemo's complaint here has been metioned numerous times.Why is this? does it put a black eye the promotion of videoblogging? Do arugements like this leave a bad taste in peoples mouths? With this new "media" are people struggling to stay at the top? and in the mean time does this stiffle the creativity?has it created a hierarchary instead of a anarchy? as a particpant (since August 2004) and observer it seems that it's not making the most positive impression. I am open to any honest and or creative disscussion. If you want to email me to mention any personal feelings I welcome that also.MickFirst of all I have to agree... this is a great topic... or rather when we shift away from talking about something we can't control... the press... something I'm not even sure why
 we're obsessed about... what with our being our own media and all... this becomes an very interesting topic... one we should talk about from time to time.That said...Well, since Josh Leo went from ranting about "a-list" to being one of the most popular vloggers I don't think it's as big an issue as people would make it out to be. But let's analyze anyway shall we? :)Where does this "a-list" establishment embed itself?1) our vlogrolls?2) directories - most popular?3) FireAnt's 10 default feeds?4) the recycled hot list of names used in previous articles on vloggers in the lexis nexus dbase?5) Where else? Our minds?or is it just active participants in the vlogosphere1) people who post videos a lot?2) people who chat here a lot?3) people who get active in lots of projects?4) or simply people who make videos people love?What else determines visibility... what else embeds the status quo into the system. What else indoctrinates?How can we break the status quo?As an example... Mefeedia is developing things like favoring, tagging, reviewing, and re-vlogging (aka. their "blog this" tool) so that anyone can quickly find and just as easily promote new vlogs and videos. And we're helping you do it because it helps us build a better directory... which is the vision of "social media"... self helping, self made... like wikipedia or any wiki... but different in form.Sure there's still a way to see the mostpopular video feeds... but we can't deny people that, it has it's utility. What we can do is develop tools that create "churn"... that agitate the status quo... so that the mix of vlogs doesn't become a homogenized flow of same same... and meanwhile you can do the same... the best way of course it revlogging... promote other peoples videos... keep an up to date vlog roll.It's no secrete that re-vlogging is ALL I do with my blog... what's more I seek out other projects like evilvlog.com to "re-contextualize" and challenge norms and expectations... Evilvlog is now a wild andchaotic churn of media coming from all over the vlogosphere and we're going to keep adding adding editorsuntil it implodes.. and/or people start creating their own "evilvlogs"... seek out people of shared interest and start your own multi-person vlog or
 blog and let's decentralize this conversation on this yahoo group a little... because it inmy mind is perhaps the one thing most responsible for this cliquish insider feeling... that new visitors get... it's well beyond it's capacity... that said perhaps I shouldn't even be posting here... but to say... disperse.. find or build new fertile lands for conversation... it's completely within your power.BTW, some other ideas on creating more churn, in addition to AWSOME collaborative re-vlogging.Perhaps mefeedia and fireant should both create _javascript_ objects for dropping in the right hand sidebar of a vlog that would contain a list of vlogs one is currently subscribed to on mefeedia or fire ant... An up to the minute vlog roll.Perhaps also a tool for displaying the items in one's personal queue of media or
 playlist... to put in the right hand side bar of their vlog.Perhaps also a tool for displaying my recently favorited or tagged videos in the right hand side bar of my vlog.FireANT, Vlogdir, Blip, Audi blog and others mightfind ways to follow suit.These things like live vlog rolls would have a TREMENDOUS impact on search traffic and traffic flow. I would absolutely love to see what Steve 

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Jan





For the record, I don't ever want a *job and yes, vlogging *is 
in most respects my life. I've been working toward creating things that are 
served by what vlogging offers since I was but a wee lass in saddle 
shoes.

If you feel on the outside ask yourself this: why do you 
begrudge folks who make vlogging their life and livlihood and the attention that 
has brought them? 

Churn. Yes. Definitely helps to bring new, talented folks to 
the top of the pot.Most of the directories have restructured their sites 
to feature new vloggers. What more do you want?

As MM points out, becoming part of the community, posting 
regularly, being active in lots of groups and community effortswill bring 
you up through the ranks. All the popular vloggers have done this and more, and 
worked tirelessly to create this community. If you are new here you have no idea 
the time and effort they have invested. 

If what you want is to walk through the door and be lifted 
upon others' shoulders and given a gratuitous round of "For he's a jolly good 
fellow," forget it. It's not going to happen without work. Lots of work. If you 
think that "posting" to this or any list community means posting your URL and 
telling folks to visit your vlog it's not going to work. Share your expertise. 
Do something. Anything. But make it open source and on some level 
selfless.

As I'm fond of saying, "Work hard; use the proper 
tools."

When did it become a sin to promote friends and family? You 
want me to promote you? Do some small thing for me and then I will. No question. 
You want me to promote you? Become my friend. That means talk with me, promote 
me, help me, console and advise me. I will do the same for you.

Videoblogging is not television, nor is it Hollywood. We have 
yet to discover a vlog-voice in terms of what styles fit best in a 320 x 240 or 
smaller screen in 3 minutes or less. We have yet to discover a way to have vlog 
conversations, link-love, and quotations, back-and-forthing as simple as 
bloggers do that. I think the style will be closeups on faces and things. Good 
sound design. Good, compact ideas. In short, the short film closer 
in.

It is still very early in the game, folks.

Cooperation and community rule.

Gettin' off my low pony now.

XOXOX,
Jan

-- "It isn't done alone. Pay more." http://groups.yahoo.com/group/roadnode101/ 
- Road Node 101http://fauxpress.blogspot.com - 
motionhttp://blog.urbanartadventures.com 
- soundhttp://vlogpresskit.blogspot.com - 
communityhttp://the-hold.blogspot.com - 
literature.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Michael I 
  
  To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com 
  
  Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 5:54 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall 
  Street Journal: Videoblogging
  
  Phenomenal response!Lets bring this together, 
  expose the trials and triumphs.Your only as good as the tools provided and 
  your only as good as the people around you. What can be done to 
  neutralize the negative emotions around this subject?Is this a 
  medium that can change perception? How easy it for us to find 
  good content and make new people feel welcome?With so many variables, 
  where or how can this been taken to the next level?Michael 
  Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  


  On Dec 16, 2005, at 6:30 PM, Michael I wrote:
  Uh not to flog a dead horse but I remember some time 
  back when Josh Leo loudly said the same thing...same song, same 
  arugement.Is this something that should be 
  addressed? I do not know the complete tift here but reading Manchessemo's 
  complaint here has been metioned numerous times.Why is 
  this? does it put a black eye the promotion of videoblogging? Do 
  arugements like this leave a bad taste in peoples mouths? With this new 
  "media" are people struggling to stay at the top? and in the mean time 
  does this stiffle the creativity?has it created a hierarchary instead 
  of a anarchy? as a particpant (since August 2004) and observer it seems 
  that it's not making the most positive impression. I 
  am open to any honest and or creative disscussion. If you want to email me 
  to mention any personal feelings I welcome that 
  also.Mick

First of all I have to agree... this is a great topic... or rather when 
we shift away from talking about something we can't control... the press... 
something I'm not even sure why we're obsessed about... what with our being 
our own media and all... this becomes an very interesting topic... one we 
should talk about from time to time.That said...

