In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 25 May 2011 21:33:26 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>I say that it is impossible (unthinkable it just cannot be) to create
>light elements from the fission of nickel or copper.
[snip]
What's impossible about:
4H + Ni60 => 2 S32 + 16.7 MeV ?
(Note that while fissionin
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 25 May 2011 21:18:50 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Could the Rossi process just be the Mills process extended to operate on a
>continuous semi-annual basis?
[snip]
That what I proposed about a month ago. :)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 25 May 2011 21:18:50 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Is it possible that Mills is seeing the same reaction that Rossi sees and
>has mistakenly invented the hydrino atom mechanism to explain it?
[snip]
Mills developed the theory first, then went looking for experimental
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 25 May 2011 23:21:44 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>In the Rossi reactor, the control system controls the temperature at or very
>near the center of catalytic activity. IMHO, it is at or near the internal
>heater. The internal heater produces an active agent via the s
yer welcome, sonny...
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Charles Hope
wrote:
> What a profound statement. Thank you!
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
> On May 25, 2011, at 15:44, Rich Murray wrote:
>
>> Let's encourage non ad hominem, civil, polite, gracious, patient,
>> evidence and detail oriented,
Thanks! Perhaps not evrything that Rossi says is absolutely true. Was
sputtering used for isotopic enrichment- actually segregation? Goes it to
the level of individual atoms?
I don't buy the idea of catalysis- it has be more probable
some emhanced nanometric effect.
Peter
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1
Axil,
IMHO, yes Mills and Rossi are seeing the same effect and are both wrong -
Jan Naudts is the only one who got it right when he proposed the hydrogen
atoms are actually relativistic. decreasing energy density for Casimir
geometry is a big clue because it mirrors relativistic effects for in
Reactivity is directly related to the tendency of the Rossi reactor core to
change power level: if reactivity is positive, the power level tends to
increase; if it is negative, the power tends to decrease; if it is zero, the
power tends to remain stable. The reactivity of the reactor may be adjuste
So sorry, please excuse me. Rydberg was misspelled in my spell checker. It’s
now corrected and won't be misspelled again.
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
>
> > Is it possible that Mills is seeing the same reaction tha
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> Is it possible that Mills is seeing the same reaction that Rossi sees and
> has mistakenly invented the “hydrino atom” mechanism to explain it?
Do you not read anything Jones Beene writes?
> Is Rydburg matter loaded into the mills catalyst and
Written in 1993, the author investigates the debunking of N-Rays because he
sees
similarities
with the tatics employed to debunk cold fusion and homeopathy. An interesting
read!
Harry
The Theatre of the Blind: Starring a Promethean Prankster, a Phoney Phenomenon,
a Prism, a Pocket, and a
This paper may come closer to explaining what goes on in the Piantelli
reaction, than it does for the Rossi reaction.
I say that it is impossible (unthinkable – it just cannot be) to create
light elements from the fission of nickel or copper.
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Alan J Fletcher w
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Mark Iverson wrote:
> John:
>
> Let me ask a few questions so I can better understand what you're
> proposing...
>
> What is your interpretation of the magnetic moment present in all elementary
> particles where electrical currents don't even come into play?
>
>
Recently, I was doing a survey of papers addressing the potassium/carbon
formation of Rydburg matter; and one paper turned up from blacklight that
got me thinking.
The thermally reversible hydrino catalysts system as a new power source.
http://www.blacklightpower.com/papers/Eng%20Power050410S
At 06:10 PM 5/25/2011, you wrote:
At 05:55 PM 5/25/2011, you wrote:
A detailed Qualitative Approach to the Cold Fusion Nuclear Reactions of H/Ni
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=497
Fig 3 -- supposedly based on measurements -- shows the results when
a single pulse of input power i
At 05:55 PM 5/25/2011, you wrote:
A detailed Qualitative Approach to the Cold Fusion Nuclear Reactions of H/Ni
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=497
Fig 3 -- supposedly based on measurements -- shows the results when a
single pulse of input power is applied:
http://www.journal-of-
What a profound statement. Thank you!
Sent from my iPhone.
On May 25, 2011, at 15:44, Rich Murray wrote:
> Let's encourage non ad hominem, civil, polite, gracious, patient,
> evidence and detail oriented, genteel, lightly humorous, collaborative
> communication -- one of the finest cultural i
A detailed Qualitative Approach to the Cold Fusion Nuclear Reactions of H/Ni
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=497
Thanks for your input, Robin
I wouldn't mind additional commentary from the collective. ;-)
Are there differing views & opinions on this matter?
Once again, I post my original questions [slightly reedited for
clarification]:
> Perhaps I've misunderstood a fundamental aspect concerning how
> ex
How about giving a few examples of the sort of answer you'd find satisfactory?
