Philippe De Muyter wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 03:02:15AM +0100, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Philippe de Muyter wrote:
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 10:20:34PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
[...]
The default digraphs now correspond to RFC1345. Most are different from
what was
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 10:20:34PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
[...]
The default digraphs now correspond to RFC1345. Most are different from
what was used in Vim 5.x. Do we care about this incompatibility?
I only noticed that now, switching my linux distro to suse 10.3, and yes, I
really
Philippe De Muyter wrote:
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 10:20:34PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
[...]
The default digraphs now correspond to RFC1345. Most are different from
what was used in Vim 5.x. Do we care about this incompatibility?
I only noticed that now, switching my linux
Andrew Myers wrote:
Philippe De Muyter wrote:
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 10:20:34PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
[...]
The default digraphs now correspond to RFC1345. Most are different from
what was used in Vim 5.x. Do we care about this incompatibility?
I only noticed that now,
Philippe De Muyter wrote:
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 10:20:34PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
[...]
The default digraphs now correspond to RFC1345. Most are different from
what was used in Vim 5.x. Do we care about this incompatibility?
I only noticed that now, switching my linux distro to
Philippe de Muyter wrote:
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 10:20:34PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
[...]
The default digraphs now correspond to RFC1345. Most are different from
what was used in Vim 5.x. Do we care about this incompatibility?
Seems like only yesterday :-).
I only noticed that
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Philippe de Muyter wrote:
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 10:20:34PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
[...]
The default digraphs now correspond to RFC1345. Most are different from
what was used in Vim 5.x. Do we care about this incompatibility?
Seems like only yesterday :-).