Well, since Josh Leo went from ranting about "a-list" to being one of 
the most popular vloggers I don't think it's as big an issue as people would 
make it out to be. But let's analyze anyway shall we? :)

Where does this "a-list" establishment embed itself?

1) our 

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-17 Thread Randolfe Wicker





I want to second all that Jan has said. When 
I first stumbled onto the world of vlogging, she was one of the first people to 
take the trouble to respond to my questions about cameras, computers, 
etc.

She is someone who has slaved selfishly to help 
build this community. And she, so far as I know, has gotten little 
attention or public appreciation for her efforts. Her reward has been in 
the warm good feelings she has earned in helping others and being part of this 
community.

She talks about riding a horse. I think of 
her as modern day Joan of Arc. Let's just hope they don't burn her at the 
stake someday in one of these ugly flame wars.
Randolfe (Randy) Wickerhttp://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/



  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Jan 

  To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com 
  
  Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 7:56 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall 
  Street Journal: Videoblogging
  
  For the record, I don't ever want a *job and yes, vlogging 
  *is in most respects my life. I've been working toward creating things that 
  are served by what vlogging offers since I was but a wee lass in saddle 
  shoes.
  
  If you feel on the outside ask yourself this: why do you 
  begrudge folks who make vlogging their life and livlihood and the attention 
  that has brought them? 
  
  Churn. Yes. Definitely helps to bring new, talented folks to 
  the top of the pot.Most of the directories have restructured their sites 
  to feature new vloggers. What more do you want?
  
  As MM points out, becoming part of the community, posting 
  regularly, being active in lots of groups and community effortswill 
  bring you up through the ranks. All the popular vloggers have done this and 
  more, and worked tirelessly to create this community. If you are new here you 
  have no idea the time and effort they have invested. 
  
  If what you want is to walk through the door and be lifted 
  upon others' shoulders and given a gratuitous round of "For he's a jolly good 
  fellow," forget it. It's not going to happen without work. Lots of work. If 
  you think that "posting" to this or any list community means posting your URL 
  and telling folks to visit your vlog it's not going to work. Share your 
  expertise. Do something. Anything. But make it open source and on some level 
  selfless.
  
  As I'm fond of saying, "Work hard; use the proper 
  tools."
  
  When did it become a sin to promote friends and family? You 
  want me to promote you? Do some small thing for me and then I will. No 
  question. You want me to promote you? Become my friend. That means talk with 
  me, promote me, help me, console and advise me. I will do the same for 
  you.
  
  Videoblogging is not television, nor is it Hollywood. We 
  have yet to discover a vlog-voice in terms of what styles fit best in a 320 x 
  240 or smaller screen in 3 minutes or less. We have yet to discover a way to 
  have vlog conversations, link-love, and quotations, back-and-forthing as 
  simple as bloggers do that. I think the style will be closeups on faces and 
  things. Good sound design. Good, compact ideas. In short, the short film 
  closer in.
  
  It is still very early in the game, folks.
  
  Cooperation and community rule.
  
  Gettin' off my low pony now.
  
  XOXOX,
  Jan
  
  -- "It isn't done alone. Pay more." http://groups.yahoo.com/group/roadnode101/ 
  - Road Node 101http://fauxpress.blogspot.com - 
  motionhttp://blog.urbanartadventures.com 
  - soundhttp://vlogpresskit.blogspot.com - 
  communityhttp://the-hold.blogspot.com - 
  literature.
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Michael I 

To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com 

Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 5:54 
    AM
    Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall 
Street Journal: Videoblogging

Phenomenal response!Lets bring this together, 
expose the trials and triumphs.Your only as good as the tools provided 
and your only as good as the people around you. What can be done to 
neutralize the negative emotions around this subject?Is this a 
medium that can change perception? How easy it for us to find 
good content and make new people feel welcome?With so many variables, 
where or how can this been taken to the next level?Michael 
Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

  
  
On Dec 16, 2005, at 6:30 PM, Michael I wrote:
Uh not to flog a dead horse but I remember some time 
back when Josh Leo loudly said the same thing...same song, same 
arugement.Is this something that should be 
addressed? I do not know the complete tift here but reading 
Manchessemo's complaint here has been metioned numerous 
times.Why is this? does it put a black eye the 
promotion of videoblogging? Do arugements like this leave a bad taste in 
peoples mouths? With this new "media"

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:27:56 +0100, petertheman [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:

 Reporters are busy (ie. lazy) ;) Whatever vlogs you mention to them
 they will probably check out, so make sure you can mention a few
 unknown ones :)

C'mone on, give them a little credit. :o)
Their boss probably only gave them one or two days to get the story done.  
Getting a feel for a new concept and a huge community *and* figure out  
what angle you want *and* condone interviews (and everyone knows interview  
victims are the really lazy ones!) takes time. They are busy, but not  
*always* lazy! :o)

- Andreas
-- 
URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Michael Sullivan



speaking of the vloggy vastness... what up with the book of vlog? is that still being compiled?On 12/16/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:27:56 +0100, petertheman 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Reporters are busy (ie. lazy) ;) Whatever vlogs you mention to them they will probably check out, so make sure you can mention a few unknown ones :)
C'mone on, give them a little credit. :o)Their boss probably only gave them one or two days to get the story done.Getting a feel for a new concept and a huge community *and* figure outwhat angle you want *and* condone interviews (and everyone knows interview
victims are the really lazy ones!) takes time. They are busy, but not*always* lazy! :o)- Andreas--URL:http://www.solitude.dk/Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM~-Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
-- sull- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://vlogdir.com - The Videoblog Directoryhttp://videobloggers.org - Free Videoblog Hosting / Vlogosphere Aggregator 
http://interdigitate.com - on again off again personal vlog





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:47:07 +0100, Michael Sullivan  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 speaking of the vloggy vastness... what up with the book of vlog?  is  
 that
 still being compiled?

As far as I know it got picked up by a new publisher and is currently  
being (re)written.

