On Thursday 17 May 2007 13:32, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> > A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> >> - What is ncftp? On my openSUSE 10.2 system I have a program
> >> called "ftp" but none called "ncftp".
> Well, AFAICT it has disappeared between SuSE 10.0 and 10.2. I have
> packages named lftp and lukemftp (which
On Friday 11 May 2007 16:29, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Nicolas Weber wrote:
> > > The directories structure of the Subversion repository has been
> > > changed. Please use this command to checkout the latest
> > > sources:
> > >
> > > svn co
> > > https://vim.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/vim/branches/
On Tuesday 08 May 2007 21:29, you wrote:
> On 5/8/07, scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i was surpised by the fact that simply running 'svn update' bumped me up
> > to 7.1a -- from previous posts i had thought there was something extra
> > that had to be do
On Tuesday 08 May 2007 15:32, you wrote:
> Mr Toothpik wrote:
> > i was surpised by the fact that simply running 'svn update' bumped me
> > up to 7.1a -- from previous posts i had thought there was something
> > extra that had to be done to get the beta, like create a new 71a
> > directory or somet
On Tuesday 08 May 2007 12:04, you wrote:
> Edward L. Fox wrote:
> > On 5/8/07, scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> i was surpised by the fact that simply running 'svn update' bumped me
> >> up to
> >> 7.1a -- from previous posts i had though
i was surpised by the fact that simply running 'svn update' bumped me up to
7.1a -- from previous posts i had thought there was something extra that had
to be done to get the beta, like create a new 71a directory or something
now i've got the beta i feel committed, and will commence chasing afte
i had to
'rm src/auto/config.cache
before i could build with this one
sc
On Friday 29 December 2006 22:00, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> scott wrote:
> > On Friday 29 December 2006 10:55, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> >> Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
> >>> scott wrote:
> >>>> has anyone else lost the ability to get a menu
On Friday 29 December 2006 10:55, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
> > scott wrote:
> >> has anyone else lost the ability to get a menu by entering
> >>
> >> :set guioptions+=m
> >>
> >> nothing happens
> >&g
On Tuesday 26 December 2006 11:36, scott wrote:
> has anyone else lost the ability to get a menu by entering
>
> :set guioptions+=m
>
> nothing happens
>
> i see
>
> 4: /usr/local/share/vim/vim70/menu.vim
>
> in :scriptnames...
>
> no glaring errors on bu
has anyone else lost the ability to get a menu by entering
:set guioptions+=m
nothing happens
i see
4: /usr/local/share/vim/vim70/menu.vim
in :scriptnames...
no glaring errors on build (7.0.178)
i build with
export CONF_OPT_GUI='--enable-gnome-check'
in SUSE linux 10.0
--
scott
;t gained anything
over and above all these new error messages
i will be reverting to my previous version (v98) -- i've got a :so ~/.vimrc
mapped so i can get my formatoptions and whatever else it resets
back (but not the last search arg!) easily
sorry to be such a pest,
scott
On Friday 15 Dec
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 10:19 -0400, Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
> scott wrote:
> >ok, so help me out here
> >
> >i've looked at filetype vim, and i see nothing that associates
> >_.txt modules with ft=txt
> >
> >whether i enter my 'ai'
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 08:13 +0200, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> scott wrote:
> > ok, so help me out here
> >
> > i've looked at filetype vim, and i see nothing that associates
> > _.txt modules with ft=txt
> >
> > whether i enter my 'ai' modules
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 06:55 +0200, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> scott wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 05:58 +0200, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> >> scott wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 01:57 +0200, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> >>>> A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> >&
ok, so help me out here
i've looked at filetype vim, and i see nothing that associates
_.txt modules with ft=txt
whether i enter my 'ai' modules with the script or by navigating
to where they are and, with my bloody fingers typing 'gvim
ai_200609.txt', still, inside the module, filetype is undefi
s
as much java and C# as i work on, i hope i can live without cindent,
but between you and me, i'm betting off is better
thanx!
sc
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 14:08 +1000, Peter Hodge wrote:
> Hello scott,
>
> The 'filetype=' message is what happens when you use ':se
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 05:58 +0200, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> scott wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 01:57 +0200, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> >> A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> >>> In (g)vim 7.0.90, when I try to invoke the help, let's say
> >>>
> >>>
help!
i'm at 7.0.90, but i've noticed the indenting weirdness before,
so i don't know when it really started
i think the other time(s) too it was in my 'ai' module, which,
although it has a .txt extenstion, comes up with 'filetype='
so weird
ok -- no filetype is defined -- fine -- this still sh
>
> Best regards,
> Tony.
tony -- all this weirdness with your help -- as dependant as
we are on whatever is insalled for 'ctags', i'd say you might
spend some time looking at whatever shows up for 'which ctags'
with a thought towards maybe fixing something there
scott
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 09:23 +0100, Matthew Winn wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 10:02:10AM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > Yakov Lerner wrote:
> I suppose there might be some way to map all the movement commands to
> reposition the current line to a certain place on the screen, but at the
> time
u one...
scott
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 22:23 +0200, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
> These two sections in the documentation seems contradictory:
>
> *gui-kde* *kde* *KDE* *KVim*
> There is no KDE version of Vim. There has been some work on a port
d i'm
a linux newbie
any help will be appreciated,
scott
23 matches
Mail list logo
