On 7/10/06, Sean Reifschneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 07:56:13PM +0300, Yakov Lerner wrote:
>Vim is special. I believe that being organic extension of
>programmer/sysadmin fingers, it deserves special attitude
>that other packages.
By refusing to build vim from sourc
On 2006-07-10, Sean Reifschneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 07:38:02AM +, Yakov Lerner wrote:
> >package-maintiners and expect them to fine-tune binary packages
> >to your inquiries/needs/wishes. Unless you are package-maintiner
>
> Having an expert tune the package
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 07:56:13PM +0300, Yakov Lerner wrote:
>Vim is special. I believe that being organic extension of
>programmer/sysadmin fingers, it deserves special attitude
>that other packages.
The point you missed, assuming I was being absurd, is that I can probably
find someone on the de
On 7/10/06, Yakov Lerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I penetrated this barrier once ~ 6 years ago, the barrier between
the stock-rpm-vim and self-build-rpm.
Correction. I wanted to write:
... the barrier between the stock-rpm-vim and self-build-vim.
On 7/10/06, Sean Reifschneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have submitted a suggestion to the Fedora packager
I wish you god luck waiting from Fedora packager.
I referred to the possibility of installing vim under $HOME/bin,
for one user only, you. (This is possible even if user is root). Th
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 07:38:02AM +, Yakov Lerner wrote:
>It is so much easier and predictable to build & install vim from
>sources youself, (with exactly the features you need), than hunt
I understand that some people believe this, but as a large-scale system
administrator I disagree. If I
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 09:26:54AM +0200, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
>Well tell them to fix that, or you'll never get access to "* or "+ from Vim.
As I said in the previous message, I've already opened a bug request with
Fedora about it. It wasn't until late today that I also tested it on
Ubuntu. Ho
On 7/10/06, Nikolai Weibull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/10/06, Sean Reifschneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>A new feature in vim would make it work extremely well, using the stock
>packages as built in Fedora Core and Ubuntu (neither builds --with-x=yes
>in the non-gvim version
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 01:41:26AM +0200, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
>But what's the point? Some characters will already have been inserted
>and they won't have had 'paste' set. I fail to see how this is a path
>to follow.
Absolutely, the first N characters of your text may have been pasted
incorrec
On 7/10/06, Sean Reifschneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A new feature in vim would make it work extremely well, using the stock
packages as built in Fedora Core and Ubuntu (neither builds --with-x=yes
in the non-gvim version).
Well tell them to fix that, or you'll never get access t
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 07:34:12AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>> and that's a workable solution. It's still annoying how clicking and
>> selecting text causes vim to move my cursor around and requires me to
>> press escape when I'm done selecting.
>
>maybe you could read :he mouse then (and rea
Le lun 10 juillet 2006 05:57, Sean Reifschneider a écrit :
> On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 11:57:48PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> >'*' works iff your vim is linked against X.
> >same is true for shift right mouse button.
> […]
> However, I have rebuilt the Fedora Core 6 test 1 RPMs --with-x=yes,
>
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 11:57:48PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>'*' works iff your vim is linked against X.
>same is true for shift right mouse button.
The ideal solution for me would be to detect more than X characters
received during the last, say, 100ms, and turn on paste then.
However, I ha
Le ven 7 juillet 2006 06:23, Sean Reifschneider a écrit :
> I haven't been very happy with using vim in an xterm with various
> settings of "mouse=", "selectmode=" and others. Part of this may be
> that the Fedora build is missing some features related to things like
> "* doesn't seem to work, and
On 7/8/06, Sean Reifschneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's certainly doable to detect that more than N characters have been
"typed" in insert mode in the last M milliseconds though, even if you don't
have access to the input buffer. Or am I missing something?
But what's the point? Some ch
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 01:43:46AM +0300, Yakov Lerner wrote:
>empty based on the size of typeahead buffer. I don't want to
>disappoint you. But I believe there is no possibility to automatically
>do something based on number of character in the input buffer.
It's certainly doable to detect that m
On 7/8/06, Sean Reifschneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Probably because for it to work in insert mode you would need to do "set
mouse=i".
set mouse=a
is a superset of
set mouse=i
nikolai
On 7/7/06, Sean Reifschneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 11:35:41AM +0300, Yakov Lerner wrote:
>On 7/7/06, Sean Reifschneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>What I'm really looking for is that when I paste using the mouse, that
>>"paste" is set.
>
>How about this
>
>:map :s
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 12:10:14AM +0200, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
>On 7/7/06, Sean Reifschneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:47:55PM +0200, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
>>>OK, so here's what you do:
>>>
>:map :set paste"*p:set nopaste
>>>
>>>and
>>>
>>> :inoremap set paste
On 7/7/06, Sean Reifschneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:47:55PM +0200, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
>OK, so here's what you do:
>
>>>:map :set paste"*p:set nopaste
>
>and
>
> :inoremap set paste*set nopaste
That doesn't seem to do the job. I'm not quite sure what you're t
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:47:55PM +0200, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
>OK, so here's what you do:
>
>>>:map :set paste"*p:set nopaste
>
>and
>
> :inoremap set paste*set nopaste
That doesn't seem to do the job. I'm not quite sure what you're trying to
accomplish here, so I can't tell where it's going
On 7/7/06, Sean Reifschneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 11:35:41AM +0300, Yakov Lerner wrote:
>On 7/7/06, Sean Reifschneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>What I'm really looking for is that when I paste using the mouse, that
>>"paste" is set.
>
>How about this
>
>:map :s
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 11:35:41AM +0300, Yakov Lerner wrote:
>On 7/7/06, Sean Reifschneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>What I'm really looking for is that when I paste using the mouse, that
>>"paste" is set.
>
>How about this
>
>:map :set paste"*p:set nopaste
>and similar thing for imap
I beli
On 7/7/06, Sean Reifschneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What I'm really looking for is that when I paste using the mouse, that
"paste" is set.
How about this
:map :set paste"*p:set nopaste
and similar thing for imap
-- untested
Yakov
24 matches
Mail list logo