- Andreas
-- 
URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Markus Sandy






they also have limited capacity

the more you tell them, the less likely they are to get it all correct
or pick the important points

i've learned to curb my enthusiasm and stick to just a few basic points


petertheman wrote:

  
of course.
seems to be an A-List of vloggers, evangelists, services that are

  
  repeatedly
  
  
mentioned over and over.  I suppose this makes sense for the latter
groups but its def good to see new vloggers getting attention... The
variety is usually good... from rboom to laughterpractice.  just

  
  wish the
  
  
reporters/editors would not 'borrow' so much from other articles and
resources and go out and find the nuggets themselves.

  
  
Reporters are busy (ie. lazy) ;) Whatever vlogs you mention to them
they will probably check out, so make sure you can mention a few
unknown ones :)

Peter



  



-- 

My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us

http://apperceptions.org
http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com
http://node101.org
http://spinflow.org
http://wearethemedia.com
http://xpressionvlog.blogspot.com

aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
skype: msandy
spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  










Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread ryanne hodson
dear dude
fuck you.


On 12/16/05, ManCheeseMo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It sure does get old reading what is basically the same article.  My
 resolution for the New Year is to unsubscribe and boycott the
 following: Rocketboom, Garfield, Jay/Ryannne, Verdi and Josh Leo.

 None of them are great.  Sure they're decent, but they sure don't
 deserve the hype over anyone else.

 Long live the underdogs.


 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christian Wach [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  On 16 Dec 2005, at 14:17, Michael Sullivan wrote:
 
   seems to be an A-List of vloggers, evangelists, services that
   are repeatedly mentioned over and over







 Yahoo! Groups Links










--
me: http://ryanedit.blogspot.com
educate in person: http://nyc.node101.org
educate online: http://freevlog.org
videos i want you to see: http://revlog.blogspot.com


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Michael Meiser
Haha, at least when mefeedia gets mentioned it's a boon for all... We  
need to keep focusing on driving traffic to everyone in the  
vlogosphere. Especially the newbies... and yeah even the porn stars.  
LOL! :)

OK. maybe not the pornstars, unless of course you mean naked Verdi.

Sorry, couldn't resist. :)

-Mike


On Dec 16, 2005, at 9:13 AM, petertheman wrote:

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It would be nice to hear about some new videobloggers in these  
 articles.

Yeah, totally. I think we need to start highlighting unknown vloggers
on our blogs, send the love around :) I mentioned a few lesser known
vlogs to the journalist when talking to them, but it doesn't seem like
she included them in the article.

And: Peter Van Dijck, who runs the mefeedia site, says that in past
months the vlog boom has paralleled the increase in numbers of people
switching from slower dial-up Internet connections to faster broadband
connections.

Well, that's not really what I said or meant, but oh well. I don't
think there's been a boom in broadband connections specificaly in the
past months :)

Cheers! I'm off on a long holiday today, backpacking in Thailand for 5
weeks. Have fun vloggers.

Peter







Yahoo! Groups Links









 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Joshua Kinberg
I didn't see FireAnt mentioned in those articles... though it would
have been nice.

Journalists repeat articles and press releases ad nauseum. That's just
the way it is.
Though I do think that the videoblogs we've seen metioned consistently
are deserving of the attention they receive.

I'm going to repeat this one till it get as popular as mundane is the
new punk

no one is entitled to an audience.

-Josh


On 12/16/05, ManCheeseMo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It sure does get old reading what is basically the same article.  My
 resolution for the New Year is to unsubscribe and boycott the
 following: Rocketboom, Garfield, Jay/Ryannne, Verdi and Josh Leo.

 None of them are great.  Sure they're decent, but they sure don't
 deserve the hype over anyone else.

 Long live the underdogs.


 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christian Wach [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  On 16 Dec 2005, at 14:17, Michael Sullivan wrote:
 
   seems to be an A-List of vloggers, evangelists, services that
   are repeatedly mentioned over and over







 Yahoo! Groups Links










 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Steve Garfield
I choose to think of it as selflessly promoting other vloggers.

On Dec 16, 2005, at 1:10 PM, ManCheeseMo wrote:

 More shameless self-promotion by Garfield.

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:

 Plus I sent her to Vlog Soup which highlights a lot of new vloggers
 each episode.

 http://stevegarfield.blogs.com/videoblog/vlog_soup/index.html

 On Dec 16, 2005, at 9:05 AM, Devlon wrote:

  It would be nice to hear about some new videobloggers in these
 articles.


 --Steve
 -- 
 Home Page - http://stevegarfield.com
 Video Blog  - http://stevegarfield.blogs.com
 Text Blog - http://offonatangent.blogspot.com

 Like Paul Revere, leading the citizen's media revolution.










 Yahoo! Groups Links








--Steve
-- 
Home Page - http://stevegarfield.com
Video Blog  - http://stevegarfield.blogs.com
Text Blog - http://offonatangent.blogspot.com

Like Paul Revere, leading the citizen's media revolution.



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/.QUssC/izNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Josh Leo



Wow how Did I get included here? I have been in one article by name once... just as much as people like Beth Agnew, Erin Nealy, Phil Hamilton, Serra Shiflet, Amy Carpenter, Josh Kopin and many more...better start adding them to your boycott list...I mean after all They all probably suck too huh? I do however think that BottomUnion should be in every article about vlogs because he is my favorite...
Man-cheese where is your URL, I'm not as much of a boycotter as I am a viewer I want to subscribe to your content...On 12/16/05, ManCheeseMo 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:It sure does get old reading what is basically the same article.My
resolution for the New Year is to unsubscribe and boycott thefollowing: Rocketboom, Garfield, Jay/Ryannne, Verdi and Josh Leo.None of them are great.Sure they're decent, but they sure don'tdeserve the hype over anyone else.
Long live the underdogs.-- Josh Leojoshleo.comstonefarm.blogspot.com
joshspicks.blogspot.comvlogcats.blogspot.comwearethemedia.com


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Joshua Kinberg
Again... was FireAnt mentioned in an article I'm not aware of?
If it was, please send me a link.


-josh


On 12/16/05, ManCheeseMo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Uh, how original.  What exactly am I promoting?  I don't even have a
 vlog to promote yet.

 My point is that the good ol' boy network gets old.  If you are
 buddies with the FireANT crew or if you're one of the pre-populated
 vlogs, you'll get extra attention.

 There are people on this board that seem to have no job other than
 promoting themselves and their friends.

 IMHO, many in this group live inside a bubble where vlogging is
 everything to them.  The funny part is that most people don't care to
 watch a person talk into a camera about mudane things.  Just wait
 until the mass media catches on - then we'll really see how popular
 you are(n't).