Sent from my iPhone.
On May 25, 2011, at 20:33, "Mark Iverson" wrote:
> Robin beat me to the punch... I was changing spark-plugs and serpentine belts
> on my car!
>
> Robin hits the nail on the head... Anything m
John:
Let me ask a few questions so I can better understand what you're proposing...
What is your interpretation of the magnetic moment present in all elementary
particles where
electrical currents don't even come into play?
Of course atoms can be affected by a magnetic field... this is the
Robin beat me to the punch... I was changing spark-plugs and serpentine belts
on my car!
Robin hits the nail on the head... Anything mathematical is the MODEL, and is
supposed to reflect
physical reality. My question was about the physical world -- what I was
asking got was a rational,
qualita
Joshua Cude wrote:
> > I will say, however, that his views seem to boil down to an assertion
> that conventional instruments and techniques do not work.
>
>
> Wrong. I have never asserted that, and I do not believe it. I will assert
> that tools do not make a carpenter, and that my views boil do
In reply to Joshua Cude's message of Wed, 25 May 2011 17:54:32 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>Maxwell's equations were developed to describe laboratory electricity and
>magnetism experiments.
...from which the peculiar perpendicular nature of the phenomenon was already
evident.
>The resulting equations the
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> I will say, however, that his views seem to boil down to an assertion that
conventional instruments and techniques do not work.
Wrong. I have never asserted that, and I do not believe it. I will assert
that tools do not make a carpenter, an
At 03:31 PM 5/25/2011, you wrote:
In reply to Alan J Fletcher's message of Wed, 25 May 2011 13:59:30 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>At 01:24 PM 5/25/2011, you wrote:
>HARD CURRENCY ENERGY- how the thermal energy of the active core
can be converted in electric energy in an economical way?
>I'm probably to
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 4:50 PM, wrote:
> In reply to Joshua Cude's message of Wed, 25 May 2011 16:08:10 -0500:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> >What do mean by "we"? It's not from observing e-m waves that we know the
> >fields are perpendicular. It follows from Maxwell's equations, which
> predict
> >the wave
Ok, you need to consider my answer if you want to understand this.
You are assuming that a thing called a magnetic field really exists and this
is the reason for your problem.
Consider first how to interact with of detect magnetic fields, first take
the Neutron, what reaction does it have to a ma
In reply to Alan J Fletcher's message of Wed, 25 May 2011 13:59:30 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>At 01:24 PM 5/25/2011, you wrote:
>HARD CURRENCY ENERGY- how the thermal energy of the active core can be
>converted in electric energy in an economical way?
>
>
>I don't think that's going to (or needs to) hap
In reply to Alan J Fletcher's message of Wed, 25 May 2011 13:06:10 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>Rossi implies that the output is constantly monitored and automatically
>adjusted. He guarantees a 6x amplification, but he probably has plenty of
>'amplification' in reserve.
[snip]
I'm beginning to wonder abo
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Wed, 25 May 2011
16:37:04 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>Perhaps I've misunderstood a fundamental aspect concerning how excess
>energy is supposed to be extracted from Rossi's e-cats. Is it rather
>the situation where once 500 C is reached (by external me
In reply to Joshua Cude's message of Wed, 25 May 2011 16:08:10 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>What do mean by "we"? It's not from observing e-m waves that we know the
>fields are perpendicular. It follows from Maxwell's equations, which predict
>the waves. So, certainly some people can explain in arbitrary de
It is time to repeat this point again.
Rossi does not need to use water to steam as a power transfer mechanism
because steam implies high pressure. And high pressure is expensive.
A molten salt or liquid metal coolant produced at ambient pressure can cool
the Rossi reactor. These coolants can
RE: sounding like a philosopher...
Yep, since I'm an INTP personality type, I tend to focus on the forest...
RE: our models...
I guess what prompted my intial question to the Collective (re; perpendicular E
and B fields) was
that, although we do have some good models, they were done over hundred
There is an aspect to Rossi's e-cat thermal generation process that
remains fuzzy to me. It's my understanding that Rossi has to push the
temperature of his e-Cat cores up into the neighborhood of 500C via an
external heating process before the mysterious Rossi thermal reaction
takes over.
That sa
Unlike Abd, I did not propose to taken on Cude, and I still do not.
