Tell that to the MFMP
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> People will not attempt to understand LENR until it is heating the water
> for their baths.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:13 PM, James Bowery wrote:
>
>> What is Mr. Letts' explanation for the lack of replication of h
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> The bulk of the material inside the active sphere is activated charcoal
> (carbon). The charcoal has a mesh of between 1350 and 2000 (micro mesh
> screening of 6 to 10 microns)…. That was selected to match the 8.2 micron
> peak wavelength of b
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> It is symptomatic of modern ignorance. People nowadays in the U.S. seem to
> know nothing about nature, or bacteria, or the concept of risk factor, or
> (in this case) the proportional difference between a ~50 ml of urine and 38
> million ga
People will not attempt to understand LENR until it is heating the water
for their baths.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:13 PM, James Bowery wrote:
> What is Mr. Letts' explanation for the lack of replication of his results?
>
> Seriously, the protocol that is reliably reproducible has been the Holy
The referenced article at the top of this thread as follows:
http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/NIWeekCravens.pdf
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
> Axil--
>
> Which IE article regarding magnetism are you referring to?
>
> Bob
>
> - Original Message -
> *From
Daniel Rocha wrote:
So, it was in the part that is just a reservoir, that is before
> processing and distribuition? Heh?
Yes. A large outdoor pond.
> That kind of concern is so odd.
>
It is symptomatic of modern ignorance. People nowadays in the U.S. seem to
know nothing about nature, or ba
Jed
I assume you are talking about the Craven/Gimpel experiment at the Cold Fusion
at National Instruments Week event in August 2013?
I read it last Fall and was impressed. Those two seem to want to get the
information out and provide their theory in an understandable manner.
Their ideas
Axil--
Which IE article regarding magnetism are you referring to?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: Co-Netic AA and the Dirac sea
The item below is an idem of interest in the IE article regardi
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
… and given the recent Mizuno results – where a former
> proponent of helium is now (effectively) recanting - we may be seeing a
> major change in outlook.
>
I did not read that into Mizuno's recent slides. I doubt he is recanting
any helium r
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook
> What happened to Case?
NEWFIELDS N.H. - Leslie C. Case, 79, died Thursday, July 15, 2010, at his home
in Newfields. He was born Sept. 11, 1930, in Tulsa, Ok, Mr. Case received his
doctorate of science degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Tech
Bob Cook wrote:
Jones--
>
> What happened to Case? Does anyone know?
>
He died of old age. Do you mean what happened to his experiment? McKubre
replicated with Case's help. Ed Storms tried to replicate but he saw no
excess heat. I do not know of anyone else who tried.
- Jed
So, it was in the part that is just a reservoir, that is before
processing and distribuition? Heh? That kind of concern is so odd.
2014-04-18 21:12 GMT-03:00 Jed Rothwell :
> Daniel Rocha wrote:
>
>> Was it in what part of the process cleaning of the reservoir?
>
>
> I do not think so. If they we
Jones--
What happened to Case? Does anyone know?
Sending the samples to Oak Ridge was questionable.
My first question is whether they spiked the sample before testing. I
would think the He may leak out of a porous sample pretty quickly. The
Mizuno test seemed to have a more reliable method
What is Mr. Letts' explanation for the lack of replication of his results?
Seriously, the protocol that is reliably reproducible has been the Holy
Grain of cold fusion research from day one. I find it stretches credulity
to the breaking point that after this statement in 2003:
*Has anyone replic
Daniel Rocha wrote:
Was it in what part of the process cleaning of the reservoir?
I do not think so. If they were scheduled to clean the reservoir soon, I
guess it would be okay.
They do have to dump out the water and dredge reservoirs from time to time.
- Jed
The item below is an idem of interest in the IE article regarding magnetism.
"an empirical model by Dennis Letts was used...“A Method to Calculate
Excess Power”... predicts that the heat production is linearly proportional
to the mass of the hydrogen-containing material and the magnetic field
surr
I mean, your 1st post
2014-04-18 20:50 GMT-03:00 Daniel Rocha :
> Axil, this is a good path.
>
> 2014-04-18 20:48 GMT-03:00 Axil Axil :
>> It seem like no one is interested. Everyone has their own priorities and it
>> usually revolves around making money.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:12 PM,
Axil, this is a good path.