 Maybe this is the new punk, but it is weak that the same people get
 all the hype when their content is no more creative than anyone else.
  They are just part of the in crowd (or should I say the
 self-promoting crowd).

 Just look how sensative they get when their power is questioned.

 To those: get a life, or better yet, a job.

 Watch, now one of the connected moderators will probably ban me from
 this group.  Hasn't that happened to others who disgree with the cool
 people?


 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  More shameless self-promotion by ManCheeseMo.
 
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ManCheeseMo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
  
   More shameless self-promotion by Garfield.
  
   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
   
Plus I sent her to Vlog Soup which highlights a lot of new vloggers
each episode.
   
http://stevegarfield.blogs.com/videoblog/vlog_soup/index.html
   
On Dec 16, 2005, at 9:05 AM, Devlon wrote:
   
  It would be nice to hear about some new videobloggers in these
 articles.

   
--Steve
--
Home Page - http://stevegarfield.com
Video Blog  - http://stevegarfield.blogs.com
Text Blog - http://offonatangent.blogspot.com
   
Like Paul Revere, leading the citizen's media revolution.
   
  
 









 Yahoo! Groups Links









 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Markus Sandy
they are certainly doing great things, as are many others here

i have been interviewed by several reporters and i always point out 
these folks and will continue to do so (and, yes, it is often the case 
that i don't end up in the article - BFD!)

if you do anything as significant as they do, I'll probably mention you 
too. 

so far, i am not aware of any such thing mr. underdog


ManCheeseMo wrote:

It sure does get old reading what is basically the same article.  My
resolution for the New Year is to unsubscribe and boycott the
following: Rocketboom, Garfield, Jay/Ryannne, Verdi and Josh Leo.

None of them are great.  Sure they're decent, but they sure don't
deserve the hype over anyone else.

Long live the underdogs.


  



-- 

My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us

http://apperceptions.org
http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com
http://node101.org
http://spinflow.org
http://wearethemedia.com
http://xpressionvlog.blogspot.com

aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
skype: msandy
spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Josh Leo



I have a job, Will be graduating next week and then going full time...so there is my jobas for my life...Well I have a full and fulfilling life...oh yeah, I almost forgot. To the rest of the in-crowd: we have a meeting next weekend in NYC where we will be discussing self-promotion, ego-building, how to start hype about your crappy content, and how to make sure that newbies never get any attention at all. Please bring your in-crowd notebooks and magic rings. 
this is a private party...only the elite vloggers are allowed to attend (that means no Richard Show you talentless, un-funny little puke!)in conclusion...I like Nachos
On 12/16/05, ManCheeseMo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To those: get a life, or better yet, a job.-- Josh Leojoshleo.comstonefarm.blogspot.com
joshspicks.blogspot.comvlogcats.blogspot.comwearethemedia.com


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Randy Mann

wow i rember when some one was crying he missed the boat..




From: Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:30:19 -0500

I have a job, Will be graduating next week and then going full time...so
there is my job
as for my life...Well I have a full and fulfilling life...

oh yeah, I almost forgot. To the rest of the in-crowd: we have a meeting
next weekend in NYC where we will be discussing self-promotion,
ego-building, how to start hype about your crappy content, and how to make
sure that newbies never get any attention at all. Please bring your
in-crowd notebooks and magic rings.

this is a private party...only the elite vloggers are allowed to attend
(that means no Richard Show you talentless, un-funny little puke!)

in conclusion...I like Nachos

On 12/16/05, ManCheeseMo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
  To those: get a life, or better yet, a job.
 
 

--
Josh Leo

joshleo.com
stonefarm.blogspot.com
joshspicks.blogspot.com
vlogcats.blogspot.com
wearethemedia.com




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Markus Sandy
has it occurred to you that this *is* some people's job?

sounds like sour grapes to me


ManCheeseMo wrote:

There are people on this board that seem to have no job other than
promoting themselves and their friends.

IMHO, many in this group live inside a bubble where vlogging is
everything to them.  The funny part is that most people don't care to
watch a person talk into a camera about mudane things.  Just wait
until the mass media catches on - then we'll really see how popular
you are(n't).

Maybe this is the new punk, but it is weak that the same people get
all the hype when their content is no more creative than anyone else.
 They are just part of the in crowd (or should I say the
self-promoting crowd).

Just look how sensative they get when their power is questioned.

To those: get a life, or better yet, a job.
  


-- 

My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us

http://apperceptions.org
http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com
http://node101.org
http://spinflow.org
http://wearethemedia.com
http://xpressionvlog.blogspot.com

aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
skype: msandy
spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Josh Leo



Empathy:http://joshleo.blogspot.com/2005/04/vlog-on-vlog.htmlOn 12/16/05, ManCheeseMo
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:The reason I include FireANT is because of how they pre-populated
their friends' vlogs.It feels like a cheap way to promote thein-crowd and rather unethical.And of course the comeback will be that the new directory is coming,but that has been said for months.Until the day it comes out,
FireANT is still promoting those people.What does it take to remove those vlogs from the list and push outanother build?Probably very little work, but yet it was never done.--- In 
videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Again... was FireAnt mentioned in an article I'm not aware of? If it was, please send me a link.
 -josh On 12/16/05, ManCheeseMo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Uh, how original.What exactly am I promoting?I don't even have a  vlog to promote yet. 
  My point is that the good ol' boy network gets old.If you are  buddies with the FireANT crew or if you're one of the pre-populated  vlogs, you'll get extra attention. 
  There are people on this board that seem to have no job other than  promoting themselves and their friends.   IMHO, many in this group live inside a bubble where vlogging is
  everything to them.The funny part is that most people don't care to  watch a person talk into a camera about mudane things.Just wait  until the mass media catches on - then we'll really see how popular
  you are(n't).   Maybe this is the new punk, but it is weak that the same people get  all the hype when their content is no more creative than anyone else. They are just part of the in crowd (or should I say the
  self-promoting crowd).   Just look how sensative they get when their power is questioned.   To those: get a life, or better yet, a job. 
  Watch, now one of the connected moderators will probably ban me from  this group.Hasn't that happened to others who disgree with the cool  people?--- In 
videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: More shameless self-promotion by ManCheeseMo.  
   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ManCheeseMo[EMAIL PROTECTED]   wrote:   More shameless self-promotion by Garfield.
   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
 Plus I sent her to Vlog Soup which highlights a lot of newvloggers each episode. 
http://stevegarfield.blogs.com/videoblog/vlog_soup/index.html On Dec 16, 2005, at 9:05 AM, Devlon wrote: It would be nice to hear about some new videobloggers in
these  articles.  --Steve -- Home Page - 
http://stevegarfield.com Video Blog- http://stevegarfield.blogs.com Text Blog - 
http://offonatangent.blogspot.com Like Paul Revere, leading the citizen's media revolution.
Yahoo! Groups Links  
  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM~-
Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/-- Josh Leojoshleo.comstonefarm.blogspot.com
joshspicks.blogspot.comvlogcats.blogspot.comwearethemedia.com