I will say, however, that his views seem to boil down to an assertion
that conventional instruments and techniques do not work. Calorimetry
and x-ray film do not work. Replications by hundreds of researchers mean
nothing. The
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Mark Iverson wrote:
>
> With all the sophistication and accuracy to umpteen decimal places in
> atomic physics/QM, how come we
> can't explain WHY they're perpendicular! I think any theory should have to
> explain the simple
> observations first before delving do
Alan J Fletcher wrote:
I don't think that's going to (or needs to) happen any time soon ---
it only delivers 500C (limited by the nickel powder degrading?) at 50
bar.
Electrical conversion efficiency at that level is less than 20% (??)
-- times the 6x factor is barely over unity.
It is way b
At 01:24 PM 5/25/2011, you wrote:
HARD CURRENCY ENERGY- how
the thermal energy of the active core can be converted in electric energy
in an economical way?
I don't think that's going to (or needs to) happen any time soon --- it
only delivers 500C (limited by the nickel powder degrading?) at 50 b
HARD CURRENCY ENERGY- how the thermal energy of the active core
can be converted in electric energy in an economical way?
I don't think that's going to (or needs to) happen any time soon --- it
only delivers 500C (limited by the nickel powder degrading?) at 50 bar.
Electrical conversion efficie
Thank you! But we have not seen much of these features during the
experiments. Let's hope it is OK.
Peter
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
> *SCALE-UP- *the problem was already shown at the first virtue; modular
> scale-up is not genuine scale up., IMHO. It has to be mor
SCALE-UP- the problem was already shown at the first virtue;
modular scale-up is not genuine scale up., IMHO. It has to be more than
addition of many small units. Question- why it was made a scale down
after the first two experiments?
The scale down was for controlability. The February
"130kW"
Peter,
Regarding "cheapness" : It appears the "enrichment" Rossi mentions is a free
side effect of sputtering [Soret effect] that only segregates the isotopes by a
matter of centimeters but since this places the heavier isotopes closer to the
cold reactor wall and each other it may be enough to
Thanks for: "... Nevertheless, In my view you may not have adequately
rebuttaled the bulk of Joshua's rebuttals in an honorable fashion"
Let's encourage non ad hominem, civil, polite, gracious, patient,
evidence and detail oriented, genteel, lightly humorous, collaborative
communication -- one
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Mark Iverson wrote:
> I think any theory should have to explain the simple
> observations first before delving down into more difficult and esoteric
> aspects of physics.
You sound more like a philosopher now. I know it's cliché but, the
more I learn, the more I
Dear Friends,
I have just published a SWOT analysis of the E-cat.
at my EgoOut blog. SW part.
"Buying the E-cat in sack?" (better not in the sack)
It needs improvement. Please help- waiting crotics
suggestions advices.
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
You're right Terry, I don't like your answer!
And I don't think any of the other explanations answered the question
adequately...
>From my purely physical model, it would be a natural cause-effect relationship
>due to a polarizable
vacuum... i.e., the electric and magnetic fields of mainstream
Ok, Joshua Cude IS aware of Abd's posts. Good.
...
>From Abd
> I have not read the rest of his [Cude's] trash.
> I have actual research to do.
In my view such pithy responses tend to reveal petulant behavior and a
little bit of immaturity too.
Keep in mind, Abd, several days ago you essentiall
On 2011-05-25 19:37, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
Dear Mr Alessandre Casali: you are right, 300 is not the exact number,
is an order of magnitude. Actually, the configuration of the 1 MW plant
is complex, and confidential. I can’t give details: of course you are
right: 2,5 x 300 makes 750. We will pro
Alessandro Casali
May 25th, 2011 at 4:43 AM
Dear Mr. Rossi,
Thanks in advance for your patience, i have a simple question that im
sure you can clarify.
You have recently stated that each signle e-cat (in the 1 MW Greek plant)
will produce 2.5 kW so how can you reach 1 MW with only 300 e-cats?
http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n1105/24spirit/
NASA closes book on Spirit rover's historic mission
BY STEPHEN CLARK
SPACEFLIGHT NOW
Posted: May 24, 2011
NASA's immobilized, crippled Spirit rover likely succumbed to cold
temperatures during the last Martian winter, and officials will cease
att
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-13522957
Egyptian pyramids found by infra-red satellite images
By Frances Cronin
BBC News
The infrared image on the right reveals the ancient city streets of
Tanis near modern-day San El Hagar.
Seventeen lost pyramids are among the buildings identified in a new
sa
Hoyt,
It is hard to stop speculating when there are so many clues and
common denominators circulating with respect to the work of Rossi and other
researchers.
Fran
I think Moller was enjoying same benefit of "Soret enrichment" from
sputtering with MAHG as Rossi. We recently learned Rossi also sputters Ni
powder inside of his reactor walls. Rossi appears to keep gain low in E-cat, We
speculate this preserves the Casimir geometry of pits on surface ar
54 matches
Mail list logo