2014-04-18 20:48 GMT-03:00 Axil Axil :
> It seem like no one is interested. Everyone has their own priorities and it
> usually revolves around making money.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:12 PM, James Bowery wrote:
>>
>> That was a 2003 interview.
>>
>> If as reliable
It seem like no one is interested. Everyone has their own priorities and
it usually revolves around making money.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:12 PM, James Bowery wrote:
> That was a 2003 interview.
>
> If as reliable as he claimed it should be in just about every science fair
> in the world by n
Was it in what part of the process cleaning of the reservoir? In my
city's it seems the last stage is covered.
2014-04-18 19:33 GMT-03:00 Jed Rothwell :
> A recent news item:
>
> http://time.com/66459/portland-reservoir-pee/
>
> "Portland Dumps 38 Million Gallons of Water After Man Pees in Reservo
A recent news item:
http://time.com/66459/portland-reservoir-pee/
"Portland Dumps 38 Million Gallons of Water After Man Pees in Reservoir
April 17, 2014
The city plans to dump 38 million gallons of water after authorities say a
19-year-old urinated in a large, uncovered reservoir during an earl
That was a 2003 interview.
If as reliable as he claimed it should be in just about every science fair
in the world by now.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> http://newenergytimes.com/v2/views/Group1/Letts.shtml
>
>
>
> Mr. Letts is experimenting with Nanoplasmonics and gettin
From: Jed Rothwell
That is fun to read! Good experiment. Good write up.
Yes it is a fabulous, simple experiment that is ripe for both replication
and improvement.
And it is somewhat poignant for those who have followed the field for a
while, to mention Les Case –
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LettsDstimulatio.pdf
*Laser Polarization Angle*
“In 2003 Letts and Cravens reported that single laser beam polarization
seemed to be an important factor in stimulating deuterated palladium
cathodes [9]. When the laser beam polarization was at a 90 degree angle
wi
That is fun to read! Good experiment. Good write up.
- Jed
Dennis Cravens mentioned here on vortex that he has had success in LENR
when he adds rare earth metals to his experiments.
The method by which this addition of rare earths might succeed in LENR is
that rare earths have an electron orbital structure like iron where the 4F
electron obit is the same
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/views/Group1/Letts.shtml
Mr. Letts is experimenting with Nanoplasmonics and getting a COP of up to
30 with it.
He is shining a low powered laser onto the cracked surface of palladium
which has been roughened through deuterium loading.
Here too, the level of mag
The Cravens experiment shows two important optimizations applied to LENR:
direct application of magnetism and sizing particles based on dipole based
black body temperature resonance.
A powdered magnet is used to provide magnetic stimulation of LENR reactions
on the surface of carbon micro particle
Here is a good writeup of the Cravens experiment/demo at NI week - which may
go down as one of the most underappreciated experiments of the past decade
in Physics - due to its simplicity, far-reaching implications and lack of a
credible alternative explanation. If only it had been replicated by now
Hi all,
Being without understanding of QM and not sharp enough to see the
theoretical explanations I think this is positive enough. I would focus on
the following:
You may try to think of any possibilities of constructing fundamental
scalar fields
(complex fields, of course) in some way or the oth
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:15 AM, Ian Glen Walker wrote:
> Hi all
>
>
>
> More Scientists putting their head above the parapet. A paper positively
> reviewing the work of Prof. Arata, by Florentin Smarandache and Vic
> Christianto has appeared on vixra under the mathematics section:
>
> “Unleashing
Well, I wouldn't call Smarandache a very mainstream scientist...
perhaps I'd say he is "less" mainstream than CF researchers...
2014-04-18 5:15 GMT-03:00 Ian Glen Walker :
> Hi all
>
>
>
> More Scientists putting their head above the parapet. A paper positively
> reviewing the work of Prof. Arata,
Hi all
More Scientists putting their head above the parapet. A paper positively
reviewing the work of Prof. Arata, by Florentin Smarandache and Vic
Christianto has appeared on vixra under the mathematics section:
"Unleashing the Quark Within: Lenr, Klein-Gordon Equation, and Elementary
Parti
33 matches
Mail list logo