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Markus Sandy
ManCheeseMo wrote:

Watch, now one of the connected moderators will probably ban me from
this group.  Hasn't that happened to others who disgree with the cool
people?
  

actually no
you generally have to first violate the terms of use statements that you 
have agreed to

-- 

My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us

http://apperceptions.org
http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com
http://node101.org
http://spinflow.org
http://wearethemedia.com
http://xpressionvlog.blogspot.com

aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
skype: msandy
spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Markus Sandy






i thought jay was the vlogfather

i could have sworn i saw a picture ;)


ManCheeseMo wrote:

  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Steve Watkins" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
  
  
I am glad there is no single 'Adam Curry' figure of the videoblogging
world. Judging by the sensitivity and flames that can come out of such
discussions by videobloggers on topics such as motive, fame, ego,
money etc, I expect anybody trying to be 'the vodfather' would be
reasted by the vlogosphere. Such things are better when diluted, when
there are many vlog brothers and sisters doing such thing, not a
single 'great leader'.

  
  
HA!  Wasn't Garfield just referred to as "The Vlogfather" in one of
the recent articles?  I'm sure that was his suggestion given his
pompus footer about being like Paul Revere, leading this whole
vlogging thing.  I can't believe nobody else sees throught the egos.





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





  



-- 

My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us

http://apperceptions.org
http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com
http://node101.org
http://spinflow.org
http://wearethemedia.com
http://xpressionvlog.blogspot.com

aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
skype: msandy
spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  










Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Michael Meiser


 On Dec 16, 2005, at 2:09 PM, ManCheeseMo wrote:

 Uh, how original.  What exactly am I promoting?  I don't even have a
 vlog to promote yet.

Therin is the problem and solution... Dude! you have to vlog! it's  
liberating.

This perception you have of people promoting them and their  
friends... it a comunity... they support one another. There's nothing  
new under the sun there... They enjoy one another's videos and have  
for a very long time... it's part of simply participating... you  
alienate and exclude your self... we've all been there... those that  
whom have the biggest strongest opinions are the ones who need to  
vlog the most... it translates to good vlogging... I just mentioned  
joshs early a-list vlog rant... check it out! http:// 
joshleo.blogspot.com/2005/04/vlog-on-vlog.html

We've all been there... but the lid is off the jar as they say... all  
you have to do is grab a camera and speak your mind... my I suggest a  
good rant on a-list vloggers! better yet how about the stupid press!  
They never get it right. :)

-Mike

Michael Meiser
http://mmeiser.com/blog - fun stuff
http://mmeiser.com/backchannel - del.icio.us link blog
http://evilvlog.com - serious lunacy has a new domain
http://mefeedia.com - I love mefeedia


 My point is that the good ol' boy network gets old.  If you are
 buddies with the FireANT crew or if you're one of the pre-populated
 vlogs, you'll get extra attention.

 There are people on this board that seem to have no job other than
 promoting themselves and their friends.

 IMHO, many in this group live inside a bubble where vlogging is
 everything to them.  The funny part is that most people don't care to
 watch a person talk into a camera about mudane things.  Just wait
 until the mass media catches on - then we'll really see how popular
 you are(n't).

 Maybe this is the new punk, but it is weak that the same people get
 all the hype when their content is no more creative than anyone else.
  They are just part of the in crowd (or should I say the
 self-promoting crowd).

 Just look how sensative they get when their power is questioned.

 To those: get a life, or better yet, a job.

 Watch, now one of the connected moderators will probably ban me from
 this group.  Hasn't that happened to others who disgree with the cool
 people?


 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 More shameless self-promotion by ManCheeseMo.

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ManCheeseMo  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

 More shameless self-promotion by Garfield.

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

 Plus I sent her to Vlog Soup which highlights a lot of new vloggers
 each episode.

 http://stevegarfield.blogs.com/videoblog/vlog_soup/index.html

 On Dec 16, 2005, at 9:05 AM, Devlon wrote:

  It would be nice to hear about some new videobloggers in these
 articles.


 --Steve
 -- 
 Home Page - http://stevegarfield.com
 Video Blog  - http://stevegarfield.blogs.com
 Text Blog - http://offonatangent.blogspot.com

 Like Paul Revere, leading the citizen's media revolution.










  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor  
 ~--
 Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the  
 Sweet Life.
 http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
  
 ~-


 Yahoo! Groups Links









 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Markus Sandy






you must be a mac user or you wouldn't bring this up

I've used both mac and windows

windows version comes with big list, mac with small

mac was easier to start with

i liked it that the list started small and then i grew it through my
own discovery process

I've got 233 feeds now in fireant, so i don't see the issue


as to the ease of each and every little software change, it's a matter
of priorities. obviously the directory has been a huge priority

equally obvious is the lowering of priorities for any development team
on things that will be obsoleted by soon to be released features and
services - while the topic has been discussed here before, i don't
recall anyone seriously crying about this until now and so i imagine
the priority remained low

seems pretty obvious to me that the fireant folks work mighty hard to
deliver a fair and quality product



ManCheeseMo wrote:

  The reason I include FireANT is because of how they pre-populated
their friends' vlogs.  It feels like a cheap way to promote the
in-crowd and rather unethical.

And of course the comeback will be that the new directory is coming,
but that has been said for months.  Until the day it comes out,
FireANT is still promoting those people.

What does it take to remove those vlogs from the list and push out
another build?  Probably very little work, but yet it was never done.


--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
  
  
Again... was FireAnt mentioned in an article I'm not aware of?
If it was, please send me a link.


-josh


On 12/16/05, ManCheeseMo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


  Uh, how original.  What exactly am I promoting?  I don't even have a
vlog to promote yet.

My point is that the "good ol' boy" network gets old.  If you are
buddies with the FireANT crew or if you're one of the pre-populated
vlogs, you'll get extra attention.

There are people on this board that seem to have no job other than
promoting themselves and their friends.

IMHO, many in this group live inside a bubble where vlogging is
everything to them.  The funny part is that most people don't care to
watch a person talk into a camera about mudane things.  Just wait
until the mass media catches on - then we'll really see how popular
you are(n't).

Maybe this is the new punk, but it is weak that the same people get
all the hype when their content is no more creative than anyone else.
 They are just part of the in crowd (or should I say the
self-promoting crowd).

Just look how sensative they get when their "power" is questioned.

To those: get a life, or better yet, a job.

Watch, now one of the connected moderators will probably ban me from
this group.  Hasn't that happened to others who disgree with the cool
people?


--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Enric" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
More shameless self-promotion by ManCheeseMo.

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "ManCheeseMo"

  

  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  

  
wrote:


  More shameless self-promotion by Garfield.

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  

  
  wrote:
  
  

  
Plus I sent her to Vlog Soup which highlights a lot of new

  

  

  
  vloggers
  
  

  

  
each episode.

http://stevegarfield.blogs.com/videoblog/vlog_soup/index.html

On Dec 16, 2005, at 9:05 AM, Devlon wrote:



   It would be nice to hear about some new videobloggers in
  

  

  

  
  these
  
  

  

  

  articles.

  

--Steve
--
Home Page - http://stevegarfield.com
Video Blog  - http://stevegarfield.blogs.com
Text Blog - http://offonatangent.blogspot.com

Like Paul Revere, leading the citizen's media revolution.


  

  
  







Yahoo! Groups Links







  

  
  





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





  



-- 

My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us

http://apperceptions.org
http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com
http://node101.org
http://spinflow.org
http://wearethemedia.com
http://xpressionvlog.blogspot.com

aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
skype: msandy
spin: [EMAIL 

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Josh Leo



David Jr! I got an email from him self promoting himself this morning!:DAVIDJR.COM/TV SEASON 1 (7 episodes, running 27 minutes each)
HOPE YOU ENJOY THE SHOW - I'D LOVE YOUR FEEDBACK - PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD!We had a nice little chat a few weeks back about his videosI gave him my feedback...he didn't want it after I supplied it...
I'm glad we got rid of the anonymity...We obviously have some different thoughts about video... and he siad it himself a few weeks back something along the lines of Vlogging is not really my thing
check out his videos...he has got a very unique style!http://davidjrcom.blogspot.com/-- Josh Leo
joshleo.com
stonefarm.blogspot.comjoshspicks.blogspot.com

vlogcats.blogspot.comwearethemedia.com






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Steve Garfield
You need to chill out man.

Please read Steven Covey's 7 Habits of Highly Effective People where he 
says, Seek First To Understand.

I DID NOT suggest to the reporter anything about being the vlogfather.  
Clark ov Saturn is that.

Do some original research of your own.  Contact the reporter. Listen to 
the interview tapes.

On Dec 16, 2005, at 2:12 PM, ManCheeseMo wrote:

 HA!  Wasn't Garfield just referred to as The Vlogfather in one of
 the recent articles?  I'm sure that was his suggestion given his
 pompus footer about being like Paul Revere, leading this whole
 vlogging thing.  I can't believe nobody else sees throught the egos.

--Steve
-- 
Home Page - http://stevegarfield.com
Video Blog  - http://stevegarfield.blogs.com
Text Blog - http://offonatangent.blogspot.com

Like Paul Revere, leading the citizen's media revolution.



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Michael Sullivan



i'm the vodfather. you can be the vlogfather.clark can be the Fredo.deal?On 12/16/05, Steve Garfield 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:You need to chill out man.Please read Steven Covey's 7 Habits of Highly Effective People where he
says, Seek First To Understand.I DID NOT suggest to the reporter anything about being the vlogfather.Clark ov Saturn is that.Do some original research of your own.Contact the reporter. Listen to
the interview tapes.On Dec 16, 2005, at 2:12 PM, ManCheeseMo wrote: HA!Wasn't Garfield just referred to as The Vlogfather in one of the recent articles?I'm sure that was his suggestion given his
 pompus footer about being like Paul Revere, leading this whole vlogging thing.I can't believe nobody else sees throught the egos.--Steve--Home Page - http://stevegarfield.com
Video Blog- http://stevegarfield.blogs.comText Blog - http://offonatangent.blogspot.comLike Paul Revere, leading the citizen's media revolution.
 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM~-Yahoo! Groups Links* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
-- sull- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -The hybrid or the meeting of two media is a moment of truth and revelation from which new form is born
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://vlogdir.com - The Videoblog Directoryhttp://videobloggers.org - Free Videoblog Hosting / Vlogosphere Aggregator 
http://interdigitate.com - on again off again personal vlog


  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Randolfe Wicker
In an interview (podcast) with Michael Verdi, they talked about six 
different books on vlogging being in the works.
Randolfe (Randy) Wicker
http://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/



- Original Message - 
From: Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 9:50 AM
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging


 On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:47:07 +0100, Michael Sullivan
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 speaking of the vloggy vastness... what up with the book of vlog?  is
 that
 still being compiled?

 As far as I know it got picked up by a new publisher and is currently
 being (re)written.

 - Andreas
 -- 
 URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
 Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.




 Yahoo! Groups Links





 



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Markus Sandy
no, actually i find the mac version much easier to use

Susan wrote:

*choke*
Markus, did you just admit that something was better in the Windows
version? 
:)
Susan
http://vlog.kitykity.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

you must be a mac user or you wouldn't bring this up

I've used both mac and windows

windows version comes with big list, mac with small

mac was easier to start with




-- 

My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us

http://apperceptions.org
http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com
http://node101.org
http://spinflow.org
http://wearethemedia.com
http://xpressionvlog.blogspot.com

aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
skype: msandy
spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Verdi
On Dec 16, 2005, at 4:30 PM, ManCheeseMo wrote:

 I meant that FireANT could take the exising live
 build, strip it of the pre-populated feeds and release a 1.0b4
 version.  There would be no bugs that do not already exisit, which has
 nothing to do with the up and coming release.

The only problem with that is that since their isn't a directory on  
Mac yet, your version wouldn't do anything when you first installed  
it. Might be confusing for a new user.
-Verdi



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Ron Watson


snarkMaybe it could be populated it with Davidjr merchandise links? :-)/snarkWhat is the problem with people getting press for lots of hard work? What is the problem with having a set directory? I added my feed and several others quite easily, and it is just as simple to delete them. A seniority system is not necessarily a bad thing, especially in the early stages of development.This medium has developed so fast. I was looking at it late last year, or maybe even earlier this year, and it just wasn't there yet. Now it is ready to pop. Great thanks should be given to apple and iTunes for giving us this grand opportunity to foster change. Even more thanks should be given to all of the pioneers, teachers, techies, and cool people that have brought this revolution to a head.Get out and get in print. Say smart things. Help your friends and those you respect. Thanks a bunch. I can't wait to see where this goes...Ron Watsonhttp://k9disc.blip.tvhttp://k9disc.comhttp://pawsitivevybe.comOn Dec 16, 2005, at 5:30 PM, ManCheeseMo wrote:  Not quite the idea.  I meant that FireANT could take the exising live build, strip it of the pre-populated feeds and release a 1.0b4 version.  There would be no bugs that do not already exisit, which has nothing to do with the up and coming release.  Besides, the whole issue of pre-populated feeds was only used as an example of the bigger issue.  And to your previous point about not having legs to stand on because I do not have a vlog of my own-- Does that mean you think that a viewer's opinions are less than a creators?  Good luck with that.   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   That's right--just because you have a crappy attitude about a member  list in ant that was created months and months ago, let's push out a  non-complete build that could possibly be buggy and turn away an  audience that might really get into vlogging otherwise.  Great idea.  Susan  http://vlog.kitykity.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 




  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Randolfe Wicker





Beautifully stated, Jonny. I'd put (b) in 
front of (a). I think those involved in teaching, linking, commenting, 
public speaking, writing books, creating aggregators,etc. deserve to get 
the most attention.

I've noticed that Michael Verdi seems to be getting 
lost in the publicity rush. He and Ryanne are very special players because 
they taught many vloggers how to vlog through their Freevlog 
tutorials.

Steve Garfield is slick, experienced and 
professional. With vlog soup, he mixes other vlogs into a more appetizing 
package (taking the best of each vlog to make a super-good whole). 
Obviously, doing a vlog for a politician that seemed to have played some part in 
an election is a vlogging application made-for-the-media.

Ego is always at play with all of us. It 
doesn't even have to be something related to dreams of glory. It can be as 
simple as having a certain sense of integrity about your work which can be 
easily slighted with an off-the-cuff comment like the one directed at Josh Leo 
as being a college boy who vlogs about playing miniature gold while drunk...he's 
created a sizeable body of work that deserves a better description than 
that.

KityKity is another popular vlogger who could be 
"dismissed" with a similar minimizing quote. Every vlogger should see that 
any reporter they deal with sees some of their "good" and compelling work. 
(KityKity did acharming vlog in which the billboards along the highway 
became min-screens (among others).)

Jonny, you are someone who could come off in an 
article in any number of ways (all somewhat beyond your control)--as a serious 
educator and commentator and/or as a "silly comedian".

The important thing is to learn as you go 
along. If one reporter slights you, just get up, keep going, shape your 
message a little differently and hope for better print the next time. Life 
doesn't start or end with getting your name in print. Famous today and 
forgotten tomorrow! Been there. Done that.

Randolfe (Randy) Wicker

Videographer, Writer, ActivistAdvisor: The Immortality 
InstituteHoboken, NJhttp://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/201-656-3280



  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  jonny 
  goldstein 
  To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com 
  
  Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 2:18 
  PM
  Subject: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street 
  Journal: Videoblogging
  The first movers in any social network have an advantage 
  overlatecomers. That said, there's a fair amount of vloggers who 
  startedaround when the folks discussed here started, and they don't get 
  asmuch attention. Why do these folks get more attention? For the most 
  part:a) They crank out good videos often.b) They are deeply 
  involved in the social aspects of videoblogging(teaching, linking, 
  commenting, reviewing, writing vlog related books,doing vlog related 
  public speaking, creating tools for the vlogcommunity, setting up forums 
  for interaction, organizing conferences).c) And yes, journalists are 
  looking for the biggest bang for the leasteffort, so once people get 
  established as "good," there's a biastoward referencing them in news 
  stories--it's easy, and does the jobfor the journalist. d) Since 
  people can't do much about c) vloggers who are looking formedia glory 
  should focus on doing a) and b). Or...e) Relax, get a life, make a few 
  videos now and then, and not freakout about being a star. 
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Steve Watkins" 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I fail to see any purpose in 
  boycotting anything, how would it change the issue?  I 
  suppose its natural that some will get annoyed with stuff they 
  consider 'overexposed', but I dont think a solution has to be 
  negative, I do not think this is a case where the 'old guard' are 
  standing in the way of new videoblogs receiving attention, thats one 
  of the benefits of videoblogging after all.  I think its 
  actually gone better than could be expected so far, very few examples 
  of people coming along and trying to build their own hype via the 
  shortcut of taking credit from the people who have actually helped 
  build the scene.  I am glad there is no single 'Adam Curry' 
  figure of the videoblogging world. Judging by the sensitivity and 
  flames that can come out of such discussions by videobloggers on 
  topics such as motive, fame, ego, money etc, I expect anybody trying 
  to be 'the vodfather' would be reasted by the vlogosphere. Such things 
  are better when diluted, when there are many vlog brothers and sisters 
  doing such thing, not a single 'great leader'.  I am 
  also interested in the fact that there seems to be quite a divide 
  between videoblogs that are well promoted in mainstream media and 
  various websites, and those video podcasts which are promoted via 
  itunes.   Steve of Elbows --- In 
  videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "ManCheeseMo" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:   It sure does get old reading what is 
  basically the same article. My  

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Michael I



Uh not to flog a dead horse but I remember some time back when Josh Leo loudly said the same thing...same song, same arugement.   Is this something that should be addressed? I do not know the complete tift here but reading Manchessemo's complaint here has been metioned numerous times.   Why is this? does it put a black eye the promotion of videoblogging? Do arugements like this leave a bad taste in peoples mouths? With this new "media" are people struggling to stay at the top? and in the mean time does this stiffle the creativity? has it created a hierarchary instead of a anarchy? as a particpant (since August 2004) and observer it seems that it's not making the most positive impression.I am open to any honest and or creative disscussion. If you want to email me to mention any personal feelings I welcome that also.   Mick ManCheeseMo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote: Uh, how original. What exactly am I promoting? I don't even have a vlog to promote yet.  My point is that the "good ol' boy" network gets old. If you are buddies with the FireANT crew or if you're one of the pre-populated vlogs, you'll get extra attention.  There are people on this board that seem to have no job other than promoting themselves and their friends.  IMHO, many in this group live inside a bubble where vlogging is everything to them. The funny part is that most people don't care to watch a person talk into a camera about mudane things. Just wait until the mass media catches on - then we'll really see how popular you are(n't).  Maybe this is the new punk, but it is weak that the same people get all the hype when their content is no more creative than
 anyone else.  They are just part of the in crowd (or should I say the self-promoting crowd).  Just look how sensative they get when their "power" is questioned.  To those: get a life, or better yet, a job.  Watch, now one of the connected moderators will probably ban me from this group. Hasn't that happened to others who disgree with the cool people?   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Enric" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   More shameless self-promotion by ManCheeseMo.--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "ManCheeseMo" [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote: More shameless self-promotion by Garfield.  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   Plus I sent her to Vlog Soup which highlights a lot of new vloggers each episode.  
  http://stevegarfield.blogs.com/videoblog/vlog_soup/index.htmlOn Dec 16, 2005, at 9:05 AM, Devlon wrote: It would be nice to hear about some new videobloggers in these  articles.--Steve-- Home Page - http://stevegarfield.comVideo Blog - http://stevegarfield.blogs.comText Blog - http://offonatangent.blogspot.comLike Paul Revere, leading the citizen's media revolution.  
 __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 




  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Individual
  
  
Fireant
  
  
Typepad
  
  


Use
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Josh Wolf
Although I haven't followed this thread from the start... I do have  
to agree that ManCheeseMo has a point although it seems somewhat  
misguided. I do imagine that FireANT's pre-loaded set of the first  
wave vloggers did provide them with a leg-up in building an audience.  
I don't consider this something to complain about, but it is probably  
true.

However, this phenomena is not what is contributing to the good ol'  
boy network in regards to coverage by the mainstream press. Nor is  
it their active involvement in this group and videoblogging as a  
whole which may be part of it and to be commended. The real reason  
that the same group of people are always highlighted by the  
mainstream press is that the mainstream press are lazy journalists.

Some editor somewhere tells their reporter, I want you do to a story  
on videoblogging. Now rather than looking for sources to talk about  
videoblogging by looking around the net, the writer is far more  
likely to pull up a Lexus-Nexus search on videoblogging or video  
podcasting -- and use the exact same sources for her article as the  
one previous. This is one of the dominant reasons that the same  
vloggers are frequently profiled.

To give you an example, I was interviewed about Current TV prior to  
the launch by Salon magazine. This article prompted the AP, Knight  
Ridder, The Wall Street Journal, TIME and others to contact me and  
inquire about my thoughts on Current TV.

Josh
http://www.joshwolf.net

On Dec 16, 2005, at 11:09 AM, ManCheeseMo wrote:

 Uh, how original.  What exactly am I promoting?  I don't even have a
 vlog to promote yet.

 My point is that the good ol' boy network gets old.  If you are
 buddies with the FireANT crew or if you're one of the pre-populated
 vlogs, you'll get extra attention.

 There are people on this board that seem to have no job other than
 promoting themselves and their friends.

 IMHO, many in this group live inside a bubble where vlogging is
 everything to them.  The funny part is that most people don't care to
 watch a person talk into a camera about mudane things.  Just wait
 until the mass media catches on - then we'll really see how popular
 you are(n't).

 Maybe this is the new punk, but it is weak that the same people get
 all the hype when their content is no more creative than anyone else.
  They are just part of the in crowd (or should I say the
 self-promoting crowd).

 Just look how sensative they get when their power is questioned.

 To those: get a life, or better yet, a job.

 Watch, now one of the connected moderators will probably ban me from
 this group.  Hasn't that happened to others who disgree with the cool
 people?


 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 More shameless self-promotion by ManCheeseMo.

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ManCheeseMo  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:


 More shameless self-promotion by Garfield.

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 wrote:


 Plus I sent her to Vlog Soup which highlights a lot of new vloggers
 each episode.

 http://stevegarfield.blogs.com/videoblog/vlog_soup/index.html

 On Dec 16, 2005, at 9:05 AM, Devlon wrote:


  It would be nice to hear about some new videobloggers in these
 articles.



 --Steve
 -- 
 Home Page - http://stevegarfield.com
 Video Blog  - http://stevegarfield.blogs.com
 Text Blog - http://offonatangent.blogspot.com

 Like Paul Revere, leading the citizen's media revolution.













  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor  
 ~--
 Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the  
 Sweet Life.
 http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
  
 ~-


 Yahoo! Groups Links










Don't hate the media, become the media.- Jello Biafra



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income homes are not online. Make a difference this holiday season!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5UeCyC/BWHMAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Verdi
On Dec 16, 2005, at 7:09 PM, Josh Wolf wrote:

 To give you an example, I was interviewed about Current TV prior to
 the launch by Salon magazine. This article prompted the AP, Knight
 Ridder, The Wall Street Journal, TIME and others to contact me and
 inquire about my thoughts on Current TV.


Exactly. After this weekend's article in the NY Times a reporter for  
our local daily paper contacted me. She was very excited about that  
article and was interested in contacting all the people mentioned.

Anyway she came to NODE101 and talked to me for a long time but got  
real defensive the more I talked about circumventing the corporate  
media. I guess that's not the story she wanted for the business  
section. She seemed a lot more interested in the whole TV stardom on  
$20 a day thing.

Verdi

--
Me: http://michaelverdi.com
RD: http://graymattergravy.com
Learn to videoblog: http://freevlog.org
Learn to videoblog in person: http://node101.org


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [videoblogging] Re: Wall Street Journal: Videoblogging

2005-12-16 Thread Josh Wolf
Actually Verdi if she was writing for the business section, the hook  
might be a little more econ-orientated than TV Stardom with $20 a  
day -- more like, promote your product to the internet using this  
handy dandy new thing called a vlog I'm surprised Keven Tredau's  
website doesn't feature a videoblog...

Josh

On Dec 16, 2005, at 5:21 PM, Verdi wrote:

 On Dec 16, 2005, at 7:09 PM, Josh Wolf wrote:


 To give you an example, I was interviewed about Current TV prior to
 the launch by Salon magazine. This article prompted the AP, Knight
 Ridder, The Wall Street Journal, TIME and others to contact me and
 inquire about my thoughts on Current TV.



 Exactly. After this weekend's article in the NY Times a reporter for
 our local daily paper contacted me. She was very excited about that
 article and was interested in contacting all the people mentioned.

 Anyway she came to NODE101 and talked to me for a long time but got
 real defensive the more I talked about circumventing the corporate
 media. I guess that's not the story she wanted for the business
 section. She seemed a lot more interested in the whole TV stardom on
 $20 a day thing.

 Verdi

 --
 Me: http://michaelverdi.com
 RD: http://graymattergravy.com
 Learn to videoblog: http://freevlog.org
 Learn to videoblog in person: http://node101.org


  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor  
 ~--
 AIDS in India: A lurking bomb. Click and help stop AIDS now.
 http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
  
 ~-


 Yahoo! Groups Links










We can bomb the world to pieces, but we can't bomb it into to peace.
Power to the peaceful!

Spearhead - Bomb the World



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/u8TY5A/tzNLAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/